Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
3164 still works here (although there are a few minor WBIR issues) -Tim -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:13 PM To: Bob McGwier Cc: k.nesb...@shaw.ca; flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Bob McGwier wrote: > > Yes, but the changes you are referring to actually occurred in 3160. I > contend you just didn't svn up until 3166 after I made those changes. > > > There have been two major improvements in CW recently in the test branch. > These are being beat up and more done before they are released. Thanks for > the feedback. This will all be in the upcoming stable release. Test Branch SVN 3160 works fine. SVN 3166 and 3167 still appear broken. Any idea what happened between 3160 and 3166 to cause the problem? 73 de Brian, WB6RQN/J79BPL ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Bob McGwier wrote: > > Yes, but the changes you are referring to actually occurred in 3160. I > contend you just didn't svn up until 3166 after I made those changes. > > > There have been two major improvements in CW recently in the test branch. > These are being beat up and more done before they are released. Thanks for > the feedback. This will all be in the upcoming stable release. Test Branch SVN 3160 works fine. SVN 3166 and 3167 still appear broken. Any idea what happened between 3160 and 3166 to cause the problem? 73 de Brian, WB6RQN/J79BPL ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
Yes, but the changes you are referring to actually occurred in 3160. I contend you just didn't svn up until 3166 after I made those changes. There have been two major improvements in CW recently in the test branch. These are being beat up and more done before they are released. Thanks for the feedback. This will all be in the upcoming stable release. Bob knesbitt wrote: John, this is a major break through if in fact its reproducible. What more have you learned since your original post (I see no comments in this regard on the reflecto). Bob, come up for air and fess up for your actions. Kirb - VE6IV -- The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK. 73 John N3WT ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ -- (Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. "You don't need to see the whole staircase, just take the first step.", MLK. Twitter:rwmcgwier Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
Yes, but the changes you are referring to actually occurred in 3160. I contend you just didn't svn up until 3166 after I made those changes. There have been two major improvements in CW recently in the test branch. These are being beat up and more done before they are released. Thanks for the feedback. This will all be in the upcoming stable release. Bob knesbitt wrote: John, this is a major break through if in fact its reproducible. What more have you learned since your original post (I see no comments in this regard on the reflecto). Bob, come up for air and fess up for your actions. Kirb - VE6IV -- The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK. 73 John N3WT ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ -- (Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. "You don't need to see the whole staircase, just take the first step.", MLK. Twitter:rwmcgwier Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
Same exact thing here as WX7Y Bret, the temporary work around is to sequence through the sample rates. Need to do this every time on start up, a large change in frequency or band change. Cycle through the sample rates and it will start operating. I'm sure this will be fixed up very soon. (it is Alpha code) Anyone else notice improvement in the QSK? I sure do. John N3WT -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz]on Behalf Of Bret Mills Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 3:57 PM To: 'FireBrick'; 'FlexRadio List' Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? Same exact problem here EXCEPT if I would go and reset my Audio sample rate to 4800 it started to work except the SQUELCH was up and squelching the receiver, I then went to 9600 sample rate and every NOW was working then I went back to 19200 sample rate and it now works BUT when I shut down PowerSDR and brought it back up, I had to do it again and this time it took several sample rate switching back and forth before it finally sinked with the Driver(I think) and worked like it is supposed to. So every time you start PowerSDR we will need to do this until they fix the bug. Hope this helps track it down for others. 73's Thanks Bret WX7Y -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of FireBrick Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 12:47 PM To: FlexRadio List Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? I did the same thing and am experincing the same problem. Duh I just entered a bug report. On 6/14/2009 1:25:28 PM, NZ8J (n...@woh.rr.com) wrote: > I just tried this test branch 1.19.1 SVN:3166 , but had two problems > when I did the calibration for images, 17 and 6 meters failed plus I > don't get any audio and the panadapter line jumps from a normal signal > line at about -120 or so up to a straight line at about -60. It seems > to happen about every 1 sec. > > Any ideas? > Thanks > Tim > NZ8J > > -Original Message- > From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz > [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney > Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 1:05 PM > To: FlexRadio List > Subject: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? > > > > > The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, > "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. > The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth > sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. > > I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no > issues > , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't > understand what N4HY > is > doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact > the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
Same exact problem here EXCEPT if I would go and reset my Audio sample rate to 4800 it started to work except the SQUELCH was up and squelching the receiver, I then went to 9600 sample rate and every NOW was working then I went back to 19200 sample rate and it now works BUT when I shut down PowerSDR and brought it back up, I had to do it again and this time it took several sample rate switching back and forth before it finally sinked with the Driver(I think) and worked like it is supposed to. So every time you start PowerSDR we will need to do this until they fix the bug. Hope this helps track it down for others. 73's Thanks Bret WX7Y -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of FireBrick Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 12:47 PM To: FlexRadio List Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? I did the same thing and am experincing the same problem. Duh I just entered a bug report. On 6/14/2009 1:25:28 PM, NZ8J (n...@woh.rr.com) wrote: > I just tried this test branch 1.19.1 SVN:3166 , but had two problems > when I did the calibration for images, 17 and 6 meters failed plus I > don't get any audio and the panadapter line jumps from a normal signal > line at about -120 or so up to a straight line at about -60. It seems > to happen about every 1 sec. > > Any ideas? > Thanks > Tim > NZ8J > > -Original Message- > From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz > [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney > Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 1:05 PM > To: FlexRadio List > Subject: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? > > > > > The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, > "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. > The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth > sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. > > I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no > issues > , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't > understand what N4HY > is > doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact > the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
I did the same thing and am experincing the same problem. Duh I just entered a bug report. On 6/14/2009 1:25:28 PM, NZ8J (n...@woh.rr.com) wrote: I just tried this test branch 1.19.1 SVN:3166 , but had two problems when I did the calibration for images, 17 and 6 meters failed plus I don't get any audio and the panadapter line jumps from a normal signal line at about -120 or so up to a straight line at about -60. It seems to happen about every 1 sec. Any ideas? Thanks Tim NZ8J -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 1:05 PM To: FlexRadio List Subject: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
I am having this exact same problem with Test SVN 3166. Both receivers. on XP pro and Windows 7 64bit Tried new database, power cycle, etc. Trunk, Pretty betty work fine. Dave W0DHB NZ8J wrote: I just tried this test branch 1.19.1 SVN:3166 , but had two problems when I did the calibration for images, 17 and 6 meters failed plus I don't get any audio and the panadapter line jumps from a normal signal line at about -120 or so up to a straight line at about -60. It seems to happen about every 1 sec. Any ideas? Thanks Tim NZ8J -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 1:05 PM To: FlexRadio List Subject: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK. 73 John N3WT ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Re: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK?
I just tried this test branch 1.19.1 SVN:3166 , but had two problems when I did the calibration for images, 17 and 6 meters failed plus I don't get any audio and the panadapter line jumps from a normal signal line at about -120 or so up to a straight line at about -60. It seems to happen about every 1 sec. Any ideas? Thanks Tim NZ8J -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 1:05 PM To: FlexRadio List Subject: [Flexradio] Test Branch SVN 3166 improved QSK? The latest Test Branch SVN 3166, which according to the change log, "redone vfo initialization", seems to improve the CW QSK significantly. The TX>RX transition sounds better on the audio, no pop, now smooth sounding. My Delay at 15ms seems best and quick. I can also now set the Sample Rate at 192K and Buffer to 1024 with no issues , whereas before I had to use 192/2048. I don't understand what N4HY is doing on Test branch SVN 3166, don't know if it is supposed to impact the CW QSK, but it appears to improve the fast QSK. 73 John N3WT ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ ___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
