FLUXLIST: Fwd: Art Guys stay current!

2001-05-25 Thread allen bukoff

In our never-ending quest to bring you the very best in Art Guys art, we 
invite you to visit

http://TheArtGuys.com/works/current.html

See The Art Guys make a drawing!

See things you've never seen before from "One Minute Ax"!

You won't believe your eyes!

Thank you





Re: FLUXLIST: re response to FAPO

2001-05-25 Thread Carol Starr

jason, get a life. c.

-- 
carol starr
taos, new mexico, usa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

jason pierce wrote:
> 
> who's complaining, bennett is not being considerate
> i beg to differ only 3 of those post were complaints
> the rest were my poetry. o.k i will quit
> refering to bennet in my poetry. if you recollect
> we asked him nicely. Bennet has posted ALOT
> of poetry. this would make the fourth complaint.
> i'm just saying every time he post a poem i am going
> to post one to mock him. we only ask that he post
> links to his poetry instead but obviously that is
> JUST WAY TOO MUCH TO ASK. since you are
> counting my post why not count bennett poems too?
> how many poems has he posted? my apologies
> but i am still going to post mock poetry untill
> bennett stops. that's right when did this become a poetry
> list??? i would like herr Bennett to answer
> 
> murf du sag
> 
> sig nog no non non non [ripened fruit]
> jurg ur red due sog [mixed fruit]
> becon fut your derelict mict [tangerines]
> mookoo  mookoo moogo giapan [strawberries]
> mushu pork [almonds are not fruit]
> liggu ligggu shrimp fried rice [pomengranates]
> licko licko fundu for the masses [grapes, the seedless variety]
> 
> jason pierce
> rep Fluxlisters Against Poetry Overload

-- 
carol starr
taos, new mexico, usa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



FLUXLIST: re:response to FAPA

2001-05-25 Thread jason pierce

i want to address some of these things specifically:

1. my wish was not to make this public,
it was a private request. it is only now public
because Bennet or whoever desired it so. as i
told no one except my "co conspirators". so
if anyone is irritated by this public issue you should
know who  to blame.

2. you are asking me to consider Bennetts feelings etc.
simply, i did so to the best of my ability...i wanted Bennett
spared of any public ridicule that some felt would be neccessary
to get him to quit posting so much poetry. HENCE the private
request. subsequently FAPA was attacked as being "sneaky"
"undemocratic" and against "freedom". and now is being attacked
for not respecting his feelings. when that was the sole intent
of the private request. so both criticisms are erroneous.

3. the only source of the lack of respect Bennett is getting is
from his desire (or someone he told) to make the issue public.

4. as far as "present" "discuss" and "theorize about our work" i was
simply presenting discussing and theorize about my "work"
and Bennetts work. we don't object to Bennett "presenting"
his work in the form of links, as we felt he has somewhat abused
his "presenting " privelages, rights or whatever.

5. as far as "the Tournament of Blockades" goes only 2 submitions
have been generated (both by myself) one: an anonymous blockade
and two: a blockade of Bennetts poetry bombardment. so there is
nothing to report. i also Blockaded some right-libertarians on an
anarchy news group but i felt that blockade not worth submiting.

6. barring any further attacks against FAPA this will be
the last that i personally will say on the issue UNLESS
Bennett continues to post his poetry not in the form of
a link (posting his actual poetry instead of providing
a link to his poetry posted on an outside source)
if he does then i will continue my personal blockading
activities. so it's up to him if he wishes to coninue
this "lack of consideration" for his feelings. as it was up
to him from the very start. he had all the time in the world
to consider that he may be posting too much poetry.

Jason Pierce
rep. Fluxlisters Against Poetic Aggression

At 4:47 AM -0700 5/25/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
>Jason,
>
>This is addressed to you since you claim representation of FAPA.
>
>Since 14th September 2000 you have sent 14 posts to Fluxlist. 8 of these
>have been to complain about John M. Bennett sending poetry to the list. That
>means over 50% of your input to this list in the last 9 months has been
>complaint-based.
>
>Whilst I respect your right to say that you do not wish to see John's poems
>on Fluxlist I do not think the way you are going about this respects John's
>feelings in any way.
>
>
>
>In reality, in the history of this list, complaints and the sort of action
>you are now undertaking have led to more people leaving the list (or ceasing
>to post frequently) than anything else. Whilst some people may think that
>John posts too many of his poems I'm in no doubt that everyone would rather
>see the result of individual creativity in their inbox as oppose to the
>material you're currently posting which not only causes bad feeling towards
>John but on your own admission is designed purely to spoof John's form of
>creative expression and done in a manner (FAPA) that can only be hurtful and
>make John feel uncomfortable here. John joined Fluxlist because he saw a
>copy of the Fluxlist poetry book "Happy New Ears" that we did a while back.
>John's poetry has stimulated interesting discussion on the list in the past
>and no doubt will do so again. Those who don't like it can indeed delete it
>and for those receiving the digest version I don't believe that John's short
>texts can be that much of a burden even if his poetry does not appeal to
>you.
>
>Jason, I would urge you to stop this and consider the feelings of others a
>little more. When you subscribed to Fluxlist you will have received a long
>message about the list which included the following:
>
>"Along with the obvious invitation to historians and theorists of the past,
>we encourage active artists to present, discuss, and theorize their work."
>
>John's posts fit into the above framework.
>
>Also from the introductory notes about the list is this:
>
>"Several kinds of behavior will result in expulsion from Fluxlist. Abuse,
>harassment, impersonation, violation of confidentiality, reposting of
>private posts without permission and spamming are unacceptable. "
>
>I think your spoof poems are bordering on harassment now and ask that you
>stop this campaign and post more positive material instead if you wish to
>contribute to the list. You've made your point, now is the time to let it
>lie before things get unpleasant.
>
>On a more positive note you never told us what happened with your 7th Annual
>Tournament of Blockades. Some info on how that turned out would be great.
>
>cheers,
>
>Sol.





FLUXLIST: ARBITRARY ART GRANT, Seattle (fwd)

2001-05-25 Thread { brad brace }



"ARBITRARY ART GRANT - $500 
Artists for a Work Free America is giving away $500 to "one random person 
in the act of making, or pretending to make a film." Southeast corner of 
Denny & Westlake, Saturday June 2nd, 1-2 PM. In cash, on the spot, no 
application, no judge. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info."

- End Forwarded Message -


The 12hr-ISBN-JPEG Project since 1994 

+ + + serial   ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/b/bbrace
+ + +  eccentric  ftp://ftp.idiom.com/users/bbrace
+ + + continuous   ftp://ftp.teleport.com/users/bbrace
+ + +hypermodern  ftp://ftp.rdrop.com/pub/users/bbrace
+ + +imagery   ftp://ftp.pacifier.com/pub/users/bbrace

  News://alt.binaries.pictures.12hr ://a.b.p.fine-art.misc
  Reverse Solidus: http://www.teleport.com/~bbrace/bbrace.html
   http://www.eskimo.com/~bbrace/bbrace.html
   Mirror: http://bbrace.laughingsquid.net/

 { brad brace }    [EMAIL PROTECTED]   ~finger for pgp

Note: all "Teleport" addresses (web/ftp/email) are being eliminated: 
no thanks to Earthlink scum. Please choose from listed alternates.






















FLUXLIST: project - heart radish cross

2001-05-25 Thread Mick Boyle

Heart Radish Cross Project

You all are invited to participate in this visual exchange. The link below
is a 800 x 600 pixel  jpg image (163kb) composed of some small ink
drawings of hearts radishes and crosses. Download this image and
change it, add to it, mutate it,  do anything you like with any part of it. It is 
fairly
simple and in black and white but feel free to change it color it any way you
want. The only "rule" is that there should be at least one element from the original
image visible. Please post a URL to view your image. Have fun!

Mick

http://www.alltel.net/~moontea/hrc.jpg






Re: FLUXLIST: re response to FAPO

2001-05-25 Thread Deborah

At 01:29 PM 5/25/01 -0500, you wrote:
>my apologies
>but i am still going to post mock poetry untill
>bennett stops.

Aggression!!!

So much energy focused into the head of a needle for the forcing of one's will.



Human nature?

Dull , at best.

Deborah




FLUXLIST: re response to FAPO

2001-05-25 Thread jason pierce

who's complaining, bennett is not being considerate
i beg to differ only 3 of those post were complaints
the rest were my poetry. o.k i will quit
refering to bennet in my poetry. if you recollect
we asked him nicely. Bennet has posted ALOT
of poetry. this would make the fourth complaint.
i'm just saying every time he post a poem i am going
to post one to mock him. we only ask that he post
links to his poetry instead but obviously that is
JUST WAY TOO MUCH TO ASK. since you are 
counting my post why not count bennett poems too?
how many poems has he posted? my apologies
but i am still going to post mock poetry untill 
bennett stops. that's right when did this become a poetry
list??? i would like herr Bennett to answer

murf du sag

sig nog no non non non [ripened fruit]
jurg ur red due sog [mixed fruit]
becon fut your derelict mict [tangerines]
mookoo  mookoo moogo giapan [strawberries]
mushu pork [almonds are not fruit]
liggu ligggu shrimp fried rice [pomengranates]
licko licko fundu for the masses [grapes, the seedless variety]

jason pierce
rep Fluxlisters Against Poetry Overload





FLUXLIST: Mick's digital art website

2001-05-25 Thread Mick Boyle

http://www.alltel.net/~moontea/main.html

Well here it is. Please take a look if you're interested.
I am interested in any comments or reactions to these pieces.
Thanks.

