Think the person was simply referring to the vocabulary and syntax, since
they're both based on the ECMA standards. Not sure it deserved an ad
hominem attack. It's a pretty accurate statement that someone who knows
ActionScript won't be baffled by JS.


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:50 AM, danielpr...@yahoo.com [flexcoders] <
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
>
> > js is almost exactly like Actionscript.
> Typical of a JS advocate, no real knowledge of object oriented structures
> and concepts. Bet this is by another manager type that doesn't know an
> array from a variable (actually that WOULD be the same level of knowledge
> in this case wouldn't it.)
>
>  
>



-- 
John Hall
jh...@cactusware.com
http://www.cactusware.com
          • ... danielpr...@yahoo.com [flexcoders]
            • ... sk.jameel2...@gmail.com [flexcoders]
            • ... Wemerson Couto GuimarĂ£es wemerso...@gmail.com [flexcoders]
            • ... Scott Fanetti scott.fane...@gmail.com [flexcoders]
              • ... Dan Pride danielpr...@yahoo.com [flexcoders]
              • ... Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com [flexcoders]
              • ... danielpr...@yahoo.com [flexcoders]
              • ... Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com [flexcoders]
              • ... Dan Pride danielpr...@yahoo.com [flexcoders]
              • ... Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com [flexcoders]
            • ... John Hall jh...@cactusware.com [flexcoders]
    • [flexcode... danielpr...@yahoo.com [flexcoders]
      • Re: [... David Adams dpad...@gmail.com [flexcoders]
  • [flexcoders] R... Jacob Schatz playpianolikew...@gmail.com [flexcoders]

Reply via email to