[Fink-users] scribus compilation failed

2007-03-01 Thread Guy Lauquin
OSX 10.4.8
Package manager version: 0.26.1
Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync powerpc

Scibus failed to compile:
message error in config.log

configure:4937: gcc -E -I/sw/include conftest.c
conftest.c:12:28: error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory
configure:4943: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h.  */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME 
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME 
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION 
| #define PACKAGE_STRING 
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT 
| #define PACKAGE scribus
| #define VERSION 1.3.3.8
| #define KDELIBSUFF 
| #define HAVE_LIBART 1
| /* end confdefs.h.  */
| #include ac_nonexistent

Thanks
guy

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] scribus compilation failed

2007-03-01 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 3/1/07, Guy Lauquin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 OSX 10.4.8
 Package manager version: 0.26.1
 Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync powerpc

 Scibus failed to compile:
 message error in config.log

 configure:4937: gcc -E -I/sw/include conftest.c
 conftest.c:12:28: error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory
 configure:4943: $? = 1
 configure: failed program was:
 | /* confdefs.h.  */
 | #define PACKAGE_NAME 
 | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME 
 | #define PACKAGE_VERSION 
 | #define PACKAGE_STRING 
 | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT 
 | #define PACKAGE scribus
 | #define VERSION 1.3.3.8
 | #define KDELIBSUFF 
 | #define HAVE_LIBART 1
 | /* end confdefs.h.  */
 | #include ac_nonexistent

 Thanks
 guy


It would have been good to provide the build output--I see messages
like this fairly often in config.log even on successful builds--and to
provide context for the config.log piece.

Are you saying that your attempt failed during configuration, or was
the failure the one reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg14983.html
?

If it was the latter, a fix for the package that was causing the
problem (libart2) was committed about five hours ago to CVS, and
should be available to you if you selfupdate.

-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
(akh)
Fink Documenter (still)

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] scribus compilation failed

2007-03-01 Thread Guy Lauquin

On 3/1/07, Guy Lauquin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OSX 10.4.8
Package manager version: 0.26.1
Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync powerpc

Scibus failed to compile:
message error in config.log

configure:4937: gcc -E -I/sw/include conftest.c
conftest.c:12:28: error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory
configure:4943: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h.  */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME 
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME 
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION 
| #define PACKAGE_STRING 
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT 
| #define PACKAGE scribus
| #define VERSION 1.3.3.8
| #define KDELIBSUFF 
| #define HAVE_LIBART 1
| /* end confdefs.h.  */
| #include ac_nonexistent

Thanks
guy



It would have been good to provide the build output--I see messages
like this fairly often in config.log even on successful builds--and to
provide context for the config.log piece.

Are you saying that your attempt failed during configuration, or was
the failure the one reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg14983.html
?

If it was the latter, a fix for the package that was causing the
problem (libart2) was committed about five hours ago to CVS, and
should be available to you if you selfupdate.

--
Alexander K. Hansen
(akh)
Fink Documenter (still)


here is part of the build output:

perl -pi -e 's|\-no\-cpp\-precomp||g' configure
/var/tmp/tmp.1.Expmwb
#!/bin/sh -ev
 export PATH=/sw/lib/freetype219/bin:$PATH
 ./configure --prefix=/sw --with-qt-dir=/sw 
--with-qt-includes=/sw/include/qt --with-qt-libraries=/sw/lib 
--with-extra-includes=/sw/include --with-extra-libs=/sw/lib 
--disable-dependency-tracking --mandir=/sw/share/man

checking build system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0
checking host system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0
checking target system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /sw/bin/ginstall -c
checking for -p flag to install... yes
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
not using lib directory suffix
checking for extra includes... added
checking for extra libs... added
checking for pkg-config... /sw/bin/pkg-config
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for g++... g++
checking for C++ compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C++ compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... none
checking whether g++ supports -fvisibility=hidden... yes
checking whether to use gcc symbol visibility controls... no - 
disabled or no compiler support

checking for libart2-config... /sw/bin/libart2-config
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
. . . . . . . . .

checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E
checking whether g++ supports -O0... yes
checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed
checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... no
checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r
checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -p
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all
checking dlfcn.h usability... yes
checking dlfcn.h presence... yes
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
checking for g77... g77
checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... yes
checking whether g77 accepts -g... yes
checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 65536
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -p output from gcc object... ok
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for ar... ar
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for strip... strip
checking if gcc static flag  works... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fno-common
checking if gcc PIC flag -fno-common works... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... darwin8.8.0 dyld
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
checking whether a program can dlopen itself... yes
checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... yes
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... no
configure: creating libtool
appending configuration tag CXX to libtool
checking for ld used by g++... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... no
checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking for g++ option to produce PIC... -fno-common
. . . . . . . 

Re: [Fink-users] scribus compilation failed

2007-03-01 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 3/1/07, Guy Lauquin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 On 3/1/07, Guy Lauquin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 OSX 10.4.8
  Package manager version: 0.26.1
  Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync powerpc

  Scibus failed to compile:
  message error in config.log

  configure:4937: gcc -E -I/sw/include conftest.c
  conftest.c:12:28: error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory
  configure:4943: $? = 1
  configure: failed program was:
  | /* confdefs.h.  */
  | #define PACKAGE_NAME 
  | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME 
  | #define PACKAGE_VERSION 
  | #define PACKAGE_STRING 
  | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT 
  | #define PACKAGE scribus
  | #define VERSION 1.3.3.8
  | #define KDELIBSUFF 
  | #define HAVE_LIBART 1
  | /* end confdefs.h.  */
  | #include ac_nonexistent

  Thanks
  guy


  It would have been good to provide the build output--I see messages
  like this fairly often in config.log even on successful builds--and to
  provide context for the config.log piece.

  Are you saying that your attempt failed during configuration, or was
  the failure the one reported in
 http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg14983.html
  ?

  If it was the latter, a fix for the package that was causing the
  problem (libart2) was committed about five hours ago to CVS, and
  should be available to you if you selfupdate.

  --
  Alexander K. Hansen
  (akh)
  Fink Documenter (still)


 here is part of the build output:


 perl -pi -e 's|\-no\-cpp\-precomp||g' configure
  /var/tmp/tmp.1.Expmwb
  #!/bin/sh -ev
   export PATH=/sw/lib/freetype219/bin:$PATH
   ./configure --prefix=/sw --with-qt-dir=/sw
 --with-qt-includes=/sw/include/qt
 --with-qt-libraries=/sw/lib
 --with-extra-includes=/sw/include --with-extra-libs=/sw/lib
 --disable-dependency-tracking --mandir=/sw/share/man
  checking build system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0
  checking host system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0
  checking target system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0
  checking for a BSD-compatible install... /sw/bin/ginstall -c
  checking for -p flag to install... yes
  checking whether build environment is sane... yes
  checking for gawk... gawk
  checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
  not using lib directory suffix
  checking for extra includes... added
  checking for extra libs... added
  checking for pkg-config... /sw/bin/pkg-config
  checking for style of include used by make... GNU
  checking for g++... g++
  checking for C++ compiler default output file name... a.out
  checking whether the C++ compiler works... yes
  checking whether we are cross compiling... no
  checking for suffix of executables...
  checking for suffix of object files... o
  checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
  checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
  checking dependency style of g++... none
  checking whether g++ supports -fvisibility=hidden... yes
  checking whether to use gcc symbol visibility controls... no - disabled or
 no compiler support
  checking for libart2-config... /sw/bin/libart2-config
  checking for gcc... gcc
 checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
 . . . . . . . . .


 checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E
  checking whether g++ supports -O0... yes
  checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed
  checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld
  checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... no
  checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r
  checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -p
  checking whether ln -s works... yes
  checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all
  checking dlfcn.h usability... yes
  checking dlfcn.h presence... yes
  checking for dlfcn.h... yes
  checking for g77... g77
  checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... yes
  checking whether g77 accepts -g... yes
  checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 65536
  checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -p output from gcc object... ok
  checking for objdir... .libs
  checking for ar... ar
  checking for ranlib... ranlib
  checking for strip... strip
  checking if gcc static flag  works... yes
 checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no
  checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fno-common
  checking if gcc PIC flag -fno-common works... yes
  checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
  checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries...
 yes
  checking dynamic linker characteristics... darwin8.8.0 dyld
  checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
  checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
  checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
  checking whether a program can dlopen itself... yes
  checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... yes
  checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
  checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
  checking whether to build static libraries... no
  configure: creating libtool
  appending configuration 

Re: [Fink-users] scribus compilation failed

2007-03-01 Thread Martin Costabel
Guy Lauquin wrote:
[]
 /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
 art_realloc(void*, unsigned long)
 art_free(void*)
 art_alloc(unsigned long)

Yes, this is the bug caused by libart2-2.3.18. It didn't happen with 
2.3.17, and the upgrade to 2.3.19 should solve it.

-- 
Marti

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


[Fink-users] can someone help me debug this please?

2007-03-01 Thread Marc Hoffman

pi4:~ root# fink install svn-client-ssl
Information about 1996 packages read in 1 seconds.

fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual  
dependency. The candidates:
(1) db44-aes-shlibs: Shared Libraries for db44-aes
(2) db44-shlibs: Shared Libraries for db44

Pick one: [1] 2
The following package will be installed or updated:
svn-client-ssl
The following 27 additional packages will be installed:
apr-ssl apr-ssl-common apr-ssl-shlibs autoconf2.5 automake1.9 cyrus- 
sasl2-dev cyrus-sasl2-shlibs db43-ssl-shlibs
db44-shlibs expat gdbm3 io-string-pm libtool14 libtool14-shlibs  
libxml2 m4 neon24-ssl neon24-ssl-shlibs
openldap23-dev openldap23-shlibs openssl097 openssl097-dev openssl097- 
shlibs pkgconfig svn-ssl-shlibs swig
swig-shlibs
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
/sw/bin/apt-get-lockwait -q --ignore-breakage --download-only install  
db44-shlibs=4.4.16-1001
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
   db44-shlibs
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2  not upgraded.
11 packages not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 757kB of archives. After unpacking 1860kB will be used.
Get:1 http://bindist.finkmirrors.net 10.4/release/main db44-shlibs  
4.4.16-1001 [757kB]
Fetched 757kB in 2s (324kB/s)
Download complete and in download only mode
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/db43-ssl- 
shlibs_4.3.29-1001_darwin-powerpc.deb
dpkg: considering removing db43-shlibs in favour of db43-ssl-shlibs ...
dpkg: no, cannot remove db43-shlibs (--auto-deconfigure will help):
svn-shlibs depends on db43-shlibs (= 4.3.29-1001)
   db43-shlibs is to be removed.
dpkg: regarding .../db43-ssl-shlibs_4.3.29-1001_darwin-powerpc.deb  
containing db43-ssl-shlibs:
db43-ssl-shlibs conflicts with db43-shlibs
   db43-shlibs (version 4.3.29-1001) is installed.
/sw/bin/dpkg: error processing /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/db43-ssl- 
shlibs_4.3.29-1001_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install):
conflicting packages - not installing db43-ssl-shlibs
Errors were encountered while processing:
/sw/var/cache/apt/archives/db43-ssl-shlibs_4.3.29-1001_darwin- 
powerpc.deb
### execution of /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1
Failed: can't install package db43-ssl-shlibs-4.3.29-1001
pi4:~ root#

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] can someone help me debug this please?

2007-03-01 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 3/1/07, Marc Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


snip

 /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/db43-ssl-
 shlibs_4.3.29-1001_darwin-powerpc.deb
 dpkg: considering removing db43-shlibs in favour of db43-ssl-shlibs ...
 dpkg: no, cannot remove db43-shlibs (--auto-deconfigure will help):
 svn-shlibs depends on db43-shlibs (= 4.3.29-1001)
db43-shlibs is to be removed.
 dpkg: regarding .../db43-ssl-shlibs_4.3.29-1001_darwin-powerpc.deb
 containing db43-ssl-shlibs:
 db43-ssl-shlibs conflicts with db43-shlibs
db43-shlibs (version 4.3.29-1001) is installed.
 /sw/bin/dpkg: error processing /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/db43-ssl-
 shlibs_4.3.29-1001_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install):
 conflicting packages - not installing db43-ssl-shlibs
 Errors were encountered while processing:
 /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/db43-ssl-shlibs_4.3.29-1001_darwin-
 powerpc.deb
 ### execution of /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1
 Failed: can't install package db43-ssl-shlibs-4.3.29-1001
 pi4:~ root#


Your problem is that you apparently have a non-ssl version of svn that
wants db43-shlibs, and it won't automatically swap out--this is a
common issue when trying to switch to an -ssl version.

Try the following:

sudo apt-get remove db43-shlibs

(let it remove anything that depends on it--you can reinstall stuff later)

fink install svn-client-ssl

-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
(akh)
Fink Documenter (still)

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] can someone help me debug this please?

2007-03-01 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Try:
sudo apt-get remove db43 db43-shlibs; fink install db43-ssl
(since you're logged in as root you can skip the sudo)

Let us know what happens.


Marc Hoffman wrote:
 db43-ssl-shlibs conflicts with db43-shlibs
db43-shlibs (version 4.3.29-1001) is installed.
 /sw/bin/dpkg: error processing /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/db43-ssl- 
 shlibs_4.3.29-1001_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install):
 conflicting packages - not installing db43-ssl-shlibs
 Errors were encountered while processing:
 /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/db43-ssl-shlibs_4.3.29-1001_darwin- 
 powerpc.deb
 ### execution of /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1
 Failed: can't install package db43-ssl-shlibs-4.3.29-1001
 pi4:~ root#


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


[Fink-users] obsolete glib2?

2007-03-01 Thread Claus Atzenbeck
Hi all,

I experienced a strange behavior: cleanup --all wants to remove glib2.
I am surprised that it is supposed to be removed, since many packages
depend on it. Here is what I see:

~~
$ fink cleanup --all
[...]
The following 1 obsolete package(s) will be removed:
   glib2  2.12.9-1  Handy library of utility functions

/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait --purge glib2
dpkg: Abhangigkeitsproblem verhindert das Loschen von glib2:
 pango1-xft2 hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.6.6-).
 libgnome2 hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.8.0-1).
 libgnomeui2-shlibs hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.8.0-1).
 libbonoboui2-shlibs hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.6.6-).
 gtk+2 hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.6.6-).
 libbonoboui2 hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.6.6-).
/sw/bin/dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von glib2 (--purge):
 Abhangigkeitsproblem - losche nicht
Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von:
 glib2
### execution of /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1

WARNING: not all obsolete packages could be removed.
/sw/sbin/fink-dpkg-status-cleanup
/sw/var/lib/dpkg/status cleanup:
keep 357
omit 0
~~

[ fink: ]
Package manager version: 0.26.1
Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync powerpc
[ OS: ]
ProductName:Mac OS X
ProductVersion: 10.4.8
BuildVersion:   8L127

Thanks!
Claus

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] obsolete glib2?

2007-03-01 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 3/1/07, Claus Atzenbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all,

 I experienced a strange behavior: cleanup --all wants to remove glib2.
 I am surprised that it is supposed to be removed, since many packages
 depend on it. Here is what I see:

 ~~
 $ fink cleanup --all
 [...]
 The following 1 obsolete package(s) will be removed:
glib2  2.12.9-1  Handy library of utility functions

 /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait --purge glib2
 dpkg: Abhangigkeitsproblem verhindert das Loschen von glib2:
  pango1-xft2 hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.6.6-).
  libgnome2 hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.8.0-1).
  libgnomeui2-shlibs hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.8.0-1).
  libbonoboui2-shlibs hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.6.6-).
  gtk+2 hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.6.6-).
  libbonoboui2 hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.6.6-).
 /sw/bin/dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von glib2 (--purge):
  Abhangigkeitsproblem - losche nicht
 Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von:
  glib2
 ### execution of /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1

 WARNING: not all obsolete packages could be removed.
 /sw/sbin/fink-dpkg-status-cleanup
 /sw/var/lib/dpkg/status cleanup:
 keep 357
 omit 0
 ~~

 [ fink: ]
 Package manager version: 0.26.1
 Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync powerpc
 [ OS: ]
 ProductName:Mac OS X
 ProductVersion: 10.4.8
 BuildVersion:   8L127

 Thanks!
 Claus


glib2 is indeed obsolete--packages that Depend on it should now depend
on glib2-shlibs instead.  Check fink info glib2

The packages that you see that Depend on glib2 need to have that
dependency fixed.
-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
(akh)
Fink Documenter (still)

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] obsolete glib2?

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Macks
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Claus Atzenbeck wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I experienced a strange behavior: cleanup --all wants to remove glib2.
 I am surprised that it is supposed to be removed, since many packages
 depend on it. Here is what I see:
 
 ~~
 $ fink cleanup --all
 [...]
 The following 1 obsolete package(s) will be removed:
glib2  2.12.9-1  Handy library of utility functions
 
 /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait --purge glib2
 dpkg: Abhangigkeitsproblem verhindert das Loschen von glib2:
  pango1-xft2 hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.6.6-).
[lots more]

Due to a reorganization of the glib2* package set, the glib2 package
itself no longer contains any files--there is no (longer:) any reason
for any package to need or want it. However, some packages have not
yet been adjusted by their maintainers for this new glib2* layout. You
are seeing a symptom of those un-adjusted packages...no harm in having
an empty package installed. For more information, see:

  http://wiki.finkproject.org/index.php/Fink:Packaging:Obsolete_Packages

and (I think) 'fink info glib2'.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] obsolete glib2?

2007-03-01 Thread Claus Atzenbeck
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Daniel Macks wrote:

 Due to a reorganization of the glib2* package set, the glib2 package
 itself no longer contains any files--there is no (longer:) any reason
 for any package to need or want it. However, some packages have not
 yet been adjusted by their maintainers for this new glib2* layout. You
 are seeing a symptom of those un-adjusted packages...no harm in having
 an empty package installed. For more information, see:

   http://wiki.finkproject.org/index.php/Fink:Packaging:Obsolete_Packages

 and (I think) 'fink info glib2'.

Thanks, also to Alexander.

Claus

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] obsolete glib2?

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Claus Atzenbeck wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I experienced a strange behavior: cleanup --all wants to remove glib2.
 I am surprised that it is supposed to be removed, since many packages
 depend on it. Here is what I see:
 
 ~~
 $ fink cleanup --all
 [...]
 The following 1 obsolete package(s) will be removed:
glib2  2.12.9-1  Handy library of utility functions
 
 /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait --purge glib2
 dpkg: Abhangigkeitsproblem verhindert das Loschen von glib2:
  pango1-xft2 hangt ab von glib2 (= 2.6.6-).
 [lots more]

 Due to a reorganization of the glib2* package set, the glib2 package
 itself no longer contains any files--there is no (longer:) any reason
 for any package to need or want it. However, some packages have not
 yet been adjusted by their maintainers for this new glib2* layout. You
 are seeing a symptom of those un-adjusted packages...no harm in having
 an empty package installed. For more information, see:

   http://wiki.finkproject.org/index.php/Fink:Packaging:Obsolete_Packages

 and (I think) 'fink info glib2'.

Note that this is the result of a *change* to the package layout, not
just a belated observation that glib2 has never had anything in it. So
one has to update the dependencies _to require the version that has
the new layout_, not just change the package-name listed in the
dependency.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users