Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Jim Wilson writes:
 When the 1900 first came out it was _so_ much nicer than anything else flying
 out of this part of Maine.  You see them in the air all day long now down
 around the cape and the vineyard.  If there is a problem, it isn't obvious or
 we'd be probably be hearing talk of a grounding...one would hope.

Not to take away from the seriousness of this, but to angle the discussion
back towards flightgear.

Has anyone thought about building a B1900 model for flightgear?  It
would be nice to have a really well done twin turbo (3d model, flight
model, engine model, prop model, cockpit, sounds, animations, etc.)
and I think this would be a great candidate.

Regards,

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Citiescurt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Jim Wilson
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 I was sitting in my car waiting for a doctors appointment
 watching the departures from KHYA fly overhead and saw 
 these poor souls and was thinking it was odd they still had the 
 gear down 
 
 http://www.capecodonline.com/cctimes/repairpreceded28.htm

Did you see the dive?  It was just Sunday that I left the area down there,
quite a shock, when I read the news the other night.

When the 1900 first came out it was _so_ much nicer than anything else flying
out of this part of Maine.  You see them in the air all day long now down
around the cape and the vineyard.  If there is a problem, it isn't obvious or
we'd be probably be hearing talk of a grounding...one would hope.

Best,

Jim


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Jim Wilson
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Jim Wilson writes:
  When the 1900 first came out it was _so_ much nicer than anything else flying
  out of this part of Maine.  You see them in the air all day long now down
  around the cape and the vineyard.  If there is a problem, it isn't obvious or
  we'd be probably be hearing talk of a grounding...one would hope.
 
 Not to take away from the seriousness of this, but to angle the discussion
 back towards flightgear.
 
 Has anyone thought about building a B1900 model for flightgear?  It
 would be nice to have a really well done twin turbo (3d model, flight
 model, engine model, prop model, cockpit, sounds, animations, etc.)
 and I think this would be a great candidate.
 

Oh yes!  It's a beautiful aircraft visually and is certainly a standard in
recent years.  I'm just kind of thinking I should finish some of my other
projects first :-).  But...if someone is intetrested in configuring an FDM
(which takes some time to do right) I'll start a 3D model.  I really can't
take on both right now.

Best,

Jim

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Erik Hofman
Curtis L. Olson wrote:

Has anyone thought about building a B1900 model for flightgear?  It
would be nice to have a really well done twin turbo (3d model, flight
model, engine model, prop model, cockpit, sounds, animations, etc.)
and I think this would be a great candidate.
What's wrong with the Fokker 50?

Erik

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Erik Hofman writes:
 Curtis L. Olson wrote:
 
  Has anyone thought about building a B1900 model for flightgear?  It
  would be nice to have a really well done twin turbo (3d model, flight
  model, engine model, prop model, cockpit, sounds, animations, etc.)
  and I think this would be a great candidate.
 
 What's wrong with the Fokker 50?

How's it doing lately, it wasn't very far along the last time I looked
at it.

Regards,

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Citiescurt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Erik Hofman writes:
 Curtis L. Olson wrote:
 
  Has anyone thought about building a B1900 model for flightgear?  It
  would be nice to have a really well done twin turbo (3d model, flight
  model, engine model, prop model, cockpit, sounds, animations, etc.)
  and I think this would be a great candidate.
 
 What's wrong with the Fokker 50?

I should have said, Yes! let's do both. :-)

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Citiescurt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Erik Hofman
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Erik Hofman writes:

Curtis L. Olson wrote:


Has anyone thought about building a B1900 model for flightgear?  It
would be nice to have a really well done twin turbo (3d model, flight
model, engine model, prop model, cockpit, sounds, animations, etc.)
and I think this would be a great candidate.
What's wrong with the Fokker 50?


How's it doing lately, it wasn't very far along the last time I looked
at it.
The B1900 is still nowhere :-)

There is a FDM (needs tweaking) and a 3D model with animations.

I do have some audio somewhere, and since it has a glass cockpit it can 
reuse much of Jim's 747 cockpit.

Erik

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Jim Wilson
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Curtis L. Olson wrote:
 
  Has anyone thought about building a B1900 model for flightgear?  It
  would be nice to have a really well done twin turbo (3d model, flight
  model, engine model, prop model, cockpit, sounds, animations, etc.)
  and I think this would be a great candidate.
 
 What's wrong with the Fokker 50?
 
 Erik

That is a twin turbo and so is the OV10. The B1900 is a lot different
otherwise, a class we really don't have represented (light turbo).

Better looking too. ::: duck :::  :-)

Best,

Jim

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Jim Wilson
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Erik Hofman writes:
  Curtis L. Olson wrote:
  
   Has anyone thought about building a B1900 model for flightgear?  It
   would be nice to have a really well done twin turbo (3d model, flight
   model, engine model, prop model, cockpit, sounds, animations, etc.)
   and I think this would be a great candidate.
  
  What's wrong with the Fokker 50?
 
 I should have said, Yes! let's do both. :-)
 

Yes, the Fokker 50 is a very nice aircraft, even if a little uncomely in the
nose area. ;-)

Best,

Jim

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Erik Hofman
Jim Wilson wrote:
Erik Hofman said:

What's wrong with the Fokker 50?

That is a twin turbo and so is the OV10. The B1900 is a lot different
otherwise, a class we really don't have represented (light turbo).
Better looking too. ::: duck :::  :-)
Did you ever have the honor to see one fly?

Erik

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] AutoTrim ?

2003-08-28 Thread Jim Wilson
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Jim Wilson wrote:
  Erik Hofman said:
 
 What's wrong with the Fokker 50?
 
  
  That is a twin turbo and so is the OV10. The B1900 is a lot different
  otherwise, a class we really don't have represented (light turbo).
  
  Better looking too. ::: duck :::  :-)
 
 Did you ever have the honor to see one fly?

It is possible during one of several layovers in Keflavic.  But I can't swear
to it.  I remember seeing some twins about that size, but didn't know what
they were.

The truth is I've been crazy about aircraft since I was five years old and
think they are _all_ really neat in their own way.

Best,

Jim


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel