Re: [Fink-devel] Results of 2014 Fink buildworld run on 10.9

2014-09-20 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
Dear Fink developers:

The recent buildworld run did not validate the .info and .deb files. 
I've manually run the builworld debs through the validator and the 
following debs came out with errors:

Validating .deb file 
devel/qscintilla2.11-qt4-x11-shlibs_2.8.2-1_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: File name '/sw/lib/qt4-x11/lib/libqscintilla2.11.dylib' specified 
in Shlibs does not appear to have linker data at all
Error: package contains the shared library
   /sw/lib/qt4-x11/lib/libqscintilla2.11.1.0.dylib
but the corresponding install_name
   libqscintilla2.11.dylib
is not an absolute pathname.

Validating .deb file graphics/aquaterm-shlibs_1.1.1-2_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: Framework files not part of a specific library-version, but 
package does not declare BuildDependsOnly to be true (or false)
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/AquaTerm
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Headers/
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Resources/
Offending file: 
/sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/Current/

Validating .deb file libftdi-shlibs_0.20-1_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: Shlibs field says compatibility version for 
/sw/lib/libftdi.1.dylib is 19.0.0, but it is actually 22.0.0.

Validating .deb file sci/r-base_2.15.3-112_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: Framework files not part of a specific library-version, but 
package does not declare BuildDependsOnly to be true (or false)
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Headers
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Libraries
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/PrivateHeaders
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/R
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources
Validating .deb file sci/r-base_3.0.3-8_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: Framework files not part of a specific library-version, but 
package does not declare BuildDependsOnly to be true (or false)
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Headers
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Libraries
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/PrivateHeaders
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/R
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources
Validating .deb file sci/r-base_3.1.1-3_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: Framework files not part of a specific library-version, but 
package does not declare BuildDependsOnly to be true (or false)
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Headers
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Libraries
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/PrivateHeaders
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/R
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources

Validating .deb file sci/vtk510-shlibs_5.10.1-1_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: package contains the shared library
   /sw/lib/vtk510/libLSDyna.5.10.1.dylib
but the corresponding install_name and compatibility_version
   %p/lib/vtk510/libLSDyna.5.10.dylib 5.10.0
are not listed in the Shlibs field.  See the packaging manual.
Error: package contains the shared library
   /sw/lib/vtk510/libvtkhdf5_hl.1.8.5.dylib
but the corresponding install_name and compatibility_version
   %p/lib/vtk510/libvtkhdf5_hl.1.8.5.dylib 1.8.5
are not listed in the Shlibs field.  See the packaging manual.

Validating .deb file cran-rjava-r30_0.9-6-1_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: package contains the shared library
   /sw/lib/R/3.0/site-library/rJava/jri/libjri.jnilib
but the corresponding install_name
   libjri.jnilib
is not an absolute pathname.

Validating .deb file fuse4x-dev_0.10.0-2_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: The -framework flag may get munged by libtool. See the gcc 
manpage for information about passing multi-word options to flags for 
specific compiler passes.
Offending file: /sw/lib/libfuse4x.la
Offending line: inherited_linker_flags='  -framework CoreFoundation'

Validating .deb file gflags-py27_2.0-2_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: File in a language-versioned package does not have a pathname 
specific to that version.
Offending file: /sw/bin/gflags2man.py

(a lot of ghcmods failed with these two errors)
Validating .deb file ghc-network_2.5.0.0-1_darwin-x86_64.deb...
Error: Headers installed (files in an include/ directory), as well as a 
.dylib file, but package does not declare BuildDependsOnly to be true 
(or false)
Error: package contains the shared library
 
/sw/lib/x86_64-osx-ghc-7.8.2/network-2.5.0.0/libHSnetwork-2.5.0.0-ghc7.8.2.dylib
but the corresponding install_name
   @rpath/libHSnetwork-2.5.0.0-ghc7.8.2.dylib
is not an absolute pathname.

Validating .deb file libtevent0_0.9.21-1_darwin-x86_64.deb...

Re: [Fink-devel] Results of 2014 Fink buildworld run on 10.9

2014-09-20 Thread Kevin Horton

 On Sep 20, 2014, at 17:42 , Hanspeter Niederstrasser 
 hanspe...@snaggledworks.com wrote:
 
 Dear Fink developers:
 
 The recent buildworld run did not validate the .info and .deb files. I've 
 manually run the builworld debs through the validator and the following debs 
 came out with errors:
 
 Validating .deb file graphics/aquaterm-shlibs_1.1.1-2_darwin-x86_64.deb...
 Error: Framework files not part of a specific library-version, but package 
 does not declare BuildDependsOnly to be true (or false)
   Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/AquaTerm
   Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Headers/
   Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Resources/
   Offending file: 
 /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/Current/
 
 
 Hanspeter

I need some assistance resolving the reported validation issues with the 
aquaterm package.  

1. Hanspeter - I don’t get the above errors when I build the package in 
maintainer mode, using fink 0.37.0.  What validation test are you running? In 
the future, I’d hope to catch these issues myself, before I release a package.

2. Reading the error message, and reviewing the Packaging Manual, it looks like 
I could avoid the error by adding “BuildDependsOnly: False”.  But, I don’t 
understand the implications of doing that, nor do I know what I should write in 
the DescPackaging field.  Or, is there a way to fix the root problem, rather 
than putting a bandage over the error?

Thanks,

—
Kevin Horton
--
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Results of 2014 Fink buildworld run on 10.9

2014-09-20 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 9/20/2014 6:44 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:

 On Sep 20, 2014, at 17:42 , Hanspeter Niederstrasser 
 hanspe...@snaggledworks.com wrote:

 Dear Fink developers:

 The recent buildworld run did not validate the .info and .deb files. I've 
 manually run the builworld debs through the validator and the following debs 
 came out with errors:

 Validating .deb file graphics/aquaterm-shlibs_1.1.1-2_darwin-x86_64.deb...
 Error: Framework files not part of a specific library-version, but package 
 does not declare BuildDependsOnly to be true (or false)
  Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/AquaTerm
  Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Headers/
  Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Resources/
  Offending file: 
 /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/Current/


 Hanspeter

 I need some assistance resolving the reported validation issues with the 
 aquaterm package.

 1. Hanspeter - I don’t get the above errors when I build the package in 
 maintainer mode, using fink 0.37.0.  What validation test are you running? In 
 the future, I’d hope to catch these issues myself, before I release a package.

 2. Reading the error message, and reviewing the Packaging Manual, it looks 
 like I could avoid the error by adding “BuildDependsOnly: False”.  But, I 
 don’t understand the implications of doing that, nor do I know what I should 
 write in the DescPackaging field.  Or, is there a way to fix the root 
 problem, rather than putting a bandage over the error?

1) I'm using a validator test that just went into git HEAD:
https://github.com/fink/fink/commit/c47d5780ba1b4d0954d1a655d6e2c6afd235e757

2) The proper fix is to move files in unversioned directories (those 
marked as offending above) to the BuildDependsOnly aquaterm-dev package. 
Bump %r to 3 or higher, and add Replaces: aquaterm-shlibs (= 1.1.1-2) 
to the -dev SplitOff so that the new aquaterm-dev-1.1.1-3 package can 
overwrite the now overlapping files from the old aquaterm-shlibs_1.1.1-2 
package. You can see what I did to qt4-base-mac to fix the same error 
for comparison: 
http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/qt4-base-mac.info?r1=1.13r2=1.14

Hanspeter


--
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Results of 2014 Fink buildworld run on 10.9

2014-09-20 Thread Kevin Horton
On Sep 20, 2014, at 20:00 , Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com 
wrote:
 
 On 9/20/2014 6:44 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
 
 On Sep 20, 2014, at 17:42 , Hanspeter Niederstrasser 
 hanspe...@snaggledworks.com wrote:
 
 Dear Fink developers:
 
 The recent buildworld run did not validate the .info and .deb files. I've 
 manually run the builworld debs through the validator and the following 
 debs came out with errors:
 
 Validating .deb file graphics/aquaterm-shlibs_1.1.1-2_darwin-x86_64.deb...
 Error: Framework files not part of a specific library-version, but package 
 does not declare BuildDependsOnly to be true (or false)
 Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/AquaTerm
 Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Headers/
 Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Resources/
 Offending file: 
 /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/Current/
 
 
 Hanspeter
 
 I need some assistance resolving the reported validation issues with the 
 aquaterm package.
 
 1. Hanspeter - I don’t get the above errors when I build the package in 
 maintainer mode, using fink 0.37.0.  What validation test are you running? 
 In the future, I’d hope to catch these issues myself, before I release a 
 package.
 
 2. Reading the error message, and reviewing the Packaging Manual, it looks 
 like I could avoid the error by adding “BuildDependsOnly: False”.  But, I 
 don’t understand the implications of doing that, nor do I know what I should 
 write in the DescPackaging field.  Or, is there a way to fix the root 
 problem, rather than putting a bandage over the error?
 
 1) I'm using a validator test that just went into git HEAD:
 https://github.com/fink/fink/commit/c47d5780ba1b4d0954d1a655d6e2c6afd235e757
 
 2) The proper fix is to move files in unversioned directories (those 
 marked as offending above) to the BuildDependsOnly aquaterm-dev package. 
 Bump %r to 3 or higher, and add Replaces: aquaterm-shlibs (= 1.1.1-2) 
 to the -dev SplitOff so that the new aquaterm-dev-1.1.1-3 package can 
 overwrite the now overlapping files from the old aquaterm-shlibs_1.1.1-2 
 package. You can see what I did to qt4-base-mac to fix the same error 
 for comparison: 
 http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/qt4-base-mac.info?r1=1.13r2=1.14
 

The validator is complaining about everything that is in the framework - every 
single top level directory!  All its complaints are about the symlinks that 
contain the whole of the framework, including the portions that are declared as 
shlibs.  Is none of the framework required during run time?  I’d run that test 
myself, but so far I’ve failed to craft an updated info file that installs 
without error.

—
Kevin Horton
--
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Results of 2014 Fink buildworld run on 10.9

2014-09-20 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 9/20/2014 8:20 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
 On Sep 20, 2014, at 20:00 , Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com 
 wrote:

 On 9/20/2014 6:44 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:

 On Sep 20, 2014, at 17:42 , Hanspeter Niederstrasser 
 hanspe...@snaggledworks.com wrote:

 Dear Fink developers:

 The recent buildworld run did not validate the .info and .deb files. I've 
 manually run the builworld debs through the validator and the following 
 debs came out with errors:

 Validating .deb file graphics/aquaterm-shlibs_1.1.1-2_darwin-x86_64.deb...
 Error: Framework files not part of a specific library-version, but package 
 does not declare BuildDependsOnly to be true (or false)
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/AquaTerm
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Headers/
Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Resources/
Offending file: 
 /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/Current/


 Hanspeter

 I need some assistance resolving the reported validation issues with the 
 aquaterm package.

 1. Hanspeter - I don’t get the above errors when I build the package in 
 maintainer mode, using fink 0.37.0.  What validation test are you running? 
 In the future, I’d hope to catch these issues myself, before I release a 
 package.

 2. Reading the error message, and reviewing the Packaging Manual, it looks 
 like I could avoid the error by adding “BuildDependsOnly: False”.  But, I 
 don’t understand the implications of doing that, nor do I know what I 
 should write in the DescPackaging field.  Or, is there a way to fix the 
 root problem, rather than putting a bandage over the error?

 1) I'm using a validator test that just went into git HEAD:
 https://github.com/fink/fink/commit/c47d5780ba1b4d0954d1a655d6e2c6afd235e757

 2) The proper fix is to move files in unversioned directories (those
 marked as offending above) to the BuildDependsOnly aquaterm-dev package.
 Bump %r to 3 or higher, and add Replaces: aquaterm-shlibs (= 1.1.1-2)
 to the -dev SplitOff so that the new aquaterm-dev-1.1.1-3 package can
 overwrite the now overlapping files from the old aquaterm-shlibs_1.1.1-2
 package. You can see what I did to qt4-base-mac to fix the same error
 for comparison:
 http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/qt4-base-mac.info?r1=1.13r2=1.14


 The validator is complaining about everything that is in the framework - 
 every single top level directory!  All its complaints are about the symlinks 
 that contain the whole of the framework, including the portions that are 
 declared as shlibs.  Is none of the framework required during run time?  I’d 
 run that test myself, but so far I’ve failed to craft an updated info file 
 that installs without error.

