Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[Erik de Castro Lopo]

c.helmr...@ecodis.de wrote:

> In libFLAC/src/stream_encoder.c, the following C++ style comment was added 
> recently:
> 
> //FLAC__ASSERT(samples <= blocksize);
> 
> Since all other comments in this file (and, possibly, the entire lib) are 
> C-style /* */,
> I suggest to remove this line again.

Fixed. Thanks.

Erik
-- 
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[MauritsVB]

Over on Hydrogenaudio "o-l-a-v" has tested 1.3.1 against 1.3.2pre3 on Windows 
10 Pro x64.

The conclusion is: no errors, 1.3.2pre3 seems to produce slightly smaller files 
but is also slightly slower with encoding.

https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,113190.msg932918.html#msg932918

Maurits


> On 21 Dec 2016, at 21:55, Erik de Castro Lopo  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> New pre-release here is at:
> 
>http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
>http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
> 
> Changes:
> 
> * Fix tests with Makefile.lite build system.
> * Fixes for non-Intel CPUs.
> 
> MD5 and SHA256 sums:
> 
>> md5sum flac-1.3.2pre3*
>61aa8597a220303daf4beb2b8756979d  flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
>8b470ceac02340600db73bc6daea4fc7  flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
> 
>> sha256sum flac-1.3.2pre3*
>9f3e333db6bf9aea8fa211a0d598ec28e2e24c47830ba2f585dc5647b756e4c8  
> flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
>f0af11afb7f2187317677fd719cad1493d3bd52d0498a4facc8a937ce366ba88  
> flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
> 
> Really need someone to test the Windows binaries because I don't have
> Windows.
> 
> 
> Erik
> 
> -- 
> --
> Erik de Castro Lopo
> http://www.mega-nerd.com/
> ___
> flac-dev mailing list
> flac-dev@xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[Robert Kausch]

Am 21.12.2016 um 22:55 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:

Hi all,

New pre-release here is at:

 http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
 http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz

Really need someone to test the Windows binaries because I don't have
Windows.

I also finished my tests now.

I found no issues converting to and from FLAC in parallel with 10 
threads/processes using either libFLAC.dll or flac.exe. All good, just 
as expected.



Robert Kausch
robert.kau...@freac.org

___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[Erik de Castro Lopo]

lvqcl.mail wrote:

> I compiled sources from flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz (MinGW/Windows)
> and ran 'make check'. The result is: "All tests passed".
> 
> Then I replaced flac.exe and metaflac.exe with the files from
> flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip and re-ran the tests. Again the result
> is: "All tests passed".

Awesome. Thats the best test I can think of for the Windows
binaries.

Cheers,
Erik
-- 
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[lvqcl.mail]

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:


New pre-release here is at:

http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz



Really need someone to test the Windows binaries because I don't have
Windows.


Erik



I compiled sources from flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz (MinGW/Windows)
and ran 'make check'. The result is: "All tests passed".

Then I replaced flac.exe and metaflac.exe with the files from
flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip and re-ran the tests. Again the result
is: "All tests passed".
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[Robert Kausch]

Am 22.12.2016 um 14:31 schrieb Declan Kelly:

Do you have any of the popular front-end software that rips from CD and
then performs the encoding in parallel?

Do we have any front-end developers on this list?
I'm the developer of fre:ac that supports parallel encoding with both 
libFLAC and the command line encoder.

Most of them use a DOS window for the encoder (flac.exe or LAME for mp3)
instead of using libFLAC (or the mp3 equivalent). I would be concerned
that at least one of these might not work with the latest flac.exe .
I briefly tested libFLAC 1.3.2pre1 and and found no issues. Parallel 
encoding with flac.exe also should be no problem as every instance of 
flac.exe is a separate process.


I'll do some more tests with pre3 later today.


Robert Kausch
robert.kau...@freac.org

___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[Declan Kelly]

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:19:21AM +, oresteszoupa...@hotmail.com wrote:
> 
> For what it's worth, I tested both the 32- and 64-bit flac.exe's on my 
> Windows 10, with about 45 WAV files I have.
> 
> Got some warnings about unexpected metadata, but the audio was encoded 
> fine. Using the --keep-foreign-metadata flag cleared those warnings.

Excellent!

Do you have any of the popular front-end software that rips from CD and
then performs the encoding in parallel?

Do we have any front-end developers on this list?

Most of them use a DOS window for the encoder (flac.exe or LAME for mp3)
instead of using libFLAC (or the mp3 equivalent). I would be concerned
that at least one of these might not work with the latest flac.exe .


> On 21/12/2016 21:55, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > New pre-release here is at:
> >
> >  http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
> >  http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
> >
> >
> > Really need someone to test the Windows binaries because I don't have
> > Windows.

-- 
-Dec.
---
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[rappard]

> Really need someone to test the Windows binaries because I don't have
> Windows.

Will test on Windows 7, 64-bit (C:\>ver output: version 6.1.7601). Anything
I should look at specifically and/or more closely? Is there a (full) test
suite I could run?

--Martin
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[rappard]

> > http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
> > * Fixes for non-Intel CPUs.
>
> Compiles and runs fine on a MacMini running OpenBSD/current
> and on a BeagleBone Black running OpenBSD/current.

I can test compilation on a CentOS/VirtualBox virtual machine if
there's interest. Drive space is really cramped, so running it is
probably not a good idea.

--Martin
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[rappard]

> I even had a weird WAV that caused "WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format
> type 1 but bits-per-sample=24", but flac dealt with it without problems
> and the output file was fine and playable.

For what it's worth: this happens to me when I record with my Edirol R-09
in 24-bit mode. I'm guessing some solid-state recorders do not completely
adhere to the .wav file format standard. Never had any problems either.

--Martin
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[Jan Stary]

On Dec 22 08:55:42, mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
> http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
> * Fixes for non-Intel CPUs.

Compiles and runs fine on a MacMini running OpenBSD/current
and on a BeagleBone Black running OpenBSD/current.

Jan

___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[Erik de Castro Lopo]

Orestes Zoupanos wrote:

> For what it's worth, I tested both the 32- and 64-bit flac.exe's on my 
> Windows 10, with about 45 WAV files I have.
> 
> Got some warnings about unexpected metadata, but the audio was encoded 
> fine. Using the --keep-foreign-metadata flag cleared those warnings.
> 
> I even had a weird WAV that caused "WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format 
> type 1 but bits-per-sample=24", but flac dealt with it without problems 
> and the output file was fine and playable.

Thanks! All of what you saw is expected behaviour.

Cheers,
Erik
-- 
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

[Orestes Zoupanos]

For what it's worth, I tested both the 32- and 64-bit flac.exe's on my 
Windows 10, with about 45 WAV files I have.

Got some warnings about unexpected metadata, but the audio was encoded 
fine. Using the --keep-foreign-metadata flag cleared those warnings.

I even had a weird WAV that caused "WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format 
type 1 but bits-per-sample=24", but flac dealt with it without problems 
and the output file was fine and playable.

Cheers,
Orestes

On 21/12/2016 21:55, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> New pre-release here is at:
>
>  http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
>  http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
>
> Changes:
>
> * Fix tests with Makefile.lite build system.
> * Fixes for non-Intel CPUs.
>
> MD5 and SHA256 sums:
>
>  > md5sum flac-1.3.2pre3*
>  61aa8597a220303daf4beb2b8756979d  flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
>  8b470ceac02340600db73bc6daea4fc7  flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
>
>  > sha256sum flac-1.3.2pre3*
>  9f3e333db6bf9aea8fa211a0d598ec28e2e24c47830ba2f585dc5647b756e4c8  
> flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
>  f0af11afb7f2187317677fd719cad1493d3bd52d0498a4facc8a937ce366ba88  
> flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
>
> Really need someone to test the Windows binaries because I don't have
> Windows.
>
>
> Erik
>

___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev