Re: [Flexradio] test message
I have no idea what this is all about ... is there supposed to be a new release? ... Don -Original Message- From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Graham Haddock Sent: July 21, 2017 12:50 PM To: Tim Ellison Cc: Flex Radio Subject: Re: [Flexradio] test message Test passed. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: > > -- > Tim Ellison > > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > To opt out of the Reflector: > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] test message
Test passed. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: > > -- > Tim Ellison > > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > To opt out of the Reflector: > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
[Flexradio] test message
-- Tim Ellison ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
[Flexradio] Test
Test Sent from my iPad ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] Test
This thread has drawn more posts than any in a long time. The same topic came up a while back and eventually there was a response from Flex saying that things weren't gonna go back to the old way. For me, the new scheme seems to have little to offer, so I'll just hang out here and read the few posts that trickle in. Tony KT0NY On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Randy Hall wrote: > I have found the same for me Tom, at lease this way I am not enticed to > move > up to a 6000 as I seem to be when reading the old way. > > Randy > N4FNB > > -Original Message- > From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Tom > k2bew > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 2:39 PM > To: Tom k2bew > Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz > Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test > > Yea, I meant the "email list" not "forum". Tom > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tom k2bew wrote: > > > Spot on Peter, the forum "was" so much better. I followed topics I > > would not have otherwise and learned a lot because of it. I just don't > > have the time and or desire to filter through topics on the forum, It > > is just not he same anymore. > > I remember the good old days too... with sadness. > > 73, Tom k2BEw > > > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Peter G. Viscarola > > wrote: > > > >> Yup... the "community" web site is now the focus of almost everyone's > >> attention. > >> > >> Mark me down as "not a big fan" of the new site. I use it because > >> there's really no alternative. > >> > >> The discussions HERE on this list over the years were variously > >> engaging, stimulating, frustrating, informative, histrionic, rude, > >> funny, and interesting. I learned a lot here. > >> > >> The general organization of the Community site just somehow doesn't > >> seem as conducive to free-flowing back and forth discussions. It's > >> "post a question/problem/idea" (you must choose a category) and get a > response. > >> The new site IS however nicely conducive to people pontificating on > >> topics about which they know little and randomly complaining to Flex. > >> > >> Never mind, now I'm just randomly complaining. Gad! I think my post > >> could be summed up as "I remember the good old days, we had an active > >> email reflector, and ..." -- THAT is scary. > >> > >> Peter > >> K1PGV > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf > >> Of Larry da Ponte > >> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 2:23 AM > >> To: Tom k2bew > >> Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz > >> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test > >> > >> The new web based forum has a feature to send all posts as emails so > >> I don't have to scan the web site to see if anything is happening but > >> if I want to post I must log in first which is not quite as > >> convenient as sending an email. You can post screen shots and the > >> search is pretty good and you can edit your last post if you see you > >> made a mistake. The flex staff post frequently when not crushed with > work. > >> > >> -Larry > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:45 PM -0800, "Tom k2bew" > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> There is now a online forum on the Flex website where I think most > >> traffic that used to be on this list has moved too. I just rejoined > >> the list and was really surprized at the lack of messages compared to > >> a couple years ago when I was on it and it was very busy. > >> 73, > >> Tom K2BEW > >> > >> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Bill and Sue wrote: > >> > >> > Hi all > >> > Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not > >> > seen a comment out here in over a month. lol Bill N1EHM > >> > ___ > >> > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > >> > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > >> > To opt out of the Reflector: > >> > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.bi > >> > z > >> > > >> ___ > >> FlexRadio
Re: [Flexradio] Test
I have found the same for me Tom, at lease this way I am not enticed to move up to a 6000 as I seem to be when reading the old way. Randy N4FNB -Original Message- From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Tom k2bew Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 2:39 PM To: Tom k2bew Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test Yea, I meant the "email list" not "forum". Tom On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tom k2bew wrote: > Spot on Peter, the forum "was" so much better. I followed topics I > would not have otherwise and learned a lot because of it. I just don't > have the time and or desire to filter through topics on the forum, It > is just not he same anymore. > I remember the good old days too... with sadness. > 73, Tom k2BEw > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Peter G. Viscarola > wrote: > >> Yup... the "community" web site is now the focus of almost everyone's >> attention. >> >> Mark me down as "not a big fan" of the new site. I use it because >> there's really no alternative. >> >> The discussions HERE on this list over the years were variously >> engaging, stimulating, frustrating, informative, histrionic, rude, >> funny, and interesting. I learned a lot here. >> >> The general organization of the Community site just somehow doesn't >> seem as conducive to free-flowing back and forth discussions. It's >> "post a question/problem/idea" (you must choose a category) and get a response. >> The new site IS however nicely conducive to people pontificating on >> topics about which they know little and randomly complaining to Flex. >> >> Never mind, now I'm just randomly complaining. Gad! I think my post >> could be summed up as "I remember the good old days, we had an active >> email reflector, and ..." -- THAT is scary. >> >> Peter >> K1PGV >> >> -Original Message- >> From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf >> Of Larry da Ponte >> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 2:23 AM >> To: Tom k2bew >> Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz >> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test >> >> The new web based forum has a feature to send all posts as emails so >> I don't have to scan the web site to see if anything is happening but >> if I want to post I must log in first which is not quite as >> convenient as sending an email. You can post screen shots and the >> search is pretty good and you can edit your last post if you see you >> made a mistake. The flex staff post frequently when not crushed with work. >> >> -Larry >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:45 PM -0800, "Tom k2bew" >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> There is now a online forum on the Flex website where I think most >> traffic that used to be on this list has moved too. I just rejoined >> the list and was really surprized at the lack of messages compared to >> a couple years ago when I was on it and it was very busy. >> 73, >> Tom K2BEW >> >> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Bill and Sue wrote: >> >> > Hi all >> > Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not >> > seen a comment out here in over a month. lol Bill N1EHM >> > ___ >> > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List >> > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >> > To opt out of the Reflector: >> > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.bi >> > z >> > >> ___ >> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List >> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >> To opt out of the Reflector: >> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >> ___ >> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List >> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >> To opt out of the Reflector: >> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >> ___ >> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List >> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >> To opt out of the Reflector: >> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >> > > ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] Test
Yea, I meant the "email list" not "forum". Tom On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tom k2bew wrote: > Spot on Peter, the forum "was" so much better. I followed topics I would > not have otherwise and learned a lot because of it. I just don't have the > time and or desire to filter through topics on the forum, It is just not he > same anymore. > I remember the good old days too... with sadness. > 73, Tom k2BEw > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Peter G. Viscarola > wrote: > >> Yup... the "community" web site is now the focus of almost everyone's >> attention. >> >> Mark me down as "not a big fan" of the new site. I use it because >> there's really no alternative. >> >> The discussions HERE on this list over the years were variously engaging, >> stimulating, frustrating, informative, histrionic, rude, funny, and >> interesting. I learned a lot here. >> >> The general organization of the Community site just somehow doesn't seem >> as conducive to free-flowing back and forth discussions. It's "post a >> question/problem/idea" (you must choose a category) and get a response. >> The new site IS however nicely conducive to people pontificating on topics >> about which they know little and randomly complaining to Flex. >> >> Never mind, now I'm just randomly complaining. Gad! I think my post >> could be summed up as "I remember the good old days, we had an active email >> reflector, and ..." -- THAT is scary. >> >> Peter >> K1PGV >> >> -Original Message- >> From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of >> Larry da Ponte >> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 2:23 AM >> To: Tom k2bew >> Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz >> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test >> >> The new web based forum has a feature to send all posts as emails so I >> don't have to scan the web site to see if anything is happening but if I >> want to post I must log in first which is not quite as convenient as >> sending an email. You can post screen shots and the search is pretty good >> and you can edit your last post if you see you made a mistake. The flex >> staff post frequently when not crushed with work. >> >> -Larry >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:45 PM -0800, "Tom k2bew" >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> There is now a online forum on the Flex website where I think most >> traffic that used to be on this list has moved too. I just rejoined the >> list and was really surprized at the lack of messages compared to a couple >> years ago when I was on it and it was very busy. >> 73, >> Tom K2BEW >> >> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Bill and Sue wrote: >> >> > Hi all >> > Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not seen >> > a comment out here in over a month. lol Bill N1EHM >> > ___ >> > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List >> > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >> > To opt out of the Reflector: >> > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >> > >> ___ >> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List >> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >> To opt out of the Reflector: >> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >> ___ >> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List >> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >> To opt out of the Reflector: >> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >> ___ >> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List >> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >> To opt out of the Reflector: >> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >> > > ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] Test
Spot on Peter, the forum "was" so much better. I followed topics I would not have otherwise and learned a lot because of it. I just don't have the time and or desire to filter through topics on the forum, It is just not he same anymore. I remember the good old days too... with sadness. 73, Tom k2BEw On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Peter G. Viscarola wrote: > Yup... the "community" web site is now the focus of almost everyone's > attention. > > Mark me down as "not a big fan" of the new site. I use it because > there's really no alternative. > > The discussions HERE on this list over the years were variously engaging, > stimulating, frustrating, informative, histrionic, rude, funny, and > interesting. I learned a lot here. > > The general organization of the Community site just somehow doesn't seem > as conducive to free-flowing back and forth discussions. It's "post a > question/problem/idea" (you must choose a category) and get a response. > The new site IS however nicely conducive to people pontificating on topics > about which they know little and randomly complaining to Flex. > > Never mind, now I'm just randomly complaining. Gad! I think my post > could be summed up as "I remember the good old days, we had an active email > reflector, and ..." -- THAT is scary. > > Peter > K1PGV > > -Original Message- > From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of > Larry da Ponte > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 2:23 AM > To: Tom k2bew > Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz > Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test > > The new web based forum has a feature to send all posts as emails so I > don't have to scan the web site to see if anything is happening but if I > want to post I must log in first which is not quite as convenient as > sending an email. You can post screen shots and the search is pretty good > and you can edit your last post if you see you made a mistake. The flex > staff post frequently when not crushed with work. > > -Larry > > > > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:45 PM -0800, "Tom k2bew" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > There is now a online forum on the Flex website where I think most traffic > that used to be on this list has moved too. I just rejoined the list and > was really surprized at the lack of messages compared to a couple years ago > when I was on it and it was very busy. > 73, > Tom K2BEW > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Bill and Sue wrote: > > > Hi all > > Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not seen > > a comment out here in over a month. lol Bill N1EHM > > ___ > > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > > To opt out of the Reflector: > > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > > > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > To opt out of the Reflector: > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > To opt out of the Reflector: > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > To opt out of the Reflector: > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] Test
