Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/text ghostscript.info, 1.18, 1.19
Index: ghostscript.info === RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/text/ghostscript.info,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -d -r1.18 -r1.19 --- ghostscript.info 28 Aug 2009 00:54:17 - 1.18 +++ ghostscript.info 20 Aug 2010 13:17:45 - 1.19 @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ Package: ghostscript -Version: 8.61 -Revision: 5 +Version: 8.71 +Revision: 1 Description: Interpreter for PostScript and PDF Source: mirror:sourceforge:%n/%n-%v.tar.gz -Source-MD5: aa55ca90b891c1b3b7402a09a2146a87 +Source-MD5: 51a522a5b4818bd3dc7c1c0e9dd22bad Depends: x11, x11-shlibs, ghostscript-fonts, libiconv BuildDepends: x11-dev, libiconv-dev Conflicts: ghostscript-nox, ghostscript6, ghostscript6-nox, system-ghostscript8 How does this compare to the Submissions tracker item: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2983521group_id=17203atid=414256 Hanspeter -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/text ghostscript.info, 1.18, 1.19
Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: [] How does this compare to the Submissions tracker item: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2983521group_id=17203atid=414256 I am going blind, it seems. In my naivety, I had assumed that the SF tracker presents search results in some (chrono)logical order. It doesn't. The result is that although I had searched for them, I didn't see the recent submissions of Jens Noeckel, for which I apologize. Otherwise, since this is a trivial upgrade, it is the same, except that I conserved the previous revision's hint for configure finding X11 libs and headers, which I don't know if it is still needed. Looking more closely, I see now that some new dependencies are missing: libtiff and libpaper1. I'll add these and answer on the tracker, too. -- Martin -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Blog post of the KDE installer, including mockups
Hi all, For anybody interested in the KDE on Mac installer I've been thinking about: there are some mockups and some explanations on my blog at http://dazjorz.com/blog/?p=33. Sjors smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] cmake CMAKE_FIND_FRAMEWORK changed to LAST
Hi, The cmake installation in Fink changes the default for CMAKE_FIND_FRAMEWORK from First into Last. This was a bad idea. Can we revert that change, please? I have the following reasons to ask for this revert. 1. The documentation of cmake (in the Fink installation and on the Internet) says that the default is First. 2. Using the Fink cmake is very confusing if you don't know that the default was changed to Last. (Hell, cmake by itself is already a monster, let alone if you run into something like this.) 3. The behaviour of FIND_PATH for First and Last is not the same. Trying to avoid wasted CPU cycles is good, but not if the behaviour of cmake is changed. 4. The cmake installation DMG from www.cmake.org has the default set to First. Kind regards, Kees Bakker -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] cmake CMAKE_FIND_FRAMEWORK changed to LAST
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/20/10 5:43 PM, Kees Bakker wrote: Hi, The cmake installation in Fink changes the default for CMAKE_FIND_FRAMEWORK from First into Last. This was a bad idea. Can we revert that change, please? I have the following reasons to ask for this revert. 1. The documentation of cmake (in the Fink installation and on the Internet) says that the default is First. 2. Using the Fink cmake is very confusing if you don't know that the default was changed to Last. (Hell, cmake by itself is already a monster, let alone if you run into something like this.) 3. The behaviour of FIND_PATH for First and Last is not the same. Trying to avoid wasted CPU cycles is good, but not if the behaviour of cmake is changed. 4. The cmake installation DMG from www.cmake.org has the default set to First. Kind regards, Kees Bakker That's for the cmake maintainer to decide upon. (cc'ed) - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxu/UsACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ9G5wCfXOj2C4Ow+euJ0Bj3pDk5udOV OjEAniHs3dUK14nlyYNU6W7CcAjaFGl7 =mdzd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
