Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?
Same problem here with the epson list. My emails just don't get through. Robert --- Arthur Entlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If anyone else is on the scan@leben list... are you having problems? > > All my messages to it bounced yesterday and I got no mail from it > today. > > Code red strikes? > > Art > __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?
>If anyone else is on the scan@leben list... are you having problems? > >All my messages to it bounced yesterday and I got no mail from it today. > >Code red strikes? > >Art I had a similar problem with an epson-inkjet list message, so I'm afraid its somehow related to Mitchell Leben's server(s). Short of, or in addition to, using to a Mac, aren't there other strategic advantages we can give ourselves in re worms, viruses, etc.? Someone said that reading list mail on Yahoo rather than first-hand would do it in the case of those lists? If so, would it work for other lists? From my own experience, I have the impression than an alert and resourceful ISP can intercept, as mine does, the problematic mail? I'd switch rather than risk infection. Reading about other problems makes me think that most such things can be avoided by using Eudora instead of Microsoft's Outlook for e-mail software? I think Rafe said so on this list. You can use Microsoft's Internet Explorer w/o using Outlook; I do, although I wouldn't if I knew of a good and promising replacement for it. Sam
Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?
Arthur Entlich wrote: > > If anyone else is on the scan@leben list... are you having problems? > > All my messages to it bounced yesterday and I got no mail from it today. > > Code red strikes? Yup, it's dead. Maybe it's the dreaded code orange epson fade? ;) Haakon
Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?
In a message dated 08/02/2001 6:56:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Quite honestly, anyone who uses a PC without running a competent antvirus program is driving down a one way street with their eyes closed. Norton AV costs very little ($40US), updates are automatic (nightly here) and free for a year, >> Norton is (was) very HEAVY on my system. It would constantly crash and burn regularly and slow down my system to the point it was unusable. I believe I tried it when they came out with 6.0 (?) version 1 1/2 years ago I think. Maybe they got the kinks worked out of it but it left such a bad taste in my mouth I swore I would never try it again. Should I? Ed
RE: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?
I use McAfee on my home machine. It's the same deal, $40 a year and daily updates. I haven't noticed any impact on my system's performance and it's saved my bacon a number of times. Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 8:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben? In a message dated 08/02/2001 6:56:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Quite honestly, anyone who uses a PC without running a competent antvirus program is driving down a one way street with their eyes closed. Norton AV costs very little ($40US), updates are automatic (nightly here) and free for a year, >> Norton is (was) very HEAVY on my system. It would constantly crash and burn regularly and slow down my system to the point it was unusable. I believe I tried it when they came out with 6.0 (?) version 1 1/2 years ago I think. Maybe they got the kinks worked out of it but it left such a bad taste in my mouth I swore I would never try it again. Should I? Ed
Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?
Ed wrote: >I think I had the "works" with Norton, 3 or 4 different programs that came in >a package deal (can't remember the other names offhand). Maybe I should try >McAfee or Computer Associates (if they're still in business). I'm currently using AVG Anti-virus System, Free Edition from www.grisoft.com The updates are not daily, but come out as required, AFAICS. Colin Maddock
Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?
FWIW, McAfee shuts me down using graphics on a small RAM base. For some unknown reason, it makes backups of each scan as I do them, and crashes the program (sometimes the system) after one or two scans. That might not be a problem if I bought more RAM, but I bought Norton, instead. Best regards--LRA >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben? >Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 17:42:41 EDT > >In a message dated 8/3/2001 3:20:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > I use McAfee on my home machine. It's the same deal, $40 a year and >daily > > updates. I haven't noticed any impact on my system's performance and >it's > > saved my bacon a number of times. > > > > > >I think I had the "works" with Norton, 3 or 4 different programs that came >in >a package deal (can't remember the other names offhand). Maybe I should >try >McAfee or Computer Associates (if they're still in business). >Ed _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001 08:23:10 EDT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Norton is (was) very HEAVY on my system. I have it running on several PC's, including a pathetic P133 laptop. The only time I notice any slowdown is when it is scanning downloading mail, by about 50%. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