Please be advised that this is a test, just a test. Had it been the real thing we would all be dead by now. Sleep well tonight your Air Force is. On 2/8/2015 1:25 PM, Gedas wrote: Peter, I am with you 1000% ! Gedas, W8BYA Gallery at http://w8bya.com Light travels faster than sound This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. On 2/8/2015 11:38 AM, Peter G. Viscarola wrote: Yup... the "community" web site is now the focus of almost everyone's attention. Mark me down as "not a big fan" of the new site. I use it because there's really no alternative. The discussions HERE on this list over the years were variously engaging, stimulating, frustrating, informative, histrionic, rude, funny, and interesting. I learned a lot here. The general organization of the Community site just somehow doesn't seem as conducive to free-flowing back and forth discussions. It's "post a question/problem/idea" (you must choose a category) and get a response. The new site IS however nicely conducive to people pontificating on topics about which they know little and randomly complaining to Flex. Never mind, now I'm just randomly complaining. Gad! I think my post could be summed up as "I remember the good old days, we had an active email reflector, and ..." -- THAT is scary. Peter K1PGV -Original Message- From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Larry da Ponte Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 2:23 AM To: Tom k2bew Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test The new web based forum has a feature to send all posts as emails so I don't have to scan the web site to see if anything is happening but if I want to post I must log in first which is not quite as convenient as sending an email. You can post screen shots and the search is pretty good and you can edit your last post if you see you made a mistake. The flex staff post frequently when not crushed with work. -Larry On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:45 PM -0800, "Tom k2bew" wrote: There is now a online forum on the Flex website where I think most traffic that used to be on this list has moved too. I just rejoined the list and was really surprized at the lack of messages compared to a couple years ago when I was on it and it was very busy. 73, Tom K2BEW On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Bill and Sue wrote: Hi all Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not seen a comment out here in over a month. lol Bill N1EHM ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] Test
Peter, I am with you 1000% ! Gedas, W8BYA Gallery at http://w8bya.com Light travels faster than sound This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. On 2/8/2015 11:38 AM, Peter G. Viscarola wrote: Yup... the "community" web site is now the focus of almost everyone's attention. Mark me down as "not a big fan" of the new site. I use it because there's really no alternative. The discussions HERE on this list over the years were variously engaging, stimulating, frustrating, informative, histrionic, rude, funny, and interesting. I learned a lot here. The general organization of the Community site just somehow doesn't seem as conducive to free-flowing back and forth discussions. It's "post a question/problem/idea" (you must choose a category) and get a response. The new site IS however nicely conducive to people pontificating on topics about which they know little and randomly complaining to Flex. Never mind, now I'm just randomly complaining. Gad! I think my post could be summed up as "I remember the good old days, we had an active email reflector, and ..." -- THAT is scary. Peter K1PGV -Original Message- From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Larry da Ponte Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 2:23 AM To: Tom k2bew Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test The new web based forum has a feature to send all posts as emails so I don't have to scan the web site to see if anything is happening but if I want to post I must log in first which is not quite as convenient as sending an email. You can post screen shots and the search is pretty good and you can edit your last post if you see you made a mistake. The flex staff post frequently when not crushed with work. -Larry On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:45 PM -0800, "Tom k2bew" wrote: There is now a online forum on the Flex website where I think most traffic that used to be on this list has moved too. I just rejoined the list and was really surprized at the lack of messages compared to a couple years ago when I was on it and it was very busy. 73, Tom K2BEW On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Bill and Sue wrote: Hi all Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not seen a comment out here in over a month. lol Bill N1EHM ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] Test
Yup... the "community" web site is now the focus of almost everyone's attention. Mark me down as "not a big fan" of the new site. I use it because there's really no alternative. The discussions HERE on this list over the years were variously engaging, stimulating, frustrating, informative, histrionic, rude, funny, and interesting. I learned a lot here. The general organization of the Community site just somehow doesn't seem as conducive to free-flowing back and forth discussions. It's "post a question/problem/idea" (you must choose a category) and get a response. The new site IS however nicely conducive to people pontificating on topics about which they know little and randomly complaining to Flex. Never mind, now I'm just randomly complaining. Gad! I think my post could be summed up as "I remember the good old days, we had an active email reflector, and ..." -- THAT is scary. Peter K1PGV -Original Message- From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Larry da Ponte Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 2:23 AM To: Tom k2bew Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test The new web based forum has a feature to send all posts as emails so I don't have to scan the web site to see if anything is happening but if I want to post I must log in first which is not quite as convenient as sending an email. You can post screen shots and the search is pretty good and you can edit your last post if you see you made a mistake. The flex staff post frequently when not crushed with work. -Larry On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:45 PM -0800, "Tom k2bew" wrote: There is now a online forum on the Flex website where I think most traffic that used to be on this list has moved too. I just rejoined the list and was really surprized at the lack of messages compared to a couple years ago when I was on it and it was very busy. 73, Tom K2BEW On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Bill and Sue wrote: > Hi all > Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not seen > a comment out here in over a month. lol Bill N1EHM > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > To opt out of the Reflector: > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] Test
The new web based forum has a feature to send all posts as emails so I don't have to scan the web site to see if anything is happening but if I want to post I must log in first which is not quite as convenient as sending an email. You can post screen shots and the search is pretty good and you can edit your last post if you see you made a mistake. The flex staff post frequently when not crushed with work. -Larry On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:45 PM -0800, "Tom k2bew" wrote: There is now a online forum on the Flex website where I think most traffic that used to be on this list has moved too. I just rejoined the list and was really surprized at the lack of messages compared to a couple years ago when I was on it and it was very busy. 73, Tom K2BEW On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Bill and Sue wrote: > Hi all > Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not seen a > comment out here in over a month. lol > Bill > N1EHM > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > To opt out of the Reflector: > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] Test
There is now a online forum on the Flex website where I think most traffic that used to be on this list has moved too. I just rejoined the list and was really surprized at the lack of messages compared to a couple years ago when I was on it and it was very busy. 73, Tom K2BEW On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Bill and Sue wrote: > Hi all > Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not seen a > comment out here in over a month. lol > Bill > N1EHM > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > To opt out of the Reflector: > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] Test
Hi! I want to know if it is correct that I must sent my 6700 flex back to USA because some kind of improvement or problems must be fixed??? Francisco Viegener Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 7/2/2015, a las 13:58, Bill and Sue escribió: > > Hi all > Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not seen a > comment out here in over a month. lol > Bill > N1EHM > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > To opt out of the Reflector: > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
[Flexradio] test
I received my own email back so I guess it has just been very quiet ‘Bill ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
[Flexradio] Test
Hi all Just a test. Did I delete myself from the e mail list. Have not seen a comment out here in over a month. lol Bill N1EHM ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
[Flexradio] test message -- please ignore
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Re: [Flexradio] Test of reflector
Q5 here. W7IWW > On Aug 5, 2014, at 5:25 AM, Maury Guzick wrote: > > Wondering if I am off the reflector as have not received a post since 8/1? > > W5IO > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > To opt out of the Reflector: > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
[Flexradio] Test of reflector
Wondering if I am off the reflector as have not received a post since 8/1? W5IO ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
[Flexradio] Test
Larry WO7R (ex WO0Z) ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] -test PC hardware software
hi is any one know of a hardware test software [i am not looking for stress software] normal version ? vy 73 E.P g0uut ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] Test
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] test
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] test
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test
Alan: If you want to get a lot of messages, just mention how much you like "Facebook." --- Graham On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Alan NV8A wrote: > Please pardon the "noise." I've "reset" my email address and options to the > same as they were before -- now to see if I get messages. > > Alan NV8A > > ___ > FlexRadio Systems Mailing List > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: > http://www.flexradio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] Test
Please pardon the "noise." I've "reset" my email address and options to the same as they were before -- now to see if I get messages. Alan NV8A ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] test, please ignore
this is a test for greg ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] Test message only
Test message only for new subscriber. No attachments included. Thanks, Ron ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] Test Message
Sorry for the bandwidth. I just had a couple of messages refused & am testing it out. 73, Ray, K9DUR http://k9dur.info ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] test
Test Klaus Lohmann FlexRadio Systems Representative for EU Godeke-Michels-Weg 12 D-21762 Otterndorf GERMANY "Tune in Excitement!" ™ Tel.: (+49) 4751 900501 Fax.:(+49) 4751 998569 Cell Phone: 0171 2751584 mailto:kl...@flex-radio.com mailto:flexradio...@t-online.de FlexRadio Systems: www.flex-radio.com ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] test ignore please
test ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] Test
test ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] test
ignore 57 Year Old Mom Looks 27! Mom Reveals $5 Wrinkle Trick That Has Angered Doctors! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4e08b6122d948b63adst05vuc ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] test
test Get Free Email with Video Mail & Video Chat! http://www.juno.com/freeemail?refcd=JUTAGOUT1FREM0210 ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] Test message
test message 57 Year Old Mom Looks 27! Mom Reveals $5 Wrinkle Trick That Has Angered Doctors! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4e01cfd3e323f168d37st02vuc ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] Test ...
test 57 Year Old Mom Looks 27! Mom Reveals $5 Wrinkle Trick That Has Angered Doctors! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4e00c41d97211127b51st03vuc ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] test
Test sorry, 73 Beppe ik3vig ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] Test Message
ignore Ed ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] Test
Test. 73 Gwyn - G4FKH ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] test message
Just a test ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] test
test, sorry IK3VIG ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
[Flexradio] Test disregard
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test post
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Drive/Demo PowerSDR
I could not get the demo to work on my Sony laptop at all (vista 32) but the radio worked fine 10 minutes after I unboxed it. Brett - Original Message - From: "Tim Ellison" To: "budirving" ; Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:09 AM Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test Drive/Demo PowerSDR The problem is that when running the demo, there has to be a hardware component that performs the A/D and D/A conversions and this is your PC sound card. Vista and to a lesser degree Win7 have made it difficult to use generic sound cards for this purpose. You can get it you work with a lot of "fiddling" with soundcard setting. The FLEX-x000 SDRs have their own internal A/D and D/A converters so this issue is moot when you have radio hardware attached to the PC running PowerSDR. PowerSDR v2.0 will be 100% compatible with Win7 x64, so it will not have the problems listed below because it does not use .NET 1.1 -Tim -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of budirving Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:23 AM To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: [Flexradio] Test Drive/Demo PowerSDR Is there a solution for this? I see the notice that there is a known compatibility issue with the latest update to Vista. I am trying to run the test drive version of PowerSDR with Windows 7, 64 bit on an HP desktop, quad processor, 6GB. PowerSDR requires Microsoft NET Framework 1.1.4322 which in turn will not install - it has compatibility issues with Windows 7. I have just ordered my Flex 5000 and would like to work out the PowerSDR installation before the radio arrives. 73, AB1KK ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to telli...@itsco.com ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to brett.gazdzin...@verizon.net ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Flexradio] Test Drive/Demo PowerSDR
The problem is that when running the demo, there has to be a hardware component that performs the A/D and D/A conversions and this is your PC sound card. Vista and to a lesser degree Win7 have made it difficult to use generic sound cards for this purpose. You can get it you work with a lot of "fiddling" with soundcard setting. The FLEX-x000 SDRs have their own internal A/D and D/A converters so this issue is moot when you have radio hardware attached to the PC running PowerSDR. PowerSDR v2.0 will be 100% compatible with Win7 x64, so it will not have the problems listed below because it does not use .NET 1.1 -Tim -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of budirving Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:23 AM To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: [Flexradio] Test Drive/Demo PowerSDR Is there a solution for this? I see the notice that there is a known compatibility issue with the latest update to Vista. I am trying to run the test drive version of PowerSDR with Windows 7, 64 bit on an HP desktop, quad processor, 6GB. PowerSDR requires Microsoft NET Framework 1.1.4322 which in turn will not install - it has compatibility issues with Windows 7. I have just ordered my Flex 5000 and would like to work out the PowerSDR installation before the radio arrives. 73, AB1KK ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to telli...@itsco.com ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Flexradio] Test Drive/Demo PowerSDR
Is there a solution for this? I see the notice that there is a known compatibility issue with the latest update to Vista. I am trying to run the test drive version of PowerSDR with Windows 7, 64 bit on an HP desktop, quad processor, 6GB. PowerSDR requires Microsoft NET Framework 1.1.4322 which in turn will not install - it has compatibility issues with Windows 7. I have just ordered my Flex 5000 and would like to work out the PowerSDR installation before the radio arrives. 73, AB1KK ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Flexradio] Test
Test to see if I connect to reflector. 73, Brian, ZL1IE ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Flexradio] Test Message Please Ignore
I am just testing the reflector. Doug, VA3CR ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Flexradio] Test
Sorry for the interruption Sent from Greg's iPhone ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Flexradio] test-do not respond
**Dell Studio XPS Desktop: Save up to $400 - Limited Time Offer (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222466512x1201463496/aol?redir=htt p:%2F%2Faltfarm.mediaplex.com%2Fad%2Fck%2F12309%2D81939%2D1629%2D3) ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Flexradio] test
test Ted wb9jox ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test SVN 3171 fails RX image & level calibration
Now that the test branch is back in business I attempted to do an rx level and image calibration with clean install. Driver at 96000/1024. PowerSDR started and set to 96000/1024 then run calibration. It fails at 12 meters with the red X in panadapter display. Dave wo2x / ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
3164 still works here (although there are a few minor WBIR issues) -Tim -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:13 PM To: Bob McGwier Cc: k.nesb...@shaw.ca; flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Bob McGwier wrote: > > Yes, but the changes you are referring to actually occurred in 3160. I > contend you just didn't svn up until 3166 after I made those changes. > > > There have been two major improvements in CW recently in the test branch. > These are being beat up and more done before they are released. Thanks for > the feedback. This will all be in the upcoming stable release. Test Branch SVN 3160 works fine. SVN 3166 and 3167 still appear broken. Any idea what happened between 3160 and 3166 to cause the problem? 73 de Brian, WB6RQN/J79BPL ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Bob McGwier wrote: > > Yes, but the changes you are referring to actually occurred in 3160. I > contend you just didn't svn up until 3166 after I made those changes. > > > There have been two major improvements in CW recently in the test branch. > These are being beat up and more done before they are released. Thanks for > the feedback. This will all be in the upcoming stable release. Test Branch SVN 3160 works fine. SVN 3166 and 3167 still appear broken. Any idea what happened between 3160 and 3166 to cause the problem? 73 de Brian, WB6RQN/J79BPL ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
Yes, but the changes you are referring to actually occurred in 3160. I contend you just didn't svn up until 3166 after I made those changes. There have been two major improvements in CW recently in the test branch. These are being beat up and more done before they are released. Thanks for the feedback. This will all be in the upcoming stable release. Bob knesbitt wrote: John, this is a major break through if in fact its reproducible. What more have you learned since your original post (I see no comments in this regard on the reflecto). Bob, come up for air and fess up for your actions. Kirb - VE6IV -- The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK. 73 John N3WT ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ -- (Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. "You don't need to see the whole staircase, just take the first step.", MLK. Twitter:rwmcgwier Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
Yes, but the changes you are referring to actually occurred in 3160. I contend you just didn't svn up until 3166 after I made those changes. There have been two major improvements in CW recently in the test branch. These are being beat up and more done before they are released. Thanks for the feedback. This will all be in the upcoming stable release. Bob knesbitt wrote: John, this is a major break through if in fact its reproducible. What more have you learned since your original post (I see no comments in this regard on the reflecto). Bob, come up for air and fess up for your actions. Kirb - VE6IV -- The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK. 73 John N3WT ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ -- (Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. "You don't need to see the whole staircase, just take the first step.", MLK. Twitter:rwmcgwier Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
John, this is a major break through if in fact its reproducible. What more have you learned since your original post (I see no comments in this regard on the reflecto). Bob, come up for air and fess up for your actions. Kirb - VE6IV -- The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK. 73 John N3WT ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
Same exact thing here as WX7Y Bret, the temporary work around is to sequence through the sample rates. Need to do this every time on start up, a large change in frequency or band change. Cycle through the sample rates and it will start operating. I'm sure this will be fixed up very soon. (it is Alpha code) Anyone else notice improvement in the QSK? I sure do. John N3WT -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz]on Behalf Of Bret Mills Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 3:57 PM To: 'FireBrick'; 'FlexRadio List' Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? Same exact problem here EXCEPT if I would go and reset my Audio sample rate to 4800 it started to work except the SQUELCH was up and squelching the receiver, I then went to 9600 sample rate and every NOW was working then I went back to 19200 sample rate and it now works BUT when I shut down PowerSDR and brought it back up, I had to do it again and this time it took several sample rate switching back and forth before it finally sinked with the Driver(I think) and worked like it is supposed to. So every time you start PowerSDR we will need to do this until they fix the bug. Hope this helps track it down for others. 73's Thanks Bret WX7Y -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of FireBrick Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 12:47 PM To: FlexRadio List Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? I did the same thing and am experincing the same problem. Duh I just entered a bug report. On 6/14/2009 1:25:28 PM, NZ8J (n...@woh.rr.com) wrote: > I just tried this test branch 1.19.1 SVN:3166 , but had two problems > when I did the calibration for images, 17 and 6 meters failed plus I > don't get any audio and the panadapter line jumps from a normal signal > line at about -120 or so up to a straight line at about -60. It seems > to happen about every 1 sec. > > Any ideas? > Thanks > Tim > NZ8J > > -Original Message- > From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz > [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney > Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 1:05 PM > To: FlexRadio List > Subject: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? > > > > > The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, > "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. > The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth > sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. > > I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no > issues > , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't > understand what N4HY > is > doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact > the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
