Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
...and the FLEX-5000, the FLEX-5000C and the FLEX-5000D too (I couldn't resist either) -Tim - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 4:13 PM To: Marty; flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors And PowerSDR and SDRx and SVN and SVN-X and ... Sorry I had to react 73 groeten Peter petervn(a)hetnet.nl <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; pa0pvn(a)hetnet.nl <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; pa0pvn(a)gmail.com ; pa0pvn(a)amsat.org . Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] namens Marty Verzonden: do 19-4-2007 20:44 Aan: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Onderwerp: Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors This may have already been recommended. I have been doing a lot of deleting without reading. Why don't we just put "SDR-5000" or "SDR-1000" or something to distinguish between the two in the subject line for hardware issues and then put "power SDR" for software issues? This way we all can click and delete or filter out the messages we are not concerned with. Marty KG6QKJ ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachment s/20070419/dcc64ae9/attachment.html ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
And PowerSDR and SDRx and SVN and SVN-X and ... Sorry I had to react 73 groeten Peter petervn(a)hetnet.nl <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; pa0pvn(a)hetnet.nl <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; pa0pvn(a)gmail.com ; pa0pvn(a)amsat.org . Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] namens Marty Verzonden: do 19-4-2007 20:44 Aan: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Onderwerp: Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors This may have already been recommended. I have been doing a lot of deleting without reading. Why don't we just put "SDR-5000" or "SDR-1000" or something to distinguish between the two in the subject line for hardware issues and then put "power SDR" for software issues? This way we all can click and delete or filter out the messages we are not concerned with. Marty KG6QKJ ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20070419/dcc64ae9/attachment.html ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
I was thinking more like one filters the subject, if you don't like the current discussion then filter on the subject "separate reflectors" That way no particular code word has to be put in the subject, one is not dependent on someone putting in the right code word. I prefer top posting, but don't mind bottom posting if the entries are kept trimmed. I totally dislike long posting with no paragraphs to separate the thoughts, just one giant post, I generally delete them without even reading them. Sometimes you can't even people to agree that they disagree, maybe the planet needs to be hit by a 100 mile diameter meteorite. At 01:55 PM 4/19/2007, you wrote: >On 4/19/07, Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > This may have already been recommended. I have been doing a lot of > > deleting without reading. > > > > Why don't we just put "SDR-5000" or "SDR-1000" or something to > > distinguish between the two in the subject line for hardware issues > > and then put "power SDR" for software issues? > > > > This way we all can click and delete or filter out the messages we > > are not concerned with. > > > > Marty > > KG6QKJ > >Good idea, but... > >You can't get people to agree on whether to top post or bottom post, >nor can you get people to trim their responses to a thread, nor can >you get them to not change the subject line in a thread when it >involves the same topic, nor can you get them to post text only (no >html), so I doubt you will people to consistently tag their subject >lines like "SDR-5000". > >Phil N8VB > >___ >FlexRadio mailing list >FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ >FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ >FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Cecil K5NWA www.qrpradio.com www.hpsdr.com Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt. (When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults!) ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
On 4/19/07, k5nwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was thinking more like one filters the subject, if you don't like > the current discussion then filter on the subject "separate > reflectors" That way no particular code word has to be put in the > subject, one is not dependent on someone putting in the right code word. This is basically what I do myself. I just have a bunch of filtering rules for all my emails and it generally works very well. > I prefer top posting, but don't mind bottom posting if the entries > are kept trimmed. I totally dislike long posting with no paragraphs > to separate the thoughts, just one giant post, I generally delete > them without even reading them. I am indifferent to top or bottom posting, but I know that it throws some people into fits. One of the things that does aggravate me is changing the subject line with no apparent reason. > Sometimes you can't even people to agree that they disagree, maybe > the planet needs to be hit by a 100 mile diameter meteorite. > Sometimes I wonder if that might be the best solution also. 73 Phil N8VB ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
Use what is available. Why not use the Forums for special interest discussions? That is what it is there for. The groups are already set up. http://forums.flex-radio.com/Forum50-1.aspx (FLEX-5000 Forum) http://forums.flex-radio.com/Forum46-1.aspx (SDR-1000 Forum) -Tim - FRS KB Administrator -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Beckmann-wa0rse Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:10 PM To: k5nwa Cc: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors Ahem I am well aware of how to use an e-mail filter and have a number of them set up for this and other reflectors. I *have* and *will continue* to put in *more than a little* effort to update them in the future. (Let's not get too nasty, eh? I was simply weighing in with my opinion.) If we follow the logic of "let the filters do everything" to its conclusion, then all e-mail should be sent to everyone, everywhere and they should be responsible for filtering out what they want from what they do. My suggestion is merely that at some point it makes sense to have "special interest groups" emerge. There is synergy -- no question. In my opinion, that does not require one monolythic reflector nor would segregation require out-of-control cross posting. We all have our ways of handling information parsing. Some segregation might be helpful to some of us. 73 --Paul, wa0rse On 4/19/07, k5nwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And in the darkness bind them...always finish your quote. > > I'm in favor of one reflector, as stated by Dan the cross posting > will drive you crazy, and if you only sign on to one what did you miss? > > It would be more worthwhile for the people that get offended by > posting on subjects not to their liking to put a little effort and > learn how to use the email filter to kill all mail on a particular discussion. > > At 11:57 AM 4/19/2007, you wrote: > > > > > > My guess is if the reflector were split, at least 75% of the current > > > subscribers would subscribe to both. So what have you gained? A lot > >of cross > > > posting? > > > > > > >Dan raises an excellent point: With multiple reflectors, we'd > >undoubtedly suffer lots of cross-posting. > > > >A single list also makes searching easier. > > > >I vote for one list to rule them all... > > > >de Peter K1PGV > > > > > >___ > >FlexRadio mailing list > >FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > >http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > >Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > >FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ > >FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ > > Cecil > K5NWA > www.qrpradio.com www.hpsdr.com > > Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt. > (When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults!) > > > ___ > FlexRadio mailing list > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ > > -- Paul Beckmann, PhD Beckmann Research, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 612-414-0302 ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
On 4/19/07, Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This may have already been recommended. I have been doing a lot of > deleting without reading. > > Why don't we just put "SDR-5000" or "SDR-1000" or something to > distinguish between the two in the subject line for hardware issues > and then put "power SDR" for software issues? > > This way we all can click and delete or filter out the messages we > are not concerned with. > > Marty > KG6QKJ Good idea, but... You can't get people to agree on whether to top post or bottom post, nor can you get people to trim their responses to a thread, nor can you get them to not change the subject line in a thread when it involves the same topic, nor can you get them to post text only (no html), so I doubt you will people to consistently tag their subject lines like "SDR-5000". Phil N8VB ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
I don't think ANY one is being nasty, again words written without tone ARE often misinterpreted. I am always amazed at the imposed interpretation of email, I have always been of the notion that unless someone address you specifically with an issue than all post are individual opinions . Thanks, Al KE5EUP KCARC,ARRL,TAPR,AMSAT,HPSDR Paul Beckmann-wa0rse wrote: > Ahem I am well aware of how to use an e-mail filter and have a > number of them set up for this and other reflectors. I *have* and > *will continue* to put in *more than a little* effort to update them > in the future. (Let's not get too nasty, eh? I was simply weighing in > with my opinion.) > > If we follow the logic of "let the filters do everything" to its > conclusion, then all e-mail should be sent to everyone, everywhere and > they should be responsible for filtering out what they want from what > they do. My suggestion is merely that at some point it makes sense to > have "special interest groups" emerge. > > There is synergy -- no question. In my opinion, that does not require > one monolythic reflector nor would segregation require out-of-control > cross posting. > > We all have our ways of handling information parsing. Some segregation > might be helpful to some of us. > > 73 > --Paul, wa0rse > > > On 4/19/07, k5nwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> And in the darkness bind them...always finish your quote. >> >> I'm in favor of one reflector, as stated by Dan the cross posting >> will drive you crazy, and if you only sign on to one what did you miss? >> >> It would be more worthwhile for the people that get offended by >> posting on subjects not to their liking to put a little effort and >> learn how to use the email filter to kill all mail on a particular >> discussion. >> >> At 11:57 AM 4/19/2007, you wrote: >> My guess is if the reflector were split, at least 75% of the current subscribers would subscribe to both. So what have you gained? A lot >>> of cross >>> posting? >>> Dan raises an excellent point: With multiple reflectors, we'd >>> undoubtedly suffer lots of cross-posting. >>> >>> A single list also makes searching easier. >>> >>> I vote for one list to rule them all... >>> >>> de Peter K1PGV >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> FlexRadio mailing list >>> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >>> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >>> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ >>> FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ >>> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ >>> >> Cecil >> K5NWA >> www.qrpradio.com www.hpsdr.com >> >> Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt. >> (When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults!) >> >> >> ___ >> FlexRadio mailing list >> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ >> FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ >> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ >> >> >> > > > ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
Thank You. This topic is beginning to get out of hand and people are taking it personally when it's a general discussion. Babies should be well fed and protected! At 01:48 PM 4/19/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I don't think ANY one is being nasty, again words written without >tone ARE often misinterpreted. I am always amazed at the imposed >interpretation of email, I have always been of the notion that >unless someone address you specifically with an issue than all post >are individual opinions . > >Thanks, >Al >KE5EUP >KCARC,ARRL,TAPR,AMSAT,HPSDR > >Cecil >K5NWA >www.qrpradio.com www.hpsdr.com > >Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt. >(When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults!) ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
This may have already been recommended. I have been doing a lot of deleting without reading. Why don't we just put "SDR-5000" or "SDR-1000" or something to distinguish between the two in the subject line for hardware issues and then put "power SDR" for software issues? This way we all can click and delete or filter out the messages we are not concerned with. Marty KG6QKJ ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
Ahem I am well aware of how to use an e-mail filter and have a number of them set up for this and other reflectors. I *have* and *will continue* to put in *more than a little* effort to update them in the future. (Let's not get too nasty, eh? I was simply weighing in with my opinion.) If we follow the logic of "let the filters do everything" to its conclusion, then all e-mail should be sent to everyone, everywhere and they should be responsible for filtering out what they want from what they do. My suggestion is merely that at some point it makes sense to have "special interest groups" emerge. There is synergy -- no question. In my opinion, that does not require one monolythic reflector nor would segregation require out-of-control cross posting. We all have our ways of handling information parsing. Some segregation might be helpful to some of us. 73 --Paul, wa0rse On 4/19/07, k5nwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And in the darkness bind them...always finish your quote. > > I'm in favor of one reflector, as stated by Dan the cross posting > will drive you crazy, and if you only sign on to one what did you miss? > > It would be more worthwhile for the people that get offended by > posting on subjects not to their liking to put a little effort and > learn how to use the email filter to kill all mail on a particular discussion. > > At 11:57 AM 4/19/2007, you wrote: > > > > > > My guess is if the reflector were split, at least 75% of the current > > > subscribers would subscribe to both. So what have you gained? A lot > >of cross > > > posting? > > > > > > >Dan raises an excellent point: With multiple reflectors, we'd > >undoubtedly suffer lots of cross-posting. > > > >A single list also makes searching easier. > > > >I vote for one list to rule them all... > > > >de Peter K1PGV > > > > > >___ > >FlexRadio mailing list > >FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > >http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > >Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > >FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ > >FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ > > Cecil > K5NWA > www.qrpradio.com www.hpsdr.com > > Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt. > (When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults!) > > > ___ > FlexRadio mailing list > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ > > -- Paul Beckmann, PhD Beckmann Research, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 612-414-0302 ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
There is too much synergy and commonality in the products to segregate based on hardware, after all, it is PowerSDR that is the "radio" not the box, which is only a RF to IQ converter (and visa versa), when you get right down to it. One dream, one goal, one mind and one reflector! -Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Kirk (KW5TX) Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 11:21 AM To: Flexradio Subject: [Flexradio] seperate reflectors Wouldn't it be nice if there was a reflector for the SDR1000 specifically and one for the new 5000... So that those of us who have no intentions of buying the 5000 for at least a year or 2 ...don't get inundated with junk mail :) just a thought steve kw5tx ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
i think there are too many common elements in the product line for the radios' themselves' to have separate reflectors. my $0.02USD worth. phil AB2JL - Original Message - From: "k5nwa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 1:06 PM Subject: Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors > And in the darkness bind them...always finish your quote. > > I'm in favor of one reflector, as stated by Dan the cross posting > will drive you crazy, and if you only sign on to one what did you miss? > > It would be more worthwhile for the people that get offended by > posting on subjects not to their liking to put a little effort and > learn how to use the email filter to kill all mail on a particular > discussion. > > At 11:57 AM 4/19/2007, you wrote: >> > >> > My guess is if the reflector were split, at least 75% of the current >> > subscribers would subscribe to both. So what have you gained? A lot >>of cross >> > posting? >> > >> >>Dan raises an excellent point: With multiple reflectors, we'd >>undoubtedly suffer lots of cross-posting. >> >>A single list also makes searching easier. >> >>I vote for one list to rule them all... >> >>de Peter K1PGV >> >> >>___ >>FlexRadio mailing list >>FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >>http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >>Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ >>FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ >>FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ > > Cecil > K5NWA > www.qrpradio.com www.hpsdr.com > > Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt. > (When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults!) > > > ___ > FlexRadio mailing list > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ > ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
And in the darkness bind them...always finish your quote. I'm in favor of one reflector, as stated by Dan the cross posting will drive you crazy, and if you only sign on to one what did you miss? It would be more worthwhile for the people that get offended by posting on subjects not to their liking to put a little effort and learn how to use the email filter to kill all mail on a particular discussion. At 11:57 AM 4/19/2007, you wrote: > > > > My guess is if the reflector were split, at least 75% of the current > > subscribers would subscribe to both. So what have you gained? A lot >of cross > > posting? > > > >Dan raises an excellent point: With multiple reflectors, we'd >undoubtedly suffer lots of cross-posting. > >A single list also makes searching easier. > >I vote for one list to rule them all... > >de Peter K1PGV > > >___ >FlexRadio mailing list >FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ >FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ >FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Cecil K5NWA www.qrpradio.com www.hpsdr.com Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt. (When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults!) ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
> > My guess is if the reflector were split, at least 75% of the current > subscribers would subscribe to both. So what have you gained? A lot of cross > posting? > Dan raises an excellent point: With multiple reflectors, we'd undoubtedly suffer lots of cross-posting. A single list also makes searching easier. I vote for one list to rule them all... de Peter K1PGV ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] separate reflectors
There have from time to time been a number of threads generated on splitting the reflector. I would much rather filter topics of personal interest using the "eyeball, brain and finger method" than feel that I might be missing something of importance because it was posted on the reflector to which I do not subscribe. My guess is if the reflector were split, at least 75% of the current subscribers would subscribe to both. So what have you gained? A lot of cross posting? Excluding times like the present, this reflector is a long way from overload. 73, Dan N4XWE __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20070419/d0bc14a8/attachment.html ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
