RE: [Flashcoders] This is really really really annoying

2007-02-23 Thread Devine, Rich (Techlink Resources)
Not to state the obvious, but everyone that is replying to the list with
a "Me Too" is just adding to the traffic.  I don't think we need to keep
responding that we are all having the same issue.  Judging by the email
sent by the admins earlier, I'm pretty sure, that they know of the
problem and are working to resolve it (I'm hoping).  I wouldn't guess
that responding to the list is going to do anything more except continue
to annoy the rest of us and add to the number of digests that we receive
when the system is functioning correctly.

Just my two cents,

Rich

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Styles
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:33 PM
To: Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: [Flashcoders] This is really really really annoying

I've reset the password, i've logged in and changed my options to
reflect
the fact that I WANT A DIGEST (AGAIN)

It _seemed_ to accept my request, yet i'm still getting individual
messages
from the mailing list...

this is NOT A DIGEST! I DONT WANT individual messages...

I like being part of the lst and don't want to have to unsubscribe
because
it got annoying. please fix whatever needs to be fixed.
thanks.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


[Flashcoders] (no subject)

2006-12-07 Thread Devine, Rich (Techlink Resources)
Hello all, 

This is my first post to the forums, so please forgive and feel free to
send constructive criticisms regarding any protocols I may have
accidentally missed. 

I have a rather complex (at least for me) issue that I am running into
with the combo box component. I dynamically create several movieclips
via a template system (which are draggable), each of which is made up of
multiple form elements including the combo box. I put the entire
template on a layer called "assets" (for illustation purposes, think of
these as dynamically added rows in a table). 

The first issue I noticed was that the FONTS in the combo box and linked
dropdown were inconsistent. Secondly, the asset layer(s) were resized to
accommodate the length of the dropdowns when the button (the "v" next to
the combo box) was clicked but not resized when the combo box was
closed. Initially I thought this was simply a style setting (to address
the fonts) and swapDepths setting (to bring the currently selected combo
to the top of the layer stacking order), but neither seemed to work. It
was at this point that I read about the "_lockroot = true;" fix . . .
which did seem to fix both the above issues, but ONLY when added to the
Asset layer and now I am seeing the dropdowns displaying behind the text
area of the combo box directly below it. I have tried everything from
changing the swapDepths on the dropdown to cycling through all of the
other combo boxes / asset layer rows and toggling their lockroot status
(swapping true for currently selected and false for everything else).
Nothing has worked and I am absolutely out of ideas. Any help would be
GREATLY appreciated.

Thanks in advance, 

Rich

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com