Mick





Re: FLUXLIST: Visual Poetry/JMB

2001-05-25 Thread dbchirot1


Dear fellow workers:

Visual poetry I think actually begins with cave paintings--petroglyphs--
the relationships among presenting visually and sounding--
forms, colors, lines considered as both visual and sound--
and then used as scores as well for performance--
dance--
often it is considered that Mallarme created modern visual poetry
with his "Un Coup de des"--
the Russian and Italian Futurists--of very different political ideas--
and Cubists painters and poets, the Dadas--contributed much to modern
visual poetry-
the history of it has been very rich in the European and Latin American
countries--
in the USA we are very fortunate to live in a time with John M Bennett's 
LOST AND FOUND TIMES--Harry Burrus' O!!Zone--Crag Hill's SCORE--
David Stone's BLACKBIRD--
journals that present the great variety of visual poetry being done--
all over the world--
also there are many presses in Canada that publish a lot of good work--
and Dimitry Bulatov in Russia--
also web sites such as one from here in Wisconsin--
Karl Young's Light and Dust--which has a lot of work by Patchen and also
the great bpNichol--
d.a.levy as well from the USA--
I have been published a lot as a visual poet--I don't have a definition 
of it--
I always have the hope that, like mail art, it will remain a wide open 
field--
in each person and place it becomes an event--
the page becomes a space of action--
it is true so called Concrete Poetry "solidified" many people's ideas of
visual poetry--
but it was before and has continued to be site/sight/cite of work
that has varied greatly--
with historical/political implications--
that is its power
actually--I support strongly  Bennett's "poetic aggression"--
freedom of speech, writing--these are essential--
the history of visual poetry in itself--in all its presentations--has 
been a struggle
with this --
and as well a great shout and song of freedom--
davidbc







FLUXLIST: blockade RE bennet

2001-05-25 Thread jason pierce

this poetry stuff is fun! i to am an aeroplaner
if he posts his poetry i have the right to criticize or make fun of it.
it's fun i was secretly hoping it would come to this.
his poetry bombardment has been insulting to me
and a few others for a while. but herr bennett did not even consider that.

dorf on golf with fresh fruit addendum

there were pigeons in a house [strawberries]
cre pux chicken pox  [bannanas]
molotov [pomengranates]
random word thing [bits of crush apple]
peotry that could be written by a comuter AI [squash, not a fruit]
except of course much better [bats known to eat fruit]
"moss rift of slowness storage rice" [a juicy center, the monkey bites into]
Bennet just writes in that indeterminant style (grapefruit]
because jeg lurf morf it's very easy [the seedless variety]
that way eick eick he can pretend he's as artist [stuck to the bottom of their toes]

muddle fuddle

ideterminant poetry is the easiest to proliferate [locust not a fruit]
and it's been done 5 million times before [locust like fruit]
just can't wait to read 5 million more [fruit is ambivalent to locust]
mark the center of the glass [pineapples not as deadly as was previously thought]
bennet must be such an ass [oranges are still popular]


jason pierce
rep. Fluxlister Against Poetic Aggression



Re: FLUXLIST: Date: Tue, 25 May 2094 21:33:36 -0400

2001-05-25 Thread ann klefstad

Jackson mac low is certainly in the spirit of fluxus and has had some
associations with fluxus people--in any case, fluxus in some sense means taking
communicative means and playing with them, whether those means are visual,
verbal, sonic, etc--after all, higgins's intermedia includes all these. And, as
John notes, the list is what the list becomes. We've never been very
prescriptive--that is, if you want it different start posting different things.

AK

ddyment wrote:

> not sure how to phrase this. i really mean no offensive by it and it's not a
> direct response to anyone in particular (i skim so fast i don't even know
> who's who anymore). the question is
>
> when did this become a poetry site?
>
> i'm not opposed to poetry, but it has little in common with fluxus. you
> could argue that concrete poetry overlapped into fluxus (a very little) but
> of all the contributions fluxus made to culture (performance, events,
> multiples, artists' books, etc) concrete poetry has aged the worst.
>
> i think of emmett williams as the only fluxus artist who would identify
> him/herself as a poet first and foremost. and his output has been
> consistently mediocre. has anyone /read/ his autobiography? his something
> else press years (the best things he's done) are completely ignored due to
> something that happened with dick higgins which he never forgave (an
> interesting story for those in the know). that which is included, is
> unbearably dull.
>
> i realize i am in the minority when i say that this list would benefit from
> a more historical perspective. i am not against the idea of new art emerging
> and being disseminated online. but if the concern is really NEW then start a
> new forum. why call it fluxus? it's like those boring artists on ebay who
> try to sell their work as genuine fluxus. it's not continueing a tradition
> (and who wants to do that, anyway) - it's exploitation.
>
> fluxus was just a name chosen at random,from the dictionary. there are many
> more.
>
> dave
>
> i'm sure this lives up to my passive/aggressive reputation. forgive me.




Re: FLUXLIST: Visual Poetry

2001-05-25 Thread Carol Starr

hi pedro,

this index was sent to me by clemente padin when i asked, what is visual poetry?

bests, carol :)



Pedro wrote:
> 
> John,
> I have a question.
> This arose in conversation recently.
> Who came up with Visual Poetry?
> I'm guessing it was the Futurists with all their wild experiments
> with Fonts and typography.
> You may not know the answer but I thought you might.
> Does Bern Porter figure in to this picture anywhere?
> And where does all this fit in to Fluxus?
> I hope that's not a lot of work.
> I know your sight limits your time on the computer.
> Thanks,
> Pedro

-- 
carol starr
taos, new mexico, usa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Directorio de Poesía Visual







	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
   
   


















	
  
  
 
  

 
  
   
   





























Arbol Veloz
Art & Video Exhibit
Arte Con Sciència
Bienal Internacional de Poesía Visual 
Burning Press
Christy Sheffield Sanford
Ciberpoema Animado
Clemente Padin
Concrete Poems
Concrete Poetry
Concretismo
Correspondence. Poetry Video
Cut-Up Machine
Cut-Up. 
Cyberpoetry Directory : CyberPoetry Gallery
Cyberpoetry
Décio Pignatari. Concretismo
Edgardo Antonio Vigo
Eduardo Kac. Holopoetry
 El Operador Visual en la Poesía.
Guillaume Apollinaire
Gutenberg Mail Art Gallery
Fluxus Online
Fringe
Hai-Rise. Urban Haikú
Indra´s Net : Hologography
Ink Fix Junkie Poetry Video
 Jim Andrews






Kave on Web
Light & Dust Poets
Literary Television
Marcel Duchamp
Marcel Duchamp
National Poetry Asociation
Poesía Experimental en América Latina
Poesía Virtual
Poesía Visual y Tridimensional
Poesía Visual
Poetry Video
Postypographika
Proto-Anthology of Hypermedia Poetry
Robert Kendall
Rodrigo Cerqueira. Poesía Concreta
Selections from Visual Poems
 S. Holzbauer
Splintered Fields
The Departament of Objects and Delusions
The Peter Finch Archive 
The Think Artist Index
Ubuweb, Visual, Concrete & Sound Poetry
Visual Poetry in Latin America
3 ViTre di Polipoesia
Voices & Visions. Video-clips
Web Koch
William Burroughs. Cut-Up Technique
Wonderfully Absurd Temple








FLUXLIST: # a letter from mary //draft v2

2001-05-25 Thread Douglas Penn

# a letter from mary  //draft v2

the rotting jesus
when the ice that clings on to your beard is screaming agony
how 'bout unabashedly bawling your eyes out
how 'bout remembering your divinity
Let him kiss me with the kisses of this mouth
My tongue, every atom of my blood, formed from this soil
, this air
But to what purpose
Disturbing the dust on a bowl of rose-leaves
You know how it feels when the real world encroaches
Rubbing elbows with the unemployed and you
Together we went traveling, as we received the call
He spends his life walking the streets of New York City
--See the tuna fleets clearing the sea out
--See the Bedouin fires at night
I sit in my house for days on end
and stare at roses in the closet
Dishes in the sink, the TV’s in repair
Don’t look at the floor, Don’t go up the stairs
Oh God help me Hold my breath
I want you to notice when I’m not around
You’re so fucking special...
Falling, yes I’m falling,
Go ahead make yourself comfortable darlin’
I’m not doing this to be thanked, laugh if you want to
You’re an errand boy, sent by grocery clerks, to collect a bill.
With those eyes Just a breath Can send me back To Bethlehem
one eye pointed upwards looking for the holes in the sky
one eye on the little flashing red light
we see Tibet through the binoculars of the people
Though I know that evenin’s empire has returned into sand
Vanished from my hand,
I’m so glad that you have decided to come
you have watched on repeat the story of your life
across the ceiling and in review
to the soul’s desires, the body listens
what the flesh requires
and I can see you--
Your brown skin shinin' in the sun
Little red feet with big blue toes
and I still pray for
I do not know
Other echoes




Re: FLUXLIST: Date: Tue, 25 May 2094 21:33:36 -0400

2001-05-25 Thread John M. Bennett

Dave & Pedro and all:

Fluxlist is not a poetry site, but "poetry" (that is, playing
with language for a variety of reasons/ends) is a part of it as it was/is
with much of Fluxus activity.  A listsite is what people make of it
and put into it.  I have no problem with changing the name but
calling it Fluxlist seems fine, as it's a common point of reference for
most people in it.

