Re: [flexcoders] Flex is becoming unviable

2007-10-16 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Monday 15 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Everything works fine (ignoring the 500kb framework file it is
> necessary for users to access the site.)

With the .60 player and Flex 3, that can be cached across any Flex web sites.

> 200kb or 130kb (not really small but acceptable). But now, with beta 2
> simple files came to 400kb.


Read the release notes. Esp. the bit about 'export release version'.

> I becoming thinking i waste my time learning flex and waste the money
> of my client testing flex in your app, I am already thinking about
> redo the whole project in ruby on rails and ajax.

Dube ! No, just no :-)

-- 
Tom Chiverton. Are you a great Flex programmer, who knows Cairngorm, and has 
done some ColdFusion work ? Would you like to work for a top 30 law firm in 
Manchester, UK ? Are not an agency ? If yes, send email !



This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St 
James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is available 
for inspection at the registered office.  Any reference to a partner in 
relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP.  Regulated by The 
Solicitors Regulation Authority.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must not 
read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform 
any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or 
contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify 
Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.


--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Re: [flexcoders] Flex is becoming unviable

2007-10-15 Thread Brendan Meutzner
I can't remember the exact terminology for it, but one of the goals
for Flex generated swfs involves caching the common framework files on
client machines, to avoid repeated download, thus cutting the swf size
drastically.  I'm sure Ales or Matt can speak more to this feature.

Brendan


On 10/15/07, Douglas Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ugh take a look at the release notes for FB3 Beta 2 and be sure you are
> looking at the released version of your SWFs, not the debug versions that
> are generated by default only now.
>
> DK
>
> On 10/15/07, danielvlopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   Hello, i create a big project in flex using modules, RSLs and etc...
> > This project is real client, and he accept test flex in you website.
> > Everything works fine (ignoring the 500kb framework file it is
> > necessary for users to access the site.)
> >
> > Now i thinking use flex in small projects like simple websites, in old
> > versions of flex, like 3beta 1 or flex 2 swf files are smaller, like
> > 200kb or 130kb (not really small but acceptable). But now, with beta 2
> > simple files came to 400kb.
> >
> > I becoming thinking i waste my time learning flex and waste the money
> > of my client testing flex in your app, I am already thinking about
> > redo the whole project in ruby on rails and ajax.
> >
> > If adobe and flex team does not begin to worry about the size of swfs
> > believe deeply that the flex will not last for a long time  And
> > certainly I will have wasted time and money.
> >
> > :(
> >
> > This is the code i use for test size of swf:
> >
> > 
> > http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml";
> > layout="absolute">
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Douglas Knudsen
> http://www.cubicleman.com
> this is my signature, like it?
>


-- 
Brendan Meutzner
http://www.meutzner.com/blog/


Re: [flexcoders] Flex is becoming unviable

2007-10-15 Thread Douglas Knudsen
ugh take a look at the release notes for FB3 Beta 2 and be sure you are
looking at the released version of your SWFs, not the debug versions that
are generated by default only now.

DK

On 10/15/07, danielvlopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Hello, i create a big project in flex using modules, RSLs and etc...
> This project is real client, and he accept test flex in you website.
> Everything works fine (ignoring the 500kb framework file it is
> necessary for users to access the site.)
>
> Now i thinking use flex in small projects like simple websites, in old
> versions of flex, like 3beta 1 or flex 2 swf files are smaller, like
> 200kb or 130kb (not really small but acceptable). But now, with beta 2
> simple files came to 400kb.
>
> I becoming thinking i waste my time learning flex and waste the money
> of my client testing flex in your app, I am already thinking about
> redo the whole project in ruby on rails and ajax.
>
> If adobe and flex team does not begin to worry about the size of swfs
> believe deeply that the flex will not last for a long time  And
> certainly I will have wasted time and money.
>
> :(
>
> This is the code i use for test size of swf:
>
> 
> http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml";
> layout="absolute">
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>  
>



-- 
Douglas Knudsen
http://www.cubicleman.com
this is my signature, like it?


[flexcoders] Flex is becoming unviable

2007-10-15 Thread danielvlopes
Hello, i create a big project in flex using modules, RSLs and etc...
This project is real client, and he accept test flex in you website.
Everything works fine (ignoring the 500kb framework file it is
necessary for users to access the site.)

Now i thinking use flex in small projects like simple websites, in old
versions of flex, like 3beta 1 or flex 2 swf files are smaller, like
200kb or 130kb (not really small but acceptable). But now, with beta 2
simple files came to 400kb.

I becoming thinking i waste my time learning flex and waste the money
of my client testing flex in your app, I am already thinking about
redo the whole project in ruby on rails and ajax.

If adobe and flex team does not begin to worry about the size of swfs
believe deeply that the flex will not last for a long time  And
certainly I will have wasted time and money.

:(

This is the code i use for test size of swf:


http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml";
layout="absolute">