Re: [Fink-users] Bug in Maxima
Just an FYI, the latest version of maxima at their sourceforge site is 5.17.1, perhaps it fixes this error. On 22 Jan 2009, at 04:01, Alexander Hansen wrote: Jean-Franois Mertens wrote: On 22 Jan 2009, at 03:01, Sean Lake wrote: Hello all, There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is: integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf); The output maxima gives me (after responding that R is positive) is: Integral is divergent -- an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); I get the same, with the previous version of maxima and sbcl (machine just got back from repair, still updating..) _ and also with "maxima -l clisp" (I build maxima with both lisp engines enabled). Even just with : integrate(r^(-3),r,3,inf); I don't know if this needs to be passed upstream or not, but thought I'd run it by the list first. Definitely, to maxima (conceivably still something wrong in the syntax ? But doesn't seem to me.) JF Mertens I tried 5.13.0 on a Linux box, and got the right answer. I tried 5.17.0 on Windows (built versus GCL, I believe), and it gives the same error as for ours. I'm inclined to blame the current maxima itself on this. Seems you have the most information to send the bug upstream ... :) JF -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Bug in Maxima
James Howse wrote: Just an FYI, the latest version of maxima at their sourceforge site is 5.17.1, perhaps it fixes this error. Unfortunately, no; but it's apparently fixed in their current CVS version. I've gone ahead and updated to 5.17.1 in current/unstable regardless -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison On 22 Jan 2009, at 04:01, Alexander Hansen wrote: Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 22 Jan 2009, at 03:01, Sean Lake wrote: Hello all, There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is: integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf); The output maxima gives me (after responding that R is positive) is: Integral is divergent -- an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); I get the same, with the previous version of maxima and sbcl (machine just got back from repair, still updating..) _ and also with maxima -l clisp (I build maxima with both lisp engines enabled). Even just with : integrate(r^(-3),r,3,inf); I don't know if this needs to be passed upstream or not, but thought I'd run it by the list first. Definitely, to maxima (conceivably still something wrong in the syntax ? But doesn't seem to me.) JF Mertens I tried 5.13.0 on a Linux box, and got the right answer. I tried 5.17.0 on Windows (built versus GCL, I believe), and it gives the same error as for ours. I'm inclined to blame the current maxima itself on this. Seems you have the most information to send the bug upstream ... :) JF -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] Bug in Maxima
Hello all, There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is: integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf); The output maxima gives me (after responding that R is positive) is: Integral is divergent -- an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); The correct output is: 1/(2*R^2) This expression integrate(r^(-3), r, R, D); produces the correct output (after answering that R-D is positive and D is positive). I am using sbcl 1.0.24-2, and fink --version gives: Package manager version: 0.28.6 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Jan 21 16:33:36 2009, 10.5, i386 I don't know if this needs to be passed upstream or not, but thought I'd run it by the list first. Thanks, Sean -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Bug in Maxima
On 22 Jan 2009, at 03:01, Sean Lake wrote: Hello all, There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is: integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf); The output maxima gives me (after responding that R is positive) is: Integral is divergent -- an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); I get the same, with the previous version of maxima and sbcl (machine just got back from repair, still updating..) _ and also with maxima -l clisp (I build maxima with both lisp engines enabled). Even just with : integrate(r^(-3),r,3,inf); I don't know if this needs to be passed upstream or not, but thought I'd run it by the list first. Definitely, to maxima (conceivably still something wrong in the syntax ? But doesn't seem to me.) JF Mertens -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Bug in Maxima
Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 22 Jan 2009, at 03:01, Sean Lake wrote: Hello all, There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is: integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf); The output maxima gives me (after responding that R is positive) is: Integral is divergent -- an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); I get the same, with the previous version of maxima and sbcl (machine just got back from repair, still updating..) _ and also with maxima -l clisp (I build maxima with both lisp engines enabled). Even just with : integrate(r^(-3),r,3,inf); I don't know if this needs to be passed upstream or not, but thought I'd run it by the list first. Definitely, to maxima (conceivably still something wrong in the syntax ? But doesn't seem to me.) JF Mertens I tried 5.13.0 on a Linux box, and got the right answer. I tried 5.17.0 on Windows (built versus GCL, I believe), and it gives the same error as for ours. I'm inclined to blame the current maxima itself on this. -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Bug in Maxima
On 22 Jan 2009, at 04:01, Alexander Hansen wrote: Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 22 Jan 2009, at 03:01, Sean Lake wrote: Hello all, There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is: integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf); The output maxima gives me (after responding that R is positive) is: Integral is divergent -- an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); I get the same, with the previous version of maxima and sbcl (machine just got back from repair, still updating..) _ and also with maxima -l clisp (I build maxima with both lisp engines enabled). Even just with : integrate(r^(-3),r,3,inf); I don't know if this needs to be passed upstream or not, but thought I'd run it by the list first. Definitely, to maxima (conceivably still something wrong in the syntax ? But doesn't seem to me.) JF Mertens I tried 5.13.0 on a Linux box, and got the right answer. I tried 5.17.0 on Windows (built versus GCL, I believe), and it gives the same error as for ours. I'm inclined to blame the current maxima itself on this. Seems you have the most information to send the bug upstream ... :) JF -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
