Re: [flexcoders] MXML schema
On Saturday 31 May 2008, Mark Volkmann wrote: > Is there an official XML Schema for MXML? Not for Flex 3. > If so, where can I get it? The xsd4mxml project can make you one though. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[flexcoders] MXML schema
Is there an official XML Schema for MXML? If so, where can I get it?
Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema
On Tuesday 03 Apr 2007, neilac wrote: > However, according to XMLSpy, this schema is not well-formed and > therefore not valid. Can you please point me to where Adobe has posted > the correct schema? Hi, I maintain that schema :-) What does XMLSpy complain about ? I and others use the schema daily with Eclipse's WebTools project without any issues at all, but if there is something up with it that I can fix I'll look at it. -- Tom Chiverton Helping to collaboratively generate sticky platforms on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [flexcoders] MXML Schema
We no longer provide a schema for MXML. The language was designed to be easily written by a human and isn't well-suited to being described in a schema -- it's too loosy-goosy in terms of what can nest inside what, whether you write a property as an attribute or child tag, etc.The schema we offered for Flex 1.5 was so large it didn't perform well and it was pretty much unmaintainable and inextensible so with Flex 2.0 we stopped providing one. - Gordon From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of neilac Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:38 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] MXML Schema I am new to Flex and looking for the XML Schema document that defines the structure of an MXML document. I have found a schema at the following URL: http://falkensweb.com/mxml2.xsd <http://falkensweb.com/mxml2.xsd> However, according to XMLSpy, this schema is not well-formed and therefore not valid. Can you please point me to where Adobe has posted the correct schema? Thanks very much.
[flexcoders] MXML Schema
I am new to Flex and looking for the XML Schema document that defines the structure of an MXML document. I have found a schema at the following URL: http://falkensweb.com/mxml2.xsd However, according to XMLSpy, this schema is not well-formed and therefore not valid. Can you please point me to where Adobe has posted the correct schema? Thanks very much.
[flexcoders] MXML schema
I've read in several articles, eg... * http://www.adobe.com/ap/products/flex/productinfo/tooling/ * http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/articles/paradigm.html ...that there is a schema for mxml that can be used in various IDEs. Where can I find this schema? I have downloaded the Flex 2 SDK but it's not to be found anywhere. Many thanks, Gordon
RE: [flexcoders] MXML Schema
There are quite a few constructs that turned out to be extremely expensive to put in the schema. In theory, none of them would prevent validation of your document, they would only be unavailable for hinting. As it is, the schema is horribly complex but represents a reasonable compromise in correctness vs. usefulness. If you bump into certain limitations, you are welcome to add them, but be aware that small changes to the schema can make it unusable for run-time hinting in many tools. -Roger Roger Gonzalez mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reto M. Kiefer > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 3:18 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema > > Hi Blake, > > > As I learned earlier (see ColumnChart thread), the lower-case tags > > aren't objects but shortcuts for defining properties of the > parent tag. > > So, as in that ColumnChart thread, this code: > > Thnaks for your replay, I didn't studied the thread "ColumnChart" > intensivly because right now I'm far away from developing a charting > application... > > But nevertheless regardless if the lowercase-tags are objects or > shourtcuts for the parent's attributes they should be provided within > the xml schema definition, but they aren't. I studied the schema > carefully, they don't appear neither as attributes to their > parent tags > nor as alowed children tags. > > Cheers > > Reto > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema
On 5/19/05, Reto M. Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Macromedia ships a file called mxml.xsd with Flex. [...] > But some featrues are missing, so I have a hunch that the Scheme is not > complete. [...] I think you're right. See Roger's email on this: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders@yahoogroups.com/msg01744.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema
Hi Blake, > As I learned earlier (see ColumnChart thread), the lower-case tags > aren't objects but shortcuts for defining properties of the parent tag. > So, as in that ColumnChart thread, this code: Thnaks for your replay, I didn't studied the thread "ColumnChart" intensivly because right now I'm far away from developing a charting application... But nevertheless regardless if the lowercase-tags are objects or shourtcuts for the parent's attributes they should be provided within the xml schema definition, but they aren't. I studied the schema carefully, they don't appear neither as attributes to their parent tags nor as alowed children tags. Cheers Reto Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [flexcoders] MXML Schema
> But some featrues are missing, so I have a hunch that the Scheme is > not complete. For example while beeing in a within a > no hinting for "result" or "concurenncy" is provided. > Checking the Schema with a Schema-Browser results in that attributes > or sub-tags for are not provided. As I learned earlier (see ColumnChart thread), the lower-case tags aren't objects but shortcuts for defining properties of the parent tag. So, as in that ColumnChart thread, this code: ... Is the same as: ... Cheers, Blake Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[flexcoders] MXML Schema
Dear all, not a direct question but I'd like to discuss this issue with you. I'm using Eclipse for Developing Flex with the oXygen-Plugin (XML), ASDT (ActionScript Plugin) and Sysdeo (Tomcat monitoring & SOAP-Debugging!). It works like a charm and i prefer it instead of using Flexbuilder. Moreover I can code directly my logic tier (Java and PHP) without switching the IDE. Macromedia ships a file called mxml.xsd with Flex. It is declared to be a generated XML-Schema for XMLM by the compiler. The oXygen-Plugin provides functionalities in order to provide code-hinting while developing MXML (like Flexbuilder). But some featrues are missing, so I have a hunch that the Scheme is not complete. For example while beeing in a within a no hinting for "result" or "concurenncy" is provided. Checking the Schema with a Schema-Browser results in that attributes or sub-tags for are not provided. I'd like to know from you if you have exerienced other missing elements in the Schema. Or do you know a source for obtaining a complete Schema? Thanks in andvance CU Reto Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [flexcoders] MXML Schema validation
We test it for validation against a few small unit tests, but few people use it for more than smart code highlighting. You might just want to hack up your local copy, as you noticed, its a nasty hairy beast. (Producing a schema at all was quite a chore. It made me want to take up carpentry or car repair or even cleaning up after circus elephants.) -Roger Roger Gonzalez mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Spike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 4:25 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema validation > > > Looks to me like the Schema is wrong. It doesn't allow for any > attributes of and permits only the > tag as a > child. > > Anyone know if I can get my hands on on that's correct? > > Spike > > Spike wrote: > > Does anyone know whether the MXML Schema that comes with > Flex 1.5 really > > can be used for validation? > > > > Xerces is telling me that the tag isn't > allowed to have a > > name attribute. The Flex documentation clearly states the > opposite is > > true and the tag would be pretty useless without it, so what is it > > that's going wrong? > > > > Xerces or the Schema? > > > > I've had a quick look at the schema myself, but my eyes > started to glaze > > over by the time I got to about line 5000. > > > > Spike > > > > -- > > > Stephen Milligan > Code poet for hire > http://www.spike.org.uk > > Do you cfeclipse? http://cfeclipse.tigris.org > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema validation
Looks to me like the Schema is wrong. It doesn't allow for any attributes of and permits only the tag as a child. Anyone know if I can get my hands on on that's correct? Spike Spike wrote: Does anyone know whether the MXML Schema that comes with Flex 1.5 really can be used for validation? Xerces is telling me that the tag isn't allowed to have a name attribute. The Flex documentation clearly states the opposite is true and the tag would be pretty useless without it, so what is it that's going wrong? Xerces or the Schema? I've had a quick look at the schema myself, but my eyes started to glaze over by the time I got to about line 5000. Spike -- Stephen Milligan Code poet for hire http://www.spike.org.uk Do you cfeclipse? http://cfeclipse.tigris.org