Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
This kind of reminds me of the robot packet station I ran for Field Day one year a long time ago. It would call CQ, wait for a connection, log it, hand out a QSO number, then disconnect and start over. All running on my Commodore 128! 73, Jim KQ6EA --- "Peter G. Viscarola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > They're all "really hard" > > > > Indeed. > > I suspect it wouldn't be all that difficult to build > a LOUSY contesting > robot... you know, one that slogged up the 20M band > in the CQ WW RTTY DX > Contest and attempted to QSO every station running a > frequency... and > moving on when successful or after a few > unsuccessful tries. I shudder > to think of the "contest etiquette" such a robot > would display. > > It might be easier for the robot to run a frequency. > > But I suspect building a GOOD contesting robot would > be VERY difficult > indeed. There's just so much "feel" and personal > judgment involved in > contesting. In timing, choosing bands, choosing the > stations to try to > contact, setting the receiver parameters (filers, RF > and AF gain, etc). > > H... I must admit that I kinda like the idea of > a robot sitting on a > frequency and trying to run it. I wonder how many > Qs/hr it'd be able to > sustain?? > > It DOES lead to some interesting questions: Would we > have to have it to > periodically and randomly transmit "PSE QSY PSE QSY > freq in use"?? > Would I still count as the control operator if I'm > in the other room > eating lunch and watching the football game?? (just > kidding, boys... > don't go nuts on me) > > > de Peter K1PGV > > > ___ > FlexRadio mailing list > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ > > ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
> > They're all "really hard" > Indeed. I suspect it wouldn't be all that difficult to build a LOUSY contesting robot... you know, one that slogged up the 20M band in the CQ WW RTTY DX Contest and attempted to QSO every station running a frequency... and moving on when successful or after a few unsuccessful tries. I shudder to think of the "contest etiquette" such a robot would display. It might be easier for the robot to run a frequency. But I suspect building a GOOD contesting robot would be VERY difficult indeed. There's just so much "feel" and personal judgment involved in contesting. In timing, choosing bands, choosing the stations to try to contact, setting the receiver parameters (filers, RF and AF gain, etc). H... I must admit that I kinda like the idea of a robot sitting on a frequency and trying to run it. I wonder how many Qs/hr it'd be able to sustain?? It DOES lead to some interesting questions: Would we have to have it to periodically and randomly transmit "PSE QSY PSE QSY freq in use"?? Would I still count as the control operator if I'm in the other room eating lunch and watching the football game?? (just kidding, boys... don't go nuts on me) de Peter K1PGV ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
yea but I only have maybe 5-10 years to retirement depending on how I want to push it, so the machine looses. The military thing is interesting, but it does not particularly take into account the amalgum of that one little thing that makes the difference. The occurence of that highly improbable event that is so fundamental it changes everything. Life is not deterministic, but largely random. linux or PowerSDR and the GLP license for example The invention of the polio vaccine for example. The military would have devised really great and tiny respirators not a vaccine. 73 W9OY. - Original Message From: Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Lee A Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Flexradio Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 6:04:44 PM Subject: Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone??? At 02:06 PM 10/9/2007, Lee A Crocker wrote: > If you can command arrays of robot receivers, you can command > arrays of target aquisition just as easily. Where Ham Radio once > was the test bed of communications technology, radio contesting > could become the test bed of incredible weapons system design. It's already been done. Modern electronic warfare systems do this sort of thing now (i.e. using a variety of dsp techniques to look at the signals, AI to provide cuing for the operators, etc.), as do active and passive sonars. Not that there isn't room for improvement, but the development budgets in that world substantially exceed the resources of hams, and we, as hams, are more likely to adopt their methods and algorithms than they are to use ours. Adaptive signal finding algorithms are but one aspect of this research. > If you can command arrays of probes (RX) you can command means of > complex process flows that are most amenable to human intervention > and can't just be left to AI for decision making. Sure.. but I'd venture that the ham contesting world is sufficiently unique that I'm not sure user interface and signal processing that supports that will transfer over to, say, weapons system targeting. The personnel skills might transfer easier, i.e. someone who is good at picking out the signals in a pileup might also be good at discerning sonar or radar targets in clutter. At least these days, modern comm networks mean that being a signals analyst doesn't put you out in the field with a big "shoot at me" whip sticking out of your backpack. > I'm an anesthesiologist would you like the AI deciding how to > keep you alive during the course of your heart bypass or brain > aneurysm surgery when the surgeon goes "son of a bitch" and > blood hits the ceiling? Would you like to rely on the mere > goodness of the code? We actually tried to devise some systems > that maintain blood pressure automatically for example when I was in > residency. Dismal failure. Human in control with a big box of > drugs and a whole lot of knowledge? Virtually no failure. I agree... but the machine is gaining on you... Jim, W6RMK Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
At 03:38 PM 10/9/2007, Ken wrote: >What happen to the love of Ham Radio! All of this high tech >conveniences takes the "Love" away! Keep the feet wet and the hands >dirty. This way when you win or log all of those "stations" you know >you deserve _the_ pat on the back! Hands can get dirty in a compiler just as easily as with a soldering iron or hacksaw. It's all about experimentation and fooling around in whatever medium floats your boat. The first guy or gal to make a robot contestor that racks up 10,000 Q's on field day can justly feel proud of their output, as much as the guy or gal who did it using rockmite. They're all "really hard" ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
At 02:06 PM 10/9/2007, Lee A Crocker wrote: > If you can command arrays of robot receivers, you can command > arrays of target aquisition just as easily. Where Ham Radio once > was the test bed of communications technology, radio contesting > could become the test bed of incredible weapons system design. It's already been done. Modern electronic warfare systems do this sort of thing now (i.e. using a variety of dsp techniques to look at the signals, AI to provide cuing for the operators, etc.), as do active and passive sonars. Not that there isn't room for improvement, but the development budgets in that world substantially exceed the resources of hams, and we, as hams, are more likely to adopt their methods and algorithms than they are to use ours. Adaptive signal finding algorithms are but one aspect of this research. > If you can command arrays of probes (RX) you can command means of > complex process flows that are most amenable to human intervention > and can't just be left to AI for decision making. Sure.. but I'd venture that the ham contesting world is sufficiently unique that I'm not sure user interface and signal processing that supports that will transfer over to, say, weapons system targeting. The personnel skills might transfer easier, i.e. someone who is good at picking out the signals in a pileup might also be good at discerning sonar or radar targets in clutter. At least these days, modern comm networks mean that being a signals analyst doesn't put you out in the field with a big "shoot at me" whip sticking out of your backpack. > I'm an anesthesiologist would you like the AI deciding how to > keep you alive during the course of your heart bypass or brain > aneurysm surgery when the surgeon goes "son of a bitch" and > blood hits the ceiling? Would you like to rely on the mere > goodness of the code? We actually tried to devise some systems > that maintain blood pressure automatically for example when I was in > residency. Dismal failure. Human in control with a big box of > drugs and a whole lot of knowledge? Virtually no failure. I agree... but the machine is gaining on you... Jim, W6RMK ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
What happen to the love of Ham Radio! All of this high tech conveniences takes the "Love" away! Keep the feet wet and the hands dirty. This way when you win or log all of those "stations" you know you deserve _the_ pat on the back! Lee A Crocker wrote: > No it will still be open to the vagaries of contesting, propagation, station > design, stratagey and deployment. It will just be an incredibly more > efficient system, and the guys who think contesting is sitting there all > night pusing the button on the keyer will go the way of the dodo. Certainly > coding the AI and user interface will be important but so will the hardware > interface and the choice of bands, and most especially the systems design. > The outcome of any contest will never be solely the venue of code, but the > ingenuity of the systems builder/operator just the same as it is today There > is a reason W3LPL and K3LR are who they are. Eventually the robots will have > to guess where each other will appear, and you could have band hopping > techniques as part of the S & P. If 10 wasn't very open for example you > could have only one or a few RX devoted to signal analysis. The user > interface would be more like a gaming console with a whole chair wired > and heads up displays popping up as new ones came along. What's the > commercial application for developing such a system? I can think of a few. > If you can command arrays of robot receivers, you can command arrays of > target aquisition just as easily. Where Ham Radio once was the test bed of > communications technology, radio contesting could become the test bed of > incredible weapons system design. If you can command arrays of probes (RX) > you can command means of complex process flows that are most amenable to > human intervention and can't just be left to AI for decision making. I'm an > anesthesiologist would you like the AI deciding how to keep you alive during > the course of your heart bypass or brain aneurysm surgery when the surgeon > goes "son of a bitch" and blood hits the ceiling? Would you like to rely > on the mere goodness of the code? We actually tried to devise some systems > that maintain blood pressure automatically for example when I was in > residency. Dismal failure. Human in control with a big box of drugs and a > whole lot of knowledge? Virtually no failure. > > 73 W9OY > > > > > > > Need a vacation? Get great deals > to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. > http://travel.yahoo.com/ > > ___ > FlexRadio mailing list > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ > > > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20071009/c9ae5676/attachment.html ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
W6RMK: >But seriously, it's only a matter of time before someone does build a contesting robot. The computing horsepower is available, it's just a matter of desire and skills coming together, just instead of the skill being digging out the CW and good operating skills with timing, it will be coding the AI. Done...about 15 years ago by N6TR (author of TR-Log). 73, Bill W4ZV http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/1993-07/msg00247.html Well, as someone who has done this, I would make the following proposal: 1. Pick a contest and sponsor a robot category. It wouldn't have to be done as part of the official contest, but could be done with results in the NCJ. I would suggest Field Day. 2. The robot can only search and pounce. No packet information can be used. 3. Comply to FCC rules. This is some gray areas here. If I write a computer program that controls the radio, am I in control of the operation since I wrote the program? 4. CW only. As more people start doing this type of thing, then we can think about expanding it. It really is a lot of work and to do it right, it will cost some bucks as well. Tree N6TR/7 ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
Amateur coded / Destroyer Contesting AC/DC Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
No it will still be open to the vagaries of contesting, propagation, station design, stratagey and deployment. It will just be an incredibly more efficient system, and the guys who think contesting is sitting there all night pusing the button on the keyer will go the way of the dodo. Certainly coding the AI and user interface will be important but so will the hardware interface and the choice of bands, and most especially the systems design. The outcome of any contest will never be solely the venue of code, but the ingenuity of the systems builder/operator just the same as it is today There is a reason W3LPL and K3LR are who they are. Eventually the robots will have to guess where each other will appear, and you could have band hopping techniques as part of the S & P. If 10 wasn't very open for example you could have only one or a few RX devoted to signal analysis. The user interface would be more like a gaming console with a whole chair wired and heads up displays popping up as new ones came along. What's the commercial application for developing such a system? I can think of a few. If you can command arrays of robot receivers, you can command arrays of target aquisition just as easily. Where Ham Radio once was the test bed of communications technology, radio contesting could become the test bed of incredible weapons system design. If you can command arrays of probes (RX) you can command means of complex process flows that are most amenable to human intervention and can't just be left to AI for decision making. I'm an anesthesiologist would you like the AI deciding how to keep you alive during the course of your heart bypass or brain aneurysm surgery when the surgeon goes "son of a bitch" and blood hits the ceiling? Would you like to rely on the mere goodness of the code? We actually tried to devise some systems that maintain blood pressure automatically for example when I was in residency. Dismal failure. Human in control with a big box of drugs and a whole lot of knowledge? Virtually no failure. 73 W9OY Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. http://travel.yahoo.com/ ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
At 09:06 AM 10/9/2007, Lee A Crocker wrote: >If it was me I would have 14 watch receivers in the passband running >as robots, one receiver for the run station and one RX for the S&P >station. I would have the robots automatically scan a given >sub-band looking for stuff needed, by analyzing every signal in >their little slice of spectrum in a sub band. I'm a CW guy so it >would require some means of artificial analysis of CW signals like a >neural net or AI. If something showed up that was needed the robot >would inform the S&P op and would take that op to the correct freq >to work the station. The S&P op could be doing a second run in the >mean time while he was waiting for the robots to inform him of >S&P. If you had more watch receivers you could probably have both >ops timeshare S&P with run on seperate bands.. That might require a >second transmitter SDR-X here we come Well heck.. why not have the AI robot just do the QSO... how hard can it be to send TNX UR 59 QRZ? But seriously, it's only a matter of time before someone does build a contesting robot. The computing horsepower is available, it's just a matter of desire and skills coming together, just instead of the skill being digging out the CW and good operating skills with timing, it will be coding the AI. Jim, W6RMK ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
At 09:58 AM 10/9/2007, Tim Ellison wrote: >Ahhh. A new contest class - Multi Operator AI Spider Assisted (MOAISA) No.. *Zero* Operator, Watched by Enthralled Amateur... ZOWEA Jim ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
Ahhh. A new contest class - Multi Operator AI Spider Assisted (MOAISA) -Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee A Crocker Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:06 PM To: Flexradio Subject: Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone??? If it was me I would have 14 watch receivers in the passband running as robots, one receiver for the run station and one RX for the S&P station. I would have the robots automatically scan a given sub-band looking for stuff needed, by analyzing every signal in their little slice of spectrum in a sub band. I'm a CW guy so it would require some means of artificial analysis of CW signals like a neural net or AI. If something showed up that was needed the robot would inform the S&P op and would take that op to the correct freq to work the station. The S&P op could be doing a second run in the mean time while he was waiting for the robots to inform him of S&P. If you had more watch receivers you could probably have both ops timeshare S&P with run on seperate bands.. That might require a second transmitter SDR-X here we come 73 W9OY Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658 ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
If it was me I would have 14 watch receivers in the passband running as robots, one receiver for the run station and one RX for the S&P station. I would have the robots automatically scan a given sub-band looking for stuff needed, by analyzing every signal in their little slice of spectrum in a sub band. I'm a CW guy so it would require some means of artificial analysis of CW signals like a neural net or AI. If something showed up that was needed the robot would inform the S&P op and would take that op to the correct freq to work the station. The S&P op could be doing a second run in the mean time while he was waiting for the robots to inform him of S&P. If you had more watch receivers you could probably have both ops timeshare S&P with run on seperate bands.. That might require a second transmitter SDR-X here we come 73 W9OY Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658 ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
At 08:12 PM 10/8/2007, Duane - N9DG wrote: >Has anyone else pondered the feasibility of running one >session of PowerSDR on two separate computers with both being >connected to a single 5000A HW box?? Aside from the considerable difficulty integrating such a thing with the current PowerSDR software, it's an intriguing concept. The bandwidth of the new radio is sufficiently large that you could probably cover the whole band of interest without ever retuning the RF section. You'd need to split the UI into "set band of interest"(which tunes the hardware) and "tune within band of interest" (which tunes the software receiver). I can imagine something which dynamically adjusts the hardware tuning to span all receiver users' current selected frequencies, but you'd have to have some sophistication to warn a user when they're too close to the band edge and/or a "lead operator" who can dominate the selection. The audio path is pretty simple.. you feed the Rx audio to all clients and they tune within it. The clients need to be told what the "center frequency" of the audio stream is, so they can relate user command/display in actual frequency to where in the I/Q bandwidth it is. Would you give each user the same panadapter display, representing the hardware tuned band? There's also an issue if one of the users wants to be at a frequency which happens to be at zero frequency in the I/Q stream, where performance isn't so wonderful. Again, some clever arbiter that takes "desired tuning frequencies from users 1..N" and turns that into "hardware tune frequency" and "user offset 1..N" would be fine. Sort of a juiced up version of the current spur reduction tuning algorithm. (And, if the F5K is using the new low spur DDS from Analog Devices, the need to tune for spur reduction is lessened... or just use only one side of the I/Q spectrum.. 100kHz is still pretty wide) I think the challenge is in specifying the rule-set behavior in a intuitive fashion, rather than the actual implementation (assuming the new architecture is implemented separating UI, dsp, and hardware control more thoroughly). What about Tx/Rx issues? >I'm thinking that such concept could be useful in an >Unlimited Multi Op contest category. One operator would be >the "run" operator and the other operator being the S&P >operator. Each would have their own UI control and each could >have two RX's as in today's PowerSDR, and then with the next >generation PowerSDR software, maybe even 3-4 RX's per >operator. No doubt would take some practice to learn how to >team operate like that, but I would think it should be >doable. Yes? No? > >Duane >N9DG Jim, W6RMK ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
I think that would probably require that components (rx1, rx2, tx) inside the 5000A box be separately addressable on the firewire bus, and that PowerSDR had the capabilty to target them separately. I don't think the software is there yet, but I might be wrong. And we won't have that second receiver anytime soon, I am guessing. Jerry W4UK At 11:12 PM 10/8/2007, you wrote: >Has anyone else pondered the feasibility of running one >session of PowerSDR on two separate computers with both being >connected to a single 5000A HW box?? > >I'm thinking that such concept could be useful in an >Unlimited Multi Op contest category. One operator would be >the "run" operator and the other operator being the S&P >operator. Each would have their own UI control and each could >have two RX's as in today's PowerSDR, and then with the next >generation PowerSDR software, maybe even 3-4 RX's per >operator. No doubt would take some practice to learn how to >team operate like that, but I would think it should be >doable. Yes? No? > >Duane >N9DG > > > > > >Need a vacation? Get great deals >to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. >http://travel.yahoo.com/ > >___ >FlexRadio mailing list >FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ >FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ >FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] 2OSR Anyone???
Once again, demonstrating the point that contesters are driving so many of the interesting SDR challenges... Duane - N9DG wrote: > Has anyone else pondered the feasibility of running one > session of PowerSDR on two separate computers with both being > connected to a single 5000A HW box?? Most of what you're describing is not a big reach at all. What's novel about this scenario is the need to arbitrate commands and data input from more than one operator at a time. On its face, that would seem to be much more of a "human protocol" issue than a technical one. However it does imply three important requirements: first, command message streams from each UI need to be stateful; second, the command protocol needs to include priorities; and third, commands may need some sort of time tagging and scheduling. Very interesting. Important stuff to bring into the picture. Fortunately, not something either the UIs or the DSP need to know anything about. For the rest, this configuration isn't much different from running multiple UIs on one machine, except the control/focus issue is more clearly defined for a single user with several UI instances. In that case, commands can still be treated as atomic rather than stateful, and can be executed as they arrive rather than needing scheduling. Much, much simpler. > I'm thinking that such concept could be useful in an > Unlimited Multi Op contest category... 73 Frank AB2KT ___ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
