Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help
On Apr 19, 2004, at 6:45 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: We need a mechanism to mark packages as "should not be moved to 10.3", especially if there is going to be a general call to action like this. This is done. See http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/compare.php now. Maintainers can change the status of their packages to green (dont move) red (can't move, won't compile) or white (move me). -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help
I maintain three of those (skycal, socat and sswf) but am still on 10.2.8. I'll be happy to resume maintainership when I upgrade, but in the meantime porting assistance would be appreciated. socat and skycal are pretty simple. Chris On Monday, April 19, 2004, at 06:46 PM, Ben Hines wrote: Still > 500 pkgs show 'not moved' from 10.2-gcc3.3 to 10.3. A number of these are obsolete, but many are not. Anyone with commit access feel free to move over anything that works. (I usually start them out in the 10.3 tree with the new filename format, but be sure to fix any references to the patch file in the info) If a maintainer no longer desires to maintain a package they can remove their names from the maintainer line once it is in the 10.3 tree, but the package should still be moved. (with a 'None' maintainer) list: http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/finknotmoved.html -Ben -- Chris Dolan, Software Developer, Clotho Advanced Media Inc. 608-294-7900, 211 S Paterson Suite 260, Madison WI 53703 PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help
On Apr 19, 2004, at 6:45 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: All of the packages on that list which have me as the maintainer were deliberately not moved, and should not be moved. I will be happy to supply reasons if required. We need a mechanism to mark packages as "should not be moved to 10.3", especially if there is going to be a general call to action like this. Yes, i'm going to make one, but you should note the reason in the DescPackaging field as well. -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help
All of the packages on that list which have me as the maintainer were deliberately not moved, and should not be moved. I will be happy to supply reasons if required. We need a mechanism to mark packages as "should not be moved to 10.3", especially if there is going to be a general call to action like this. -- Dave --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help
On Apr 19, 2004, at 5:47 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Apr 19, 2004, at 5:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote: I think the #Package: term-ansicolor-rb16 commented out Package fields broke my script. (these are old scripts from the 10.1 move, they don't call fink and used a sketchy parser.. i updated the script to use some of the read_properties_lines regex, but it should really be reimplemented. (feel free, if you want. :) Though actually the best way to implement this would be using the PDB (web package database) with some SQL queries... i think i may have even done that at one point. I'll look at it again. Ok, i'm on crack today... I did already implement that :) http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/compare.php?tree1=current-10.2-gcc3.3- unstable&cmp=0&tree2=current-10.3-unstable -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help
On Apr 19, 2004, at 5:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote: I think the #Package: term-ansicolor-rb16 commented out Package fields broke my script. (these are old scripts from the 10.1 move, they don't call fink and used a sketchy parser.. i updated the script to use some of the read_properties_lines regex, but it should really be reimplemented. (feel free, if you want. :) Though actually the best way to implement this would be using the PDB (web package database) with some SQL queries... i think i may have even done that at one point. I'll look at it again. -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help
On Apr 19, 2004, at 5:08 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 04:46:03PM -0700, Ben Hines wrote: Still > 500 pkgs show 'not moved' from 10.2-gcc3.3 to 10.3. http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/finknotmoved.html Something's wrong...you list gnome/pygtk2-py* and libs/term-ansicolor-rb, but they are in 10.3. I think the #Package: term-ansicolor-rb16 commented out Package fields broke my script. (these are old scripts from the 10.1 move, they don't call fink and used a sketchy parser.. i updated the script to use some of the read_properties_lines regex, but it should really be reimplemented. (feel free, if you want. :) The new pygtk2 is not showing up because the new pygtk2 is a variant package. It can't handle that. There are very few of those though, so the count is pretty accurate. -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Still >500 packages not moved from 10.2 tree, need help
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 04:46:03PM -0700, Ben Hines wrote: > Still > 500 pkgs show 'not moved' from 10.2-gcc3.3 to 10.3. > > http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/finknotmoved.html Something's wrong...you list gnome/pygtk2-py* and libs/term-ansicolor-rb, but they are in 10.3. Shuold this maybe go on a Wiki somewhere or as a file in CVS so we can mark the disposition? I know some of mine on that list are obsolete... dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
