Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Mark Andrews
They haven't raised any money yet. The money will only be collected if 
Borland were to accept an offer from these folks. The amount so far is 
more akin to pledges.


Mark

L505 wrote:


Who gets the $22,000 they have raised so far, if their plan doesn't work out?


___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Object pascal a "Modern Language"

2006-03-03 Thread Mark Andrews

Tony Pelton wrote:


it is *everything* that Java is, but better.


i feel like the hobbyist programmer in me has been reborn AND ... i've
actually started to look out into the job market a little, with an eye
towards maybe trying to make a jump from being a Java J2EE web
application developer to making a jump to doing Pascal development for
a day job, if the right opportunity came along.

Yet another lost soul wanders out of the C-Language (C, C++, C#, Java, 
Python, et. al.)  forrest and into the fertile fields of Object Pascal.


You know, in all my years of using Pascal (starting with Turbo 3.01A in 
1986) and Object Pascal (starting with Turbo 5.5 in 1989), I have heard 
this story on more than one occasion. However, I have never heard a 
story describing the opposite, ie. a person going from Pascal to a 
C-Language and having the same epiphany. I've tried to make the 
transition myself on several occasions, but I always end up coming back 
to Pascal.


Congratulations!

Mark
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Object pascal a "Modern Language"

2006-03-03 Thread Mark Andrews

Matt Henley wrote:


understand.  A modern language such as any of the .NET languages will
meet the efficiency objective but portability remains an issue.  While

I believe the with .Net, you will have the same speed issues that you 
have with Python since it compiles to CLR and not native machine code. 
So he is mistaken in his initial premise. Java will have the same issue. 
Plus, when running a simulation, you don't want the program to suddenly 
decide it has to do garbage collection, thus slowing down. Any .Net or 
Java program will have these problems due to their very architecture.


What does he consider a "modern language". You can't begin to quell his 
anxiety or disperse his ignorance until he can give you a definition. 
Ask for specifics.


Is he aware that Lazarus is written in Free Pascal? I would show him 
Pixel... it is very impressive.


Mark




___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] for..in loops?

2005-11-20 Thread Mark Andrews

Marc Santhoff wrote:



If you'd ask me: My wish would be to see fpc compiling programmes for
the BlackFin-CPUs and for the ECOS2 operating system, can this be
implemented, please? ;)

Marc



So  the number of users of fpc is extended by two? three at most? :-)

Mark
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal