Re: [Finale] slurs needed over tremolos?

2010-07-01 Thread Mark D Lew

On Jun 30, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Ryan wrote:

I'm waffling back and forth over the need for slurs over fingered  
tremolos
in strings. Example: Whole note C, whole note A, three tremolo  
beams in

between.
My familiarity with the music tells me that a slur is somewhat  
implied, but
I wonder if a slur would help the sight reader. There are a lot of  
tremolos

like this in this piece, ranging from the whole note level down to the
eighth note level.


A pair of whole notes linked by tremolo does not require a slur.   
This is per Ted Ross, whom I agree with on this point.


Ross also notes there is a trend toward notating a whole note worth  
of tremolo not as two whole notes connected by three beams, but  
rather two pairs of half notes each connected by three beams (ie,  
looks like pairs of beamed 32nd notes, but with open note heads).  If  
your purpose is to enhance readability for a sight reader, I  
recommend this practice.


In this case you do need a slur, because you have two pairs which you  
are linking as a single tremolo. Basic rule is if it's a single pair  
you don't need a slur, but if it's more than a pair you do.


Caveat: My experience is with piano music, including piano reductions  
of orchestra, but not with string parts.


mdl
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] slurs needed over tremolos?

2010-07-01 Thread John Howell

At 11:43 PM -0700 6/30/10, Mark D Lew wrote:

On Jun 30, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Ryan wrote:


I'm waffling back and forth over the need for slurs over fingered tremolos
in strings. Example: Whole note C, whole note A, three tremolo beams in
between.
My familiarity with the music tells me that a slur is somewhat implied, but
I wonder if a slur would help the sight reader. There are a lot of tremolos
like this in this piece, ranging from the whole note level down to the
eighth note level.


A pair of whole notes linked by tremolo does not require a slur.  
This is per Ted Ross, whom I agree with on this point.


Ross also notes there is a trend toward notating a whole note worth 
of tremolo not as two whole notes connected by three beams, but 
rather two pairs of half notes each connected by three beams (ie, 
looks like pairs of beamed 32nd notes, but with open note heads). 
If your purpose is to enhance readability for a sight reader, I 
recommend this practice.


In this case you do need a slur, because you have two pairs which 
you are linking as a single tremolo. Basic rule is if it's a single 
pair you don't need a slur, but if it's more than a pair you do.


Caveat: My experience is with piano music, including piano 
reductions of orchestra, but not with string parts.


Interestingly enough, Roemer disagrees.  He shows them with slurs 
regardless of the note values.  But he does give this note:  Also, 
traditionally, the slur is not always used [in engraved music], 
whereas in manuscript writing it is.


He also uses the term tremolando for the fingered tremolo, which is 
one I had not run into, and it's handy to have a term for it.


But my previous comment is still valid.  Slurs (and ties) are BOWING 
instructions for string players (and breath instructions for wind 
players), and should be used on tremolandos for those specific 
purposes, and not just because they're tremolandos.  (And pianists 
don't have to worry about either bowing or breathing!)


Roemer does show one strange example of a 2-bar whole-note tremolando 
with dual ties--the first notes of each measure tied and the second 
notes of each measure tied, and I would not write it that way.  I 
would stretch a single tie (or actually a slur) from the first note 
of the figure to the last (4th) note as being more clear.


John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts  Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

We never play anything the same way once.  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] slurs needed over tremolos?

2010-06-30 Thread Ryan
I'm waffling back and forth over the need for slurs over fingered tremolos
in strings. Example: Whole note C, whole note A, three tremolo beams in
between.
My familiarity with the music tells me that a slur is somewhat implied, but
I wonder if a slur would help the sight reader. There are a lot of tremolos
like this in this piece, ranging from the whole note level down to the
eighth note level.
In addition to your own insight, can someone tell me what Stone, Read, et al
say about this, if anything? My copies are at my office and I'm working from
home tonight.
Thanks for your help
Ryan
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] slurs needed over tremolos?

2010-06-30 Thread John Howell

At 6:24 PM -0700 6/30/10, Ryan wrote:

I'm waffling back and forth over the need for slurs over fingered tremolos
in strings. Example: Whole note C, whole note A, three tremolo beams in
between.
My familiarity with the music tells me that a slur is somewhat implied, but
I wonder if a slur would help the sight reader. There are a lot of tremolos
like this in this piece, ranging from the whole note level down to the
eighth note level.
In addition to your own insight, can someone tell me what Stone, Read, et al
say about this, if anything? My copies are at my office and I'm working from
home tonight.
Thanks for your help
Ryan


A bowed tremolo keeps the bow in the same place.  But you're talking 
about a fingered tremolo, which means the bow travels.  And that 
means that it's a good idea to include bowings (slurs) telling the 
player when to change bows.  That will change depending on whether 
the dynamic is soft (more notes to a bow, gentle bowing) or loud 
(fewer notes to a bow, heavier bowing).


If you want to send an example, I could give you a better opinion.

John


--
John R. Howell, Assoc. Prof. of Music
Virginia Tech Department of Music
College of Liberal Arts  Human Sciences
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:john.how...@vt.edu)
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

We never play anything the same way once.  Shelly Manne's definition
of jazz musicians.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale