Re: [flexcoders] Re: Future Scope of Flex
Think the person was simply referring to the vocabulary and syntax, since they're both based on the ECMA standards. Not sure it deserved an ad hominem attack. It's a pretty accurate statement that someone who knows ActionScript won't be baffled by JS. On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:50 AM, danielpr...@yahoo.com [flexcoders] flexcoders@yahoogroups.com wrote: js is almost exactly like Actionscript. Typical of a JS advocate, no real knowledge of object oriented structures and concepts. Bet this is by another manager type that doesn't know an array from a variable (actually that WOULD be the same level of knowledge in this case wouldn't it.) -- John Hall jh...@cactusware.com http://www.cactusware.com
Re: [flexcoders] Problem with Flash 13
Might check this out: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23703920/flash-sandbox-security-error-just-started-popping-up-in-the-last-day-dead-in-wa On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Jairo França ja...@tgi.inf.br [flexcoders] flexcoders@yahoogroups.com wrote: After updating to Flash player 13 I'm receiving the following error: SecurityError: Error #3769: Security sandbox violation: Cannot send HTTP headers when using navigateToUrl(). Any idea? Thanks --- Este email está limpo de vírus e malwares porque a proteção do avast! Antivírus está ativa. http://www.avast.com -- John Hall jh...@cactusware.com http://www.cactusware.com