Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-23 Thread toronado455
I think it's the composer's responsibility to WORK OUT the pedaling to
ensure that all the enharmonics are spelled in a way that works for the
harp. I don't think it's a crime to include a single diagram at the
beginning, but would never indicate pedal changes, because precisely how
those changes are marked and where they occur varies according to
performer's preferences.

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Andrew Stiller kalli...@ix.netcom.comwrote:

 I disagree. IMO it is absolutely the composer's responsibility to indicate
 the pedalling in any harp part, whether by diagram or by the older  method
 of writing in the pitch names.

 As for harpist's preferring to do it themselves, I can only cite the
 example of Lejaren Hiller, whose music I publish and who never bothered with
 pedalling diagrams. On one extracted harp part, the harpist pencilled in the
 note Jerry, harps have pedals!  I add pedalling diagrams to the harp parts
 in all my editions of his work.

 Andrew Stiller
 Kallisti Music Press
 http://www.kallistimusic.com/


 On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:41 AM, toronado...@gmail.com wrote:

   On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:56 PM, John Howell john.how...@vt.edu wrote:

  There are at least 2 active harpists (and teachers) on the SibList, and

 their consensus is that harpists would much prefer to enter their own
 diagrams, in the forms they prefer, and put them where they want them.
  Unless you are an experienced harpist yourself, the better part of
 valor
 might be to avoid putting in your own.

 John


 I agree.
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-20 Thread Lee Actor
String players can very quickly detect deficiencies in string writing by
awkward bowings (or even no bowings at all, which I have seen on occasion).
I don't think you necessarily need to be a string player to write competent
bowings (though of course it helps), but you do need more than a surface
understanding of the physical mechanism involved.  A key element that is
sometimes overlooked or not well understood is that a successful bowing
depends very much on where in the bow it begins, which in turn depends on
where the previous passage leaves the bow.

It is true that a pro can make most bowings work (though not without
considerable cursing), but an awkward bowing can cause an entire string
section of amateurs to crash and burn immediately.

If you write or arrange for strings, you simply must include phrasing that
makes sense to a string player, or you're starting out with 3 strikes
against you.  I should add that string players will almost always change the
printed bowings, but it's still important to make the intention of your
phrasing clear.

Lee Actor
Composer-in-Residence and Assistant Conductor, Palo Alto Philharmonic
Assistant Conductor, Nova Vista Symphony
http://www.leeactor.com


 I used to put pedal diagrams in harp parts until a harpist told me that
 regardless of what is in the part, every harpist will write in their own
 pedaling.  I see it as similar to printing fingering in string
 parts (i.e.,
 presumptuous), unless your name is Carlos Salzedo.

 Well put, Lee!

 I never put in string fingerings, knowing that my own fingerings
 would be too advanced for some (community) players, but too limited
 for full-time professionals.  Unless, of course, it's for a special
 effect, like sul G.

 I do, however, ALWAYS mark bowings, as any composer or arranger
 should do, and knowing how should be part of the detailed knowledge
 that composer or arranger should have mastered.  Phrasing is bowing,
 and vice versa.

 John


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-20 Thread dhbailey

John Howell wrote:

At 10:43 AM -0700 9/18/09, Lee Actor wrote:


I used to put pedal diagrams in harp parts until a harpist told me that
regardless of what is in the part, every harpist will write in their own
pedaling.  I see it as similar to printing fingering in string parts 
(i.e.,

presumptuous), unless your name is Carlos Salzedo.


Well put, Lee!

I never put in string fingerings, knowing that my own fingerings would 
be too advanced for some (community) players, but too limited for 
full-time professionals.  Unless, of course, it's for a special effect, 
like sul G.


I do, however, ALWAYS mark bowings, as any composer or arranger should 
do, and knowing how should be part of the detailed knowledge that 
composer or arranger should have mastered.  Phrasing is bowing, and vice 
versa.


John




It would be very interesting to learn (perhaps a college 
paper?) to what degree composers' bowings or phrase markings 
are altered when they're published in the music.


I agree with John that a good background in bowings is vital 
to indicate your preferences and that all people who write 
for strings need to understand them, even if they don't mark 
them, simply so they can have a good idea what the people 
playing the music have to deal with when they play. 
Non-string players can be very silly in what they expect 
string players to be capable of doing, just as string 
players can be very silly in what they expect brass and 
woodwind players to be able to do.


And I tell my woodwind and brass students to always be leery 
of music written for their instruments by organ players, who 
can sustain a note for the entire work if they so choose and 
sometimes think every other instrument can, too.


--
David H. Bailey
dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-20 Thread John Howell

At 12:43 AM -0700 9/20/09, Lee Actor wrote:

String players can very quickly detect deficiencies in string writing by
awkward bowings (or even no bowings at all, which I have seen on occasion).


Yeah; it takes about 20 seconds, tops!  BUT, if your bowing survives 
that first 20 seconds, you gain credibility.



I don't think you necessarily need to be a string player to write competent
bowings (though of course it helps), but you do need more than a surface
understanding of the physical mechanism involved.


Yes, that was my point.  And even though I'm a string player, I 
constantly learn from other string players.  In fact just adore being 
able to watch the Vienna Phil when they do a TV special, because 
their bowings are so incredibly artistic.  I understand why they use 
them AFTER I see (and hear) them, but it wouldn't have thought of 
doing it that way myself.



A key element that is
sometimes overlooked or not well understood is that a successful bowing
depends very much on where in the bow it begins, which in turn depends on
where the previous passage leaves the bow.


Absolutely!  Bowing is a continuous process in real time, just like a 
singer's breathing, except that a singer can sustain tone for a lot 
longer.  And it's not just ups and downs, but very subtle degrees of 
bow spacing, speed, and weight that shape the phrases.  You can't 
just put in *a* bowing; you have to look back to see how to get it to 
come out that way, and then look forward to see what kind of trouble 
you'll be in 4 bars later!



If you write or arrange for strings, you simply must include phrasing that
makes sense to a string player, or you're starting out with 3 strikes
against you.


Definitely.  Even bad bowings are better than no bowings, because 
they indicate your ideas about phrasing even if they're unplayable.



I should add that string players will almost always change the
printed bowings, but it's still important to make the intention of your
phrasing clear.


Some players will, some won't, and will continue to follow poor 
bowings.  And what feels good and effective to one player may feel 
awkward to another; that's why concertmasters and section leaders get 
the big bucks!  (But remember that I'm heavily invested in volunteer 
community music and in teaching.)  I'm very careful with mine, but 
*I* even end up changing them when they don't do what I hoped they 
would.  But what it comes down to is that phrasing is a performer's 
art, no matter how much of the art a composer tries to take over. 
And the conductor, AS PERFORMER, must have the last word.  My stand 
partner is of the take the bowing as it comes school.  Our 
conductor, on the other hand, understands the musical subtleties that 
good bowings can produce, after a career as a teacher, conductor, and 
professional orchestral player, and bows our parts very carefully.


Thanks, Lee.

John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts  Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

We never play anything the same way once.  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-20 Thread John Howell

At 7:18 AM -0400 9/20/09, dhbailey wrote:


It would be very interesting to learn (perhaps a 
college paper?) to what degree composers' 
bowings or phrase markings are altered when 
they're published in the music.


Wow!  That would be a bear of a study to set up. 
First, it would have to be limited, but to what? 
A single professional orchestra?  That gets you 
into personal issues with conductors and 
concertmasters, plus the hassle of working with 
an orchestra librarian to get copies of the music 
before the rental sets are shipped back.


Then multiply that by the number of orchestras to 
be covered, whether professional, college, or 
community.  (And just THAT comparison would be an 
eye-opener, I'd bet.)


One class of music that will ALWAYS be altered 
from what's printed is Broadway orchestra books, 
but you'll NEVER get your hands on them, and 
they're supposed to have all markings erased 
before they go back.  Even when it's obvious that 
a string player has bowed them, they've been 
bowed for a section with 20 violins, while in our 
pit we'll have 4 or 6 trying to balance with the 
winds and rhythm sections (WITHOUT mics, if I 
have anything to say about it!).




I agree with John that a good background in 
bowings is vital to indicate your preferences 
and that all people who write for strings need 
to understand them, even if they don't mark 
them, simply so they can have a good idea what 
the people playing the music have to deal with 
when they play. Non-string players can be very 
silly in what they expect string players to be 
capable of doing, just as string players can be 
very silly in what they expect brass and 
woodwind players to be able to do.


Specific case in point:  Sometimes phrase marks 
are drawn over such a long passage that our first 
impression is that they can't possible be bowed 
that way, without changing bows.   But it's also 
a way for a composer to force a true pianissimo 
from the strings, even though it takes very fine 
bow control.  So when Dvorák does it, we trust 
him because he was a violist, but when an 
academic composer does it we probably will NOT 
trust him.  But orchestra protocols usually take 
care of this:  section players watch their 
principals, and principals watch their 
concertmaster.  But in the pit, the rule is to 
break all slurs needed to get a big tone.


John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts  Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

We never play anything the same way once.  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-19 Thread John Howell

At 10:43 AM -0700 9/18/09, Lee Actor wrote:


I used to put pedal diagrams in harp parts until a harpist told me that
regardless of what is in the part, every harpist will write in their own
pedaling.  I see it as similar to printing fingering in string parts (i.e.,
presumptuous), unless your name is Carlos Salzedo.


Well put, Lee!

I never put in string fingerings, knowing that my own fingerings 
would be too advanced for some (community) players, but too limited 
for full-time professionals.  Unless, of course, it's for a special 
effect, like sul G.


I do, however, ALWAYS mark bowings, as any composer or arranger 
should do, and knowing how should be part of the detailed knowledge 
that composer or arranger should have mastered.  Phrasing is bowing, 
and vice versa.


John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts  Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

We never play anything the same way once.  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-18 Thread Andrew Stiller
I disagree. IMO it is absolutely the composer's responsibility to 
indicate the pedalling in any harp part, whether by diagram or by the 
older  method of writing in the pitch names.


As for harpist's preferring to do it themselves, I can only cite the 
example of Lejaren Hiller, whose music I publish and who never bothered 
with pedalling diagrams. On one extracted harp part, the harpist 
pencilled in the note Jerry, harps have pedals!  I add pedalling 
diagrams to the harp parts in all my editions of his work.


Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://www.kallistimusic.com/

On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:41 AM, toronado...@gmail.com wrote:

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:56 PM, John Howell john.how...@vt.edu 
wrote:


  There are at least 2 active harpists (and teachers) on the SibList, 
and

their consensus is that harpists would much prefer to enter their own
diagrams, in the forms they prefer, and put them where they want 
them.
 Unless you are an experienced harpist yourself, the better part of 
valor

might be to avoid putting in your own.

John




I agree.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-18 Thread arabushk
I would suppose different harpists are different. I had one tell me
emphatically that it was cheating for a harpist to use someone else's
diagrams. Since she never played my concerto we never did test it in
practice.

ajr

 I disagree. IMO it is absolutely the composer's responsibility to
 indicate the pedalling in any harp part, whether by diagram or by the
 older  method of writing in the pitch names.

 As for harpist's preferring to do it themselves, I can only cite the
 example of Lejaren Hiller, whose music I publish and who never bothered
 with pedalling diagrams. On one extracted harp part, the harpist
 pencilled in the note Jerry, harps have pedals!  I add pedalling
 diagrams to the harp parts in all my editions of his work.

 Andrew Stiller
 Kallisti Music Press
 http://www.kallistimusic.com/

 On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:41 AM, toronado...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:56 PM, John Howell john.how...@vt.edu
 wrote:

   There are at least 2 active harpists (and teachers) on the SibList,
 and
 their consensus is that harpists would much prefer to enter their own
 diagrams, in the forms they prefer, and put them where they want
 them.
  Unless you are an experienced harpist yourself, the better part of
 valor
 might be to avoid putting in your own.

 John


 I agree.
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-18 Thread Lee Actor
 I disagree. IMO it is absolutely the composer's responsibility to
 indicate the pedalling in any harp part, whether by diagram or by the
 older  method of writing in the pitch names.

 As for harpist's preferring to do it themselves, I can only cite the
 example of Lejaren Hiller, whose music I publish and who never bothered
 with pedalling diagrams. On one extracted harp part, the harpist
 pencilled in the note Jerry, harps have pedals!  I add pedalling
 diagrams to the harp parts in all my editions of his work.

 Andrew Stiller


I used to put pedal diagrams in harp parts until a harpist told me that
regardless of what is in the part, every harpist will write in their own
pedaling.  I see it as similar to printing fingering in string parts (i.e.,
presumptuous), unless your name is Carlos Salzedo.

Lee Actor
Composer-in-Residence and Assistant Conductor, Palo Alto Philharmonic
Assistant Conductor, Nova Vista Symphony
http://www.leeactor.com


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-18 Thread dhbailey

Lee Actor wrote:

I disagree. IMO it is absolutely the composer's responsibility to
indicate the pedalling in any harp part, whether by diagram or by the
older  method of writing in the pitch names.

As for harpist's preferring to do it themselves, I can only cite the
example of Lejaren Hiller, whose music I publish and who never bothered
with pedalling diagrams. On one extracted harp part, the harpist
pencilled in the note Jerry, harps have pedals!  I add pedalling
diagrams to the harp parts in all my editions of his work.

Andrew Stiller



I used to put pedal diagrams in harp parts until a harpist told me that
regardless of what is in the part, every harpist will write in their own
pedaling.  I see it as similar to printing fingering in string parts (i.e.,
presumptuous), unless your name is Carlos Salzedo.



That seems to be the consensus of the harpists on the 
Sibelius list as well -- leave them out unless you're a 
harpist and know what the heck you're doing.



--
David H. Bailey
dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-18 Thread GERALD BERG
Passing strange.  mp subito -- is too much confusion  and entire absence of 
harp pedals is no confusion at all!

Gerald Berg




From: dhbailey dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 2:11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

Lee Actor wrote:
 I disagree. IMO it is absolutely the composer's responsibility to
 indicate the pedalling in any harp part, whether by diagram or by the
 older  method of writing in the pitch names.
 
 As for harpist's preferring to do it themselves, I can only cite the
 example of Lejaren Hiller, whose music I publish and who never bothered
 with pedalling diagrams. On one extracted harp part, the harpist
 pencilled in the note Jerry, harps have pedals!  I add pedalling
 diagrams to the harp parts in all my editions of his work.
 
 Andrew Stiller
 
 
 I used to put pedal diagrams in harp parts until a harpist told me that
 regardless of what is in the part, every harpist will write in their own
 pedaling.  I see it as similar to printing fingering in string parts (i.e.,
 presumptuous), unless your name is Carlos Salzedo.
 

That seems to be the consensus of the harpists on the Sibelius list as well -- 
leave them out unless you're a harpist and know what the heck you're doing.


-- David H. Bailey
dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-17 Thread toronado455
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Aaron Sherber aa...@sherber.com wrote:

 On 9/11/2009 9:48 PM, toronado...@gmail.com wrote:

 Anyone use the engraver text fonts to do graphical harp pedal diagrams?
 (O,
 shift -O, P, shift -P)


 A much better solution is Matthew Hindson's freeware Harp Pedal font:

 http://www.hindson.com.au/wordpress/free-fonts-available-for-download/

 I've used this for a few projects and been very pleased.

 Aaron.

Thanks for the link. I tried it out and decided it is good, but I like the
engraver font a bit better.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-17 Thread toronado455
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:56 PM, John Howell john.how...@vt.edu wrote:

   There are at least 2 active harpists (and teachers) on the SibList, and
 their consensus is that harpists would much prefer to enter their own
 diagrams, in the forms they prefer, and put them where they want them.
  Unless you are an experienced harpist yourself, the better part of valor
 might be to avoid putting in your own.

 John


I agree.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-13 Thread John Howell

At 6:48 PM -0700 9/11/09, toronado...@gmail.com wrote:

Anyone use the engraver text fonts to do graphical harp pedal diagrams? (O,
shift -O, P, shift -P)

Makes it alot easier than futzing with the shape designer stuff, but do
harpists like the way it looks OK, because it does look a bit different. Or
am I using the wrong font/characters?


There are at least 2 active harpists (and teachers) on the SibList, 
and their consensus is that harpists would much prefer to enter their 
own diagrams, in the forms they prefer, and put them where they want 
them.  Unless you are an experienced harpist yourself, the better 
part of valor might be to avoid putting in your own.


John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts  Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

We never play anything the same way once.  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-11 Thread toronado455
Anyone use the engraver text fonts to do graphical harp pedal diagrams? (O,
shift -O, P, shift -P)

Makes it alot easier than futzing with the shape designer stuff, but do
harpists like the way it looks OK, because it does look a bit different. Or
am I using the wrong font/characters?
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] harp pedal diagram

2009-09-11 Thread Aaron Sherber

On 9/11/2009 9:48 PM, toronado...@gmail.com wrote:

Anyone use the engraver text fonts to do graphical harp pedal diagrams? (O,
shift -O, P, shift -P)


A much better solution is Matthew Hindson's freeware Harp Pedal font:

http://www.hindson.com.au/wordpress/free-fonts-available-for-download/

I've used this for a few projects and been very pleased.

Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale