Re: Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?

1999-02-14 Thread Steve McIlree
This message is from: Steve McIlree [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  I am afraid that I must count myself in the camp of the Monty
  Roberts detractors. I purchased his book when it first was published
  in the US and started to read it eagerly. The more I read of Monty
  Roberts, the sole discoverer and practitioner of his training
  methods, the more disgusted I became. I guess if I had waited for a
  NY Times bestseller to pick up my first book on horse-training I
  might have been more ready to buy his line. But I have read writings
  of too many other horsepersons from Xenophon to Ray Hunt, Pat
  Parelli, Linda Tellington-Jones, and others to think that Monty
  Roberts' discoveries are unique to him. But time and again, in both
  print and interviews, he blatantly states that no one else has ever
  approached horse training the same as he. Now, I don't deny that
  Monty is a fine horseman, but his need to claim that he is the one
  and only is too much for me to stomach.

  And yes, I *do* think that his attitude and claims are damaging.
  There are far too many people involved with horses today who think
  that there is nothing to learn about horse/human relationships, and
  who refuse to pick up a magazine let alone a book. If these people
  read Monty's book because is was a bestseller, and believe his claim
  that it is the last word on horse training they will surely be
  losers. If people think they learned about horse behavior and
  training from this book that was primarily a autobiography, they
  should check out some other books that are specifically on horse
  behavior and training.

  Finally, if it is true as his aunt claims, that Monty's method of
  join-up was previously published in a 1957 book by Marvin E.
  Roberts, I think that the man is beneath contempt. Marvin was his
  father, the abusive horse trainer who Monty claims beat him for
  proposing non-abusive training methods.

--
Steve McIlree  Cynthia Madden -- Pferd, Keyah, Skipper, Tank -- Omaha, 
Nebraska, USA
  Then we began to ride.  My soul smoothed itself out, a long-cramped scroll
  freshening and fluttering in the wind. --Robert Browning(1812-1889)



Re: Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?

1999-02-14 Thread Sessoms
This message is from: Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I reckon he's a good horseman, but he needs to use some of that respect,
understanding and kindness on his own family.  I was appalled at what he
said about his father who, I understand, is no longer around to defend
himself.  You just don't talk about your father like that.  I don't care
if what he said is true or not.  Where is the honor.

Meredith Sessoms
Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~  Dorina  ~  NFR Aagot  ~



Re: Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?

1999-02-13 Thread Mary Thurman
This message is from: Mary Thurman [EMAIL PROTECTED]






---Bushnell's [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Ruthie,

I have also read Monte's book.  Have not read the magazine article
defaming him, but I imagine it is like most other things.  There is
more that one way to do a thing.  If you are successful doing a thing
(moreso than others, say) then you will make enemies and they will try
to detract from your success.  I have used some of his ideas re: horse
body language and found it works.  If it works for me I use it, if not
I don't.  Not all methods work for all people or for all horses.  This
I learned from Wil Howe, another horse trainer - not a whisperer, a
real trainer.  He says to take what works for you from each person's
method you study and make your own method.  Works for me.

Cheers,

Mary
==
Mary Thurman
Raintree Farms
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



Re: Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?

1999-02-13 Thread Northhorse
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 2/13/99 15:41:14 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

 I read Monty's book The Man Who Listens to Horses and thought it was a
 pretty good book - an interesting biography.   I also read the article in
Horse  Rider and was rather surprised at how it  shot down just about every
aspect of his bio.

I dunno about this article.  I was brought up in the Hollywood type
environment and know that whenever somebody makes it, there are a
hundred vultures with no talent ready to tear down those who do have talent
(one of the reasons that National Enquirer exists, I would imagine).  I've
heard other negative things about Monty, and really can't say they are right
or wrong.  But a long time ago I worked for him.  He was a good horseman,
and was very kind to me.  In the short time I worked for him (was helping get
horses ready for his St. Patrick's Day Sale at Hollywood Park) he taught me a
lot of stuff that I still use to this day.  And told me some of the stories
that are now in his book.  BUT some of those stories have taken a slightly
different twist than when he told them to me those many years ago.  I would
assume that he is just a great storyteller.  There are threads of truth to the
stories and points he's trying to make, but changing a little twist here or
there makes the reader/listener want more.  Nothing wrong with that in my
book.  But then again, I may be unduly influenced because my ex is an
independent filmmaker, and I saw the poetic license that is sometimes needed
to make a mundane story saleable.

Pamela



Re: Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?

1999-02-13 Thread Jean Gayle
This message is from: Jean Gayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are quite right Steve, when it can be done that way.  I was referring to
the filmed story of his attempt to break a wild horse out on the prairie.
It was tedious to me and dangerous work and the horse really was not tamed
as I recall.  Jean


-Original Message-
From: Steven A White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, February 13, 1999 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?


This message is from: Steven A White [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jean,

I think the point was why use cruelty when you can just as easily get
good results with kindness.  Many horses have been injured and killed
when they were force broken.

I have seen in person Monty Roberts start a green horse that wasn't even
halter broke and have a person riding him around a ring within 25
minutes.  I personally knew the man who owned the horse, so I know that
it wasn't a hoax.  25 minutes doesn't seem like a lot of trouble to me.

-Steve White
Waterloo, NE


On Sat, 13 Feb 1999 13:06:35 -0800 Jean Gayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
This message is from: Jean Gayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Well I for one thought his way of handling wild horses was an attempt
to
prove himself right and his father wrong.  nothing wrong with that.
The
movie showing him working with a wild horse over a period of days made
me
wonder if the old cowboys did not save themselves a lot of trouble by
their
methods of breaking.  Having ridden many cow ponies who were broken in
less
than gentle means I found them reliable and not afraid of humans.
There is
more than one way to do all things.  Jean Gayle Wash. state


-Original Message-
From: Bushnell's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, February 13, 1999 11:40 AM
Subject: Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?


This message is from: Bushnell's
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Just read a feature piece in the February issue of Horse and Rider
entitled Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers? in which Monty Robert's
best
seller, The Man Who Listens to Horses is maligned.

A cowboy hero bites the dust, as many of his accounts are
discredited. We
were both originally favorably impressed with the book (although felt
it
had a lame conclusion) but it must be theorhetically correct insofar
as
horse taming is concerned.

What do you think?

Ruthie Bushnell







Re: Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?

1999-02-13 Thread Kate MacGillivray
This message is from: Kate MacGillivray [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I read Monty's book The Man Who Listens to Horses and thought it was a
pretty good book - an interesting biography.
I also read the article in Horse  Rider and was rather surprised at how it
shot down just about every aspect of his bio.
Regardless of whether or not Monty fabricated and embellished much of his
life, I was still blown away at the way he handled and joined up with the
horses we saw at a demonstration in Ottawa.  I don't think there is any
dispute over his horsemanship.
Kate



Re: Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?

1999-02-13 Thread Jean Gayle
This message is from: Jean Gayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Well I for one thought his way of handling wild horses was an attempt to
prove himself right and his father wrong.  nothing wrong with that.  The
movie showing him working with a wild horse over a period of days made me
wonder if the old cowboys did not save themselves a lot of trouble by their
methods of breaking.  Having ridden many cow ponies who were broken in less
than gentle means I found them reliable and not afraid of humans.  There is
more than one way to do all things.  Jean Gayle Wash. state


-Original Message-
From: Bushnell's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, February 13, 1999 11:40 AM
Subject: Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?


This message is from: Bushnell's [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Just read a feature piece in the February issue of Horse and Rider
entitled Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers? in which Monty Robert's best
seller, The Man Who Listens to Horses is maligned.

A cowboy hero bites the dust, as many of his accounts are discredited. We
were both originally favorably impressed with the book (although felt it
had a lame conclusion) but it must be theorhetically correct insofar as
horse taming is concerned.

What do you think?

Ruthie Bushnell




Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers?

1999-02-13 Thread Bushnell's
This message is from: Bushnell's [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Just read a feature piece in the February issue of Horse and Rider
entitled Horse Whispers-or Horsefeathers? in which Monty Robert's best
seller, The Man Who Listens to Horses is maligned. 

A cowboy hero bites the dust, as many of his accounts are discredited. We
were both originally favorably impressed with the book (although felt it
had a lame conclusion) but it must be theorhetically correct insofar as
horse taming is concerned.

What do you think?

Ruthie Bushnell