Re: [fpc-pascal] sql server embedded: sqlite the only solution?
You need to bind the embedded API for it, and the rest is the same. You act like it's a server. I haven't done it myself, only read about it in the Firebird's source documentation :) Ido http://ik.homelinux.org/ On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > > I use firebird embedded. Fast, reliable, easily installed and > > much more powerful as sqlite. > > What is required to use firebird embedded? I know about it, but never > looking into it. > > We have an application we need to distribute with minimal install and > thought of firebird embedded, but I haven't had a chance to read up on it. > Any pointers or URL's, wiki pages I can look at? > > > Regards, > - Graeme - > > -- > fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal > http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ > > ___ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Queue integer values
> I need a queue that can store integer values. Is there any way to use TQueue for this task You can extend TQueue to have a method to insert the integer as pointers. Ex: type TMyQueue = class(TQueue) public procedure AddInt(const Integer: i); end; ... // implementation procedure TMyQueue.AddInt(const Integer: i); var p: PInteger; begin New(p); p^:=i; Add(p); end; Just don't forget to Dispose all the contents before destroying the queue or you'll have memory leak. > or does a generic queue class exist which I can use? AFAIR, no. Last time I check, only list and map have been implemented. But you can make your own, it's not difficult. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Queue-integer-values-tp26817366p26824766.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] sql server embedded: sqlite the only solution?
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, ik wrote: You need to bind the embedded API for it, and the rest is the same. You act like it's a server. I haven't done it myself, only read about it in the Firebird's source documentation :) All it takes (if you use sqldb) is 1 statement in a unit initialization or program startup code: uses ibase60dyn; // must be there Begin UseEmbeddedFirebird:=True; That's it. Michael. Ido http://ik.homelinux.org/ On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > I use firebird embedded. Fast, reliable, easily installed and > much more powerful as sqlite. What is required to use firebird embedded? I know about it, but never looking into it. We have an application we need to distribute with minimal install and thought of firebird embedded, but I haven't had a chance to read up on it. Any pointers or URL's, wiki pages I can look at? Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pas...@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Andreas Berger wrote: If I made one, then I'll make it using Powtils (fully CGI) or ExtPascal (fully Ajax) because that's what I know and have been experience with. I myself prefer to use fpWeb since it's provided by FPC's FCL. No third party dependency is good for new comers, and it's also better FPC/Lazarus promotion. I also intend to study fpWeb and would try to combine it with ExtPascal, if possible. I vote for a CGI approach (Then I could help). A sub-vote would go for fpWeb (Just need to find some good documentation for it), but I would accept Powtils. The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server. It works with all 4 types. Michael. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
So I would recommend going with something closer to home (part of FPC) - like fpWeb. This gives much better certainty that it will be continuously maintained - even if that only means no new feature but at least compilable with latest FPC. Yes, that's also the main reason of mine to build a web forum using fpWeb, instead of Powtils or ExtPascal. -- -Bee- ...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing ...writing stories at http://beeography.wordpress.com ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] sql server embedded: sqlite the only solution?
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Roberto Padovani wrote: What about data encryption? Is anyone of those providing it ? Firebird definitely not. Personally, I don't think that this is the task of a database engine... Michael. Thanks! R# 2009/12/16 ik : You also have Firebird Embeeded and MySQL Embedded (I really dislike MySQL) afaik. Ido http://ik.homelinux.org/ On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Codebue Fabio - P-Soft wrote: I'm trying to develop an application on windows mobile with lazarus/free pascal. I need SQL server embedded on it to manage a lot of data. SQLite3 is the only solution available? I CAN'T find information anywhere... some idea? Codebue Fabio ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pas...@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pas...@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] sql server embedded: sqlite the only solution?
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > All it takes (if you use sqldb) is 1 statement in a unit initialization or > program startup code: > > uses ibase60dyn; // must be there > > Begin >UseEmbeddedFirebird:=True; > Thanks Michael. Any thoughts on a tiOPF patch for the SqlDB persistence layer? ;-) Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] sql server embedded: sqlite the only solution?
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: All it takes (if you use sqldb) is 1 statement in a unit initialization or program startup code: uses ibase60dyn; // must be there Begin UseEmbeddedFirebird:=True; Thanks Michael. Any thoughts on a tiOPF patch for the SqlDB persistence layer? ;-) And what should it do according to you ? IMHO tiOPF kicks in too late; the layer is loaded only once, at program startup. Michael. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use > an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server. > It works with all 4 types. That's good news! Can you explain more about what you mean by "standalone server"? One of our lightweight apps we are thinking of is a simple executable with built-in HTTP Server support (no Apache or other full featured HTTP servers required) - is that what you mean by "standalone server"? This 'lightweight' HTTP server application will be executed before the client access our CGI apps on localhost. I still have code lying around somewhere which is about 400 lines of code implementing a basic HTTP server that also supports CGI - it simply uses the available TCP support from FPC - no 3rd party components like INDY, lnet etc... Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Queue integer values
> You can extend TQueue to have a method to insert the integer as pointers. Thanks for the answer, but I already found a way of using TQueue directly to solve my problem. R. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] sql server embedded: sqlite the only solution?
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > And what should it do according to you ? > IMHO tiOPF kicks in too late; the layer is loaded only once, at program > startup. Exactly why I'm asking your? :-) Can the initialization code in SqlDB (firebird embedded) not be delayed or overridden slightly later - after application startup? Note: I haven't tried to use Firebird Embedded yet - so just thinking out loudly. If push comes to shove, I can always hard-code our "lightweight" apps to use SqlDB Embedded like you showed before, but I would prefer to keep it flexible via compiler defines - like the way persistence layers are toggled in tiOPF. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
Well, fpWeb is winner, yes? Bee can create a sourceforge project? 2009/12/17 Graeme Geldenhuys : > Michael Van Canneyt wrote: >> >> The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use >> an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server. >> It works with all 4 types. > > That's good news! Can you explain more about what you mean by "standalone > server"? One of our lightweight apps we are thinking of is a simple > executable with built-in HTTP Server support (no Apache or other full > featured HTTP servers required) - is that what you mean by "standalone > server"? This 'lightweight' HTTP server application will be executed > before the client access our CGI apps on localhost. I still have code lying > around somewhere which is about 400 lines of code implementing a basic HTTP > server that also supports CGI - it simply uses the available TCP support > from FPC - no 3rd party components like INDY, lnet etc... > > > Regards, > - Graeme - > > -- > fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal > http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ > > ___ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pas...@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] sql server embedded: sqlite the only solution?
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: And what should it do according to you ? IMHO tiOPF kicks in too late; the layer is loaded only once, at program startup. Exactly why I'm asking your? :-) Can the initialization code in SqlDB (firebird embedded) not be delayed or overridden slightly later - after application startup? Note: I haven't tried to use Firebird Embedded yet - so just thinking out loudly. If push comes to shove, I can always hard-code our "lightweight" apps to use SqlDB Embedded like you showed before, but I would prefer to keep it flexible via compiler defines - like the way persistence layers are toggled in tiOPF. I don't see the benefit in that. Compiler defines are evil, no need to promote them. You can perfectly create a descendent of the existing tiOPF DB connection, which, when created, sets the variable if the library was not yet loaded. In effect, this should do the same as what I did PROVIDED no other code attempts to use the sqldb layer. If you then register this new connection as firebird-embedded, then you have the choice. No compiler defines needed, and you have the choice. (Note that it is impossible to mix the two, but that is a firebird limitation). Michael. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server. It works with all 4 types. That's good news! Can you explain more about what you mean by "standalone server"? One of our lightweight apps we are thinking of is a simple executable with built-in HTTP Server support (no Apache or other full featured HTTP servers required) - is that what you mean by "standalone server"? This 'lightweight' HTTP server application will be executed before the client access our CGI apps on localhost. I still have code lying around somewhere which is about 400 lines of code implementing a basic HTTP server that also supports CGI - it simply uses the available TCP support from FPC - no 3rd party components like INDY, lnet etc... Joost van der sluis has developed a leightweight lnet server app, which you can use to debug the webserver modules. There is no reason why you could not use it in a production environment. You could even use his code to create a bridge between fpweb and your server app. Michael. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
Well, fpWeb is winner, yes? Bee can create a sourceforge project? If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I almost know nothing about fpWeb. I even intend to study fpWeb from this project. The project owner should be someone who knows how to build (at least) the application skeleton using the choosen framework as the base for further work by someone elses. BTW, I prefer googlecode to host an open source project. -- -Bee- ...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing ...writing stories at http://beeography.wordpress.com ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote: Well, fpWeb is winner, yes? Bee can create a sourceforge project? If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I almost know nothing about fpWeb. I even intend to study fpWeb from this project. The project owner should be someone who knows how to build (at least) the application skeleton using the choosen framework as the base for further work by someone elses. BTW, I prefer googlecode to host an open source project. If it is going to be used for FPC, we can create a project on the FPC SVN server, this is not really a problem. Michael. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:23:08 +0100 (CET), Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote: > >>> Well, fpWeb is winner, yes? >>> Bee can create a sourceforge project? >> >> If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I >> almost >> know nothing about fpWeb. I even intend to study fpWeb from this project. >> The >> project owner should be someone who knows how to build (at least) the >> application skeleton using the choosen framework as the base for further >> work >> by someone elses. >> >> BTW, I prefer googlecode to host an open source project. > > If it is going to be used for FPC, we can create a project on the FPC SVN > server, this is not really a problem. Why don't use Git this time? It's making code review and code merging from other sources a lot easier. (Just my 2 cents) ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:23:08 +0100 (CET), Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote: > >>> Well, fpWeb is winner, yes? >>> Bee can create a sourceforge project? >> >> If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I >> almost >> know nothing about fpWeb. I even intend to study fpWeb from this project. >> The >> project owner should be someone who knows how to build (at least) the >> application skeleton using the choosen framework as the base for further >> work >> by someone elses. >> >> BTW, I prefer googlecode to host an open source project. > > If it is going to be used for FPC, we can create a project on the FPC SVN > server, this is not really a problem. Why don't use Git this time? It's making code review and code merging from other sources a lot easier. (Just my 2 cents) ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server. It works with all 4 types. Is there any demo or documentation about them, especially the FCGI? I only saw CGI demos and very lack of documentation around fpWeb, CMIIW. I've been spoiled by ExtPascal, and I love the CGI gateway and auto- shutdown feature of ExtPascal. Can a similar feature be implemented in fpWeb? How about binding with JS framework for the browser side UI? Also the Ajax part. I propose fpWeb to support Google's Closure for that purpose. Are they possible to be done with fpWeb? How much effort will be required to achieve it? Where should we start to work on it? TIA. -- -Bee- ...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing ...writing stories at http://beeography.wordpress.com ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
Matthias Klumpp schreef: server, this is not really a problem. Why don't use Git this time? A. Because there no Git Server on the FPC SVN server. It's making code review and code merging from other sources a lot easier. I don't understand what you mean here. Vincent ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] sql server embedded: sqlite the only solution?
2009/12/17 Michael Van Canneyt : > > I don't see the benefit in that. Compiler defines are evil, no need to > promote them. The compiler defines for linking persistence layers are limited to one unit out of about three hundred units - no compiler defines are in your actual project code, only in the Compiler Options dialog which then applies to the whole project. So that's not really promoting them. > You can perfectly create a descendent of the existing tiOPF DB connection, > which, when created, sets the variable if the library was not yet loaded. In This is what I meant - I'll take a look closer at the time when we actually need embedded firebird support. > (Note that it is impossible to mix the two, but that is a firebird > limitation). No, I was going to use one or the other, not both firebird connection methods. -- Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
[fpc-pascal] Problem compiling DLL for 64Bit Windows - complete example attached
Hi!
I'm having serious troubles compiling a DLL for 64bit Windows.
I'm using FPC svn 1 (Ver 2.5.1) on all machines. I tried on WinXP
32bit (works), Vista 64bit (doesn't work), Win7 32Bit (works) and Win7
64bit (doesn't work).
The DLL works as a print-monitor, providing a virtual printer port.
For the definitions I used the windows-Unit whereever it would work, the
missing ones (mainly the Monitor-Structure i ported from MSDN.
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa506794.aspx)
To see the problem copy the resulting dll in your \windows\system32
folder. Then add a registry folder
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Print\Monitors\PMon64Test
Inside this folder add a string named "Driver" with a value of
"PMon64.dll" (which has to be the name of the dll in the System32 Folder.
Restart the Spooler-Service and try to add a Printer to your system.
On Win64 the Spooler Service will produce an Error with the ErrorCode
0x06be, on win32 the normal AddPrinter Dialog will appear.
The source attached provides a basic dll, wich will do nothing but write
some information to C:\TMP\DEBUG.TXT if that file is existant (so please
create it first!)
The Source is:
Start
library PMon64;
{$mode Delphi}
{$H+}
uses Windows, Sysutils;
type
pMonitor=^rMonitor;
TEnumPortsFunc=function(pName:LPWSTR;dwLevel:DWORD;pPorts:LPBYTE;
cbBuf:DWORD;pdwNeeded:LPDWORD;
pdwReturned:LPDWORD):BOOL;stdcall;
TOpenPortFunc=function(pName:LPWSTR;H:PHANDLE):BOOL;stdcall;
TOpenPortExFunc=function(pName,pPrinterName:LPWSTR;H:PHANDLE;
_Monitor:pMonitor):BOOL;stdcall;
TStartDocPortFunc=function(hPort:HANDLE;pPrinterName:LPWSTR;
JobID,Level:DWORD;
pDocInfo:LPBYTE):BOOL;stdcall;
TWritePortFunc=function(hPort:HANDLE;pBuffer:LPBYTE;
cbBuf:DWORD;pcbWritten:LPDWORD):BOOL;stdcall;
TReadPortFunc=function(hPort:HANDLE;pBuffer:LPBYTE;cbBuf:DWORD;
pcbRead:LPDWORD):BOOL;stdcall;
TEndDocPortFunc=function(hPort:HANDLE):BOOL;stdcall;
TClosePortFunc=function(hPort:HANDLE):BOOL;stdcall;
TAddPortFunc=function(pName:LPWSTR;h:HWND;
pMonitorName:LPWSTR):BOOL;stdcall;
TAddPortExFunc=function(pName:LPWSTR;Level:DWORD;pBuffer:LPBYTE;
pMonitorName:LPWSTR):BOOL;stdcall;
TConfigurePortFunc=function(pName:LPWSTR;h:HWND;
pMonitorName:LPWSTR):BOOL;stdcall;
TDeletePortFunc=function(pName:LPWSTR;h:HWND;
pMonitorName:LPWSTR):BOOL;stdcall;
TGetPrinterDataFromPortFunc=function(hPort:HANDLE;ControlID:DWORD;
pValueName,lpInBuffer:LPWSTR;
cbInBuffer:DWORD;
lpOutBuffer:LPWSTR;
cbOutBuffer:DWORD;
lpcbReturned:LPDWORD):BOOL;stdcall;
TSetPortTimeOutsFunc=function(hPort:HANDLE;lpTCO:pCommTimeouts;
reserved:DWORD):BOOL;stdcall;
TXcvOpenPortFunc=function(pszObject:LPCWSTR;GrantedAccess:ACCESS_MASK;
phXcv:PHANDLE):BOOL;stdcall;
TXcvDataPortFunc=function(hXcv:HANDLE;pszDataName:LPCWSTR;
pInputData:PBYTE;cbInputData:DWORD;
pOutputData:PBYTE;cbOutputData:DWORD;
pcbOutputNeeded:PDWORD):DWORD;stdcall;
TXcvClosePortFunc=function(hXcv:HANDLE):BOOL;stdcall;
rMonitor=packed record
pfnEnumPorts: TEnumPortsFunc;
pfnOpenPort: TOpenPortFunc;
pfnOpenPortEx: TOpenPortExFunc;
pfnStartDocPort: TStartDocPortFunc;
pfnWritePort: TWritePortFunc;
pfnReadPort: TReadPortFunc;
pfnEndDocPort: TEndDocPortFunc;
pfnClosePort: TClosePortFunc;
pfnAddPort: TAddPortFunc;
pfnAddPortEx: TAddPortExFunc;
pfnConfigurePort: TConfigurePortFunc;
pfnDeletePort: TDeletePortFunc;
pfnGetPrinterDataFromPort: TGetPrinterDataFromPortFunc;
pfnSetPortTimeOuts: TSetPortTimeOutsFunc;
pfnXcvOpenPort: TXcvOpenPortFunc;
pfnXcvDataPort: TXcvDataPortFunc;
pfnXcvClosePort: TXcvClosePortFunc;
end;
rMonitorEx=packed record
dwMonitorSize:DWORD;
Monitor:rMonitor;
end;
pMonitorEx=^rMonitorEx;
var
Mon:rMonitorEx;
procedure DbgSend(Text:String);
var f:Textfile;
begin
if FileExists('C:\TMP\DEBUG.TXT') then begin
AssignFile(f,'C:\TMP\DEBUG.TXT');
Append(f);
Writeln(f,FormatDateTime('HH:MM:SS',now())+': '+Trim(Text));
CloseFile(f);
end;
end;
function EnumPorts(pName:LPWSTR;dwLevel:DWORD;pPorts:LPBYTE;
cbBuf:DWORD;pdwNeeded:LPDWORD;
pdwReturned:LPDWORD):BOOL;stdcall;
begin
DbgSend('EnumPorts');
end;
function OpenPort(pName:LPWSTR;H:PHANDLE):BOOL;stdcall;
begin
DbgSend('OpenPort');
end;
function StartDocPort(hPort:HANDL
Re: [fpc-pascal] Problem compiling DLL for 64Bit Windows - complete example attached
Lukas Gradl wrote: Hi! I'm having serious troubles compiling a DLL for 64bit Windows. I'm using FPC svn 1 (Ver 2.5.1) on all machines. I tried on WinXP 32bit (works), Vista 64bit (doesn't work), Win7 32Bit (works) and Win7 64bit (doesn't work). > rMonitor=packed record ... end; rMonitorEx=packed record dwMonitorSize:DWORD; Monitor:rMonitor; end; Are you sure the C record is packed too ? This would mean that all function pointers in rMonitor are not aligned. Marc ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
Vincent Snijders wrote: > > A. Because there no Git Server on the FPC SVN server. Git doesn't need a server/daemon app to work on a server - anyway, git includes everything needed. Anyway, SourceForge and GitHub etc all support Git repositories with no problems - so we don't need to disturb the FPC SVN server. >> It's making code review and code merging from >> other sources a lot easier. > > I don't understand what you mean here. Use Git to find out. :-) Consequently, I agree with Mattias. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
Bee Jay wrote: > > If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I > almost know nothing about fpWeb. Well if you don't use it, you will never learn it. There seems to be 4 or so developers interested in this. ANYBODY, just create a damn repository and start coding - no point is talking about it and doing nothing. Just so you know, I think the FPC based forum idea a nice idea (nice demo app), but I have no time for it. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef: I agree with Mattias. I didn't think Mattias commented on this thread. Do you mean Matthias, who suggested to use Git on the FPC svn server? Vincent ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
Vincent Snijders wrote: > > I didn't think Mattias commented on this thread. Do you mean Matthias, ah, spelling mistake from my side. Yes, I was agreeing with what Matthias Klumpp said. > who suggested to use Git on the FPC svn server? Then we can't call it a FPC SVN server any more. :-) I really don't care where projects are created - I think SourceForge or GitHub are more visible and accessible by all. So that would be my first choice anyway. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
