Re: FLUXLIST: test x
At 01:01 AM 7/14/01 +0200, you wrote: >As always, ex-listowner Sol doesn't get it. > >1. > >2. > >3. > >4. > >5. >6. > >7. > >8. > >9. > >Best wishes to all and especially to the ones who get it. >Eric Andersen. Is this going to be over soon? Deborah
Re: FLUXLIST: test x
At 04:27 PM 7/12/01 +0100, you wrote: >I apologise to anyone who has just joined the list as it may seem at the >moment that being on this list is somewhat of a waste of time. Please rest >assured that this list has a good culture that is only occasionally >compromised as is occurring at the moment. I've been here only a few months and can attest, as a relatively new person, that this is one of the most unique and fascinating lists I've ever encountered. This recent volley will surely pass. Hang in all newcomers. It's worth the wait. Deborah
Re: FLUXLIST: St. Auby Tamas, Eric Anderson, seed requests, and listowners
At 01:13 AM 7/11/01 -0700, you wrote: >Good question. I don't know. Should we vote? We could just allow an impromptu act of creativity to unwind! Deborah
Re: FLUXLIST: St. Auby Tamas, Eric Anderson, seed requests, and listowners
At 12:12 AM 7/11/01 -0400, you wrote: >The intention always was, however, that we would rotate the >list-owners. SO if you want to be a Fluxlist listowner, just start rotating! Clockwise or counter? Deborah
Re: FLUXLIST: magic-bean performance
At 08:45 PM 6/19/01 +0100, Roger Stevens wrote: >Ahhh, but you see > >It's not that simple... Guess not! What's the secret? Debroah
Re: FLUXLIST: magic-bean performance
Me too Me too Me too Me too Me too Me too Me too At 12:43 PM 6/19/01 +0100, you wrote: >i tried, i tried, i tried, i tried >cc > >Roger Stevens wrote: > > > > www.activateyourmagicbeans.com
Re: FLUXLIST: stuff and such
At 02:33 PM 5/28/01 -0400, Owen Smith wrote: >So my plan >is - and if anyone wants to join me in this please do - at 3PM EST, >tomorrow May 29th 2001 I am going to go out and have a beer (IPA) and >toast to the list and moving on. . . so join me in a beverage where ever >you are and raise a glass to the next step aqnd remembering that we are >all in this because we share interestes as well as having divergent >views/ideas. Great idea!!! I'll be there. Deborah
Re: FLUXLIST: rere vote, links for everyone
At 03:38 PM 5/27/01 -0500, jason pierce wrote: >that brings up another thing if somebody >wants to publicly post their poetry they >should expect a little negative criticism. >it kind of goes with the territory. Saying someone's work shouldn't be posted, when they happen to be prolific, is not critiquing. It's an attempt at censorship. Deborah
Re: FLUXLIST: rerererere sol
I know I said I wasn't going to say any more on this but this is so hard to pass up. At 07:19 AM 5/27/01 -0500, you wrote: >actually it was just me and one of my friends. >he kind of put me up to it. if you're trying >to get me to rat out someone else i'm not going to >do it. Get you to "rat out someone" and you're not going to? You may not have given a name but you just ratted him out in spirit by foisting the responsibility for your actions on him. >the "faction" thing was a joke. my theory >was that me and my friend weren't the only ones >that thought bennett was posting too much poetry. Guess you had a bogus theory? >so there I should say so! You just told me, didn't you? This is perfect!! Deborah
Re: FLUXLIST: re:vote: links for everyone
At 02:49 AM 5/27/01 -0500, scott rigby wrote: >After all, if one member of the list has to post their messages in the >form of links, >then everyone should. > >Who's with me? anyone...? If one does, everyone ought to. I agree. And, it's possibly the silliest thing I've read in a long time. I want to hurry this post along so that it will make it into tomorrow's digest which will be, for the most part, empty bickering (me included) about something that is terminally ludicrous. Why not just let the man post his poems and go in peace?!?! Life is so damned short... Deborah .. who will honor you all by saying no more about the subject.
Re: FLUXLIST: rererere sol
At 01:58 PM 5/26/01 -0500, jason pierce wrote: >fine with me, i was just trying to help out some friends >that were irritated with Bennets poetry bombardment. YES! You've said it again. The last bastion of those with no cause. A league of supporters whom no one knows! Email lists at their most stereotypical best. So much for creativity!! Deborah
Re: FLUXLIST: Re: FLUXLIST-digest V1 #708
At 01:41 PM 5/26/01 -0500, you wrote: >Self Defense!!! Another way to truly defend yourself would be to leave. But then, I suppose, you wouldn't get all this attention. Keep on keepin' on. You must be loving it! Deborah
Re: FLUXLIST: re response to FAPO
At 01:29 PM 5/25/01 -0500, you wrote: >my apologies >but i am still going to post mock poetry untill >bennett stops. Aggression!!! So much energy focused into the head of a needle for the forcing of one's will. Human nature? Dull , at best. Deborah
