Re: [fonc] Migrating / syncing computation "live-documents"

2012-04-11 Thread Alan Kay
Croquet does replicated distributed computing. LOCUS did "freely migrating 
system nodes".

One actually needs both (though a lot can be done with today's capacities just 
using the Croquet techniques).

Cheers,

Alan




>
> From: Shawn Morel 
>To: Alan Kay ; Fundamentals of New Computing 
> 
>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 5:14 PM
>Subject: Migrating / syncing computation "live-documents"
> 
>
>
>
>Taken from the massive multi-thread "Error trying to compile COLA"
>
>And I've also mentioned Popek's LOCUS system as a nice model for migrating 
>processes over a network. It was Unix only, but there was nothing about his 
>design that required this.
>
>
>When thinking about storing and accessing documents, it's fairly 
>straightforward to think of some sort of migration / synchronization scheme.
>
>In thinking of objects more on par with VMs / computers / services, has there 
>been any work on process migration that's of any importance since LOCUS? Did 
>Croquet push the boundaries of distributing computations?
>
>
>shawn
>
>___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc


[fonc] Migrating / syncing computation "live-documents"

2012-04-11 Thread Shawn Morel

Taken from the massive multi-thread "Error trying to compile COLA"

> And I've also mentioned Popek's LOCUS system as a nice model for migrating 
> processes over a network. It was Unix only, but there was nothing about his 
> design that required this.


When thinking about storing and accessing documents, it's fairly 
straightforward to think of some sort of migration / synchronization scheme.

In thinking of objects more on par with VMs / computers / services, has there 
been any work on process migration that's of any importance since LOCUS? Did 
Croquet push the boundaries of distributing computations?

shawn
___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc