Re: [Flexradio] TSVN cache service?

2006-07-18 Thread Jim Lux
At 04:12 PM 7/17/2006, Sami Aintila wrote:
On 7/18/06, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those of you Tortoiseing.. how do you prevent tsvncache from running?

You probably need to disable the entire Tortoise shell extension. You
can use ShellExView to do this without having to uninstall Tortoise.
Download from here:
http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/shexview.html

In theory, you shouldn't need to shut down the whole extension. the 
cacheing service is apparently a separate part.

James Lux, P.E.
Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group
Flight Communications Systems Section
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213
4800 Oak Grove Drive
Pasadena CA 91109
tel: (818)354-2075
fax: (818)393-6875



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] TSVN cache service?

2006-07-18 Thread Eric Wachsmann
I did some googling and it appears that this is a common issue.  They have
apparently added the ability to specify which folders this process will
crawl to reduce the overhead.  This is in the 1.4.x version nightly builds
though.  I'm not sure, but I don't think a 1.3.x server will work with 1.4.x
clients.  I could be wrong though.

You can try disabling recursive icons and/or using the include/exclude paths
in the TortoiseSVN Settings (right click a file/folder - TortoiseSVN -
Settings).  See the attached screenshot.

Registry key to show an icon when tsvncache is running
http://www.nabble.com/Disable-TSVNCache.exe-to-minimize-disk-IO--t920019.htm
l



Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 radio.biz] On Behalf Of Jim Lux
 Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 8:57 AM
 To: Sami Aintila
 Cc: flexRadio
 Subject: Re: [Flexradio] TSVN cache service?
 
 At 04:12 PM 7/17/2006, Sami Aintila wrote:
 On 7/18/06, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Those of you Tortoiseing.. how do you prevent tsvncache from running?
 
 You probably need to disable the entire Tortoise shell extension. You
 can use ShellExView to do this without having to uninstall Tortoise.
 Download from here:
 http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/shexview.html
 
 In theory, you shouldn't need to shut down the whole extension. the
 cacheing service is apparently a separate part.
 
 James Lux, P.E.
 Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group
 Flight Communications Systems Section
 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213
 4800 Oak Grove Drive
 Pasadena CA 91109
 tel: (818)354-2075
 fax: (818)393-6875
 
 
 
 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
 Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
 FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Image1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 39984 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060718/9c753972/attachment.png
 
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] SDR1000 Damaged. Make sure you turn it OFF when you walk away. Update

2006-07-18 Thread Radio Station W5AMI
On 7/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 At 7:00 AM I jumped out of bed to the crack of a nearby
 lightening strike.  Yep, you guessed it, the SDR1000 was once
 again knock out.  Although, it was nice to have it back for a
 while.

I have learned by experience to never leave on any of my solid state
gear when I'm away from them for an extended period of time.  My
hollow state equipment is much more resistant, but I still turn them
off overnight, even if I hear there will be no storms pass through the
area.

I live on a high ridge and lightning seems to be attracted by my QTH.
I've had a hot water tank, dishwasher, a TV, satellite rcvr, and solid
state audio gear die from this, just by being left ON.

The SS stuff that was turned off did not get affected.

My SDR1K is stable enough for anything I'll ever do to just turn on
when I'm ready to operate, and in 10 minutes or so, it's like a rock
for my purposes.

I agree 100% !  Turn off your SDR1k or any other SS device when you
are not around.

Brian .. w5ami

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] Delta 44 Driver Version ???

2006-07-18 Thread k6kdk
I have finally heard back from M-Audio tech support via email

They state that, indeed, the revision number issue is a typo on their end.

Additionally I asked about any available workaround to the fact that the
M-Audio driver installer overwrites previous configuration files. If you
install a new driver then YOU MUST go back into the control panel and
re-configure all your previous settings from the factory defaults as
installed by the M-Audio driver installation routine.  They state there is
no workaround.

-Dan K6KDK


- Original Message -
From: Dudley Hurry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Delta 44 Driver Version ???


 Dan,

 I have not updated mine yet and it shows 5.10.00.0051.   So the first
 number must have been a typo..

 73,
 Dudley
 WA5QPZ


 At 06:23 PM 7/16/2006 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Maybe someone can save me the trouble of a phone call to M-Audio Tech
 Support.  On June 22, 2006 M-Audio issued a Driver update for XP .
According
 to the download site it is revision : 5.10.00.5052, but when I loaded it
the
 revision number in the About Panel came up as: 5.10.00.0052.
 
 Anyone know what's up with this ??
 
 -Dan K6KDK
 
 
 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
 Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
 FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com





___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] Dual Core Optimization

2006-07-18 Thread lloen
 Larry, please forgive me, but I strongly disagree with the throw
 more hardware at the problem to fix it. There is a three letter
 mega-company who has made 50+ successful years by following that
 schematic :-) and correspondingly cost it's customers mega-bucks!.


I can build, pretty much from scratch, a perfectly fast, fine, usable SDR
computer system for 200 dollars, probably including case but not including
the D44 card.  Toss in another 90 bucks, max, for a copy of Windows and
you're there.

Last time I did this was:

CPU 80
Motherboard 50
Memory  50

Salvage keyboard, mouse, case, hardfile, graphics card (surely, everyone
can do this much), and I was done for a Linux box.  Everyone else add
Windows and stir.  Case and power supply is 50 or less, by the way.  An
adequate hardfile, another 50.  But, odds are, you won't need some of
this, so about 200 is right.

We've been on ATX so long, it's exceedingly unlikely that you'd have to
get a new case and power supply, not with an ordinary desktop at least,
nor would you have to get a hardfile (I presume everyone reading these
words has one).

It wouldn't be a Pentium IV at 2.4 GHz, or the absolute spiffiest
available box, but it would be AMD at the same basic performance level
that I use today for my SDR.  The chips and boards to do this at these
kinds of prices have been around for a while, now.  I did this last maybe
two or four years ago, but surely, prices haven't gone up in the interim,
have they?

Many of us have been more than willing to throw that much money at sound
cards (some of us, more than once).

I'm Mr. Solder Phobe and I can do this much.  How many on this list can't
do this?


 **You DO NOT need to REMEMBER what to turn ON or OFF** but rather
 use the method suggested by Cecil KD5NWA called Profiles.

You missed the part of my critique when I actually wanted to run a full,
integrated, internet-connected system with my SDR, not some sort of
crippled SDR-only thing.

That renders the Profile argument irrelevant.  I agree the Profile thing
would be a nice way to go if you want to run that way, but I don't.

Some of us, probably many/most of us, want to run everything.  That's what
I want to do for sure.

So, for my money, you upgrade or you add.  Because, I, at least, want it all.

This whole thing reminds me of dual booting.  Sure, people actually do it.
 But, most don't because they want all the function all the time.



Larry WO0Z


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] Dual Core Optimization

2006-07-18 Thread Robert McGwier
I noticed that Larry did not tell you which big blueish three letter 
company he works for.

;-).

Bob



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Larry, please forgive me, but I strongly disagree with the throw
 more hardware at the problem to fix it. There is a three letter
 mega-company who has made 50+ successful years by following that
 schematic :-) and correspondingly cost it's customers mega-bucks!.

 

   


-- 
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be
made in a very narrow field.  Niels Bohr


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] Dual Core Optimization

2006-07-18 Thread Alan NV8A
On 07/18/06 05:19 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Larry, please forgive me, but I strongly disagree with the throw
 more hardware at the problem to fix it. There is a three letter
 mega-company who has made 50+ successful years by following that
 schematic :-) and correspondingly cost it's customers mega-bucks!.

 
 I can build, pretty much from scratch, a perfectly fast, fine, usable SDR
 computer system for 200 dollars, probably including case but not including
 the D44 card.  Toss in another 90 bucks, max, for a copy of Windows and
 you're there.
 
 Last time I did this was:
 
 CPU 80
 Motherboard 50
 Memory  50
 
 Salvage keyboard, mouse, case, hardfile, graphics card (surely, everyone
 can do this much), and I was done for a Linux box.  Everyone else add
 Windows and stir.  Case and power supply is 50 or less, by the way.  An
 adequate hardfile, another 50.  But, odds are, you won't need some of
 this, so about 200 is right.
 
 We've been on ATX so long, it's exceedingly unlikely that you'd have to
 get a new case and power supply, not with an ordinary desktop at least,
 nor would you have to get a hardfile (I presume everyone reading these
 words has one).
 
 It wouldn't be a Pentium IV at 2.4 GHz, or the absolute spiffiest
 available box, but it would be AMD at the same basic performance level
 that I use today for my SDR.  The chips and boards to do this at these
 kinds of prices have been around for a while, now.  I did this last maybe
 two or four years ago, but surely, prices haven't gone up in the interim,
 have they?

So what do you make of the second QST review, where the author expressed 
regrets that they had settled for the Celeron (2.4GHz??) rather than 
going for the P4 (2.8GHz to 3.2GHz??)? He found the performance with 
only a 2.xGHz Celeron disappointing.

Alan NV8A

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] Dual Core Optimization

2006-07-18 Thread lloen

[snip]
 So what do you make of the second QST review, where the author expressed
 regrets that they had settled for the Celeron (2.4GHz??) rather than
 going for the P4 (2.8GHz to 3.2GHz??)? He found the performance with
 only a 2.xGHz Celeron disappointing.

 Alan NV8A


MHz isn't everything, especially these days.

I had hypothesized before (based on my sample size of two) that Celeron's
crippled cache hurt more than the MHz issues.

I still suspect that to be true, until my betters, correct me (or maybe
recorrect me -- getting to be a while since I mentioned this).  My 1.3 GHz
lappy is a Celeron and, at double the recommended MHz it ought, by all
precedent, to be plenty fast enough.  It mostly is, but there are the odd
glitches that my 2.4 GHz P IV never sees.

But, on modern CPUs, cache can matter and Intel has used it (or, the lack
of it) to differentiate models.

It would not surprise me to find our code is sensitive to cache -- not
hard to do with the state of today's art -- my unscientific observations
sure seem to suggest it.  It could be my USB Creative Sound Card too,
somehow, but I'd bet first on the cache unless/until I or someone else
measures it and correct

In any case, my rather ordinary, aging (at least 2 year old) P IV 2.4 GHZ
is totally, totally solid with the D44 and I'd expect the corresponding
AMD to be solid also.


Larry  WO0Z


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


[Flexradio] Delta 44 mineature Interface Kits again available.

2006-07-18 Thread Eric Ellison
Hi Folks! 

 

Tony and I have been barraged with questions about an earlier offering we
made for a small interface kit which interfaces the Delta-44 sound card to
the SDR-1000 and provides filtering and single point of ground as well as
bypass caps. In any event it is SMALL compared to the breakout box which
comes with the D-44 soundcard, and really handy if you are taking the
SDR-1000 out of the shack for mobile or portable operation, as we did in
Belize during the CQWW phone dxpedition!

 

Tony has consented to run another round of these kits, and depending on
interest, they will be less expensive than the kits I shipped earlier this
year. The price (depending on interest) will probably be 15 to 20 dollars.

 

To see the first round files and information for this Tony - KB9YIG
original, check out:

 

http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=40

 
Delta 44 Interface Kit preliminary assembly instructions.

 

http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=42

 
Picture from Kurt - KC9FOL showing top side of D-44 interface with spkr
ground connected. Other details will use this pict in messages. Thanks Kurt!

 

http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=43

 
D-44 Interface kit mounted in simple plastic box

 

http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=38

 
Delta 44 Interface Kit Schematic V 1.1 for Kit assembly reference.

 

 

Tony will accept orders via his e-mail at:

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

Can ANYONE go wrong with a KB9YIG original. Look at your SoftRock(XX)! Frame
it, if ya don't use it! This is history in the making and the 'future of
radio!'

 

Eric2 - AA4SW - V31(S)oftware (R)adio!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060718/3e488603/attachment.html
 
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] FW: Forwarded a second time! D-44 round ? Important forthe Reflector!

2006-07-18 Thread Tim Ellison
A double reflection?

-Tim
---
Tim Ellison ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Integrated Technical Services ( http://www.itsco.com )

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Ellison
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:14 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] FW: Forwarded a second time! D-44 round ? Important
forthe Reflector!

Tim

Second time! (smile)! Redirecting back to to Flex Reflector! 

Eric2


-Original Message-
From: Eric Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:04 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: 'Tony Parks'
Subject: Forwarded a second time! D-44 round ? Important for the
Reflector!

Tim

I thought this important to re-direct back to the Reflector. If Tony
does
not respond directly, I will.

Eric2


-Original Message-
From: Eric Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:51 PM
To: 'Tim Ellison'
Cc: 'Tony Parks'
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Delta 44 miniature Interface Kits again
available.

Hi Tim!

Although I can't speak for Tony, YES! This would be a very valuable
modification to the kit, and very simple to accomplish. I am copying
Tony on
this message. We did find that various configuration's of grounding
worked
well and differently in different computer-D44 hardware configurations. 

Thanks for being diligent and keeping up. (*as always!*)

Eric2




-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:24 PM
To: Eric Ellison
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Delta 44 miniature Interface Kits again
available.

Eric,

I am stealing a reply you made to the reflector regarding the Interface
kit and grounding when some folks had to use multiple ground connections
to get it to work

Also I think in the configuration that you are using you must also
complete the mic ground as well as the speakers as some have reported.
If we do another board which allows options such as these, I'll
definitely go with Berg connectors and removable jumpers.

Will the new run of the board have the Berg connectors?  It would be a
great improvement for a little cost since I think there is a size that
will fit the board without modification.

Just wondering.  If you do, I'll get another one just for the jumper
option.

-Tim
---
Tim Ellison ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Integrated Technical Services ( http://www.itsco.com )


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Ellison
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:05 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Delta 44 mineature Interface Kits again available.

Hi Folks! 

 

Tony and I have been barraged with questions about an earlier offering
we
made for a small interface kit which interfaces the Delta-44 sound card
to
the SDR-1000 and provides filtering and single point of ground as well
as
bypass caps. In any event it is SMALL compared to the breakout box which
comes with the D-44 soundcard, and really handy if you are taking the
SDR-1000 out of the shack for mobile or portable operation, as we did in
Belize during the CQWW phone dxpedition!

 

Tony has consented to run another round of these kits, and depending on
interest, they will be less expensive than the kits I shipped earlier
this
year. The price (depending on interest) will probably be 15 to 20
dollars.

 

To see the first round files and information for this Tony - KB9YIG
original, check out:

 

http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=40

 
Delta 44 Interface Kit preliminary assembly instructions.

 

http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=42

 
Picture from Kurt - KC9FOL showing top side of D-44 interface with spkr
ground connected. Other details will use this pict in messages. Thanks
Kurt!

 

http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=43

 
D-44 Interface kit mounted in simple plastic box

 

http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=38

 
Delta 44 Interface Kit Schematic V 1.1 for Kit assembly reference.

 

 

Tony will accept orders via his e-mail at:

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

Can ANYONE go wrong with a KB9YIG original. Look at your SoftRock(XX)!
Frame
it, if ya don't use it! This is history in the making and the 'future of
radio!'

 

Eric2 - AA4SW - V31(S)oftware (R)adio!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060718/3e488603/attach
ment.html 
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] Simple Watchdog circuit for the SDR in case of power line failure

2006-07-18 Thread john_eckert


Sweet and simple.  I was thinking of putting it on the 110VAC side and 
connecting other things in the shack to it also.

Unfortunately, it still doesn't solve the root problem.  If the PC goes
out to lunch for any reason(op crash, component failer, virus,...) and 
the SDR is connected to it, the SDR will end up in an indeterminate 
state. 

What I think I'll do is use either the serial or a USB port to ping a 
relay driver from a small piece of code.  If the ping stops, the juice 
goes off.

Hm, maybe use one of the X2 control lines and put the code in 
PowerSDR.

73,
k2ox

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] Simple Watchdog circuit for the SDR in case of power line failure

2006-07-18 Thread Jim Lux
At 07:50 PM 7/18/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Sweet and simple.  I was thinking of putting it on the 110VAC side and 
connecting other things in the shack to it also.

Unfortunately, it still doesn't solve the root problem.  If the PC goes
out to lunch for any reason(op crash, component failer, virus,...) and
the SDR is connected to it, the SDR will end up in an indeterminate
state.

This is sort of a generic problem with dumb peripherals connected to the 
PC parallel port where some configurations are dangerous.  I've had the 
same trouble with a PWM motor controller.

The end solution is to actually put a dedicated supervisory processor in 
the peripheral that can manage stuff, and provide a safe interface. 
However, the parallel port is just so convenient.  Maybe the idea would be 
to have a ethernet/USB to parallel interface widget that has deterministic 
 safe behavior.

Jim 



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] Simple Watchdog circuit for the SDR in case of power line failure

2006-07-18 Thread lloen
 At 07:50 PM 7/18/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The end solution is to actually put a dedicated supervisory processor in
 the peripheral that can manage stuff, and provide a safe interface.
 However, the parallel port is just so convenient.  Maybe the idea would be
 to have a ethernet/USB to parallel interface widget that has deterministic
  safe behavior.

 Jim


This is one reason, amongst many, I have long wished for Flex to put out a
SDR 497 controller product.  497 is just a made up number, but it was in
a PDF I sent out once upon a time.  It would have USB in (not TCP/IP --
overkill and not really needed -- USB is easy to secure via the regular PC
and a PC is needed anyway) and then the output would be (for existing SDR
owners) short audio cables plus the parallel port.

The hypothetical new, 1497, dedicated version of this same product would
dispense with that and integrate it into a revised whole so we'd have
maybe a slightly larger box that was simpler (just USB in) and most of the
remaining plugs would be the same ones ever rig has had since Drake
separates.

This would also take care of problems like which sound card to use (it
would be built-in or else replaced with effective D/A A/D) and anomolies
like having the PA amplifier values stored in the PowerSDR console DB
instead of out in NVRAM outboard where it really belongs.

The USB side would simply be binary bytes in and out (e.g. floating point
numbers for the audio in both directions with an easy to deal with CAT
style interface so the controller could be as simple as possible.  I think
USB 2.0 has an ample data rate -- if not, then firewire.

The controller could manage the state, potentially resetting everything
via some sort of non maskable interrrupt as power was in the process of
being removed (there might be time for that).  A specified reset if you
don't hear from me would also be easy to add to the CAT style command
interface.



Larry  WO0Z


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] Simple Watchdog circuit for the SDR in case of power line failure

2006-07-18 Thread Bill Tracey
Some level of fail safe functionality is in the works for the Janus+Ozy 
soundcard and controller gizmo some of the  HPSDR.org folks are working 
on.  The board and the PC communicate via USB using a protocol that 
includes (among other things) a sync sequence every 512 bytes.  Current 
thought is to have the code in the FPGA set everything to a safe state if 
it does not see the sync sequence from the PC for a few frames.

USB 2.0 has more than enough data rate -- we're currently doing 192 khz 24 
bit sampling on the prototypes.

Cheers,

Bill (kd5tfd)



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


[Flexradio] SDR1000 Damaged. Make sure you turn it OFF when you walk away. Update

2006-07-18 Thread john_eckert

Just a bit on my philosophy about turning things off and on.  

Ages ago I worked for a company that made computer peripherals. An
account I was dealing with had hundreds of Smart CRT terminals.
Any time a storm was in the area we would cringe because we knew if
the power went out some(a lot) of those terminals wouldn't come
back on line.  We might have to zig zag across the state to repair 
them. The failures were always attributed lightning or surges on
the power or data lines.

The customer then instituted a program to power down and disconnect
the terminals when they felt there was a good chance that a thunder
storm was nearby. Guess what?  Same number of failures!

Customers also noticed that when the techs would come in to do 
scheduled preventive maintenance there was good chance they were
going to 'break' the terminal. Often the only action was to power 
it down, lift the top, do a visual inspection, and power it back up.

How many times have you heard It was working fine when I turned it
off?  Have you ever noticed that light bulbs very rarely burn out
after they've been on a while?  But, you walk into a dark room, flip
the switch on and all you get is a brief flash. (Kinda sounds like Andy 
Rooney. Huh).

I always felt the main culprit was repeated expansion/contraction due
to the thermal change when powering up/down the device. 

A few years ago while working in a wafer fab I asked the QC guy, whose
job was to determine failure modes of returned devices, what were the
biggest reasons for failures.  Number one, overheating.  Due either to
poor heat sinking, poor ventilation or excess current.  Number two,
stresses. Due to manufacturing processes or thermal cycling.

So that's why I leave the things that I want least to fail- turned on.
That would be my HF rig and my work computer.

My philosophy about lightening protection:  Yous pays yous money and 
yous take yous chances.  

On the air since 1971 this is my first damage from lightening.  
$1.50 for the part from Digikey.  If it happens again I reserve the 
right to change my philosophy. :) 

Mileage Does Vary,
k2ox

 

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


Re: [Flexradio] Simple Watchdog circuit for the SDR in case of power line failure

2006-07-18 Thread john_eckert
To be fair. I'm sure when Gerald was setting at his kitchen table designing his 
little 'homebrew radio' for himself if he had the faintest idea we would all 
want/own one he would have done some things differently.  

This is a great opportunity for someone to do a little homebrewing and/or 
marketing of a useful SDR accessory. 

Eric E, can you hear me now? :)

73,
John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:31 PM
To: Jim Lux
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Simple Watchdog circuit for the SDR in case of power 
line failure

 At 07:50 PM 7/18/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The end solution is to actually put a dedicated supervisory processor in
 the peripheral that can manage stuff, and provide a safe interface.
 However, the parallel port is just so convenient.  Maybe the idea would be
 to have a ethernet/USB to parallel interface widget that has deterministic
  safe behavior.

 Jim


This is one reason, amongst many, I have long wished for Flex to put out a
SDR 497 controller product.  497 is just a made up number, but it was in
a PDF I sent out once upon a time.  It would have USB in (not TCP/IP --
overkill and not really needed -- USB is easy to secure via the regular PC
and a PC is needed anyway) and then the output would be (for existing SDR
owners) short audio cables plus the parallel port.

The hypothetical new, 1497, dedicated version of this same product would
dispense with that and integrate it into a revised whole so we'd have
maybe a slightly larger box that was simpler (just USB in) and most of the
remaining plugs would be the same ones ever rig has had since Drake
separates.

This would also take care of problems like which sound card to use (it
would be built-in or else replaced with effective D/A A/D) and anomolies
like having the PA amplifier values stored in the PowerSDR console DB
instead of out in NVRAM outboard where it really belongs.

The USB side would simply be binary bytes in and out (e.g. floating point
numbers for the audio in both directions with an easy to deal with CAT
style interface so the controller could be as simple as possible.  I think
USB 2.0 has an ample data rate -- if not, then firewire.

The controller could manage the state, potentially resetting everything
via some sort of non maskable interrrupt as power was in the process of
being removed (there might be time for that).  A specified reset if you
don't hear from me would also be easy to add to the CAT style command
interface.



Larry  WO0Z


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com