Re: RFS: logkeys
On 21.05.2010 15:14, Michael Prokop wrote: * Vedran Furač vedran.fu...@gmail.com [Tue May 18, 2010 at 02:57:41PM +0200]: So manpage is not needed, I could probably removed those. Others are only minor warnings. Hm, would it be worth the effort providing init scripts? I'd prefer if there's a clean interface how to start and stop logkeys processes. I'm wondering about the DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE in COPYING even though http://code.google.com/p/logkeys/ says GNU General Public License v3. I'm aware that the WTFPL is considered as GPL compatible, though I'm wondering whether debian/copyright shouldn't mention WTFPL instead? I don't know. If you decide it's better that way, I'll update the package. Yeah, please reflect the use of WTFPL in the copyright file. Sure, I'll implement the requested changes and contact you to upload the package for me. Thanks, Vedran -- http://vedranf.net | a8e7a7783ca0d460fee090cc584adc12 attachment: vedran_furac.vcf___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: RFS: logkeys
* Tiago Bortoletto Vaz ti...@debian.org [Thu May 20, 2010 at 12:21:46PM -0300]: Citando Michael Prokop m...@debian.org: @Debian-Forensics team: are we interested in this package? Package sounds good and it would be nice having it in Debian, but IMO it has not to do with forensics. Ok, just what I thought. So I'd suggest to NOT integrate it to Debian-Forensics, but I'd volunteer to sponsor the package, Vedran. mfg, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: RFS: logkeys
* Vedran Furač vedran.fu...@gmail.com [Tue May 18, 2010 at 02:57:41PM +0200]: On 18.05.2010 13:31, Michael Prokop wrote: I was directed to this mailing list by Asheesh Laroia. I am looking for a sponsor for my package logkeys. I would also note that I'm familiar with this process as, for some years now, I already maintain a couple of packages in debian and hopefully I haven't made any errors when packaging this one. It builds this binary package: logkeys- a keylogger for GNU/Linux systems The upload would fix these bugs: 567414 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logkeys - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logkeys/logkeys_0.1.0-1.dsc The package builds fine and lintian complains just about quilt-patch-missing-description, binary-without-manpage, manpage-has-errors-from-man and hyphen-used-as-minus-sign. Those binaries without manpage are: # cat /usr/bin/lkl #!/bin/bash logkeys --start # cat /usr/bin/lklk #!/bin/bash logkeys --kill So manpage is not needed, I could probably removed those. Others are only minor warnings. Hm, would it be worth the effort providing init scripts? I'd prefer if there's a clean interface how to start and stop logkeys processes. I'm wondering about the DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE in COPYING even though http://code.google.com/p/logkeys/ says GNU General Public License v3. I'm aware that the WTFPL is considered as GPL compatible, though I'm wondering whether debian/copyright shouldn't mention WTFPL instead? I don't know. If you decide it's better that way, I'll update the package. Yeah, please reflect the use of WTFPL in the copyright file. regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: RFS: logkeys
Hi, Vedran, first of all - sorry for the long delay in answering your mail. * Vedran Furač vedran.fu...@gmail.com [Tue Apr 06, 2010 at 10:54:43PM +0200]: I was directed to this mailing list by Asheesh Laroia. I am looking for a sponsor for my package logkeys. I would also note that I'm familiar with this process as, for some years now, I already maintain a couple of packages in debian and hopefully I haven't made any errors when packaging this one. * Package name: logkeys Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Kernc kernc...@gmail.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/logkeys/ * License : GPLv3 Section : admin It builds this binary package: logkeys- a keylogger for GNU/Linux systems The upload would fix these bugs: 567414 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logkeys - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logkeys/logkeys_0.1.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. The package builds fine and lintian complains just about quilt-patch-missing-description, binary-without-manpage, manpage-has-errors-from-man and hyphen-used-as-minus-sign. I'm wondering about the DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE in COPYING even though http://code.google.com/p/logkeys/ says GNU General Public License v3. I'm aware that the WTFPL is considered as GPL compatible, though I'm wondering whether debian/copyright shouldn't mention WTFPL instead? @Debian-Forensics team: are we interested in this package? regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: RFS: logkeys
Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 13:31 +0200, Michael Prokop a écrit : @Debian-Forensics team: are we interested in this package? regards, -mika- Hi, I'm not sure that it fits in Debian forensics. What do others think about that ? -- Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: RFS: logkeys
On 18.05.2010 13:31, Michael Prokop wrote: Hi, Vedran, first of all - sorry for the long delay in answering your mail. No problem, better late than never. ;) I was directed to this mailing list by Asheesh Laroia. I am looking for a sponsor for my package logkeys. I would also note that I'm familiar with this process as, for some years now, I already maintain a couple of packages in debian and hopefully I haven't made any errors when packaging this one. It builds this binary package: logkeys- a keylogger for GNU/Linux systems The upload would fix these bugs: 567414 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logkeys - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logkeys/logkeys_0.1.0-1.dsc The package builds fine and lintian complains just about quilt-patch-missing-description, binary-without-manpage, manpage-has-errors-from-man and hyphen-used-as-minus-sign. Those binaries without manpage are: # cat /usr/bin/lkl #!/bin/bash logkeys --start # cat /usr/bin/lklk #!/bin/bash logkeys --kill So manpage is not needed, I could probably removed those. Others are only minor warnings. I'm wondering about the DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE in COPYING even though http://code.google.com/p/logkeys/ says GNU General Public License v3. I'm aware that the WTFPL is considered as GPL compatible, though I'm wondering whether debian/copyright shouldn't mention WTFPL instead? I don't know. If you decide it's better that way, I'll update the package. Regards, Vedran -- http://vedranf.net | a8e7a7783ca0d460fee090cc584adc12 attachment: vedran_furac.vcf___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
