[Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-03 Thread David R. Morrison
Dear Fink folks,

Yesterday saw a major new release of teTeX, and there are new Fink packages
for this release in the unstable tree.  Users should be aware that upgrading
to these new packages will require the download of 80 MB of source files,
and substantial compiling time.

If you are upgrading from a previous teTeX installation on Fink, you will
most likely need to reinstall one of the packages in the middle of the
upgrade.  There is a warning message which tells you what to do, when
this is necessary.

If you wish to use teTeX with X11 disabled, you should install the new
tetex-nox package.  If you just try to install this directly, though,
you'll be forced to install X11 while some of the component pieces are
being built.  To get around this problem, you can download the two files

  http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/software/tetex-dev_2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb
  http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/software/tetex-shlibs_2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb

and install them by issuing the commands

  sudo dpkg -i /path/to/tetex-dev_2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb
  sudo dpkg -i /path/to/tetex-shlibs_2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb

Once this has been done, tetex-nox can be built and installed without
installing X11.

The previous bundle-tetex package has been replaced by a new tetex
package, and many of the old pieces (tetex-macosx, context, pdftex, etc.)
are now contained directly in tetex-base.

Note to users of xdvi: teTeX now contains a version of xdvi, so there is
no need to install a separate package.  However, this is a different version
than the one which has been available in Fink recently, and I would appreciate
knowing if there is any demand for the original version as an alternative.

I would appreciate feedback on these new packages.  I'd like to be able to
move them to the stable tree as soon as possible, so that binaries can be
released (which will make installation much easier for all).

  -- Dave


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-03 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi Dave,

On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 05:23  AM, David R. Morrison wrote:


Dear Fink folks,

Yesterday saw a major new release of teTeX, and there are new Fink  
packages
for this release in the unstable tree.  Users should be aware that  
upgrading
to these new packages will require the download of 80 MB of source  
files,
and substantial compiling time.

If you are upgrading from a previous teTeX installation on Fink, you  
will
most likely need to reinstall one of the packages in the middle of the
upgrade.  There is a warning message which tells you what to do, when
this is necessary.

I tried to install the new tetex. The following tex packages have been  
installed:

status		name			installed	unstable
outdated	tetex-base		1.0-13		2.0-1	
outdated	tetex-macosx	20010808-7	20010808-8
outdated	tetex-texmf		1.0.2-6	 	2.0-1
current		bundle-tetex	20010808-7	20010808-7

I started with 'fink install tetex'. The compilation runs fine until  
the package tetex-texmf has to be installed:

Writing control file...
dpkg-deb -b root-tetex-texmf-2.0-1  
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/text
dpkg-deb: building package `tetex-texmf' in  
`/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/text/tetex- 
texmf_2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb'.
ln -sf  
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/text/tetex- 
texmf_2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/debs/
rm -rf /sw/src/root-tetex-texmf-2.0-1
dpkg -i  
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/text/tetex- 
texmf_2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb
dpkg: considering removing carlisle in favour of tetex-texmf ...
dpkg: yes, will remove carlisle in favour of tetex-texmf.
dpkg: regarding .../tetex-texmf_2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb containing  
tetex-texmf:
 tetex-texmf conflicts with natbib
  natbib (version 7.0a-4) is installed.
dpkg: error processing  
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/text/tetex- 
texmf_2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install):
 conflicting packages - not installing tetex-texmf
Errors were encountered while processing:
  
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/text/tetex- 
texmf_2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb
### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1
Failed: can't install package tetex-texmf-2.0-1

I tried to remove carlisle and natbib manually. However there are more  
dependencies:

$ fink remove carlisle
sudo /sw/bin/fink  remove carlisle
Password:
Information about 2137 packages read in 1 seconds.

dpkg --remove carlisle
dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of carlisle:
 pdfscreen depends on carlisle.
dpkg: error processing carlisle (--remove):
 dependency problems - not removing
Errors were encountered while processing:
 carlisle
### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1
Failed: can't remove package carlisle

$ fink remove natbib
sudo /sw/bin/fink  remove natbib
Information about 2137 packages read in 1 seconds.

dpkg --remove natbib
dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of natbib:
 revtex depends on natbib.
dpkg: error processing natbib (--remove):
 dependency problems - not removing
Errors were encountered while processing:
 natbib
### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1
Failed: can't remove package natbib

How to proceed from here?

Thanks for your help.

Cheers,
		Remi

-
Q: How many kinds of physicists are there?
A: Three. Those who can count and those who can't.

*
Remigius K. Mommsen e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of California, Irvine   URL:http://cern.ch/mommsen
c/o SLAC voice:++1 (650) 926-3595
2575 Sand Hill Road #35 mobile:++1 (650) 387-1402
Menlo Park, CA 94025, US   fax:++1 (650) 926-8522
*



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-03 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi Dave,

Thanks for your quick update. One more package depends on carlisle:  
pdfscreen. This package can be removed without further dependencies. Is  
this package included in the new tetex, too?

The package tetex-texmf produces one warning concerning a not empty  
directory while replacing the old package:
dpkg -i  
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/text/tetex- 
texmf_2.0-2_darwin-powerpc.deb
(Reading database ... 53353 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace tetex-texmf 1.0.2-6 (using  
.../tetex-texmf_2.0-2_darwin-powerpc.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tetex-texmf ...
Replacing files in old package tetex-base ...
dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file  
`/sw/share/texmf/tex/latex/listings': Directory not empty
Setting up tetex-texmf (2.0-2) ...

The directory /sw/share/texmf/tex/latex/listings has the following  
files left:
lstdoc.sty
lstlang3.sty
lstpatch.sty

I do not know where they are coming from. A dlocate -S doesn't show any  
packages responsible for them.


The rest of the install works fine. However, when I try to run latex, I  
get the following error:

$ latex foo
This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.3.1)
I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!

The latex.fmt is at /sw/etc/texmf.local/web2c/latex.fmt and was not  
touched by the install.

So far from the testing front...

Cheers,
		Remi


On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 02:28  PM, David R. Morrison wrote:

I've updated the new teTeX packages to version 2.0-2, repairing some  
of the
problems which the early testers have pointed out (either on these  
lists, or
privately).  Thanks for helping to test!

Please note that the old bundle-tetex package is now obsolete (along  
with 11
other packages: carlisle, context, dvipdfm, epstopdfm, hyperref,  
natbib,
oberdiek, pdftex, revtex, seminar, and tetex-macosx).  Once everything  
has
been moved to the stable tree, the obsolete packages will be deleted;  
in the
meantime, you don't need to install them if you update your teTeX.

If you want to install tetex-nox and avoid installing X11, then as  
before you
can download and install a couple of .deb files to help you.  The ones  
you
need for version 2.0-2 are:

   
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/software/tetex-dev_2.0-2_darwin- 
powerpc.deb
   
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/software/tetex-shlibs_2.0-2_darwin- 
powerpc.deb

  -- Dave





---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel




-
A dream is just a dream.
A goal is a dream with a plan and a deadline.

*
Remigius K. Mommsen e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of California, Irvine   URL:http://cern.ch/mommsen
c/o SLAC voice:++1 (650) 926-3595
2575 Sand Hill Road #35 mobile:++1 (650) 387-1402
Menlo Park, CA 94025, US   fax:++1 (650) 926-8522
*



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-03 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
 David == David R Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

David If you are upgrading from a previous teTeX installation on
David Fink, you will most likely need to reinstall one of the
David packages in the middle of the upgrade.  There is a warning
David message which tells you what to do, when this is necessary.

You didn't mention that bundle-tetex is now severely broken.  It is.
It wants to install things that aren't provided by tetex-base, except
that they are, and so it tries to install the old version of
dvi-something and then (rightfully) gets conflicts when it finds they
are already installed.

So, please update or outdate bundle-tetex and system-tetex and
tetex-macosx soon.  For all of us. :)

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-03 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
 Randal == Randal L Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Randal You didn't mention that bundle-tetex is now severely broken.  It is.
Randal It wants to install things that aren't provided by tetex-base, except
Randal that they are, and so it tries to install the old version of
Randal dvi-something and then (rightfully) gets conflicts when it finds they
Randal are already installed.

The conflicts are on (at least) dvipdfm and hyperref.  (I didn't have
the patience to look at the other depends independently.) I presume
these are now folded in?

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-02 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote:

A major new release of teTeX is imminent.  If anyone would like to help
me test it, I've got packages called tetex-texmf-beta and tetex-beta
for the current release candidate, in the experimental/dmrrsn CVS
module.


Dave,

I am still stuck in the install phase:

First, I had to remove tetex-macos by hand, because of


dpkg: considering removing hyperref in favour of tetex-texmf-beta ...
dpkg: no, cannot remove hyperref (--auto-deconfigure will help):
 tetex-macosx depends on hyperref (= 6.72-2)


Then, tetex-beta-base breaks in the post-inst script with


running `pdfetex -ini   -jobname=mptopdf -progname=mptopdf mptopdf.tex' ...
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-1.10a-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5) (INITEX)
(/sw/share/texmf/tex/generic/context/mptopdf.tex
! I can't find file `syst-tex'.
l.73 \input syst-tex

Please type another input file name: 
! Emergency stop.
l.73 \input syst-tex

No pages of output.
Transcript written on mptopdf.log.
Error: `pdfetex -ini  -jobname=mptopdf -progname=mptopdf mptopdf.tex' failed
[...]
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
  /sw/share/texmf/web2c
for details.
###

This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`pdfetex -ini  -jobname=mptopdf -progname=mptopdf mptopdf.tex' failed
dpkg: error processing tetex-beta-base (--install):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 tetex-beta-base
### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1
Failed: can't install package tetex-beta-base-2.0-rc2-1

It really requires a file syst-tex which I cannot see anywhere.

--
Martin





---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-02 Thread William McCallum
My install went fine (syst-tex was where it was supposed to be) and  
everything seems to be working. I have tested it out on a document that  
uses T1 fonts and it renders them correctly, also correctly calls on  
ghostscript to render included postscript figures.

You might want to configure it to look in ~/Library/texmf as well as  
~/texmf for personal style files, since that's where people who have  
been using Gerben Weirda's distribution will have them. Or if not, put  
in a note about this to the user.

On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 12:03  AM, Martin Costabel wrote:

David R. Morrison wrote:

A major new release of teTeX is imminent.  If anyone would like to  
help
me test it, I've got packages called tetex-texmf-beta and  
tetex-beta
for the current release candidate, in the experimental/dmrrsn CVS
module.

Dave,

I am still stuck in the install phase:

First, I had to remove tetex-macos by hand, because of


dpkg: considering removing hyperref in favour of tetex-texmf-beta ...
dpkg: no, cannot remove hyperref (--auto-deconfigure will help):
 tetex-macosx depends on hyperref (= 6.72-2)


Then, tetex-beta-base breaks in the post-inst script with


running `pdfetex -ini   -jobname=mptopdf -progname=mptopdf  
mptopdf.tex' ...
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-1.10a-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5) (INITEX)
(/sw/share/texmf/tex/generic/context/mptopdf.tex
! I can't find file `syst-tex'.
l.73 \input syst-tex
Please type another input file name: ! Emergency  
stop.
l.73 \input syst-tex
No pages of output.
Transcript written on mptopdf.log.
Error: `pdfetex -ini  -jobname=mptopdf -progname=mptopdf mptopdf.tex'  
failed
[...]
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
  /sw/share/texmf/web2c
for details.
## 
#
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`pdfetex -ini  -jobname=mptopdf -progname=mptopdf mptopdf.tex' failed
dpkg: error processing tetex-beta-base (--install):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 tetex-beta-base
### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1
Failed: can't install package tetex-beta-base-2.0-rc2-1

It really requires a file syst-tex which I cannot see anywhere.

--
Martin





---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



(520) 621 6697
http://www.math.arizona.edu/~wmc



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-02 Thread David R. Morrison
I see what caused Martin's problems, and I'm working on a revised version.

Thanks for the suggestion about ~/Library/texmf Bill; I will implement that.

  -- Dave


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-02 Thread David R. Morrison
I've put a second revision of my experimental teTeX packages in the
experimental/dmrrsn CVS module.

I appreciate the feedback!

By the way, folks helping me test will probably need to remove the beta
packages by hand, when the final version comes out.

  -- Dave


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-02 Thread William McCallum
Dave,

the second revision failed to install with the following error message  
(I put the new files in my local tree and did fink update tetex-beta).

...
Transcript written on mptopdf.log.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/pdftex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/tex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/cont-en.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/elatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/etex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/mptopdf.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/pdfelatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/pdfetex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
fmtutil: /sw/share/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.

 
###
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
  /sw/share/texmf/web2c
for details.
 
###

This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`mfw -ini  -jobname=mfw -progname=mfw mf.ini' failed
dpkg: error processing tetex-beta-base (--install):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
  
/sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/tetex-beta- 
x11tools_2.0-rc2-2_darwin-powerpc.deb
 tetex-beta
 tetex-beta-base
### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1
Failed: can't batch-install packages:  
/sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/tetex-beta-shlibs_2.0- 
rc2-2_darwin-powerpc.deb  
/sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/tetex-beta_2.0-rc2- 
2_darwin-powerpc.deb  
/sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/tetex-beta- 
x11tools_2.0-rc2-2_darwin-powerpc.deb  
/sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/tetex-beta-base_2.0- 
rc2-2_darwin-powerpc.deb


On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 09:59  AM, David R. Morrison wrote:

I've put a second revision of my experimental teTeX packages in the
experimental/dmrrsn CVS module.

I appreciate the feedback!

By the way, folks helping me test will probably need to remove the  
beta
packages by hand, when the final version comes out.

  -- Dave


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


(520) 621 6697
http://www.math.arizona.edu/~wmc



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-02 Thread Martin Costabel
William McCallum wrote:

Dave,

the second revision failed to install with the following error message  
(I put the new files in my local tree and did fink update tetex-beta).

Hah! This time it installed OK for me. Funny...

--
Martin



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-02 Thread William McCallum
How do I convince fink to reinstall the older version of tetex-beta? It 
insists on wanting to install version 2, even though I've removed 
everything associated with it (then, of course, it complains that it 
can't find the package description). I've tried giving it the explicit 
version number, also fink cleanup and fink scanpackages

After the failed install of version 2, tex couldn't find my personal 
style files any more, so that's why I am trying to downgrade.

On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:21  AM, Martin Costabel wrote:

William McCallum wrote:

Dave,
the second revision failed to install with the following error 
message  (I put the new files in my local tree and did fink update 
tetex-beta).

Hah! This time it installed OK for me. Funny...

--
Martin



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



(520) 621 6697
http://www.math.arizona.edu/~wmc



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-02 Thread David R. Morrison
Sorry, Bill.  You'll need to install things in this order, by version number:
tetex-beta-shlibs, tetex-beta-base, tetex-beta-x11tools, tetex-beta.

Or, remove both the .info file and the .deb files (which might be someplace
like /sw/fink/dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc, depending on where
you put the .info files.)

  -- Dave


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



[Fink-devel] new teTeX

2003-02-01 Thread David R. Morrison
A major new release of teTeX is imminent.  If anyone would like to help
me test it, I've got packages called tetex-texmf-beta and tetex-beta
for the current release candidate, in the experimental/dmrrsn CVS
module.

  -- Dave


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel