Re: Difference between fop 1.0 and trunk in font-base URL
Hi Alexios, On 03/05/12 17:23, Alexios Giotis wrote: Hi, I noticed a difference to the way the font-base works in FOP configuration file, when I upgrade from 1.0 to trunk. In 1.0, relative paths (for example font-basesrc/test/data/fonts/font-base) are resolved against the current working directory (of the java process), while in trunk relative paths are resolved against the location of the fop.xconf file. Is it a bug or is this intentional ? In the latter case, what are the reasons for this change ? This is intentional and actually fixes the buggy previous behaviour. A relative URI should be resolved against the URI of the containing document, not the current directory in which the process is running. See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?revision=1058945view=revision See also section 5.1 of the URI RFC: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt Alex Giotis HTH, Vincent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: Difference between fop 1.0 and trunk in font-base URL
Helpful and in depth answer, Thanks Vincent On May 4, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Alexios, On 03/05/12 17:23, Alexios Giotis wrote: Hi, I noticed a difference to the way the font-base works in FOP configuration file, when I upgrade from 1.0 to trunk. In 1.0, relative paths (for example font-basesrc/test/data/fonts/font-base) are resolved against the current working directory (of the java process), while in trunk relative paths are resolved against the location of the fop.xconf file. Is it a bug or is this intentional ? In the latter case, what are the reasons for this change ? This is intentional and actually fixes the buggy previous behaviour. A relative URI should be resolved against the URI of the containing document, not the current directory in which the process is running. See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?revision=1058945view=revision See also section 5.1 of the URI RFC: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt Alex Giotis HTH, Vincent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Difference between fop 1.0 and trunk in font-base URL
Hi, I noticed a difference to the way the font-base works in FOP configuration file, when I upgrade from 1.0 to trunk. In 1.0, relative paths (for example font-basesrc/test/data/fonts/font-base) are resolved against the current working directory (of the java process), while in trunk relative paths are resolved against the location of the fop.xconf file. Is it a bug or is this intentional ? In the latter case, what are the reasons for this change ? Alex Giotis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
