Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: New YASim files for base package
Alex Romosan wrote: > is anybody able to fly the yasim planes with latest cvs and the above > patch? i keep getting: > > YASim SOLUTION FAILURE: > Solution failed to converge after 1 iterations > > for the a4, harrier, 747. I appear to have goofed something up with the posted planes. Or perhaps missed a checkin. I promise to check tonight. Things have been a little busy lately. :) Andy -- Andrew J. RossNextBus Information Systems Senior Software Engineer Emeryville, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nextbus.com "Men go crazy in conflagrations. They only get better one by one." - Sting (misquoted) ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Re: New YASim files for base package
Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The patch requires new aircraft descriptions. These are available at: > >http://plausible.org/yasim-aircraft-20020521.tar.gz > is anybody able to fly the yasim planes with latest cvs and the above patch? i keep getting: YASim SOLUTION FAILURE: Solution failed to converge after 1 iterations for the a4, harrier, 747. --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. | ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Re: New YASim files for base package
* Andy Ross -- Tuesday 21 May 2002 18:43:
> [...] a bad configuration file in the archive that, ahem, no one reported. :)
Oh ... I'm =so= sorry. :->
> No idea what the issue is with the 310 -- I'm pretty sure I test-flew
> all of the aircraft before the checkin. Maybe I missed a data file in
> the tarball?
3 data files. I just tried the a4 and the harrier, and both don't work
either ("YASim SOLUTION FAILURE"). Only the c172 and the 747 work here.
(Of course, I have applied your *.tar.gz files before.)
m.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: New YASim files for base package
Melchior FRANZ wrote: > When I reported the 747 problem, it had nothing to do with approaching. > The 747 didn't work at all! Not even the scenery was shown, before fgfs > aborted. Just the HUD and the sky. Right. That was a simpler problem -- a bad configuration file in the archive that, ahem, no one reported. :) This bug was one that John Wojnaroski and others reported a while back. The YASim configuration file says that the 747 should trim for approach at 7 degrees AoA and 130 knots with 20% fuel. In flight, the model didn't do that -- you'd be trimmed at 160+ kias even at maximum elevator authority. > The yasim C310 is broken now, like the 747 was before: It endlessly > (1 times?) outputs these: > > p0 1.689844 p1 1.684052 e -0.226954 d 0.029176 > l 85.502754 d 0.013781 aoa 0.029065 inc 0.065312 ele -0.226954 Gack, sorry. That's debug code left in the checkin. Mom always told me never to check stuff in at bedtime. I'll get that fixed pronto. No idea what the issue is with the 310 -- I'm pretty sure I test-flew all of the aircraft before the checkin. Maybe I missed a data file in the tarball? I'll take a look this evening. Andy -- Andrew J. RossNextBus Information Systems Senior Software Engineer Emeryville, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nextbus.com "Men go crazy in conflagrations. They only get better one by one." - Sting (misquoted) ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Re: New YASim files for base package
* Andy Ross -- Tuesday 21 May 2002 07:48: > I just commited a YASim patch to fix the approach lift problem I > mentioned this morning. The 747, in particular, behaves much more > sanely on approach. When I reported the 747 problem, it had nothing to do with approaching. The 747 didn't work at all! Not even the scenery was shown, before fgfs aborted. Just the HUD and the sky. Now with your recent changes it works again. I could lift off, everything felt OK. But landing was a big challenge, because the flaps seemed to produce too much lift near the ground, I could hardly get down with full flaps and no throttle. It resembled flying with --fdm=balloon. After setting boeing747.ac as model I encountered something strange. Not only that the 747 doesn't sit on the ground but hover some meters above the ground. When you are in the cockpit you see a big part of the 747 in front and beneath you. The pilot doesn't really sit in the machine. The yasim C310 is broken now, like the 747 was before: It endlessly (1 times?) outputs these: p0 1.689844 p1 1.684052 e -0.226954 d 0.029176 l 85.502754 d 0.013781 aoa 0.029065 inc 0.065312 ele -0.226954 BTW: the 'new' HUD looks quite cool ... and confusing. :-] m. -- Never make anything simple and efficient when a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