Same exact problem here EXCEPT if I would go and reset my Audio sample rate to 4800 it started to work except the SQUELCH was up and squelching the receiver, I then went to 9600 sample rate and every NOW was working then I went back to 19200 sample rate and it now works BUT when I shut down PowerSDR and brought it back up, I had to do it again and this time it took several sample rate switching back and forth before it finally sinked with the Driver(I think) and worked like it is supposed to. So every time you start PowerSDR we will need to do this until they fix the bug. Hope this helps track it down for others. 73's Thanks Bret WX7Y -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of FireBrick Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 12:47 PM To: FlexRadio List Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? I did the same thing and am experincing the same problem. Duh I just entered a bug report. On 6/14/2009 1:25:28 PM, NZ8J (n...@woh.rr.com) wrote: > I just tried this test branch 1.19.1 SVN:3166 , but had two problems > when I did the calibration for images, 17 and 6 meters failed plus I > don't get any audio and the panadapter line jumps from a normal signal > line at about -120 or so up to a straight line at about -60. It seems > to happen about every 1 sec. > > Any ideas? > Thanks > Tim > NZ8J > > -Original Message- > From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz > [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney > Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 1:05 PM > To: FlexRadio List > Subject: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? > > > > > The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, > "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. > The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth > sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. > > I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no > issues > , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't > understand what N4HY > is > doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact > the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
I did the same thing and am experincing the same problem. Duh I just entered a bug report. On 6/14/2009 1:25:28 PM, NZ8J (n...@woh.rr.com) wrote: I just tried this test branch 1.19.1 SVN:3166 , but had two problems when I did the calibration for images, 17 and 6 meters failed plus I don't get any audio and the panadapter line jumps from a normal signal line at about -120 or so up to a straight line at about -60. It seems to happen about every 1 sec. Any ideas? Thanks Tim NZ8J -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 1:05 PM To: FlexRadio List Subject: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
I am having this exact same problem with Test SVN 3166. Both receivers. on XP pro and Windows 7 64bit Tried new database, power cycle, etc. Trunk, Pretty betty work fine. Dave W0DHB NZ8J wrote: I just tried this test branch 1.19.1 SVN:3166 , but had two problems when I did the calibration for images, 17 and 6 meters failed plus I don't get any audio and the panadapter line jumps from a normal signal line at about -120 or so up to a straight line at about -60. It seems to happen about every 1 sec. Any ideas? Thanks Tim NZ8J -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 1:05 PM To: FlexRadio List Subject: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK. 73 John N3WT ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
I just tried this test branch 1.19.1 SVN:3166 , but had two problems when I did the calibration for images, 17 and 6 meters failed plus I don't get any audio and the panadapter line jumps from a normal signal line at about -120 or so up to a straight line at about -60. It seems to happen about every 1 sec. Any ideas? Thanks Tim NZ8J -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 1:05 PM To: FlexRadio List Subject: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK. 73 John N3WT ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK. 73 John N3WT ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test
N5PU testing new mail client, sri for bandwidth! ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test
Edwin Marzan AB2VW _ Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for Hotmail®. http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/LearnMore/personalize.aspx?ocid=TXT_MSGTX_WL_HM_express_032009#colortheme ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test
Please disregard. ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test - Please delete
Testing -- 73, Dudley WA5QPZ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test
Just a test ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test
Test ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test
Carl WC0V ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test 2
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test Message for the Archieves
73's , Bruce KL7JDR Bruce W. Mills P.O. Box 1500 31490 Echo Lake Road Soldotna , Alaska 99669 (907)262-4373 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test
test ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test
Not seeing my sent message Ed N5BLZ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test
Test. Sorry, for some reason I don't see my posts appearing.Edwin MarzanAB2VW _ Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista® + Windows Live™. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_012008 ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test
test ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test message, ingnore
test ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] test results?
At 09:26 PM 8/9/2007, Tom Clark, K3IO wrote: >Jim Lux wrote: >> >> >> >>I assume you've got the 8640s locked to a common source (or each other). >> >> >Highly unlikely -- the 8640s are free-running >oscillators with excellent short-term phase >noise. Signal is derived from a cavity >oscillator. The have a rudimentary frequency >stabilizer which can lock the last digit of the >frequency from an internal counter, but the >frequency can wander ±½ digit. Hence, the >two-tone measurement is not made with coherent oscillators. I was kind of wondering about that. I knew they could "lock" after a fashion, but I didn't know how they did it or what the performance was. And, as I think about it, I'm not sure that it would make much difference in a two tone measurement, assuming you're doing some sort of long term power spectrum measurement to see the spurs. Of course, if one claims the biggest spur is 60-70 dB down, that's a non-trivial measurement to make. (depending on what the power spectral density of the noise you're measuring the spur above is.. if the tone is at -10 dBm, and the spur is at -70dBc (-80dBm), your sources have to be substantially quieter, and the measurement bandwidth narrow enough to see the spur above the noise floor...) I'll have to think about it in the HF case. I've been looking at many GHz, and things are sort of different up there. ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] test results?
Tom Clark, K3IO wrote: > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20070810/f3aa5d71/attachment.html Damn. I merely hit reply and generated some embedded HTML. My apologies for the QRM. What I tried to post to Jim Lux was: >> I assume you've got the 8640s locked to a common source (or each other). Highly unlikely -- the 8640s are free-running oscillators with excellent short-term phase noise. Signal is derived from a cavity oscillator. The have a rudimentary frequency stabilizer which can lock the last digit of the frequency from an internal counter, but the frequency can wander +/- 1/2 digit. Hence, the two-tone measurement is not made with coherent oscillators. 73, Tom ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] test results?
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20070810/f3aa5d71/attachment.html ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] test results?
TNX.. just a few questions, then... At 11:54 AM 8/9/2007, Gerald Youngblood wrote: >I covered this topic in an email to the reflector on Monday. The number >quoted is two tone, third order dynamic range at 2 kHz tone spacing. With >the preamp off, the input tones used are -10 dBm to the antenna terminals. measured with a power meter at the output of the combiner, with first one generator on, then the other? >IM3 is measured using a Minicircuits ZFSC-2-1-12 combiner with 16 db of >attenuation on each of the two respective input connections to the combiner. >Each input also has a Minicircuits BLP-15 low pass filter to eliminate >mixing of the generator harmonics. The generators are HP 8640Bs. The >output of the combiner goes to a 40 dB Kay step attenuator. I assume you've got the 8640s locked to a common source (or each other). >Combiner/attenuator/filter network port-to-port isolation is in the 70-80 dB >range on 14 MHz as I recall. What's the match into the radio or the combiner? For instance, in a worst case, with a total reflection and no atten after the combiner, the port to port would only be 0.8+16+3.5+3.5 + 16+0.8 = 40.6 dB. With a more believable -20dB mismatch, it's still only 60dB port to port. Gen:filter:pad:splitter:reflection:splitter:pad:filter:Gen The output attenuator on the signal generator helps too, at least as far as generator caused IMD. That is, a -50dBm signal from Generator 1 being fed into the output of generator 2 putting out at +10 dBm isn't going to be a big deal, hopefully. One might want to look at spurious signals coming *out* of the device under test, too, particularly with a direct conversion receiver like these.. I haven't measured it recently, so I don't recall the levels, but, at least on my SDR1000s, there's a fairly healthy signal at the DDS frequency coming out of the antenna port on receive (at least if no preamp is on) It's enough that if you run 3 SDR1000s through 20dB pads into a combiner, you can see the DDSes of the other two radios on the third. Again.. detectable doesn't imply causing measurement error, but it's a trap (or a potential stalking horse for someone wanting to claim your performance isn't as good as you claim). Jim, w6rmk ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] test results?
I covered this topic in an email to the reflector on Monday. The number quoted is two tone, third order dynamic range at 2 kHz tone spacing. With the preamp off, the input tones used are -10 dBm to the antenna terminals. IM3 is measured using a Minicircuits ZFSC-2-1-12 combiner with 16 db of attenuation on each of the two respective input connections to the combiner. Each input also has a Minicircuits BLP-15 low pass filter to eliminate mixing of the generator harmonics. The generators are HP 8640Bs. The output of the combiner goes to a 40 dB Kay step attenuator. Combiner/attenuator/filter network port-to-port isolation is in the 70-80 dB range on 14 MHz as I recall. Gerald Gerald Youngblood, K5SDR FlexRadio Systems Ph: 512-535-4713 Fax: 512-233-5143 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.flex-radio.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Lux > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 12:52 PM > To: FlexRadio List > Subject: [Flexradio] test results? > > I see reference on the website to test results being in, and > better two tone, etc., but I couldn't find the test results. > I searched the KB for two-tone and found only the FAQ, which > just says "better than the SDR-1000". > > I did find some numbers on the 5000A details page, but no > details of what frequencies were tested, etc. Says "top > performing narrow spaced..." and then "incredible 105 dB on > 14 MHz", but it's not clear what is being described here. Is > that the IP3? Or a dynamic range, or what? (leaving aside the > issue of whether IP3 has meaning in a digital system or in a > system where you're not modeling the nonlinearities with low > order polynomials). > > It might be nice to have a "spec sheet" that one could point > to, and with standard definitions of the terms (i.e. a > pointer a description of how *we* define a particular number) > > I ask this because it came up when someone asked me about the > performance, and I just pointed them to the site in general. > Then, in another context, the question of how do you measure > things like small levels of IMD, when your generators may > actually create the distortion (e.g. how do you do the > combining, etc.) > > James Lux, P.E. > Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group Flight > Communications Systems Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory, > Mail Stop 161-213 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 > tel: (818)354-2075 > fax: (818)393-6875 > > > > ___ > FlexRadio mailing list > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio > Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ > > ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test results?
I see reference on the website to test results being in, and better two tone, etc., but I couldn't find the test results. I searched the KB for two-tone and found only the FAQ, which just says "better than the SDR-1000". I did find some numbers on the 5000A details page, but no details of what frequencies were tested, etc. Says "top performing narrow spaced..." and then "incredible 105 dB on 14 MHz", but it's not clear what is being described here. Is that the IP3? Or a dynamic range, or what? (leaving aside the issue of whether IP3 has meaning in a digital system or in a system where you're not modeling the nonlinearities with low order polynomials). It might be nice to have a "spec sheet" that one could point to, and with standard definitions of the terms (i.e. a pointer a description of how *we* define a particular number) I ask this because it came up when someone asked me about the performance, and I just pointed them to the site in general. Then, in another context, the question of how do you measure things like small levels of IMD, when your generators may actually create the distortion (e.g. how do you do the combining, etc.) James Lux, P.E. Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group Flight Communications Systems Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 tel: (818)354-2075 fax: (818)393-6875 ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test only.
Just testing mail forwarding. -- 73 Ian, G3NRW [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test
John P. Basilotto W5GI Marketing and Product Manager FlexRadio Systems 512-535-5266 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20070511/902f073d/attachment.html ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test, Please delete 73
Just a test.. ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] test
test only, sorry IK3VIG ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
[Flexradio] Test - Please Delete
Just testing.. I have not received a note from the forum since 1/1/2007.. Just testing.. 73, Dudley ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] test part 3
Good filter .. let's everything through! --Larry W8ER - Original Message - From: "Robert McGwier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Flex Radio" Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 7:15 PM Subject: [Flexradio] test part 3 > Testing part 3. Please ignore > > -- > AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, > TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair > "If you board the wrong train, it is no use running along the > corridor in the other direction. " - Dietrich Bonhoffer > > > ___ > FlexRadio mailing list > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com > ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
[Flexradio] test part 3
Testing part 3. Please ignore -- AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair "If you board the wrong train, it is no use running along the corridor in the other direction. " - Dietrich Bonhoffer ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
[Flexradio] Test
No mail in about 5 days. Just checking to see that all is working. Mark -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20061125/fea87032/attachment.html ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
[Flexradio] [Test] Please delete this message
Sorry for the intrusion, but I neded to test sending to the Reflector. ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
Re: [Flexradio] Test Drive report
Speaking of major re-writes when is dual receive going to be turned on? I sure would love a receiver on the DX and a tranceiver on the pileup, with the ability to hear both audio streams in the headset, preferably one in one ear and the other on both ears. 73 W9OY __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
Re: [Flexradio] Test Drive report
An example of how this may work was presented by Beppe IK3VIG in Apr 2005. (see < http://www.radioamatore.it/sdr1000/mypowersdr.html > ). The graphical designs presented by Beppe sparked what has become the current major software re-write to split Radio and GUI functions, enabling the writing of skins by users as Mike points out below. An image does indeed speak a thousand words. 73 de Joe - AB1DO Mike Naruta wrote: > > The software re-write in progress is separating the > user interface from the signal-processing. This will > make it easier to have different "skins". For the > HF CW ops there can be a cleaner panel without FM, DSB, > transverter, microphone level, etc. A skin for the > AM ragchewers doesn't care about general coverage, > 25 Hertz filter, CWU, etc. Some will have the received > signal power meter, others won't. > > If I get a chance to write a skin, I'll change those > acres of push-buttons to pull-downs. Won't that be > a clean panel? > > > Mike - AA8K ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
Re: [Flexradio] Test Drive report
Well, let's compare it to an Icom IC-7800 for example. Looking at the front panel I count 37 rotary knobs, 10 LEDs, and 82 push buttons. That doesn't include the stuff on the display, which also has two analog meter simulations, each with six scales. The software re-write in progress is separating the user interface from the signal-processing. This will make it easier to have different "skins". For the HF CW ops there can be a cleaner panel without FM, DSB, transverter, microphone level, etc. A skin for the AM ragchewers doesn't care about general coverage, 25 Hertz filter, CWU, etc. Some will have the received signal power meter, others won't. If I get a chance to write a skin, I'll change those acres of push-buttons to pull-downs. Won't that be a clean panel? Mike - AA8K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> My first impression upon looking at the screen was that of standing in >> front of a giant slot machine at the Bellagio in Las Vegas. There was so >> much activity, colors flashing and jumping around of numbers that I had to >> have a gin and tonic and lie down before continuing. >> > its cousin is dancing around in the upper right hand corner! I can certainly > understand an S meter, but is all this needed? > > ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
Re: [Flexradio] Test Drive report
> > My first impression upon looking at the screen was that of standing in > front of a giant slot machine at the Bellagio in Las Vegas. There was so > much activity, colors flashing and jumping around of numbers that I had to > have a gin and tonic and lie down before continuing. > its cousin is dancing around in the upper right hand corner! I can certainly understand an S meter, but is all this needed? > Chris, One of the great strengths of the Flex project is that both ends of the software (the back-end, or business end that is related to the RF,and the front-end which is the GUI. or user system control interface, that you see on your computer screen), is being developed under a cohesive development tracking and reporting system. Not to mention the open source, which additionally is a tremendous project strength. Log into the Bug Tracker and Feature Tracker part of the web site. You will see a Feature request ( http://support.flex-radio.com/ReviewBug.aspx?id=273&it=F ) that directly addresses some of your concerns. Feel free to add your own comments. The development team at Flex is looking at these comments. To prevent un-necessary "reflector chatter" and useless non productive message threads these Feature and Bug reports are held to that part of the web site, where they can be dealt with in a professional development environment. Chris, to be honest, it has taken all my powers of personal reserve to adhere to the protocol of using only the above mentioned Feature and Bug Trackers and not allow myself to "bubble over" into the reflector about the subject matter of your first paragraph that I quoted above. Enough said that I was concerned enough to have had previously penned a private note to John and Eric expressing my concerns. about just the subject matter that you mention.. the issue of what I used to refer to (in 25+ years of software development) as the "gee-whiz factor". Anyway, not to worry,.. no Gin and Tonic necessary. You sound like your first look already has you hooked! You are in the right place at the right time. 73s -Dan K6KDK ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
Re: [Flexradio] Test Drive report
With your own SDR-1000 you won't need the Gin! 73, Larry K2LT Professional Engineer Licensed occasionally since 1952 Still impressed with the SDR-1000 Chris Black wrote: > > > My first impression upon looking at the screen was that of standing in front > of a giant slot machine at the Bellagio in Las Vegas. There was so much > activity, colors flashing and jumping around of numbers that I had to have a > gin and tonic and lie down before continuing. > > > Semper Fi > > > > Chris Black > > ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
