Re: Flash v/s Function

2000-01-08 Thread Pat
This message is from: Pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I've been lurking with all the talk about type. Carol does liven up the chat 
room.
I must say Anne is very articulate and conversations are interesting. Since Mike
brought up the Quarter Horses, I have to jump in with a thought I've had for
awhile.
All this talk reminds me of the early 70's in the Quarter Horse world. This was 
a
time of a major transition is the QH's and I feel like I'm reliving it. Halter
classes were literally the tallest horse down to the smallest, and the more 
white
the better. smooth muscled horses vrs the old bull dog. Big time change and alot
of dissension. All I ever hear now is how the Quarter Horse has been ruined and
how we the trainers, breeders, exhibitors and the guy who drug the arena and set
up the speaker system has caused a down fall in the breed. The Quarter Horse
Association is the largest breed registry in the world, I think they grew 
because
the versatility of the breed reached out to the different avenues available. 
Yes,
the hunter/jumper QH's now stand almost 3/4 TB in some cases, but a registered 
QH
took the Jr Jumper Championship at Penn National this year. Look at Rugged Lark
(by Really Rugged, a TB) what he and Lynn Palm did for the QH image and 
dressage,
hunters...then think about the reiners and the QH's in the Olympics. If the 
QH
remained the same, bull dog, cow working, calf roping animal in the sand hills 
of
Texashummmin my opinion it would be a waste. There are still QH's built
and bred for cow work, pleasure, and yes the horrible...horrible world of "only
halter horse".although I do not agree that the halter QH is ruined either.  
To
own a QH now means as an always asked second question, "what do you do with
yours".the answer can mean everything from cutting to driving and everything
in betweenin the late 60's-early 70's the english pleasure classes was a 
trot
race, of short strided horses, noses stuck in their chests, seeing who could 
trot
faster that the other, with the influx of horses like Swift Solo, Geetas Cat,
Really Rugged and breeders like Jon Riker and Carol Harris, and trainers like
Sandy Vaughn and Lynn Palm, QH's can now go back and forth in AHSA, USDressage
Association, USCombined Training Association, ADS as well as AQHA ..OH.AND
take little Sally to Pony Club or Sally's great grandmother on a trial ride
safely. .
I don't look to see Fjords becoming anywhere near the size and popularity of 
QH's,
and I suspect alot of you would bail out before it did. But lets keep the big
picture in mind before we condemn. We have 23 Fjords here and EACH one is little
different, its fun and interesting to see and find what they each do well.
I've gone on to long, and I still don't kiss horses.
Pat with to much coffee @ Green Valley Farm



Re: Flash v/s Function

2000-01-08 Thread Meredith Sessoms
This message is from: "Meredith Sessoms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Anne wrote ...

>>>There  were two mares left in the final selection of two or three year
old mares at the show at Forde. One was a wonderful mover; free and uphill,
pushing from behind; all those things that attract a dressage rider's eye.
The other was not as nice a mover but was drop dead beautiful; a head and
face to die for, striking in color and would turn anyone's head, horse
person or not.
The judges deliberated for a long long  time and  finally chose the nicer
looking mare for first place. When I  asked them why, they said that it was
a tough decision but basically felt that it was more important to preserve
type in  the breed than to breed for more extravagant movement which, while
it has it's place is not necessarily what is needed to pull the cart up the
mountain slope or work the fields...I loved that moment because it took my
trained sport horse train of thought and soundly planted it in the context
of the
breed at hand. <<<

>Then Elaine wrote [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>
>Since we are on this topic of type, your story from Norway left me a little
>confused. It sounds like the judges where just going for looks and the
>pretty face instead of function. I'd take a real homely, nice mover over a
>gorgeous looking, average one. What's that old saying, "beauty is as beauty
>does"...or something like that. But maybe I am brainwashed by years of
>working with warmbloods!

I got the feeling Anne meant that special, typey, Fjord beauty.  There are
some things that make a Fjord a Fjord and an Arab an Arab.  What is a breed
without these distinct features?  For example ... they now breed Arabs with
long ears, lots of bloodveins, long legs, and narrow faces with hard eyes.
To me those Arabian have lost type.  The Fjord people must pay special
attention to detail to truly perserve breed type.

Assuming both mares were good movers, one better than the other, I would go
for excellent Fjord type rather than to go for movement.  A lot of people
make the mistake of thinking that in-hand classes for horses and dogs are
some kind of beauty contest.  For some breeds that is exactly what it is.
For other breeds, like Labrador Retrievers and Fjord Horses (and it should
be for Arabians before they all turn into
faux-Saddlebreds) conformation classes are an honest attempt to keep a breed
distinctive and true to type.  Without people agreeing on what makes a Fjord
a Fjord - via the standard - and then educating people -  via shows and
evaluations and books - everybody would go by their own idea of what a Fjord
should be, most probably based on the few Fjords they have encountered.  The
breed would lose type.  It is a fad these days to say that a horse with a
crest can't be athletic.  If Fjord folks followed this fad we would loose
breed type because a Fjord is not a Fjord without that strong neck.  If this
keeps our ponies from cutting cows like lightning ... then so be it.  I
don't want a horse that moves so fast she pops out from under me on a
regular basis anyways!

When you are talking about breeding Warmbloods, you aren't talking about
preserving distinct features that make the breed instantly recognizable from
any other breed.  You are talking purely about conformation with some type
thrown in, but not a distinct type.  You could say, the Oldenburg has a
longer ear, the Trakehner can have a dished face, but I don't know that
anyone could take five typical broodmares from each of the Warmblood breeds
and sort them out into their correct groups without looking at their brands.
Recognizing type is very important with our Fjords.  You can always breed
for good movement within the breed but once breed type is lost can it be
found again??

>>><<<   Meredith Sessoms
>>><<<   Soddy-Daisy. Tennessee. USA
>>><<<   Dorina & NFR Aagot



Re: Flash v/s Function

2000-01-08 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR

This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

At 11:50 PM 1/7/00 -0500, you wrote:

This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anne,

Since we are on this topic of type, your story from Norway left me a little
confused. It sounds like the judges where just going for looks and the pretty
face instead of function. I'd take a real homely, nice mover over a gorgeous
looking, average one. What's that old saying, "beauty is as beauty does"...or
something like that. But maybe I am brainwashed by years of working with
warmbloods!


Have you seen any of the "Beautiful" halter style Quarter Horses that can't 
even be ridden these days?  Sometimes beauty is only skin deep too Elaine.


I think what Anne was saying about the ones in Norway was that the 
beautiful one got the nod was that it also fit the "Type" better than the 
other one did.  Not because it was "Beautiful" so to speak.  Perhaps it was 
"Beautiful" because it was of the correct "Type".


Mike



===

Norwegian Fjord Horse Registry
Mike May, Registrar
Voice 716-872-4114
FAX 716-787-0497

http://www.nfhr.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Flash v/s Function

2000-01-07 Thread OLSENELAIN
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anne,

Since we are on this topic of type, your story from Norway left me a little 
confused. It sounds like the judges where just going for looks and the pretty 
face instead of function. I'd take a real homely, nice mover over a gorgeous 
looking, average one. What's that old saying, "beauty is as beauty does"...or 
something like that. But maybe I am brainwashed by years of working with 
warmbloods!

Elaine Olsen