The following patch works for me. It leaves behind in the 
aquaterm-shlibs SplitOff only the file that is in the Shlibs field. I'm 
actually not 100% sure that lib/libaquaterm.*.dylib belongs there 
either, since it's a convenience buildtime symlink to the real 
install_name file.

 8  8  8  8  8
Index: aquaterm.info
===
RCS file: 
/cvsroot/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/graphics/aquaterm.info,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -U8 -r1.5 aquaterm.info
--- aquaterm.info   23 Oct 2013 14:37:50 -  1.5
+++ aquaterm.info   21 Sep 2014 01:29:24 -
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
  Package: aquaterm
  Version: 1.1.1
-Revision: 2
+Revision: 3
  Source: http://www.kilohotel.com/fink/AquaTerm-%v.tar.gz
  Source-MD5: 9c8da40bda38f4b9f3a57e560fdd9b5c
  BuildDepends: xcode.app
  Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r)
  GCC: 4.0
  SourceDirectory: AquaTerm-AquaTerm-5c223a5
  PatchFile: %n.patch
  PatchFile-MD5: 94fb89d7b6eab5dc76da57fd4f7d5194
@@ -26,28 +26,40 @@
   mkdir -p %i/share/%n
   cp -p -R ../adapters %i/share/%n
   chmod u+w %i/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework
   chmod u+w %i/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions
  
  SplitOff: 
Package: %N-shlibs
Replaces: %N (= 1.0-1)
-  Files: Library lib/libaquaterm.*.dylib
+  Files: 
+   Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/A/AquaTerm
+   lib/libaquaterm.*.dylib
+  
Shlibs: 
 %p/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/A/AquaTerm 1.0.0 
%n (= 1.0.0-1)

   DocFiles: aquaterm/ReadMe aquaterm/ReleaseNotes aquaterm/INSTALL
  
  SplitOff2: 
Package: %N-dev
BuildDependsOnly: True
Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r)
-  Replaces: %N (= 1.0-1)
-  Files: include lib/libaquaterm.dylib share/%N
+  Replaces: %N (= 1.0-1), %N-shlibs (= 1.1.1-2)
+  Files: 
+   Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/AquaTerm
+   Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Headers
+   Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Resources
+   Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/Current
+   Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/A/Headers
+   include
+   lib/libaquaterm.dylib
+   share/%N
+  
DocFiles: 

Re: [Fink-devel] Results of 2014 Fink buildworld run on 10.9

2014-09-20 Thread Kevin Horton
On Sep 20, 2014, at 21:38 , Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com 
mailto:f...@snaggledworks.com wrote:
 
 On 9/20/2014 8:20 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
 On Sep 20, 2014, at 20:00 , Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com 
 mailto:f...@snaggledworks.com wrote:
 
 On 9/20/2014 6:44 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
 
 On Sep 20, 2014, at 17:42 , Hanspeter Niederstrasser 
 hanspe...@snaggledworks.com mailto:hanspe...@snaggledworks.com wrote:
 
 Dear Fink developers:
 
 The recent buildworld run did not validate the .info and .deb files. I've 
 manually run the builworld debs through the validator and the following 
 debs came out with errors:
 
 Validating .deb file graphics/aquaterm-shlibs_1.1.1-2_darwin-x86_64.deb...
 Error: Framework files not part of a specific library-version, but 
 package does not declare BuildDependsOnly to be true (or false)
   Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/AquaTerm
   Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Headers/
   Offending file: /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Resources/
   Offending file: 
 /sw/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/Current/
 
 
 Hanspeter
 
 I need some assistance resolving the reported validation issues with the 
 aquaterm package.
 
 1. Hanspeter - I don’t get the above errors when I build the package in 
 maintainer mode, using fink 0.37.0.  What validation test are you running? 
 In the future, I’d hope to catch these issues myself, before I release a 
 package.
 
 2. Reading the error message, and reviewing the Packaging Manual, it looks 
 like I could avoid the error by adding “BuildDependsOnly: False”.  But, I 
 don’t understand the implications of doing that, nor do I know what I 
 should write in the DescPackaging field.  Or, is there a way to fix the 
 root problem, rather than putting a bandage over the error?
 
 1) I'm using a validator test that just went into git HEAD:
 https://github.com/fink/fink/commit/c47d5780ba1b4d0954d1a655d6e2c6afd235e757
  
 https://github.com/fink/fink/commit/c47d5780ba1b4d0954d1a655d6e2c6afd235e757
 
 2) The proper fix is to move files in unversioned directories (those
 marked as offending above) to the BuildDependsOnly aquaterm-dev package.
 Bump %r to 3 or higher, and add Replaces: aquaterm-shlibs (= 1.1.1-2)
 to the -dev SplitOff so that the new aquaterm-dev-1.1.1-3 package can
 overwrite the now overlapping files from the old aquaterm-shlibs_1.1.1-2
 package. You can see what I did to qt4-base-mac to fix the same error
 for comparison:
 http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/qt4-base-mac.info?r1=1.13r2=1.14
 
 
 The validator is complaining about everything that is in the framework - 
 every single top level directory!  All its complaints are about the symlinks 
 that contain the whole of the framework, including the portions that are 
 declared as shlibs.  Is none of the framework required during run time?  I’d 
 run that test myself, but so far I’ve failed to craft an updated info file 
 that installs without error.
 
 The following patch works for me. It leaves behind in the 
 aquaterm-shlibs SplitOff only the file that is in the Shlibs field. I'm 
 actually not 100% sure that lib/libaquaterm.*.dylib belongs there 
 either, since it's a convenience buildtime symlink to the real 
 install_name file.
 
  8  8  8  8  8
 Index: aquaterm.info
 ===
 RCS file: 
 /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/graphics/aquaterm.info,v
 retrieving revision 1.5
 diff -u -U8 -r1.5 aquaterm.info
 --- aquaterm.info 23 Oct 2013 14:37:50 -  1.5
 +++ aquaterm.info 21 Sep 2014 01:29:24 -
 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
  Package: aquaterm
  Version: 1.1.1
 -Revision: 2
 +Revision: 3
  Source: http://www.kilohotel.com/fink/AquaTerm-%v.tar.gz 
 http://www.kilohotel.com/fink/AquaTerm-%v.tar.gz
  Source-MD5: 9c8da40bda38f4b9f3a57e560fdd9b5c
  BuildDepends: xcode.app
  Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r)
  GCC: 4.0
  SourceDirectory: AquaTerm-AquaTerm-5c223a5
  PatchFile: %n.patch
  PatchFile-MD5: 94fb89d7b6eab5dc76da57fd4f7d5194
 @@ -26,28 +26,40 @@
   mkdir -p %i/share/%n
   cp -p -R ../adapters %i/share/%n
   chmod u+w %i/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework
   chmod u+w %i/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions
  
  SplitOff: 
Package: %N-shlibs
Replaces: %N (= 1.0-1)
 -  Files: Library lib/libaquaterm.*.dylib
 +  Files: 
 +   Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/A/AquaTerm
 +   lib/libaquaterm.*.dylib
 +  
Shlibs: 
 %p/Library/Frameworks/AquaTerm.framework/Versions/A/AquaTerm 1.0.0 
 %n (= 1.0.0-1)

   DocFiles: aquaterm/ReadMe aquaterm/ReleaseNotes aquaterm/INSTALL
  
  SplitOff2: 
Package: %N-dev
BuildDependsOnly: True
Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r)
 -  Replaces: %N (= 1.0-1)
 -  Files: include lib/libaquaterm.dylib share/%N
 +  Replaces: %N (= 1.0-1), %N-shlibs (= 1.1.1-2)
 +  Files: