Yes, but the changes you are referring to actually occurred in 3160. I
contend you just didn't svn up until 3166 after I made those changes.
There have been two major improvements in CW recently in the test
branch. These are being beat up and more done before they are released.
Thanks for the feedback. This will all be in the upcoming stable release.
Bob
knesbitt wrote:
John,
this is a major break through if in fact its reproducible. What more
have you learned since your original post (I see no comments in this
regard on the reflecto).
Bob, come up for air and fess up for your actions.
Kirb - VE6IV
--
The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log,
"redone
vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX
transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My
Delay at 15ms seems best and quick.
I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no
issues
, whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what
N4HY is
doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact
the CW
QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK.
73 John N3WT
_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage:
http://www.flex-radio.com/
--
(Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio
Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
"You don't need to see the whole staircase, just
take the first step.", MLK.
Twitter:rwmcgwier
Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn
_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
