Re: [Fink-devel] fink suggestion

[TheSin]

we are working on this but it requires changes to the fink dep engine 
which none really wants to jump into willingly :)

On 26-Sep-03, at 9:22 AM, Thomas Kotzian wrote:

wouldn't it be better to check if dependencies are ok before EACH 
package gets compiled?


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] fink suggestion

[Thomas Kotzian]

i have a suggestion for fink (not the distro, i mean the perl frontend).

i was on holiday and there were a big number of package updated. i 
wanted to update all of them in one step. but for example 
postfix-release needed db3-devel but another program needed 
db41-ssl-devel and installed this one. - the postfix build died ... and 
so did other ... - after a few "fink update-all"s all works well, but 
it's not nice this way.

wouldn't it be better to check if dependencies are ok before EACH 
package gets compiled?
i don't know perl enough to peak into the source.

thanks, thomas
--
thomas kotzian, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel