Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] OpenMP: Pointers and member mappings

2023-12-11 Thread Tobias Burnus

Hi Julian,

On 07.12.23 18:24, Julian Brown wrote:

On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 12:36:34 +0100
Tobias Burnus  wrote:


LGTM, except for:

* The 'target exit data' handling - comments below - looks a bit
fishy/inconsistent.

...

Thus, I wonder whether that shouldn't be instead
OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND (node) == GOMP_MAP_DELETE
? GOMP_MAP_DELETE : GOMP_MAP_RELEASE;

I've fixed that as you suggest.  Actually I've made OpenACC use the new
node layout as well, since (a) it works and (b) it was weirdly
inconsistent before.  That is, exit data directives will no longer use
e.g.:

   GOMP_MAP_FROM
   GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET
   GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH

but instead,

   GOMP_MAP_FROM
   GOMP_MAP_RELEASE (with OMP_CLAUSE_RELEASE_DESCRIPTOR set)
   GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH

actually the current state is that GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET will be used for
the descriptor on an "exit data" directive if you refer to the whole
array, but GOMP_MAP_RELEASE (etc.) will be used if you refer to an array
section (without the flag newly added in this patch, of course). I
don't think there's any reason to maintain that inconsistency.

...

I've re-tested this version. Does it look better now?


Yes, LGTM as well.

Tobias

-
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 
München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas 
Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht 
München, HRB 106955


Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] OpenMP: Pointers and member mappings

2023-12-07 Thread Julian Brown
Hi Tobias!

On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 12:36:34 +0100
Tobias Burnus  wrote:

> Hi Julian,
> 
> LGTM, except for:
> 
> * The 'target exit data' handling - comments below - looks a bit
> fishy/inconsistent.
> 
> I intent to have a closer look with more code context, but maybe you
> should have a look at it as well.
> 
> BTW: Fortran deep-mapping is not yet on mainline. Are you aware of
> changes or in particular testcases on OG13 related to your patch
> series that should be included when upstreaming that auto-mapping of
> allocatable components patch?

I thought I'd adjusted some tests to use "pointer" instead of
"allocatable" at some point for mainline submission, but now I can't
find where I'm thinking of.  So possibly.  (I'll keep an eye out...)

> > +  if (OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND (node) == GOMP_MAP_DELETE
> > +   || OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND (node) == GOMP_MAP_RELEASE
> > +   || op == EXEC_OMP_TARGET_EXIT_DATA)
> >   {
> > [...]
> > +   gomp_map_kind map_kind
> > + = (op == EXEC_OMP_TARGET_EXIT_DATA) ? GOMP_MAP_RELEASE
> > + : OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND
> > (node);
> > +   OMP_CLAUSE_SET_MAP_KIND (node2, map_kind);
> > +   OMP_CLAUSE_RELEASE_DESCRIPTOR (node2) = 1;  
> 
> For '!$omp target exit data map(delete: array)' this looks wrong as it
> replaces 'delete' by 'release' for the descriptor - while for
>   '!$omp target (data) map(delete: array)'
> it remains 'delete'.
> 
> Thus, I wonder whether that shouldn't be instead
>OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND (node) == GOMP_MAP_DELETE
>? GOMP_MAP_DELETE : GOMP_MAP_RELEASE;

I've fixed that as you suggest.  Actually I've made OpenACC use the new
node layout as well, since (a) it works and (b) it was weirdly
inconsistent before.  That is, exit data directives will no longer use
e.g.:

  GOMP_MAP_FROM
  GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET
  GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH

but instead,

  GOMP_MAP_FROM
  GOMP_MAP_RELEASE (with OMP_CLAUSE_RELEASE_DESCRIPTOR set)
  GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH

actually the current state is that GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET will be used for
the descriptor on an "exit data" directive if you refer to the whole
array, but GOMP_MAP_RELEASE (etc.) will be used if you refer to an array
section (without the flag newly added in this patch, of course). I
don't think there's any reason to maintain that inconsistency.

> We later have the following; just reading the patch, I wonder whether
> GOMP_TO_PSET is correct for a generic 'target exit data' here or not.
>  It seems at a glance as if an "|| op == 'target exit data'" is
> missing here:
> 
> > -   if (openacc)
> > - OMP_CLAUSE_SET_MAP_KIND (desc_node,
> > +   if (openacc
> > +   || (map_kind != GOMP_MAP_RELEASE
> > +   && map_kind != GOMP_MAP_DELETE))
> > + OMP_CLAUSE_SET_MAP_KIND (node2,
> >GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET);
> > else
> > - OMP_CLAUSE_SET_MAP_KIND (desc_node,
> > map_kind);
> > -   OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (desc_node) = inner;
> > -   OMP_CLAUSE_SIZE (desc_node) =
> > TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (type);
> > -   if (openacc)
> > - node2 = desc_node;
> > -   else
> > + OMP_CLAUSE_SET_MAP_KIND (node2,
> > map_kind);  
> 
> (Here, without setting OMP_CLAUSE_RELEASE_DESCRIPTOR.)
> 
> And for completeness, we later have:
> 
> > +omp_map_clause_descriptor_p (tree c)
> > +{
> > +  if (OMP_CLAUSE_CODE (c) != OMP_CLAUSE_MAP)
> > +return false;
> > +
> > +  if (OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND (c) == GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET)
> > +return true;
> > +
> > +  if ((OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND (c) == GOMP_MAP_RELEASE
> > +   || OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND (c) == GOMP_MAP_DELETE)
> > +  && OMP_CLAUSE_RELEASE_DESCRIPTOR (c))
> > +return true;  

In that section, the "exit data" directive case is handled a few lines
higher up the function, with a condition that (now) reads:

  else if (op == EXEC_OMP_TARGET_EXIT_DATA
   || op == EXEC_OACC_EXIT_DATA)
map_kind = GOMP_MAP_RELEASE;

so I think we're OK -- unless I missed something?  (Removing the
OpenACC special case and inverting a conditional simplifies the logic
here a bit.)

> > +   /* Save array descriptor for use
> > +  in
> > gfc_omp_deep_mapping{,_p,_cnt}; force
> > +  evaluate to ensure that it is
> > +  not gimplified + is a decl.  */  
> This is part of my Fortran allocatable-components deep-mapping patch
> that is currently only on OG9 (?) to OG13, badly needs to be
> upstreamed but required that Jakub had a look at it - well, I still
> would like that he has a look at the omp-low.cc parts and it needs to
> be re-diffed.
> 
> Hence, while I wouldn't mind to keep it to avoid more 

Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] OpenMP: Pointers and member mappings

2023-12-06 Thread Tobias Burnus

Hi Julian,

LGTM, except for:

* The 'target exit data' handling - comments below - looks a bit
fishy/inconsistent.

I intent to have a closer look with more code context, but maybe you
should have a look at it as well.

BTW: Fortran deep-mapping is not yet on mainline. Are you aware of
changes or in particular testcases on OG13 related to your patch series
that should be included when upstreaming that auto-mapping of
allocatable components patch?

* * *

On 19.08.23 00:47, Julian Brown wrote:

This patch changes the mapping node arrangement used for array components
of derived types in order to accommodate for changes made in the previous
patch, particularly the use of "GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH" for pointer-typed
derived-type members instead of "GOMP_MAP_ALWAYS_POINTER".

We change the mapping nodes used for a derived-type mapping like this:

   type T
   integer, pointer, dimension(:) :: arrptr
   end type T

   type(T) :: tvar
   [...]
   !$omp target map(tofrom: tvar%arrptr)

So that the nodes used look like this:

   1) map(to: tvar%arrptr)   -->
   GOMP_MAP_TO [implicit]  *tvar%arrptr%data  (the array data)
   GOMP_MAP_TO_PSETtvar%arrptr(the descriptor)
   GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH  tvar%arrptr%data

   2) map(tofrom: tvar%arrptr(3:8)   -->
   GOMP_MAP_TOFROM *tvar%arrptr%data(3)  (size 8-3+1, etc.)


[Clarification for the patch readers - not to the patch writer]

At least to me the wording or implications of (1) were not fully clear to
me. However, it is intended that the implicit mapping ensures that the
pointer is actually mapped.

Fortunately, that's indeed the case :-)
as testing and also the new testcase 
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/map-subarray-4.f90  shows.

The related part comes from OpenMP 5.1 [349:9-12] or slightly refined
later, here the TR12 wording:

If a list item in a map clause is an associated pointer that is not 
attach-ineligible and the pointer is
not the base pointer of another list item in a map clause on the same 
construct, then it is treated as if
its pointer target is implicitly mapped in the same clause. For the purposes of 
the map clause, the
mapped pointer target is treated as if its base pointer is the associated 
pointer."  [213:18-21]

* * *


[...]
In the middle end, we process mappings using the struct sibling-list
handling machinery by moving the "GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET" node from the middle
of the group of three mapping nodes to the proper sorted position after
the GOMP_MAP_STRUCT mapping:

   GOMP_MAP_STRUCT   tvar (len: 1)
   GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET  tvar%arr (size: 64, etc.)  <--. moved here
   [...]   |
   GOMP_MAP_TOFROM *tvar%arrptr%data(3) ___|
   GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH  tvar%arrptr%data

In another case, if we have an array of derived-type values "dtarr",
and mappings like:

   i = 1
   j = 1
   map(to: dtarr(i)%arrptr) map(tofrom: dtarr(j)%arrptr(3:8))

We still map the same way, but this time we cannot prove that the base
expressions "dtarr(i) and "dtarr(j)" are the same in the front-end.
So we keep both mappings, but we move the "[implicit]" mapping of the
full-array reference to the end of the clause list in gimplify.cc (by
adjusting the topological sorting algorithm):

   GOMP_MAP_STRUCT dtvar  (len: 2)
   GOMP_MAP_TO_PSETdtvar(i)%arrptr
   GOMP_MAP_TO_PSETdtvar(j)%arrptr
   [...]
   GOMP_MAP_TOFROM *dtvar(j)%arrptr%data(3)  (size: 8-3+1)
   GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH  dtvar(j)%arrptr%data
   GOMP_MAP_TO [implicit]  *dtvar(i)%arrptr%data(1)  (size: whole array)
   GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH  dtvar(i)%arrptr%data

Always moving "[implicit]" full-array mappings after array-section
mappings (without that bit set) means that we'll avoid copying the whole
array unnecessarily -- even in cases where we can't prove that the arrays
are the same.

The patch also fixes some bugs with "enter data" and "exit data"
directives with this new mapping arrangement.  Also now if you have
mappings like this:

   #pragma omp target enter data map(to: dv, dv%arr(1:20))

The whole of the derived-type variable "dv" is mapped, so the
GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET for the array-section mapping can be dropped:

   GOMP_MAP_TOdv

   GOMP_MAP_TO*dv%arr%data
   GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET   dv%arr <-- deleted (array section mapping)
   GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH dv%arr%data

To accommodate for recent changes to mapping nodes made by
Tobias, this version of the patch avoids using GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET
for "exit data" directives, in favour of using the "correct"
GOMP_MAP_RELEASE/GOMP_MAP_DELETE kinds during early expansion.  A new
flag is introduced so the middle-end knows when the latter two kinds
are being used specifically for an array descriptor.

This version of the patch is based on the version posted for the og13
branch:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/62.html

[...]


+  if (OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND (node) == GOMP_MAP_DELETE
+   || OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND (node) == 

[PATCH v7 3/5] OpenMP: Pointers and member mappings

2023-08-18 Thread Julian Brown
This patch changes the mapping node arrangement used for array components
of derived types in order to accommodate for changes made in the previous
patch, particularly the use of "GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH" for pointer-typed
derived-type members instead of "GOMP_MAP_ALWAYS_POINTER".

We change the mapping nodes used for a derived-type mapping like this:

  type T
  integer, pointer, dimension(:) :: arrptr
  end type T

  type(T) :: tvar
  [...]
  !$omp target map(tofrom: tvar%arrptr)

So that the nodes used look like this:

  1) map(to: tvar%arrptr)   -->
  GOMP_MAP_TO [implicit]  *tvar%arrptr%data  (the array data)
  GOMP_MAP_TO_PSETtvar%arrptr(the descriptor)
  GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH  tvar%arrptr%data

  2) map(tofrom: tvar%arrptr(3:8)   -->
  GOMP_MAP_TOFROM *tvar%arrptr%data(3)  (size 8-3+1, etc.)
  GOMP_MAP_TO_PSETtvar%arrptr
  GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH  tvar%arrptr%data  (bias 3, etc.)

In this case, we can determine in the front-end that the
whole-array/pointer mapping (1) is only needed to map the pointer
-- so we drop it entirely.  (Note also that we set -- early -- the
OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_RUNTIME_IMPLICIT_P flag for whole-array-via-pointer
mappings. See below.)

In the middle end, we process mappings using the struct sibling-list
handling machinery by moving the "GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET" node from the middle
of the group of three mapping nodes to the proper sorted position after
the GOMP_MAP_STRUCT mapping:

  GOMP_MAP_STRUCT   tvar (len: 1)
  GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET  tvar%arr (size: 64, etc.)  <--. moved here
  [...]   |
  GOMP_MAP_TOFROM *tvar%arrptr%data(3) ___|
  GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH  tvar%arrptr%data

In another case, if we have an array of derived-type values "dtarr",
and mappings like:

  i = 1
  j = 1
  map(to: dtarr(i)%arrptr) map(tofrom: dtarr(j)%arrptr(3:8))

We still map the same way, but this time we cannot prove that the base
expressions "dtarr(i) and "dtarr(j)" are the same in the front-end.
So we keep both mappings, but we move the "[implicit]" mapping of the
full-array reference to the end of the clause list in gimplify.cc (by
adjusting the topological sorting algorithm):

  GOMP_MAP_STRUCT dtvar  (len: 2)
  GOMP_MAP_TO_PSETdtvar(i)%arrptr
  GOMP_MAP_TO_PSETdtvar(j)%arrptr
  [...]
  GOMP_MAP_TOFROM *dtvar(j)%arrptr%data(3)  (size: 8-3+1)
  GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH  dtvar(j)%arrptr%data
  GOMP_MAP_TO [implicit]  *dtvar(i)%arrptr%data(1)  (size: whole array)
  GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH  dtvar(i)%arrptr%data

Always moving "[implicit]" full-array mappings after array-section
mappings (without that bit set) means that we'll avoid copying the whole
array unnecessarily -- even in cases where we can't prove that the arrays
are the same.

The patch also fixes some bugs with "enter data" and "exit data"
directives with this new mapping arrangement.  Also now if you have
mappings like this:

  #pragma omp target enter data map(to: dv, dv%arr(1:20))

The whole of the derived-type variable "dv" is mapped, so the
GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET for the array-section mapping can be dropped:

  GOMP_MAP_TOdv

  GOMP_MAP_TO*dv%arr%data
  GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET   dv%arr <-- deleted (array section mapping)
  GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH dv%arr%data

To accommodate for recent changes to mapping nodes made by
Tobias, this version of the patch avoids using GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET
for "exit data" directives, in favour of using the "correct"
GOMP_MAP_RELEASE/GOMP_MAP_DELETE kinds during early expansion.  A new
flag is introduced so the middle-end knows when the latter two kinds
are being used specifically for an array descriptor.

This version of the patch is based on the version posted for the og13
branch:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/62.html

2023-08-18  Julian Brown  

gcc/fortran/
* dependency.cc (gfc_omp_expr_prefix_same): New function.
* dependency.h (gfc_omp_expr_prefix_same): Add prototype.
* gfortran.h (gfc_omp_namelist): Add "duplicate_of" field to "u2"
union.
* trans-openmp.cc (dependency.h): Include.
(gfc_trans_omp_array_section): Adjust mapping node arrangement for
array descriptors.  Use GOMP_MAP_TO_PSET or
GOMP_MAP_RELEASE/GOMP_MAP_DELETE with the OMP_CLAUSE_RELEASE_DESCRIPTOR
flag set.
(gfc_symbol_rooted_namelist): New function.
(gfc_trans_omp_clauses): Check subcomponent and subarray/element
accesses elsewhere in the clause list for pointers to derived types or
array descriptors, and adjust or drop mapping nodes appropriately.
Adjust for changes to mapping node arrangement.
(gfc_trans_oacc_executable_directive): Pass code op through.

gcc/
* gimplify.cc (omp_map_clause_descriptor_p): New function.
(build_omp_struct_comp_nodes, omp_get_attachment, omp_group_base): Use
above function.
(omp_tsort_mapping_groups): Process nodes