Re: [fossil-users] Chiselapp question

2015-11-26 Thread jim Schimpf
It worked.  I did have problem as the project code came back as:

project-code|5f509f990b361984473c2aedd087a61e0e8dc0f3|1448549878

and I had to trim off the part after the |.  If I asked as

fossil info -R LPC1114-PWM.fossil
project-name: 
project-code: 5f509f990b361984473c2aedd087a61e0e8dc0f3
checkins: 1

i got it less the extra stuff.

I set that project-code in my current repo, got the remote path OK
and it synched OK.

The only thing I then had to do then was log in to the Chiselapp version and
do admin->config to match my local version (i.e.Project Name & description) then
the home page of the original appeared.

Thank you very much for the help.

 jim schimpf

> On 26 Nov, 2015, at 14:08, Andy Bradford 
>  wrote:
> 
> Thus said jim Schimpf on Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:45:34 -0500:
> 
>> Also since that worked is there some way a I can move the local repo I
>> have of this  project (and it's history) into this  newly cloned repo.
>> Then  when I  sync that  with  Chiselapp it  will have  done the  push
>> equivalent.
> 
> Just make sure that the project code  is the same as the project code in
> Chiselapp:
> 
> $ fossil sql -R local.fossil
> SQLite version 3.9.2 2015-11-02 18:31:45
> Enter ".help" for usage hints.
> sqlite> SELECT * FROM config WHERE name = 'project-code';
> project-code|d05af28ff53c2077795d6780192daca8006202e6|1448563931
> sqlite> UPDATE config SET value = '' WHERE name = 'project-code';
> 
> Then, open  the repository, use ``fossil  remote'' to set your  sync URL
> to:
> 
> https://jschi...@chiselapp.com/user/jschimpf/repository/LPC1114-PWM
> 
> Then run ``fossil sync''
> 
> Andy
> -- 
> TAI64 timestamp: 4000565758e3
> 
> 

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] Chiselapp question

2015-11-26 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi,
I’m a ChiselApp user and have a number repos there.  Today I created a 
new repo
and am attempting to push my existing repo there I keep getting login failures. 
(using the same command that worked on previous repos)

500 FOSSIL> fossil push 
https://jschi...@chiselapp.com/user/jschimpf/repository/LPC1114-PWM -R 
LPC1114-PWM.fossil --once
password for jschimpf: 
Round-trips: 1   Artifacts sent: 33  received: 0
Error: login failed
missing or incorrect password for user “jschimpf"

The password is correct as I have I logged into chiselapp in  my browser with 
the same PW.

(1) Am I seeing a version mismatch with my version of (1.27) and Chiselapp 
running 1.25 ?
(2) Then I found I can clone the at present MT repo with

fossil clone 
https://jschi...@chiselapp.com/user/jschimpf/repository/LPC1114-PWM 
LPC1114-PWM.fossil

and it takes the password it rejected in the push.

Also since that worked is there some way a I can move the local repo I have of 
this project (and it’s history)
into this newly cloned repo.  Then when I sync that with Chiselapp it will have 
done the push equivalent.

Thanks very much for the help.

—jim schimpf







___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] NOT_A_FILE problem

2015-06-05 Thread jim Schimpf
Thank you that worked.  

So if I have one of these files turned into directory or vice-versa 
events.  The solution is to remove the offending item.  (fossil rm..) then 
commit that, add it back in and then commit again.  Makes sense and your 
explanation is the mechanism of what is going on.

—jim schimpf
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] NOT_A_FILE problem

2015-06-05 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi,
This is on OS X so bear with me.  I have repository and in there is an 
OmmnuGraffle image (like Visio). Originally it was a single file but then I 
added a png image to the picture.  On OS X it still looks like a single file 
but now it becomes a directory. When I did this and tried to commit I got:

not an ordinary file: /Users/jschimpf/Public/HayJam/Docs/images/Detector.graffle
abort due to prior errors

Doing a status I got:

504 HayJam> fossil status
repository:   /Users/jschimpf/Public/HayJam/../FOSSIL/HayJam.fossil
local-root:   /Users/jschimpf/Public/HayJam/
config-db:/Users/jim/.fossil
checkout: d7568dfc3e5510b1f89c75ffd233329cba29ad76 2015-06-05 08:44:01 UTC
parent:   6f67a2bb3b8313f70d044b3b2eaf2cd74f5fedfb 2015-06-05 07:25:10 UTC
tags: trunk
comment:  Update sensor schematic with values (user: jim)
EDITED Docs/HayJam.pdf
NOT_A_FILE Docs/images/Detector.graffle
EDITED Docs/images/Detector.png

So I then did a fossil rm of this file and did an OS rm and removed if from the 
directory.

put it back in the directory and fossil added it to the repository again.

Trying commit again I got the same problem. The status shows it’s added as a 
directory so I don’t see why this failed

fossil status

EDITED ../HayJam.pdf
DELETEDDetector.graffle
ADDED  Detector.graffle/data.plist
ADDED  Detector.graffle/image1.png
EDITED Detector.png

Any suggestions what to try:
1) Delete it, commit then re-add with new name 
2) Delete it,commit then re-add with same name 

Oh yes:

This is fossil version 1.27 [13ad130920] 2013-09-11 11:43:49 UTC

Thanks very much for the help.

    —jim schimpf

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] Book update (Chiselapp)

2013-11-03 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi,
I finally got enough time in a row to work through the tickets on the 
Fossil book 
http://www.fossil-scm.org/schimpf-book/doc/2ndEdition/fossilbook.pdf and added 
a chapter on Chiselapp the Fossil hosting site.  I have a how to do it chapter 
and would appreciate any corrections or better ways of doing it.

Thanks and special thanks to the maintainers of Chiselapp.

--jim schimpf___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 65, Issue 42

2013-06-28 Thread jim Schimpf
Help for new users:

http://www.fossil-scm.org/schimpf-book/index

tooting my own horn... and others who contributed.

--jim schimpf
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] Question about Source forge Fossil hosting

2013-03-29 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi,

I have used Chiselapp for hosting some Fossil project but just got a 
note that he is shutting down May first.  So I decided to try the source forge 
version (http://fossilrepos.sourceforge.net/) .  Very easy to create a project 
but my previous experience with Chisel seems to not to apply as I was trying to 
push the repository there it just didn't work.  Has anyone else had success 
with this ?

    --jim schimpf
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] Help with Chisel

2013-02-17 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi,
I am attempting to use the free Fossil hosting at chiselapp.com.  You 
can load repository's there and they do effectively a CGI host.  Works very 
well and thanks  and props to James for hosting the site.

There are some limits if you want to upload your repository is must < 8 
meg and if you want to clone it, also it cannot be too large as the web page 
times out.

I have a 64Meg repository that I want on there, to do that you have to 
"fossil push" it there.  You create a repository  (using the Chisel web page) 
and get the project-code from your local version (fossil info -R ) 
and put that in the create so you can log in for the push.  Also you want to 
set the password just so you know it.

Next you push to the site with:


https://jschimpf:@chiselapp.com/user/jschimpf/repository/Firenet

and then wait.

When done you can go the the above URL and login into your site.  You 
must also set up the site so it has the same Initial wiki page name as the 
original.  Then your wiki will show up on the pushed site.

After doing this I have my wiki, ticket and time line but I don't see 
any of the files.  I have also tried this locally doing a push on my local 
machine I have the same problem.  All the other stuff is there but no files.  
The repository is as large as the original so the files are there but aren't 
accessible in the pushed version.  Doing a fossil open on the pushed repository 
works but no files in the new location.

What vital thing did I miss ?

Thanks for the help 

--jim schimpf
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] Fossil hosting

2011-07-24 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi,

Just found http://chiselapp.com/ which is a Fossil free hosting  
service. There are a number of repositories there now but most are  
experiments.  Anyway you can create an account and try it out.

--jim
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] Recursive deletes ?

2010-09-09 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi,

I'm trying to tidy up a build directory after I mistakenly added a 
bunch of temp build files.  So I did:

699 terms-win> fossil rm build

DELETED  build/Debug/terms-win
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/build-state.dat
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/build-state~.dat
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/Objects-normal/x86_64/bsdserial.o
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/Objects-normal/x86_64/my_kbhit.o
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/Objects-normal/x86_64/my_serial.o
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/Objects-normal/x86_64/netcom.o
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/Objects-normal/x86_64/terms-win.LinkFileList
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/Objects-normal/x86_64/terms.o
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/Objects-normal/x86_64/tinythread.o
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/terms-win-all-target-headers.hmap
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/terms-win-generated-files.hmap
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/terms-win-own-target-headers.hmap
DELETED  
build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/terms-win-project-headers.hmap
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/terms-win.dep
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/terms-win.hmap
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/terms-win~.dep
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/categories.pbxbtree
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/cdecls.pbxbtree
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/decls.pbxbtree
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/files.pbxbtree
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/imports.pbxbtree
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/pbxindex.header
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/protocols.pbxbtree
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/refs.pbxbtree
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/strings.pbxstrings/control
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/strings.pbxstrings/strings
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/subclasses.pbxbtree
DELETED  build/terms-win.build/terms-win.pbxindex/symbols0.pbxsymbols

700 terms-win> fossil status
repository:   /Users/jschimpf/Public/FOSSIL/USBSW2.fossil
local-root:   /Users/jschimpf/Public/USBSW2/
server-code:  1cddb23bd5084e9aef5b4cb8943f5c02f844e32b
checkout: 405b036b4a33b33e6cce52fcb4dcf8adf48526b0 2010-09-09 17:18:12 UTC
parent:   420342ea51214a962a8596c071f3260747a15c83 2010-09-09 16:58:27 UTC
tags: trunk
701 terms-win> 

As you see when I run the status nothing shows as deleted, also if I do a 
checkin in this state the files are still there.  The fossil I used is:

This is fossil version [4980b9a796] 2010-09-09 13:57:50 UTC

I had the same problem with an older version so got the latest and 
greatest with the same result.

    --jim schimpf


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 30, Issue 4

2010-07-07 Thread jim Schimpf
Builds fine out of the box in various versions of OS X.  (10.5 and  
10.6) You just have to have X code installed.

--jim

On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:00 AM, fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org  
wrote:

> Send fossil-users mailing list submissions to
>   fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>   http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil- 
> users
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>   fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>   fossil-users-ow...@lists.fossil-scm.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fossil-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Makefile (Michael Richter)
>   2. Re: Makefile (Paul Ruizendaal)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:34:31 +0800
> From: Michael Richter 
> Subject: [fossil-users] Makefile
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Message-ID:
>   
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I'd like to re-engineer the Makefile approach in fossil so that it's  
> easier
> to work out what needs to be put in place for any given platform.   
> Is there
> enough interest in this that it's worth doing the work in my private  
> branch
> for inspection?
>
> -- 
> "Perhaps people don't believe this, but throughout all of the  
> discussions of
> entering China our focus has really been what's best for the Chinese  
> people.
> It's not been about our revenue or profit or whatnot."
> --Sergey Brin, demonstrating the emptiness of the "don't be evil"  
> mantra.
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/pipermail/fossil-users/attachments/20100707/33c1059a/attachment-0001.html
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:34:52 +0200
> From: Paul Ruizendaal 
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Makefile
> To: 
> Message-ID: <7501112d1ad5951ac50fd5a1e9b6c...@127.0.0.1>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:34:31 +0800, Michael Richter  >
> wrote:
>> I'd like to re-engineer the Makefile approach in fossil so that it's
> easier
>> to work out what needs to be put in place for any given platform.  Is
> there
>> enough interest in this that it's worth doing the work in my private
> branch
>> for inspection?
>
> I find that building on Linux and FreeBSD works out of the box, and  
> I'm
> told that cross-building Win executables on Linux with gcc-mingw  
> installed
> also works out of the box. Building on Windows itself with gcc-mingw
> doesn't work for me (just mingw installed, not cygwin or msys). I keep
> finding myself making the following adjustments to Makefile and
> src/main.mk:
>
> - change from slash to backslash in the file paths
> - create VERSION.h by hand: even with awk installed, the quoting  
> involved
> doesn't work
>
> There was an attempt to fix both issues a few weeks back, but is was a
> botched attempt and the changes were backed out. The slash/backslash  
> thing
> should not be too hard to correct, and I'm thinking to have a little C
> program to generate VERSION.h instead of using awk for that. The  
> source is
> already heavily preprocessed, so building one more tool should not  
> upset
> the build design.
>
> Perhaps others can comment on building fossil on OS X and Solaris.
>
> How can I help?
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> --
>
> ___
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
>
> End of fossil-users Digest, Vol 30, Issue 4
> ***

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] Fossil for dummies manual

2010-06-19 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi,

Richard Hipp has thoughtfully put the repository for the book on the 
Fossil site.  The link is now:

http://www.fossil-scm.org/schimpf-book/index

This should GREATLY speed up any access.  If you have any suggestions 
or would like to make some additions or changes message me:

jim.schi...@gmail.com

And I can give you commit access to the repository if you wish, otherwise I can 
put in (and give you credit) any additional chapters or changes you send me.  
Thanks for the kind words about the project and Richard's generosity for 
hosting this.


    --jim schimpf
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Not within an open checkout (ghi?)

2010-06-16 Thread jim Schimpf
I've updated the manual to version 1.6, it's a useful read for fossil  
users.

http://pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi  Then pick the PDF  
link.

--jim

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 6

2010-06-10 Thread jim Schimpf
Oh and one more this is on OS X 10.6.3.

--jim
On Jun 10, 2010, at 8:00 AM, fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org  
wrote:

> Send fossil-users mailing list submissions to
>   fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>   http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil- 
> users
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>   fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>   fossil-users-ow...@lists.fossil-scm.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fossil-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Question about update/multiple users (jim Schimpf)
>   2. Re: Question about update/multiple users (Michael)
>
>
> ----------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:07:51 -0400
> From: jim Schimpf 
> Subject: [fossil-users] Question about update/multiple users
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Message-ID: <0b6db8a7-c50b-4621-985c-d036bbe90...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi,
>
>   I have a simple Fossil setup with a cgi served master repository  
> and two users.  User A has made some changes, added some files then  
> done a commit.  I wanted to sync user B to this state so he could do  
> further work.  I ran a fossil update but the additional files did  
> not appear.  I looked at the timeline in the server and saw users  
> A's commit. I then tried in user B's space to do fossil update  
>  where  was the hex hash code for the commit.   
> When I tried this I got:
>
> 573 FossilBook> fossil update b263813446
> Autosync:  http://j...@pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi
>Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
> Send: 130  1  0  0
> Received:  46  1  0  0
> Total network traffic: 338 bytes sent, 342 bytes received
> fossil: no such version: b263813446
>
> The version specified doesn't exist in the local repository but does  
> in the master.  I then tried fossil sync, fossil pull with no effect.
>
> Then user A made another change and check in, at that point fossil  
> sync got a bunch of changes and then fossil update updated user B's  
> version of the checkout. (I think just fossil update would have done  
> both at this point).
>
> 581 FossilBook> fossil sync
> Server:http://j...@pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi
>Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
> Send: 355  5  0  0
> Received: 138  3  0  0
> Send: 449  7  0  0
> Received: 751  5  0  2
> Send: 494  8  0  0
> Received: 827  4  0  1
> Total network traffic: 1400 bytes sent, 1963 bytes received
>
> 582 FossilBook> fossil update
> Autosync:  http://j...@pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi
>Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
> Send: 130  1  0  0
> Received: 138  3  0  0
> Total network traffic: 336 bytes sent, 396 bytes received
> ADD Images/Advanced/Simple_Merge/sm_Marilyn.epsf
> ADD Images/Advanced/Simple_Merge/sm_after_merge.epsf
> ADD Images/Advanced/Simple_Merge/sm_jim_fork.epsf
> UPDATE Research/fossilbib.bib
> UPDATE fossilbook.lyx
>
> I don't know if I can reproduce this but I am trying to understand  
> why it acted in this "sticky" fashion, not getting the first update  
> and then working when a second was applied.
>
> --jim
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 07:57:03 -0700
> From: Michael 
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Question about update/multiple users
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Message-ID: <20100609145703.ge30...@delora.autosys.us>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 08:07:51AM -0400, jim Schimpf wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>  I have a simple Fossil setup with a cgi served master repository  
>> and two users.  User A has made some changes, added some files then  
>> done a commit.  I wanted to sync user B to this state so he could  
>> do further work.  I ran a fossil update but the additional files  
>> did not appear.  I looked at the timeline in the server and saw  