I don't agree that "concrete poetry has aged the worst"  ,
tho.  I prefer the broader more inclusive term "visual
poetry" (of which concrete poetry is a subtype) and in my
experience, visual poetry is an extremely dynamic international activity,
and growing livelier every day.  Its history goes way back to the
very beginnings of writing, and it is in all cultures with any form of
written language.  Much has been written about this.  It was
certainly part of Fluxus, however you want to define that movement. 
The current period of visual poetry you might say begins back at the
beginning of the 20th century with the Russians.  At least the use
and social/cultural meaning or place of it as a kind of outside or
alternative or avantgarde art begins about then.  The futurists
certainly gave it a big boost.  And I would say Bern Porter does
visual poetry, tho he may not think of it quite that way (or even care
particularly).  

The *term* "visual poetry* is fairly recent in general usage; I'm
not sure who came up with it first.  I started using it maybe 20
years ago as a general term to include various things like concrete
poetry, various kinds of drawn or calligraphic poetry, collage poetry,
shaped poems, etc.  Anything in which the visual experience of the
text is a major element in the work.  Of course one could say that
ALL poetry may be visual in that it includes blank spaces at the ends of
lines, which must be perceived visually.  (Tho that can also be
perceived as a marker for oral performance)

Some thoughts on the matter...

Onword,
John


 
At 06:33 AM 5/25/01 -0700, you wrote:
not sure how to phrase this. i really mean no
offensive by it and it's not a
direct response to anyone in particular (i skim so fast i don't even
know
who's who anymore). the question is

when did this become a poetry site?

i'm not opposed to poetry, but it has little in common with fluxus.
you
could argue that concrete poetry overlapped into fluxus (a very little)
but
of all the contributions fluxus made to culture (performance,
events,
multiples, artists' books, etc) concrete poetry has aged the worst.

i think of emmett williams as the only fluxus artist who would
identify
him/herself as a poet first and foremost. and his output has been
consistently mediocre. has anyone /read/ his autobiography? his
something
else press years (the best things he's done) are completely ignored due
to
something that happened with dick higgins which he never forgave 
(an
interesting story for those in the know). that which is included, 
is
unbearably dull.

i realize i am in the minority when i say that this list would benefit
from
a more historical perspective. i am not against the idea of new art
emerging
and being disseminated online. but if the concern is really NEW then
start a
new forum. why call it fluxus? it's like those boring artists on ebay
who
try to sell their work as genuine fluxus. it's not continueing a
tradition
(and who wants to do that, anyway) - it's exploitation.

fluxus was just a name chosen at random,from the dictionary. there are
many
more.

dave

i'm sure this lives up to my passive/aggressive reputation. forgive
me.


Re: FLUXLIST: Visual Poetry

2001-05-25 Thread ddyment

hey sol,

i always end up contributing to what i first complained about. let's call it
poetic justice.

not sure why kp is so underrated in the concrete poetry circles. perhaps his
work is more personal/political than the colder concrete poets.

i prefer his other work myself. the journal of albion moonlight, for
example. or some of the love poems.

and my fave concretist is local boy bp nichol.

yours,

dave

thanks for not highlighting the negative aspects of my post.


-Original Message-
From: Sol Nte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 25, 2001 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Visual Poetry


>Dave wrote:
>
>>kenneth patchen is often overlooked and
>should not be.<
>
>I would agree and assume you're referrring to books like
>"Wonderings"...do you have any ideas why he's overlooked?
>
>cheers,
>
>Sol.
>




Re: FLUXLIST: Visual Poetry

2001-05-25 Thread Sol Nte

Dave wrote:

>kenneth patchen is often overlooked and
should not be.<

I would agree and assume you're referrring to books like
"Wonderings"...do you have any ideas why he's overlooked?

cheers,

Sol.




Re: FLUXLIST: Visual Poetry

2001-05-25 Thread ddyment

pedro,

my response to poetry on this site comes immediately after your request
below. this is a coincidence only. they both arrived in my mailbox at the
same time.

dick higgins published a history of pattern poetry that should answer most
of your questions. bern porter figures early in as a practitioner of
foundpoetry (and thereforevisual). kenneth patchen is often overlooked and
should not be.

yours,

dave
-Original Message-
From: Pedro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 25, 2001 9:34 AM
Subject: FLUXLIST: Visual Poetry


>John,
> I have a question.
>This arose in conversation recently.
>Who came up with Visual Poetry?
>I'm guessing it was the Futurists with all their wild experiments
>with Fonts and typography.
>You may not know the answer but I thought you might.
>Does Bern Porter figure in to this picture anywhere?
>And where does all this fit in to Fluxus?
>I hope that's not a lot of work.
>I know your sight limits your time on the computer.
> Thanks,
> Pedro
>




FLUXLIST: Date: Tue, 25 May 2094 21:33:36 -0400

2001-05-25 Thread ddyment

not sure how to phrase this. i really mean no offensive by it and it's not a
direct response to anyone in particular (i skim so fast i don't even know
who's who anymore). the question is

when did this become a poetry site?

i'm not opposed to poetry, but it has little in common with fluxus. you
could argue that concrete poetry overlapped into fluxus (a very little) but
of all the contributions fluxus made to culture (performance, events,
multiples, artists' books, etc) concrete poetry has aged the worst.

i think of emmett williams as the only fluxus artist who would identify
him/herself as a poet first and foremost. and his output has been
consistently mediocre. has anyone /read/ his autobiography? his something
else press years (the best things he's done) are completely ignored due to
something that happened with dick higgins which he never forgave (an
interesting story for those in the know). that which is included, is
unbearably dull.

i realize i am in the minority when i say that this list would benefit from
a more historical perspective. i am not against the idea of new art emerging
and being disseminated online. but if the concern is really NEW then start a
new forum. why call it fluxus? it's like those boring artists on ebay who
try to sell their work as genuine fluxus. it's not continueing a tradition
(and who wants to do that, anyway) - it's exploitation.

fluxus was just a name chosen at random,from the dictionary. there are many
more.

dave

i'm sure this lives up to my passive/aggressive reputation. forgive me.




FLUXLIST: Visual Poetry

2001-05-25 Thread Pedro

John,
I have a question.
This arose in conversation recently.
Who came up with Visual Poetry?
I'm guessing it was the Futurists with all their wild experiments
with Fonts and typography.
You may not know the answer but I thought you might.
Does Bern Porter figure in to this picture anywhere?
And where does all this fit in to Fluxus?
I hope that's not a lot of work.
I know your sight limits your time on the computer.
Thanks,
Pedro




FLUXLIST: Puddle

2001-05-25 Thread John M. Bennett

nape cluster of yr shove stone
mice gregation stampered like yr knee
moss rift of slowness storage rice
statue dries and crumbles dense wasp
wall shimmers in the TV light
rape detention in the muddy rain
your guest rumbles, tape of phones
sinking in the bathtub faucet lost
rug chews, some collection!, clung snort
falters at the knob's thumb gas

Puddle

gas steeple curving up but falters
snort the sandwich moose of rug
lost corn lodged against the sinking
phones house paper or was your
rain befuddled amply snored or rapt
light grease cuddled in the wall
wasp or armpit heavy as statue.
rice scattered brightly on the moss
knee you showered dried the mice
stone rubbed slow against my nape


John M. Bennett




FLUXLIST: Fwd: Poesía Visual : convocatoria [] Visual Poetry : call [] VORTICE ARGENTINA

2001-05-25 Thread John M. Bennett

FYI - Fernando Garcia Delgado and his group do some
excellent projects.  Here's one:


X-PH: V4.4@orb6
From: "VORTICE ARGENTINA"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Subject: Poesía Visual : convocatoria  []  Visual Poetry :

call 
[]  VORTICE ARGENTINA
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 03:43:57 -0300
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200

4to ENCUENTRO INTERNACIONAL DE POESIA
VISUAL, SONORA Y EXPERIMENTAL
 
BASES DE LA CONVOCATORIA

VORTICE ARGENTINA INVITA A PARTICIPAR DEL 4to ENCUENTRO INTERNACIONAL
DE POESIA 
VISUAL, SONORA Y EXPERIMENTAL. SE PODRAN
PRESENTAR OBRAS Y PROYECTOS EN TODOS 
LOS FORMATOS: PAPEL, OBJETO, VIDEO,
PERFORMANCE, ACCIONES, AUDIOVISUALES, AUDIO 
EN CASSETTE, CD'S, VIDEO, ETC., CON TEMA
Y TECNICAS LIBRES. NO SERAN ACEPTADAS POESIAS 
TRADICIONALES NI SE HARAN LECTURAS DE
POEMAS.

NO DEVOLUCION DE LAS OBRAS; ESTAS FORMARAN PARTE DEL ARCHIVO VORTICE
ARGENTINA.
RECEPCION DE OBRAS Y PROYECTOS: HASTA
EL 30 DE JULIO DEL 2001.
EXHIBICION: FECHA Y LUGAR A
CONFIRMAR.
 
ENVIAR OBRAS Y PROYECTOS A:
VORTICE ARGENTINA - 4to Encuentro de
Poesia Visual
BACACAY 3103, BUENOS AIRES C1406GEE, ARGENTINA
EMAIL:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEB:
www.vorticeargentina.com.ar
 
A TODOS AQUELLOS QUE QUIERAN REALIZAR
UNA ACCION, PERFORMANCE O UN PROYECTO 
EN PARTICULAR, SE RUEGA COMUNICARSE POR
E-MAIL PARA LA COORDINACION EL EVENTO.
 
SE AGRADECE LA PARTICIPACION Y DIFUSION DE LA PRESENTE
CONVOCATORIA
 
 
+
 
 
4th INTERNATIONAL MEETING OF VISUAL, SOUND
AND EXPERIMENTAL POETRY

INTERNATIONAL CALL

VORTICE ARGENTINA ASKS ROUND TO PARTICIPATE IN THE 4th INTERNATIONAL
MEETING OF VISUAL, 
SOUND AND EXPERIMENTAL POETRY. CALLING
FOR WORKS AND PROJECTS IN ALL FORMATS: PAPER, 
OBJECTS, VIDEOS, ACTIONS, PERFORMANCES,
AUDIOVISUALS, AUDIO TAPES, CDs, VIDEO, ETC.
FREE THEME AND TECHNIQUES. NO
TRADITIONALS POEMS.

ARTWORKS WON'T BE GIVEN BACK TO THE
ARTISTS; THESE WILL BE PART OF VORTICE ARGENTINA

ARCHIVE. DOCUMENTATION TO ALL
PARTICIPANTS AFTER THE PROJECT FINISHES. 
WORKS & PROJECTS' RECEPTION
DEADLINE: JULY 30, 2001. EXHIBITION: PLACE & DATE TO BE
CONFIRMED.
 
SEND WORKS AND PROJECTS
TO:
VORTICE ARGENTINA - 4th Visual Poetry
Meeting
BACACAY 3103, BUENOS AIRES C1406GEE, ARGENTINA
EMAIL:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

WEBSITE:  www.vorticeargentina.com.ar

ANYONE INTERESTED IN CARRYING OUT AN ACTION, PERFORMANCE OR OTHER ASSORTED 
PROJECTS, PLEASE SEND E-MAIL IN ORDER TO COORDINATE THE EVENT.
 
WE'LL APPRECIATE ANY PROMOTION OF THE CURRENT CALL
 
 


FLUXLIST: Whew!

2001-05-25 Thread John M. Bennett

Friends:
Many thanks for all your comments re the PAFA spat.  I'll be staying on the 
list.  I notice some of my messages from over a week ago have started to 
appear, so there must have been some network problems somewhere.  (In spite 
of Pierce's claims to the contrary I have rarely if ever posted more than 4 
emails a week: 4 short poems.  I don't do the long ones here, my eyes can't 
take it)  I was wondering if maybe some of my messages were being 
suppressed, and some of my wonderings on that matter may yet come 
through,  but apparently that wasn't the case.  A couple of those messages 
said I wanted to unsubscribe but please ignore those.

I actually enjoy spoofs/rewritings/remakings/hacks etc of my work and have 
published hundreds of such works in various ways over the years.  I feel 
that art is both strongly individual and unique, and at the same time 
should be completely available for collaboration of any kind because in an 
important way all art is also collaborative/non-individualistic, and has no 
ego boundaries.  Pierce's spoof seems a tad mean-spirited, but at least 
it's a step in the right ("write") direction.  Try it again, Jason!  Maybe 
you'll discover something.

Josh, I like your "Aeroplaner" a lot and would like to print this one 
somewhere, perhaps in Lost & Found Times, or in Void, or in one of my other 
imprints.  OK?  If so, send me your mailing address and I'll get a copy to you.

Onword!
John The Poetry Aggressor 




Re: FLUXLIST: FLUXLIST question, attached files?

2001-05-25 Thread Sol Nte

Hi einar,

>I also do digital art...my website is http://www.symbolika.co.uk .<

Nice flash interface and interesting images.

>What might be interesting is a collaboration based on the chinese whispers
game.
One artists starts the picture, sends it to the next who sends it back etc
etc.  A dice could be rolled each image is started to see how many times the
picture will go back and forth.<

Yes, or something like the surrealist's exquisite corpse.each person
works on a blank section of a larger image?

Anyway, a couple of my digital samples are as follows:

Using Truespace and a nice Java applet (I didn't author the applet).
http://sol23.freeservers.com/lake.html

Truespace + Photoshop used in my contribution to this project, scroll down
for my name:
http://www.homestead.com/newroutines/earthpeace.html

Picasso e-book
http://www.zyarts.com/ebook/
this is great and stiil open to participants.

My page in the Picasso e-book...just a drawing in photoshop.
http://www.zyarts.com/ebook/sol.html

I had some more digital art on the web but I changed what was on which
servers recently and so my main site is now at
http://www.artden.freeserve.co.uk/

More of my stuff will appear on this space as I get the time but it also
houses the Fluxlist I-zone Gallery and a couple of other bits and pieces.
Currently I'm spending more time on audio work than visual stuff but that
will change as it's a constant ebb and flow for me between the two.

Anyway, I'm keen to pursue any collaboration with a chance aspect.
Brainstorm away

cheers,

Sol.




Re: FLUXLIST: FLUXLIST question, attached files?

2001-05-25 Thread einar

hi,

I also do digital art...my website is http://www.symbolika.co.uk .  What
might be interesting is a collaboration based on the chinese whispers game.
One artists starts the picture, sends it to the next who sends it back etc
etc.  A dice could be rolled each image is started to see how many times the
picture will go back and forth.

Jason

- Original Message -
From: "Mick Boyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:07 AM
Subject: FLUXLIST: FLUXLIST question, attached files?


> Dear Fluxlisters,
>
> I am new to this list. I make digital art and would like to share some of
it with
> this group. Is it ok to post messages with attached image files ( .jpg
format
> usually under 100kb) ? Or do the members of this list prefer a a clickable
URL
> link ? I will wait to hear your response.
>
> Also, if there any digital artists interested in collaborating on some
digital
> pieces via email please contact me.
>
> Mick
>
>
>
>




FLUXLIST: Response to FAPA

2001-05-25 Thread Sol Nte

Jason,

This is addressed to you since you claim representation of FAPA.

Since 14th September 2000 you have sent 14 posts to Fluxlist. 8 of these
have been to complain about John M. Bennett sending poetry to the list. That
means over 50% of your input to this list in the last 9 months has been
complaint-based.

Whilst I respect your right to say that you do not wish to see John's poems
on Fluxlist I do not think the way you are going about this respects John's
feelings in any way.

You write:
>so the worry is over the health of the list. say someone
doesn't like it and sees 7 or 8 (sometimes more) Bennett poems a week
that's just one (or more?)  person(s) unlikely to participate in the list.
or dissmiss it as a bunch of people wanting to cram
their poetry down your throats if you are stupid enough
to subscibe to the list.<

In reality, in the history of this list, complaints and the sort of action
you are now undertaking have led to more people leaving the list (or ceasing
to post frequently) than anything else. Whilst some people may think that
John posts too many of his poems I'm in no doubt that everyone would rather
see the result of individual creativity in their inbox as oppose to the
material you're currently posting which not only causes bad feeling towards
John but on your own admission is designed purely to spoof John's form of
creative expression and done in a manner (FAPA) that can only be hurtful and
make John feel uncomfortable here. John joined Fluxlist because he saw a
copy of the Fluxlist poetry book "Happy New Ears" that we did a while back.
John's poetry has stimulated interesting discussion on the list in the past
and no doubt will do so again. Those who don't like it can indeed delete it
and for those receiving the digest version I don't believe that John's short
texts can be that much of a burden even if his poetry does not appeal to
you.

Jason, I would urge you to stop this and consider the feelings of others a
little more. When you subscribed to Fluxlist you will have received a long
message about the list which included the following:

"Along with the obvious invitation to historians and theorists of the past,
we encourage active artists to present, discuss, and theorize their work."

John's posts fit into the above framework.

Also from the introductory notes about the list is this:

"Several kinds of behavior will result in expulsion from Fluxlist. Abuse,
harassment, impersonation, violation of confidentiality, reposting of
private posts without permission and spamming are unacceptable. "

I think your spoof poems are bordering on harassment now and ask that you
stop this campaign and post more positive material instead if you wish to
contribute to the list. You've made your point, now is the time to let it
lie before things get unpleasant.

On a more positive note you never told us what happened with your 7th Annual
Tournament of Blockades. Some info on how that turned out would be great.

cheers,

Sol.





FLUXLIST: Re: James's question on Ben Vautier

2001-05-25 Thread Sol Nte

James wrote:

>Can anyone tell me what this is --many thanks for any kind of info,
background, etc

A white folder containing:

Participations to the Festival of Non Art -- Anti Art -- Truth Art -- How
to Change Art and Mankind --That Took Place from the 1st to the 15th of
June 1969, in the World.  (Festival Non Art -- Anti Art -- La Verite est
Art -- Comment Changer L'Art et L'Homme: Partout dans le mond, du Ier au 15
Juin 1969).  Fluxus, Nice 1963.  Organized by Ben Vautier.<

I keep meaning to look this up but you might try asking Ben Vautier himself.
E-mail him:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

He also has a vast amount of stuff on the web which you may not have seen,
look at

http://www.ben-vautier.com/

Hope this helps.

cheers,

Sol.





Re: FLUXLIST: FLUXLIST question, attached files?

2001-05-25 Thread Sol Nte

Hi Mick,

>I am new to this list. I make digital art and would like to share some of
it with
this group. Is it ok to post messages with attached image files ( .jpg
format
usually under 100kb) ? Or do the members of this list prefer a a clickable
URL
link ? I will wait to hear your response.<

Unfortunately the Digest version of the list doesn't support attachments and
images do cause problems with that version of the list. If you want to share
images put them on a website and post the URL.

>Also, if there any digital artists interested in collaborating on some
digital
pieces via email please contact me.<

I'm always interested in collaboration. Please e-mail me offlist
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) and we can plan something.

anyhow, welcome to the list,

cheers,

Sol