Re: [Firebird-devel] ODP: ODP: Modern C++: constexpr
18.06.2020 13:33, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: 18.06.2020 12:12, Karol Bieniaszewski wrote: In my humble opinion this discussion is usless. Yes. But someone has too much free time because of the pandemy and this someone want to command others to do a lot of pointless work. Given that our documentation do not use term "slave" in the replication context (and usage of "master" is also limited, I usually prefer "origin" over "master"), I fail to see "lot of pointless work" at all. Dmitry Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Re: [Firebird-devel] ODP: ODP: Modern C++: constexpr
18.06.2020 12:12, Karol Bieniaszewski wrote: In my humble opinion this discussion is usless. Yes. But someone has too much free time because of the pandemy and this someone want to command others to do a lot of pointless work. That's the problem. -- WBR, SD. Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] ODP: ODP: Modern C++: constexpr
My English is bad so sorry if it have wrong maining. In my humble opinion this discussion is usless. E.g. rasism is against people. It have no corelation with software/hardware. And there must be violence against people physical or mental. But this have not relations to maschines/software. Master/slave is technical thing. It is in any electronic with magistral. And think about. If i write white people i am rasist or only when i write black people? I suppose in non of this. There must be some violence against people. In software there is not. regards, Karol Bieniaszewski Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Re: [Firebird-devel] ODP: ODP: Modern C++: constexpr
> > >> If it does not belong to both them? > > > > Its usege should be considered as use at own risk. > > That's not apropriate when working on a project as a group. I agree the usage cannot/should not be ambiguous. I believe that there already is an established pattern for "allow"/"deny" lists: - All are allowed if "allow" list is empty, otherwise must match "allow" list. - "deny" list is processed after "allow", if "deny" list not empty, it trumps "allow" list. Then, if someone creates same entry in both lists, the result would be false. Sean Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Re: [Firebird-devel] ODP: ODP: Modern C++: constexpr
On 2020-06-17 15:44, Karol Bieniaszewski wrote: >> If feature belongs to both lists - is it allowed or denied? Please explain how? By mistake. >> If it does not belong to both them? Its usege should be considered as use at own risk. That's not apropriate when working on a project as a group. Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] ODP: ODP: Modern C++: constexpr
>> If feature belongs to both lists - is it allowed or denied? Please explain how? >> If it does not belong to both them? Its usege should be considered as use at own risk. regards, Karol Bieniaszewski Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel