RE: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Builder 3 beta 3 licence
If you are in a position where you absolutely need the watermark to be removed during this beta you can mail me off-list. Matt From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of frank_sommers Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 6:36 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Builder 3 beta 3 licence Well, is there an official word on this from Adobe? We have a Flex Charting license, and I'd love to download FlexBuilder Beta 3, but we use the charting components so I can't have the watermarks show on them. It'd be great if someone from Adobe could clarify this: Can we use the existing charting license in FlexBuilder 3 beta 3 without the watermarks showing up? Thanks, -- Frank --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Josh McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Put your flex 2 serials into the .properties file in sdk/frameworks and > target flex2 sdk? Works for me but I'm still on beta2, so ymmv. > > -Josh > >
Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Builder 3 beta 3 licence
On Thursday 13 Dec 2007, Josh McDonald wrote: > Put your flex 2 serials into the .properties file in sdk/frameworks and > target flex2 sdk? That's the problem, maybe you are using stuff from the Flex 3 only Data Visualisation (i.e. what Flex 2's charting is now called). -- Tom Chiverton Helping to vitalistically deploy back-end meta-services on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[flexcoders] Re: Flex Builder 3 beta 3 licence
Well, is there an official word on this from Adobe? We have a Flex Charting license, and I'd love to download FlexBuilder Beta 3, but we use the charting components so I can't have the watermarks show on them. It'd be great if someone from Adobe could clarify this: Can we use the existing charting license in FlexBuilder 3 beta 3 without the watermarks showing up? Thanks, -- Frank --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Josh McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Put your flex 2 serials into the .properties file in sdk/frameworks and > target flex2 sdk? Works for me but I'm still on beta2, so ymmv. > > -Josh > >
Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Builder 3 beta 3 licence
Put your flex 2 serials into the .properties file in sdk/frameworks and target flex2 sdk? Works for me but I'm still on beta2, so ymmv. -Josh On Dec 14, 2007 6:37 AM, windsail05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, I have tried the charting serial too without any luck. > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com , "Corey > Smaller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > i found the watermark goes away when you use your Flex 2 serial for > > chrating (the charting serial is diff) it worked for me > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com , > "windsail05" asawilliams@ wrote: > > > > > > Yes, the question of "why the serials will not work" was answered, > but > > > there is still the issue of the watermark on the charts. > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com , > "Patrick Driggett" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I think this was just answered like 3 e-mails ago in the last half > > > hour or so. > > > > > > > > This is probably the last Beta and with release looming they are > > > clamping down. > > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 2007 2:27 PM, windsail05 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In FB3 beta 2 you are able to enter your serial numbers from > > FB2, but > > > > > in beta 3 you are not(says invalid number) and you get the > funky > > > > > watermark in the background. Does anyone know why or how? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- "This is crazy! Why are we talking about going to bed with Wilma Flintstone... She'll never leave Fred and we know it. " :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[flexcoders] Re: Flex Builder 3 beta 3 licence
Unfortunately, I have tried the charting serial too without any luck. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Corey Smaller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i found the watermark goes away when you use your Flex 2 serial for > chrating (the charting serial is diff) it worked for me > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "windsail05" asawilliams@ wrote: > > > > Yes, the question of "why the serials will not work" was answered, but > > there is still the issue of the watermark on the charts. > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Driggett" > > wrote: > > > > > > I think this was just answered like 3 e-mails ago in the last half > > hour or so. > > > > > > This is probably the last Beta and with release looming they are > > clamping down. > > > > > > On Dec 13, 2007 2:27 PM, windsail05 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In FB3 beta 2 you are able to enter your serial numbers from > FB2, but > > > > in beta 3 you are not(says invalid number) and you get the funky > > > > watermark in the background. Does anyone know why or how? > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
[flexcoders] Re: Flex Builder 3 beta 3 licence
i found the watermark goes away when you use your Flex 2 serial for chrating (the charting serial is diff) it worked for me --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "windsail05" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, the question of "why the serials will not work" was answered, but > there is still the issue of the watermark on the charts. > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Driggett" > wrote: > > > > I think this was just answered like 3 e-mails ago in the last half > hour or so. > > > > This is probably the last Beta and with release looming they are > clamping down. > > > > On Dec 13, 2007 2:27 PM, windsail05 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In FB3 beta 2 you are able to enter your serial numbers from FB2, but > > > in beta 3 you are not(says invalid number) and you get the funky > > > watermark in the background. Does anyone know why or how? > > > > > > > > >
[flexcoders] Re: Flex Builder 3 beta 3 licence
Yes, the question of "why the serials will not work" was answered, but there is still the issue of the watermark on the charts. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Driggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this was just answered like 3 e-mails ago in the last half hour or so. > > This is probably the last Beta and with release looming they are clamping down. > > On Dec 13, 2007 2:27 PM, windsail05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In FB3 beta 2 you are able to enter your serial numbers from FB2, but > > in beta 3 you are not(says invalid number) and you get the funky > > watermark in the background. Does anyone know why or how? > > > > >
