Re: [Finale] Finale 2007 - Wishlist

2005-09-02 Thread Kurt Gnos
It's kind of sad that Sibelius new features should precedent what we really 
need, isn't it? Before a serious software should announce new features, 
it should certainly repair non-working features (non-working for about 10 
years or so.)
Sibelius can do it. Microsoft can do it. Quark can do it. Photoshop can do 
it, that means Adobe can. Apple can do it. Corel, as well, as Ghostscript 
etc.. Why is Coda/MakeMusic the one and only company I know of that cannot 
it's long-praised PS-features get to work?


Kurt

At 00:23 31.08.2005, you wrote:

Kurt Gnos wrote:

Hi all,
now we got Finale 2006, we could begin to find out what we think we need 
in the next version or an update.
While I like the mixer possibilities, they are not of much use as long as 
you cannot combine the new sounds with human playback, and, even worse, 
as you can't save wav-Files or something using the sounds. I guess this 
will be made possible by a contact player update?

My priorities:
EPS-export. This must, and I hope, will be possible (again)!
A better File format or import/export filters that allow you to open and 
save between versions, I mean, also from the newer to the older version.
I'm working on a book where some of my co-autors only have Finale 2005. 
Because EPS on WinXP does not work, someone on Mac will have to do all 
the music examples again... (we work with Tiffs for a workaround, but 
finally (,-) with EPS
I have no problems in Microsoft word between platforms and versions. How 
about Finale, too? I don't mind if the new features are not support in 
the older programs, of course, just get the important stuff through.
I don't need a lot of the features added in the last few versions, I can 
do everything I need to do, but these two things would really make my 
life easier.
I'm sure you have also wishes and priorities. Why not share them? And why 
not, finally - ask Coda/MakeMusic to make them true?


You really need to raise this issue with MakeMusic now because they may 
already have the list of what features they'll add, which long-standing 
bugs they'll try to fix, which new bugs they'll try to fix, which 
long-standing broken aspects of the program they'll try to repair, which 
Sibelius 4 features they'll want to incorporate (I bet they're sweating 
Dynamic Parts right now), which features they feel will give them the edge 
over Sibelius once again.


Wait much longer and you'll be asking for Fin2008 features!



--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] Finale 2007 - Wishlist

2005-08-31 Thread ronan
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Gnos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: August 30, 2005 2:13 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] Finale 2007 - Wishlist

Hi all,

now we got Finale 2006, we could begin to find out what we think we need in 
the next version or an update.
...
I'm sure you have also wishes and priorities. Why not share them? And why 
not, finally - ask Coda/MakeMusic to make them true?

cheers

Kurt

---

One thing I have been asking for for years is improved handling of multiple
time signatures. Right now the only option is that Finale decides to
accept one staff as the main timekeeper, then adjusts all other staves so
that the bar lines all line up. In other words, a 1/4 note in 3/4 time is
longer than a 1/4 note in a simultaneous measure of 4/4 time.

What I need: 1) an option to make 1/4 notes equal in length in all staves,
regardless of the time signatures. (In other words, staggered bar lines).
2) An option to have measures equal in length, but I get to choose which
staff will be the master.

(I have asked MM several times for this.)

Best,
Ron



Ronald J Brown
PO Box 138
Newboro ON K0G 1P0
(613) 272-3181
http://www.RonaldJBrown.com

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale 2007 - Wishlist

2005-08-31 Thread Johannes Gebauer

On 18:16 Uhr ronan wrote:
One thing I have been asking for for years is improved handling of 
multiple time signatures. Right now the only option is that Finale 
decides to accept one staff as the main timekeeper, then adjusts 
all other staves so that the bar lines all line up. In other words, a
 1/4 note in 3/4 time is longer than a 1/4 note in a simultaneous 
measure of 4/4 time. What I need: 1) an option to make 1/4 notes 
equal in length in all staves, regardless of the time signatures. (In
 other words, staggered bar lines). 2) An option to have measures 
equal in length, but I get to choose which staff will be the 
master.


It is sort of possible now with invisible barlines. I guess one solution 
would be a relatively simple plugin which will make bar lines invisible 
automatically. I doubt that Finale will ever support this natively, 
simply because of the way Finale is designed.


The workaround does work, I have used it in the past, but requires some 
extra steps.


Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale 2007 - Wishlist

2005-08-30 Thread Aaron Sherber

At 02:12 PM 08/30/2005, Kurt Gnos wrote:
While I like the mixer possibilities, they are not of much use as long as
you cannot combine the new sounds with human playback,

You *can* do this -- in fact, you *should*. What you cannot do is 
combine Finale GPO sounds with Finale softsynth sounds.


and, even worse, as
you can't save wav-Files or something using the sounds. I guess this will
be made possible by a contact player update?

Several people have been told that this will be addressed in a free 
Finale maintenance release.


Aaron.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Finale 2007 - Wishlist

2005-08-30 Thread dhbailey

Kurt Gnos wrote:

Hi all,

now we got Finale 2006, we could begin to find out what we think we need 
in the next version or an update.
While I like the mixer possibilities, they are not of much use as long 
as you cannot combine the new sounds with human playback, and, even 
worse, as you can't save wav-Files or something using the sounds. I 
guess this will be made possible by a contact player update?


My priorities:
EPS-export. This must, and I hope, will be possible (again)!
A better File format or import/export filters that allow you to open and 
save between versions, I mean, also from the newer to the older version.


I'm working on a book where some of my co-autors only have Finale 2005. 
Because EPS on WinXP does not work, someone on Mac will have to do all 
the music examples again... (we work with Tiffs for a workaround, but 
finally (,-) with EPS


I have no problems in Microsoft word between platforms and versions. How 
about Finale, too? I don't mind if the new features are not support in 
the older programs, of course, just get the important stuff through.


I don't need a lot of the features added in the last few versions, I can 
do everything I need to do, but these two things would really make my 
life easier.


I'm sure you have also wishes and priorities. Why not share them? And 
why not, finally - ask Coda/MakeMusic to make them true?




You really need to raise this issue with MakeMusic now because they may 
already have the list of what features they'll add, which long-standing 
bugs they'll try to fix, which new bugs they'll try to fix, which 
long-standing broken aspects of the program they'll try to repair, which 
Sibelius 4 features they'll want to incorporate (I bet they're sweating 
Dynamic Parts right now), which features they feel will give them the 
edge over Sibelius once again.


Wait much longer and you'll be asking for Fin2008 features!



--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale