[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-11-05 17:48:26 EDT --- Is there any reason for this ticket to remain open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-11-05 18:22:57 EDT --- Nope, thanks for the poke. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-08-03 12:14:34 EDT --- fair nuff, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-07-30 08:38:09 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: poppler-data Short Description: Encoding files Owners: please clone poppler acl's (else, me: rdieter) InitialCC: please clone poppler acl's -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-30 18:59:52 EDT --- There are eighteen people in the commit ACL alone for poppler. Honestly I'd prefer not to go spamming them all when they might not particularly care. So I've added the ACL with just you, and the rest of the folks are welcome to add themselves. I'm happy to do that and save the web form clicking if they ping me. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 04:04:15 EDT --- Oh, I just noticed that this already blocks the relevant ghostscript bug. This package already has the appropriate license tag as indicated in bug 487510, so I'd say that we're good to go. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 04:01:57 EDT --- It seems that FESCo took up this issue, although it looks like there were talking about something different. See http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-10/fedora-meeting.2009-07-10-17.00.html (Adobe CMap files - code or content?) and https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/177. That seems to answer one question (the legal one) but begs another: is this package duplicating something that's already in ghostscript? Can the data be unified and shared between the two packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-09 13:47:14 EDT --- I agree that this is most likely acceptable content, though I'll keep FE-Legal in place and won't approve until that gets acked. However, we're already shipping this data in our release branches, it's not really small and has a completely different release cycle, so splitting it out makes sense in any case. Packaging-wise, this is trivial and looks fine. Just waiting for FE-Legal clearance. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 890dbadf44aee07999c050fcbe0c4ea8b32fba0e8b573c439dd7de8476a1a660 poppler-data-0.2.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: poppler-data = 0.2.1-1.fc12 = (none) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * seems acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||poppler-data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-06-23 13:52:22 EDT --- Blocking FE-legal for licensing clarification for no modification permitted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||487510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-06-23 21:42:41 EDT --- The more I think about it, the more black and white it is ... this content can't possibly be acceptable for fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-06-23 22:02:56 EDT --- Gosh, I've never dealt with content before. Re-reading, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Content_Licenses The one exception is that we permit content (but only content) which restricts modification as long as that is the only restriction. So my take is that we're still a go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
