Re: [Fink-devel] DPKG and Building Darwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ... ok so then how do i build darwin? (obviously the wrong list, but any pointers would be appreciated!) JP On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 01:37 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: On lundi, fév 10, 2003, at 08:16 Europe/Paris, John Davidorff Pell wrote: --SNIP-- Darwin-1.4 and earlier used dpkg to install its packages, but this is no longer true for Darwin-6.x (corresponding to Jaguar). It is now using a version of rpm (as in RedHat Package Manager). Debian was too GNU-infected, it seems, RedHat is more on Apple's wavelength. -- Martin - -- God is dead, now the war shall never end. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQE+R3ga7f73MXbrfvwRAgnbAJ46WkFc+cDxnGcH+isM95ASmk25ZwCfUGRt aLvTVOuRW6RhEixi1zj1XBM= =dOZr -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Nagios porting again..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Another small question. Should I have Nagios depend on Apache, or should I simply assume that people are savvy enough to use the pre-installed apple version? Is there are a fairly fool proof way to check which dependencies I should put into the info? gd is an obvious one. Mysql and postgresql for the respective versions as well. There is also an interface to a mailer, should I simply have them default to the Apple sendmail or put something as a depends here as well? Furthermore, where do I look up all the info how to properly add the service to our framework. I heard we are using daemonic? Thank you - -d - - we may race and we may run, but we can not undo what has been done. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQE+R31PiW/Ta/pxHPQRA6aOAJ9MDII5+Zby2kReEvLhat0kXiiz0gCgl6sJ j3e9hjjPV2MbDGxChP5+UgE= =7zUE -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] X11 Docs--some questions
I was looking through the X11 Documentation (recall: the version numbers are out of date for Jaguar), and I'd like to get some feedback/additional info before I proceed. By section: 3.1 The version of XFree86 listed is 4.2.0, while the current bindist/stable versions are at 4.2.1.1 . I assume it's OK to change this. 3.3 Since there's no official xfree86.org 4.2.1.x binary, then I would assume that the instructions should say to install the 4.2.0 binary and then apply the 4.2.0 - 4.2.0.1 and 4.2.0.1 - 4.2.1.1 patches. 3.4 This one's trickier: I couldn't find a 4.2.1.x source anywhere except for the one that fink uses. Should users be pointed to this, or should they build 4.2.0 and patch it? 3.10 I'd like to replace the third-digit 0's, given that for Jaguar the recommended version is 4.2.1.1 7.x The references are all for XDarwin 1.0x . Do we need to update anything for 1.1.x, or remove any sections as obsolete? Also, I plan on copying some of the new X11-specific material from the FAQ over to X11 Troubleshooting. -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] pwlib, openh323 and gnomemeeting
The good news is, gnomemeeting has been ported to OSX. The bad news is, fink's packages of pwlib and openh323 are out-of-date. I am interested in getting these packages to work, so I am volunteering for maintenance or fix of pwlib and openh323 package, and addition of gnomemeeting package. I can also help to integrate changes back to pwlib, openh323 and gnomemeeting. I have noticed the issue of installation hierarchy (pwlib). If someone can tell me how this should be fixed, I will be happy to do so. --- // Shawn --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] pwlib, openh323 and gnomemeeting
The good news is, gnomemeeting has been ported to OSX. The bad news is, fink's packages of pwlib and openh323 are out-of-date. I am interested in getting these packages to work, so I am volunteering for maintenance or fix of pwlib and openh323 package, and addition of gnomemeeting package. I can also help to integrate changes back to pwlib, openh323 and gnomemeeting. I have noticed the issue of installation hierarchy (pwlib). If someone can tell me how this should be fixed, I will be happy to do so. --- // Shawn --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2.99.901 package redux
Folks: I've put a new revision of the xfree86-4.2.99.901 package in experimental/jswhit. This package no longer contains a versioned dependency on the old xfree86 4.2.1.1 packages (to allow for an upgrade), but instead requires a dpkg -r --force-depends to remove the 4.2.1.1 packages. I've also put a shell script (upgrade_xfree86.sh) in there to handle the needed force-removes automatically. Please test it out and let me know if you think it can be moved back to unstable. I'm 99.9% sure there is no other way to upgrade without forcibly removing the 4.2.1.1 packages, but if anyone has any ideas please speak up now. Also please consider how we will tell users to perform this upgrade - should it be via a shell script like the one I've created? -Jeff -- Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313 NOAA/OAR/CDC R/CDC1FAX : (303)497-6449 325 BroadwayWeb : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124 --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2.99.901 package redux
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 10:28 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: packages, but if anyone has any ideas please speak up now. Also please consider how we will tell users to perform this upgrade - should it be via a shell script like the one I've created? I offered one idea already. Will it not work? -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2.99.901 package redux
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 01:28 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: I've put a new revision of the xfree86-4.2.99.901 package in experimental/jswhit. This package no longer contains a versioned dependency on the old xfree86 4.2.1.1 packages (to allow for an upgrade), but instead requires a dpkg -r --force-depends to remove the 4.2.1.1 packages. I've also put a shell script (upgrade_xfree86.sh) in there to handle the needed force-removes automatically. Please test it out and let me know if you think it can be moved back to unstable. I'm 99.9% sure there is no other way to upgrade without forcibly removing the 4.2.1.1 packages, but if anyone has any ideas please speak up now. Also please consider how we will tell users to perform this upgrade - should it be via a shell script like the one I've created? Perhaps in xfree86's CompileScript section, and in a PreInstScript section, check for 4.2.1.1, and if it exists, die and warn to use the script instead? --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] pwlib, openh323 and gnomemeeting
At 13:08 Uhr -0500 10.02.2003, Pai-Hsiang Hsiao wrote: The good news is, gnomemeeting has been ported to OSX. Cool :-) The bad news is, fink's packages of pwlib and openh323 are out-of-date. Nobody is maintaining them... I am interested in getting these packages to work, so I am volunteering for maintenance or fix of pwlib and openh323 package, and addition of gnomemeeting package. I can also help to integrate changes back to pwlib, openh323 and gnomemeeting. Most welcome. I have noticed the issue of installation hierarchy (pwlib). If someone can tell me how this should be fixed, I will be happy to do so. Not sure what you are talking about, could you please explain. Max --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2.99.901 package redux
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote: On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 01:28 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: I've put a new revision of the xfree86-4.2.99.901 package in experimental/jswhit. This package no longer contains a versioned dependency on the old xfree86 4.2.1.1 packages (to allow for an upgrade), but instead requires a dpkg -r --force-depends to remove the 4.2.1.1 packages. I've also put a shell script (upgrade_xfree86.sh) in there to handle the needed force-removes automatically. Please test it out and let me know if you think it can be moved back to unstable. I'm 99.9% sure there is no other way to upgrade without forcibly removing the 4.2.1.1 packages, but if anyone has any ideas please speak up now. Also please consider how we will tell users to perform this upgrade - should it be via a shell script like the one I've created? Perhaps in xfree86's CompileScript section, and in a PreInstScript section, check for 4.2.1.1, and if it exists, die and warn to use the script instead? Ben: Good idea - but I think the Conflicts: xfree86-base will cause the installation to die before it executes the PreInstScript. -Jeff -- Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313 NOAA/OAR/CDC R/CDC1FAX : (303)497-6449 325 BroadwayWeb : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124 --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Latest gd+Apple X11 + apple SDK fails to build.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hello. Info below (careful it is long) i system-xfree86 4.2-5 Placeholder package for manually installed XFree86 (I hope this is correct? ) /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. - -I/sw/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include -fno-common -I/sw/include - -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include/libpng12 -g -O2 -c -o gdxpm.lo `test -f 'gdxpm.c' || echo './'`gdxpm.c rm -f .libs/gdxpm.lo gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/sw/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include - -fno-common -I/sw/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include/libpng12 - -g -O2 -c gdxpm.c -Wp,-MD,.deps/gdxpm.TPlo -fno-common -DPIC -o gdxpm.o /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:1: illegal external declaration, found `' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:1: undefined type, found `xml' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:1: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `1.0' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:2: undefined type, found `DOCTYPE' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:2: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `plist' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:3: undefined type, found `plist' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:4: illegal expression, found `' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:5: illegal expression, found `' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:5: illegal expression, found `/' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:6: illegal expression, found `' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:6: illegal expression, found `/' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:7: illegal expression, found `' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:7: illegal expression, found `/' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:8: illegal expression, found `' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:8: illegal expression, found `/' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:9: illegal expression, found `' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:9: illegal expression, found `/' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:10: illegal expression, found `' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:10: illegal expression, found `/' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:11: illegal expression, found `' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:11: illegal expression, found `/' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:12: illegal expression, found `' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:12: illegal expression, found `/' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:13: illegal expression, found `unknown' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:13: undefined type, found `ission' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:13: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `notice' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:13: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `in' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:14: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `documentation' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:16: undefined type, found `The' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:16: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `above' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:16: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `notice' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:16: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `this' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:16: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `notice' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:16: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `be' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:16: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `in' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:17: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `copies' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:17: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `substantial' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:17: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `of' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:17: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `Software' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:19: undefined type, found `THE' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:19: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `SOFTWARE' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:19: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `PROVIDED' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:19: undefined type, found `WITHOUT' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:19: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `WARRANTY' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:19: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `ANY' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:19: undefined type, found `EXPRESS' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:19: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `OR' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:20: undefined type, found `INCLUDING' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:20: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `BUT' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:20: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `LIMITED' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:20: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `THE' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:20: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `OF' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:21: undefined type, found `FITNESS' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:21: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `FOR' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:21: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `PARTICULAR' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:21: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `AND' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:21: undefined type, found `IN' /usr/X11R6/include/X11/X.h:21: illegal external declaration, missing `;' after `NO'
Re: [Fink-devel] Latest gd+Apple X11 + apple SDK fails to build.-- Please ignore my X.h got somehow screwed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 snip well I spoke too soon, please excuse me. My X.h is very much fucked up but I have no idea how it happened, so I first posted before looking, I apologize, .d - -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCC d+ s: a-- C+ UB P+ L++ E--- W N+ o+++ K w-- O M+ V++ PS PE Y++ PGP t+ 5 X- R+ tv-- b DI D+ G e h+ r++ y++ - --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQE+SAMliW/Ta/pxHPQRAw0AAJ4u+Y+qrBTF+ZZj7nfZBB0BhYrT/wCg1nLj HZ8omNNWT0C4ivHPJcLASrI= =SKZE -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Latest gd+Apple X11 + apple SDK fails to build.-- Please ignore my X.h got somehow screwed
On Monday, Feb 10, 2003, at 14:53 US/Eastern, David wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 snip well I spoke too soon, please excuse me. My X.h is very much fucked up but I have no idea how it happened, so I first posted before looking, I apologize, Is it on UFS? UFS is very prone to this kind of disk corruption. Try rebooting in single user mode and thoroughly fscking your disks. That may help a little, but you probably need to reinstall those packages. HTH, Kyle Moffett BTW, you are not Philip Zimmerman!!! \/ ;-) - -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCC d+ s: a-- C+ UB P+ L++ E--- W N+ o+++ K w-- O M+ V++ PS PE Y++ PGP t+ 5 X- R+ tv-- b DI D+ G e h+ r++ y++ - --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++:- a16 C$ UB/L/X/*(+)$ P+++()$ L+++(++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w---(-) O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP? t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b(++) DI+ D+ G e-$ h! !r-- !y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] pwlib, openh323 and gnomemeeting
On Monday, Feb 10, 2003, at 13:40 US/Eastern, Max Horn wrote: I have noticed the issue of installation hierarchy (pwlib). If someone can tell me how this should be fixed, I will be happy to do so. Not sure what you are talking about, could you please explain. When compiling openh323, it assumes pwlib includes and libraries are installed at $PWLIBDIR/include and $PWLIBDIR/lib, respectively. Thus, the current .info file copies hem to /sw/lib/pwlib/include and /sw/lib/pwlib/lib, and set $PWLIBDIR to /sw/lib/pwlib. The proper place for installing the files might be /sw/include/pwlib and /sw/lib. I have submit my initial attempts, 3 .info files, to package submission tracker. --- // Shawn --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Latest gd+Apple X11 + apple SDK fails to build.-- Please ignore my X.h got somehow screwed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Montag, Februar 10, 2003, at 11:31 Uhr, Kyle Moffett wrote: On Monday, Feb 10, 2003, at 14:53 US/Eastern, David wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 snip well I spoke too soon, please excuse me. My X.h is very much fucked up but I have no idea how it happened, so I first posted before looking, I apologize, Is it on UFS? UFS is very prone to this kind of disk corruption. Try rebooting in single user mode and thoroughly fscking your disks. That may help a little, but you probably need to reinstall those packages. it is and was HFS+ it had strange plist entries and unicode chars in it. I am rather concerned. A reinstall did fix it though. - -d - - Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, - - Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream to dream before.. Edgar Allen Poe - The Raven -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQE+SC1XiW/Ta/pxHPQRAzg7AKClU12XQTHqMRKVSKvG46tJYn9Z5gCg2jzs kBoXqgLUWnAS2Mp51SAqAwA= =hD/B -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11 0.2 Beta out, and questions.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that the 0.2 version of Apple's X11 is out, I wanted to confirm that there is no Fink problem if it is installed. Specifically, I also wanted to ask if we should / need to re-run Ben Hines' script to correct the install_names thingamahoozit. This is no longer needed. OTOH, the libraries are still those from xfree86-4.2.1, not the 4.3.0 ones promised by Torrey. -- Martin --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Glitch in the fink/time continuum?
I just got the following message while doing a fink selfupdate-cvs [...] cvs server: Updating 10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11-wm Reading package info... WARNING: End of file reached during here-document in /Volumes/progs/System/fink/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/ gnucash-1.8.0-2.info. Updating package index... done. [...] A quick look at the file didn't give me a clue what fink was complaining about, also fink validate thought everything was ok. Therefore, I guess, the warning might have been caused by a minor irregularity in fink :-) To continue the story: selfupdate-cvs downloaded and installed fink-0.11.2.tar.gz, so now I'm at package manager version 0.11.2. Upon reviewing the selfupdate-cvs output, and seeing that fink-0.11.1-10.info was removed during the process, I assume that the original version was 0.11.1. Anyway, after selfupdate-cvs finished, I immediately ran another selfupdate-cvs in order to reproduce the warning. Unfortunately I failed, the message doesn't occur again. So this probably belongs to the realm of phantoms and chimeras. I thought I would tell the world about it, though, just in case someone is in chasing shadows :-) Patrick -- Patrick NaefThe Queen of Hearts, she made some tarts, Lucerne, Switzerland All on a summer day: [EMAIL PROTECTED]The Knave of Hearts, he stole those tarts, PGP public key: And took them quite away! http://www.herzbube.ch/Misc/PGPHerzbubeAtHerzbubeDotCH.txt --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] dependency problem with postgres-ssl and openssl
i get the following output: dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/crypto/binary-darwin-powerpc/openssl097- dev_0.9.7-2_darwin-powerpc.deb dpkg: considering removing openssl-dev in favour of openssl097-dev ... dpkg: no, cannot remove openssl-dev (--auto-deconfigure will help): postgresql-ssl-python depends on openssl-dev openssl-dev is to be removed. dpkg: regarding .../openssl097-dev_0.9.7-2_darwin-powerpc.deb containing openssl097-dev: openssl097-dev conflicts with openssl-dev openssl-dev (version 0.9.6h-1) is installed. dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/crypto/binary-darwin-powerpc/openssl097- dev_0.9.7-2_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): conflicting packages - not installing openssl097-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /sw/fink/dists/unstable/crypto/binary-darwin-powerpc/openssl097- dev_0.9.7-2_darwin-powerpc.deb ### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1 Failed: can't install package openssl097-dev-0.9.7-2 what to do in this dependency jungle? -- thomas kotzian, [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] dependency problem with postgres-ssl and openssl
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 09:01 PM, thomas kotzian wrote: i get the following output: dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/crypto/binary-darwin-powerpc/openssl097- dev_0.9.7-2_darwin-powerpc.deb dpkg: considering removing openssl-dev in favour of openssl097-dev ... dpkg: no, cannot remove openssl-dev (--auto-deconfigure will help): postgresql-ssl-python depends on openssl-dev openssl-dev is to be removed. dpkg: regarding .../openssl097-dev_0.9.7-2_darwin-powerpc.deb containing openssl097-dev: openssl097-dev conflicts with openssl-dev openssl-dev (version 0.9.6h-1) is installed. dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/crypto/binary-darwin-powerpc/openssl097- dev_0.9.7-2_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): conflicting packages - not installing openssl097-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /sw/fink/dists/unstable/crypto/binary-darwin-powerpc/openssl097- dev_0.9.7-2_darwin-powerpc.deb ### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1 Failed: can't install package openssl097-dev-0.9.7-2 what to do in this dependency jungle? Er? What does 'fink list -i postgresql' give? Postgresql-ssl-python doesn't depend on openssl-dev... Unless the old one somehow does... --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] positive feedback on fnlib-fonts-0.5-4
Hi, I'm reporting that the unstable package of Fink in the title was successfully built and has been working on my machine for a while. Sorry if this report isn't updated from the last one I submitted. Thanks for your effort on Fink Project. -- Package manager version: 0.11.2 Distribution version: 0.5.1.cvs Mac OS X version: 10.2.3 December 2002 Developer Tools gcc version: 3.1 make version: 3.79.1 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] positive feedback on imlib(-shlibs)-1.9.14-2
Hi, I'm reporting that the unstable packages of Fink in the title were successfully built and have been working on my machine for a while. Sorry if this report isn't updated from the last one I submitted. Thanks for your effort on Fink Project. -- Package manager version: 0.11.2 Distribution version: 0.5.1.cvs Mac OS X version: 10.2.3 December 2002 Developer Tools gcc version: 3.1 make version: 3.79.1 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Fwd: positive feedback on python-mode-4.6.18.2-1
This package has been working for a while now, how do I get it moved to stable? Begin forwarded message: From: Kow K [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Feb 11, 2003 3:55:04 PM Australia/Sydney To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: positive feedback on python-mode-4.6.18.2-1 Hi, I'm reporting that the unstable package of Fink in the title was successfully built and has been working on my machine for a while. Sorry if this report isn't updated from the last one I submitted. Thanks for your effort on Fink Project. -- Package manager version: 0.11.2 Distribution version: 0.5.1.cvs Mac OS X version: 10.2.3 December 2002 Developer Tools gcc version: 3.1 make version: 3.79.1 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander -- Rohan Lloyd --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
