Re: Re[2]: [flexcoders] Web app built on the top of Flex 2 frawemork only requires Flash 9 player to be preinstalled, right?

2006-01-26 Thread JesterXL 





Negative, 6.0.65.0's System.Product install ability 
still needs admin rights.
 
The experience, however, for the average user 
is a lot more seemless, brainless, and painless.
 
- Original Message - 
From: Clint Modien 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [flexcoders] Web app built on the top of Flex 2 
frawemork only requires Flash 9 player to be preinstalled, right?
Jesse..  does that mean that if a user has flash player 6 or 
later that you "don't" need admin rights to install a newer version of the flash 
player?
On 1/26/06, JesterXL 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
There 
  is no such thing as Flash Player 9.As far as Flash Player 8.5, yeah, I 
  see your point.  Still, I think adoptionrates for it will be 
  extremely higher than past ones based on the 2 mainupdating features, 1 of 
  which developers can employ themselves. - Original Message 
  -From: "Andriy Panas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "JesterXL" 
  <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
  >Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:13 PMSubject: Re[2]: 
  [flexcoders] Web app built on the top of Flex 2 frawemorkonly requires 
  Flash 9 player to be preinstalled, right?Hello 
  JesterXL,Thursday, January 26, 2006, 4:29:40 PM, you 
  wrote:> 2 things:> - Flash 8.5, not 9> - a lot of us 
  deploy on intranets, not on the internet, so having Flash> Player 8.5 
  manually installed and/or updated isn't a problem.   For 
  me, Flash 8.5 player (targeted for developers only) or forthcomingpublic 
  release of Flash 9 player are equal in one feature =they are not yet 
  downloaded by web users to their local machines.  We develop 
  Internet web-application, not intranet, thus Flex 1.5only for 2006 and 
  maybe the whole 2007 (depends on Flash 9 playerpenetration rate in 
  2007).With flash regards,Andriy Panas 
  --Flexcoders Mailing ListFAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txtSearch 
  Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! 
  Groups Links--Flexcoders Mailing 
  ListFAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txtSearch 
  Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! 
  Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go 
  to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/<*> 
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
  





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Web site design development
  
  
Computer software development
  
  
Software design and development
  
  


Macromedia flex
  
  
Software development best practice
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Re: Re[2]: [flexcoders] Web app built on the top of Flex 2 frawemork only requires Flash 9 player to be preinstalled, right?

2006-01-26 Thread Clint Modien 



Jesse..  does that mean that if a user has flash player 6 or later that you "don't" need admin rights to install a newer version of the flash player?On 1/26/06, 
JesterXL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is no such thing as Flash Player 9.As far as Flash Player 8.5, yeah, I see your point.  Still, I think adoptionrates for it will be extremely higher than past ones based on the 2 mainupdating features, 1 of which developers can employ themselves.
- Original Message -From: "Andriy Panas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "JesterXL" Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:13 PMSubject: Re[2]: [flexcoders] Web app built on the top of Flex 2 frawemorkonly requires Flash 9 player to be preinstalled, right?Hello JesterXL,
Thursday, January 26, 2006, 4:29:40 PM, you wrote:> 2 things:> - Flash 8.5, not 9> - a lot of us deploy on intranets, not on the internet, so having Flash> Player 8.5 manually installed and/or updated isn't a problem.
  For me, Flash 8.5 player (targeted for developers only) or forthcomingpublic release of Flash 9 player are equal in one feature =they are not yet downloaded by web users to their local machines.
  We develop Internet web-application, not intranet, thus Flex 1.5only for 2006 and maybe the whole 2007 (depends on Flash 9 playerpenetration rate in 2007).With flash regards,Andriy Panas
--Flexcoders Mailing ListFAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txtSearch Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups Links--Flexcoders Mailing ListFAQ: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txtSearch Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/







--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Re: Re[2]: [flexcoders] Web app built on the top of Flex 2 frawemork only requires Flash 9 player to be preinstalled, right?

2006-01-26 Thread hank williams 
Andy,

I think you misunderstand. There is no flash 9 announced or anywhere
on the publicly known horizon. 8.5 will be released to the public this
spring. There IS NO FLASH 9. Presumably there will be a flash 9 at
some point but speculating about it when there is an imminent release
of a version that will precede some far off potential flash 9 doesnt
make much sense.

Regarding 8.5 penetration, the point is that by the end of 2006,
because of the way the updaters work you could very well have a
majority of active users on 8.5 by the end of this year. That is of
course speculation, but the purpose of the new updating technology is
to achieve that kind of quick installed base updating. Whether it will
work as advertised is of course a different question, but that is the
intent.

Regards,
Hank



On 1/26/06, Andriy Panas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello JesterXL,
>
> Thursday, January 26, 2006, 4:29:40 PM, you wrote:
>
> > 2 things:
> > - Flash 8.5, not 9
> > - a lot of us deploy on intranets, not on the internet, so having Flash
> > Player 8.5 manually installed and/or updated isn't a problem.
>
>
>   For me, Flash 8.5 player (targeted for developers only) or forthcoming
> public release of Flash 9 player are equal in one feature =
> they are not yet downloaded by web users to their local machines.
>
>   We develop Internet web-application, not intranet, thus Flex 1.5
> only for 2006 and maybe the whole 2007 (depends on Flash 9 player
> penetration rate in 2007).
>
>
>
>
> With flash regards,
> Andriy Panas
>
>
>
> --
> Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: Re[2]: [flexcoders] Web app built on the top of Flex 2 frawemork only requires Flash 9 player to be preinstalled, right?

2006-01-26 Thread JesterXL 
There is no such thing as Flash Player 9.

As far as Flash Player 8.5, yeah, I see your point.  Still, I think adoption 
rates for it will be extremely higher than past ones based on the 2 main 
updating features, 1 of which developers can employ themselves.

- Original Message - 
From: "Andriy Panas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JesterXL" 
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:13 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [flexcoders] Web app built on the top of Flex 2 frawemork 
only requires Flash 9 player to be preinstalled, right?


Hello JesterXL,

Thursday, January 26, 2006, 4:29:40 PM, you wrote:

> 2 things:
> - Flash 8.5, not 9
> - a lot of us deploy on intranets, not on the internet, so having Flash
> Player 8.5 manually installed and/or updated isn't a problem.


  For me, Flash 8.5 player (targeted for developers only) or forthcoming
public release of Flash 9 player are equal in one feature =
they are not yet downloaded by web users to their local machines.

  We develop Internet web-application, not intranet, thus Flex 1.5
only for 2006 and maybe the whole 2007 (depends on Flash 9 player
penetration rate in 2007).




With flash regards,
Andriy Panas



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links








--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/