Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 2.6 release
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: Hi all its a while since FFmpeg 2.5, so its getting time to make 2.6 if you want something in it or something fixed, now is your last chance ;) About the name if noone suggests something then ill pick a random scientist from the list i have from past suggestions Since it not having been part of a release was an argument for allowing to break API to fix the default for writing the colr atom (which a number of people found more sensible), it would be nice to have that in before, because otherwise that argument would no longer hold after 2.6 is out, resulting in a rather bad situation with both options in there for a while. How much time would there be to submit a patch that changes the default? ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 2.6 release
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 05:41:41PM +0100, Robert Krüger wrote: On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: Hi all its a while since FFmpeg 2.5, so its getting time to make 2.6 if you want something in it or something fixed, now is your last chance ;) About the name if noone suggests something then ill pick a random scientist from the list i have from past suggestions Since it not having been part of a release was an argument for allowing to break API to fix the default for writing the colr atom (which a number of people found more sensible), it would be nice to have that in before, because otherwise that argument would no longer hold after 2.6 is out, resulting in a rather bad situation with both options in there for a while. How much time would there be to submit a patch that changes the default? there is no strict cast in stone release date, so i do not know i wanted to do the release soon, i do not know if that will work out there are still some things i wanted to test which may delay things but if things are all working and tested we might release tomorrow or it might be in a week, i dont know [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our enemies excel us and endeavor to excel them, by avoiding what is faulty, and imitating what is excellent in them. -- Plutarch signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 2.6 release
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 10:17:15PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 05:53:59PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi all its a while since FFmpeg 2.5, so its getting time to make 2.6 if you want something in it or something fixed, now is your last chance ;) About the name if noone suggests something then ill pick a random scientist from the list i have from past suggestions I might help writing the RELEASE_NOTES. Anything not present in the thanks! Changelog that I should mention? Particular optimizations, area where a large amount of fixes happened (and are not going to be backported), OPW, or other various project changes? if i knew something i would have added it to the Changelog probably so i cant think of anything but iam sure forgetting somthing ... BTW, do we want to encourage occasional contributors and companies to contribute more by mentioning them in a thanks section? Quickly skimming through the history I see NVIDIA, Samsung, Collabora, ... What do people think? See the bottom of http://i3wm.org/downloads/RELEASE-NOTES-4.9.txt for an example (yeah I know it's not the first time I pick that same model). sure, possible [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 2.6 release
On 01/03/15 6:17 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote: I might help writing the RELEASE_NOTES. Anything not present in the Changelog that I should mention? Particular optimizations, area where a large amount of fixes happened (and are not going to be backported), OPW, or other various project changes? VP9 asm by Ronald that made the codec usable on x86_32 and also pre-ssse3 CPUs like Phenom (Even dual core Athlons can run 1080p 30fps VP9 content now). Pretty good argument to convince Google and Mozilla to use ffvp9 IMO :P. HEVC improvements could also be mentioned (C and asm performance improvements, and monochrome sequence support). ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
[FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 2.6 release
Hi all its a while since FFmpeg 2.5, so its getting time to make 2.6 if you want something in it or something fixed, now is your last chance ;) About the name if noone suggests something then ill pick a random scientist from the list i have from past suggestions -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem conveniently. New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