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 6

2010-06-10 Thread jim Schimpf
In answer to Michael's question, I did do sync then update with the  
result as noted in the original. I even tried pull instead of sync  
with no effect.  Only after user A did another commit did user B  get  
the update after a sync.  (When I tried the sync and pull I would do a  
local ui with user B to see if the timeline reflected the timeline of  
the master repository). This is with fossil version [c56af61e5e]  
2010-04-22 15:48:25 UTC.

--jim

On Jun 10, 2010, at 8:00 AM, fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org  
wrote:

> Send fossil-users mailing list submissions to
>   fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>   http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil- 
> users
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>   fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>   fossil-users-ow...@lists.fossil-scm.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fossil-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Question about update/multiple users (jim Schimpf)
>   2. Re: Question about update/multiple users (Michael)
>
>
> ----------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:07:51 -0400
> From: jim Schimpf 
> Subject: [fossil-users] Question about update/multiple users
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Message-ID: <0b6db8a7-c50b-4621-985c-d036bbe90...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi,
>
>   I have a simple Fossil setup with a cgi served master repository  
> and two users.  User A has made some changes, added some files then  
> done a commit.  I wanted to sync user B to this state so he could do  
> further work.  I ran a fossil update but the additional files did  
> not appear.  I looked at the timeline in the server and saw users  
> A's commit. I then tried in user B's space to do fossil update  
>  where  was the hex hash code for the commit.   
> When I tried this I got:
>
> 573 FossilBook> fossil update b263813446
> Autosync:  http://j...@pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi
>Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
> Send: 130  1  0  0
> Received:  46  1  0  0
> Total network traffic: 338 bytes sent, 342 bytes received
> fossil: no such version: b263813446
>
> The version specified doesn't exist in the local repository but does  
> in the master.  I then tried fossil sync, fossil pull with no effect.
>
> Then user A made another change and check in, at that point fossil  
> sync got a bunch of changes and then fossil update updated user B's  
> version of the checkout. (I think just fossil update would have done  
> both at this point).
>
> 581 FossilBook> fossil sync
> Server:http://j...@pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi
>Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
> Send: 355  5  0  0
> Received: 138  3  0  0
> Send: 449  7  0  0
> Received: 751  5  0  2
> Send: 494  8  0  0
> Received: 827  4  0  1
> Total network traffic: 1400 bytes sent, 1963 bytes received
>
> 582 FossilBook> fossil update
> Autosync:  http://j...@pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi
>Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
> Send: 130  1  0  0
> Received: 138  3  0  0
> Total network traffic: 336 bytes sent, 396 bytes received
> ADD Images/Advanced/Simple_Merge/sm_Marilyn.epsf
> ADD Images/Advanced/Simple_Merge/sm_after_merge.epsf
> ADD Images/Advanced/Simple_Merge/sm_jim_fork.epsf
> UPDATE Research/fossilbib.bib
> UPDATE fossilbook.lyx
>
> I don't know if I can reproduce this but I am trying to understand  
> why it acted in this "sticky" fashion, not getting the first update  
> and then working when a second was applied.
>
> --jim
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 07:57:03 -0700
> From: Michael 
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Question about update/multiple users
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Message-ID: <20100609145703.ge30...@delora.autosys.us>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 08:07:51AM -0400, jim S

[fossil-users] Question about update/multiple users

2010-06-09 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi,

I have a simple Fossil setup with a cgi served master repository and 
two users.  User A has made some changes, added some files then done a commit.  
I wanted to sync user B to this state so he could do further work.  I ran a 
fossil update but the additional files did not appear.  I looked at the 
timeline in the server and saw users A's commit. I then tried in user B's space 
to do fossil update  where  was the hex hash code for the 
commit.  When I tried this I got:

573 FossilBook> fossil update b263813446
Autosync:  http://j...@pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi
Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
Send: 130  1  0  0
Received:  46  1  0  0
Total network traffic: 338 bytes sent, 342 bytes received
fossil: no such version: b263813446

The version specified doesn't exist in the local repository but does in the 
master.  I then tried fossil sync, fossil pull with no effect. 

Then user A made another change and check in, at that point fossil sync got a 
bunch of changes and then fossil update updated user B's version of the 
checkout. (I think just fossil update would have done both at this point).

581 FossilBook> fossil sync
Server:http://j...@pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi
Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
Send: 355  5  0  0
Received: 138  3  0  0
Send: 449  7  0  0
Received: 751  5  0  2
Send: 494  8  0  0
Received: 827  4  0  1
Total network traffic: 1400 bytes sent, 1963 bytes received

582 FossilBook> fossil update
Autosync:  http://j...@pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi
Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
Send: 130  1  0  0
Received: 138  3  0  0
Total network traffic: 336 bytes sent, 396 bytes received
ADD Images/Advanced/Simple_Merge/sm_Marilyn.epsf
ADD Images/Advanced/Simple_Merge/sm_after_merge.epsf
ADD Images/Advanced/Simple_Merge/sm_jim_fork.epsf
UPDATE Research/fossilbib.bib
UPDATE fossilbook.lyx

I don't know if I can reproduce this but I am trying to understand why it acted 
in this "sticky" fashion, not getting the first update and then working when a 
second was applied.

--jim 




___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] Fossil for dummies PDF

2010-05-29 Thread Jim Schimpf
Hi,

I've been working on this for a while and thought it might be useful for
the group.  This is a PDF for a new user of Fossil to show them how to use
it in a simple project.  It's not for most of the people on this list who
know much more than I about Fossil.  It is meant to be something you can
give to the friend who just wants to use Fossil for his projects. The online
documentation on the Fossil site is very good and I used the ideas there for
some of the book but personally I really like having a PDF with an active
index and TOC for documentation.

   Here is the site:

 http://pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi

(it's served by Fossil, naturally).

If you have comments or want to add to this let me know and I can give
you a login and of course credit in the text.  I would very much appreciate
your comments on what I did or did not do correctly and how it can be
improved.

--jim schimpf
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Using ticket system from command line

2010-05-15 Thread jim Schimpf
   For documentation I prefer to use LyX and then produce a  
PDF and put that into the repository.  Then you just have a link from  
a wiki page of the form: [http:doc/tip/documentation/my_user_man.pdf |  
User Manual] . The user  then has a PDF (with active links in the  
table of contents and index) of the documentation.  The advantage of  
this is that the user can at his option download the whole thing and  
print it very easily.  Also the formatting if critical can absolutely  
controlled and doesn't depend on browser issues.

 This is my preference in documentation as I try to keep all my docs  
in this form (I actually find iTunes is really great for storing  
PDFs.)  I agree with Richard that the Wiki is great for notes and  
shorter things but for longer forms and where I want active links in  
the TOC and index I would rather some other program did that for me.

--jim


On May 15, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:

> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Gour  wrote:
> On Sat, 15 May 2010 07:11:35 -0400
> >> "Richard" == Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> Dear Richard,
>
> Richard> HTML is not "complete" enough?  What do you want to do (or  
> for
> Richard> that matter what does any other wiki system do) that you  
> can't
> Richard> do (in a more "standard" way, I should add) with HTML?
>
> it is not point that HTML is not "complete", but it is simply too
> cumbersome to write documentation in HTML.
>
> So it really comes down to a matter of personal preference.  You say  
> HTML is cumbersome.  I say that Markdown, etc. are arbitrary and  
> cumbersome.  Different people have different ideas.  And yet, by  
> virtue of supporting HTML, the wiki in Fossil is both standard and  
> complete, for reasonable meanings of those words.  What you really  
> mean to say is that the fossil wiki does not suit your tastes in  
> wiki and you would prefer something different.  It's an emacs versus  
> vi thing.
>
> btw, what do you think about:
>
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=3e3018e96f ?
>
> Ticket change histories can be seen by following the links in the  
> submenu bar at the top of the ticket display.  Example:
>
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tkthistory/49929a3557
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tkttimeline?name=49929a3557
>
>
> -- 
> -
> D. Richard Hipp
> d...@sqlite.org
> ___
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] A note and some questions multiple users and fossil

2010-05-11 Thread jim Schimpf
(1) I'm working on a  "Fossil for Dummies" document.  I would hope  
this would be useful to the group as it could be passed to a new user  
to get them started.  It tries to answer the questions of someone just  
starting out in Fossil.  The work can be found at:

http://pandora.dyn-o-saur.com:8080/cgi-bin/Book.cgi/index  You can  
download the PDF.

It is NOT done, I wanted to let the group comment on it to see if I  
was going in the right direction. Also I set is up as a creative  
commons document and am open to other authors.

(2) While working on the document, the chapter on multiple users  
brought up some questions.  This document repository is a very  
degenerate case since there is really only one file in work.  With  
multiple users they are going to be editing the same file at the same  
time.  This gets into the merging, branching complications of Fossil.   
I show a way of handling it here, and while it works is there a better  
way ?  With a larger repository (i.e. more files) this might be less  
of problem since different users work on different files.  Should you  
for example, do a fossil update while you are working to ensure you  
are up to date.

Oh yes on fossil update, when you run it with the -n option it does  
not access the network repository but only the local one.  So running  
fossil update and fossil update -n give different results if the  
master has been updated.

--jim schimpf
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] DB Problem (fixed)

2009-01-24 Thread jim Schimpf
Getting the new fossil and running the update as you suggested fixed  
the problem.  Thank you (also you are up VERY early.)

--jim schimpf
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] DB Problem

2009-01-24 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi,

I have a fossil repository that's been in use for a number of  
months.  The setup is this, I have a master repository on a backed up  
server and I have my local copy.  I don't have it set for autosync  
since I take the local copy (on a laptop) to remote locations and sync  
when I get back.  Also I've taken to generating a bug/update ticket  
then adding that bug ticket ID value to the commit line so I can cross  
reference.  Then when I close the ticket I reference the commit ID in  
the bug ticket statement.

Ok, yesterday I went to generate a ticket (on the server copy of the  
DB).  I then did a local commit then did a sync. At that point the  
commit didn't show up on the server but somehow the bug ticket showed  
up twice.  Then on another try showed up in RED.  And now we have for  
the bug listing

  --
d6273bad9e
2008-12-04 14:48:17 This ticket had text attached 
but now doesn't

Fixed
one

edit
  --


  --

7c35fb8e3f  This was the ticket 
before the latest added
2008-12-04 21:22:32
Feature_Request
Tested
one
Add TL1 functions to this version
edit
Put a TL1 interface on the ICE. Use already developed EDGE code.

jim added on 2008-12-04 21:22:32:
Added TL1 code from EDGE, initial runs ok See

Database Error
access to config.value is prohibited SELECT value FROM config WHERE  
name='ticket-closed-expr'
  --

I have run a rebuild but that hasn't made much difference.  Any  
suggestion.  Note at this point I am working on copies so destructive  
edits are just fine

Oh yes the version is:  [2dffce041d] 2008-12-06 18:02:21 UTC

--jim schimpf


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users