Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:59:03 +0100 (CET) mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote: >[...] > I don't use Lazarus for FPC development. This is not a problem of Lazarus, > but more that I don't want to often rebuild lazarus when I'm working on FPC. You don't need to. Mattias ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
David Emerson schreef: on multiple projects at once. Especially, e.g., if I want to test some feature or idea in a new little project, I tend to just do that in a separate editor rather than opening another group of lazarus windows or closing the big project I'm working on. For such use case, there is the build file and run file functionality. See also: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Tutorial#The_Run_sub-menu http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/IDE_Window:_Configure_Build_file Vincent ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
It took me a couple years to take that plunge (of course a couple years ago Lazarus was not as robust as it is today) but I will never go back! Lazarus does have the distinct disadvantage that it's cumbersome to work on multiple projects at once. Especially, e.g., if I want to test some feature or idea in a new little project, I tend to just do that in a separate editor rather than opening another group of lazarus windows or closing the big project I'm working on. Some of the most valuable hotkeys for me are ctrl-click on an identifier to jump to declaration; and the same can be done with ctrl-shift-up. To go down to implementation, ctrl-shift-down (codetools commands - find procedure method). I've also customized other hotkeys, e.g. moving from tab to tab, which make the source editor feel more like other editors. The customizability coupled with the great codetools features are unmatched. ~D. On Sun 10 Jan 2010, Hans-Peter Suter wrote: > 2010/1/10 dmitry boyarintsev : > > I use Lazarus as my primary IDE (i have to use Delphi in windows sometimes). > > Lazarus is the only IDE i'm using on Mac OS X. > > Just installed Lazarus and it's much better than I expected. Simple > things like 'navigating around' are great. Didn't (yet) debug and > still call the make script from the terminal though. > > What I miss, is the TextMate ability to drag a folder containing > subfolders with .pas code files into the (libray) project. > > Cheers, > Hans-Peter > > PS: thanks also to the other suggestions! And if somebody uses Emacs I > am still interested to hear about how it goes. Thanks again! > ___ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
Hans-Peter Suter wrote: > > PS: thanks also to the other suggestions! And if somebody uses Emacs I > am still interested to hear about how it goes. Thanks again! I use Emacs most of the time to edit my Pascal (and all other :) ) code. But it has it's learning curve. And, although there are various code-completion and code-browser features, not much Pascal-specific support is available (e.g. no Pascal on http://cedet.sourceforge.net/languagesupport.shtml). So you end up using generic code completion (e.g. by dabbrev, or http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/AutoComplete), which is very dumb compared to how Lazarus completes. So if you want code features that need integration with Pascal code (code browser, code completion etc.), go with what everyone says: Lazarus :) Michalis ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
Ingemar Ragnemalm wrote: Hans-Peter Suter wrote: I'm on a mac and use TextMate currently. As it doesn't jump between declaration and implementation and ist mac-only, I am looking for a replacement. Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? I don't quite understand the question. Why is "Mac only" a problem? I use whatever is available on the platform I am on. Under Linux, I usually use Gedit. Well, except that I avoid plain text editors for development since I consider them inefficient. Emacs is good if you don't care for consistency between applications at all. It can do anything but nothing is easy with it. It has old commands from the TTY days that are different from everything else. How should "jump between declaration and implementation" work? That sounds like the kind of functionality that requires the program to parse the file contents a lot, which rules out any editor that doesn't have an explicit Pascal mode that is FPC compatible. /Ingemar ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal Yeah, I tend to use gEdit for editing just about every text file I have to edit. Even under Windows. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
Hans-Peter Suter wrote: I'm on a mac and use TextMate currently. As it doesn't jump between declaration and implementation and ist mac-only, I am looking for a replacement. Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? I don't quite understand the question. Why is "Mac only" a problem? I use whatever is available on the platform I am on. Under Linux, I usually use Gedit. Well, except that I avoid plain text editors for development since I consider them inefficient. Emacs is good if you don't care for consistency between applications at all. It can do anything but nothing is easy with it. It has old commands from the TTY days that are different from everything else. How should "jump between declaration and implementation" work? That sounds like the kind of functionality that requires the program to parse the file contents a lot, which rules out any editor that doesn't have an explicit Pascal mode that is FPC compatible. /Ingemar ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
2010/1/10 dmitry boyarintsev : > > I use it, even if develop non-LCL based applications. Same here, but I probably use Lazarus IDE to develop 99.9% of my work - which is all non-LCL related projects. Actually thinking about it, the only LCL project I sometimes work on is implementing minor fixes for the Lazarus IDE itself. :-) -- Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
2010/1/10 Paul Ishenin : > Marco van de Voort wrote: >> >> I don't use Lazarus for FPC development. This is not a problem of Lazarus, >> but more that I don't want to often rebuild lazarus when I'm working on >> FPC. >> > > Why do you need to rebuild lazarus when you are working on fpc? I second that question. I'm working on the "cpstrnew" branch using Lazarus. I never need to rebuild Lazarus IDE - I only rebuild the cpstrnew compiler and RTL when needed. -- Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
2010/1/10 dmitry boyarintsev : > I use Lazarus as my primary IDE (i have to use Delphi in windows sometimes). > Lazarus is the only IDE i'm using on Mac OS X. Just installed Lazarus and it's much better than I expected. Simple things like 'navigating around' are great. Didn't (yet) debug and still call the make script from the terminal though. What I miss, is the TextMate ability to drag a folder containing subfolders with .pas code files into the (libray) project. Cheers, Hans-Peter PS: thanks also to the other suggestions! And if somebody uses Emacs I am still interested to hear about how it goes. Thanks again! ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
Yes, and I am using the devel version of FPC (2.5.1). It works fine for building the whole Lazarus. Juha ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
On sunnuntai, 10. tammikuuta 2010 16:04:09 dmitry boyarintsev wrote: > I use Lazarus as my primary IDE (i have to use Delphi in windows > sometimes). Lazarus is the only IDE i'm using on Mac OS X. > > I use it, even if develop non-LCL based applications. > The best option Lazarus has to offer is Codetools, not available in > other environments Hi, I sneak in here with a newbie question: How to debug FPC internal code with Lazarus (or with anything)? I tried it now first time. I opened project "compiler/pp.lpi" and run it. It actually built the compiler and started it, and started printing its help to stdout, but then Lazarus said: "Oops, the debugger entered error state..." Last lines on console are: [WARNING] Debugger: Unexpected async-record: *running,thread-id="all" [WARNING] TGDBMIDebugger: ExecuteCommand "-exec-continue" failed. Juha Manninen ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
Marco van de Voort wrote: I don't use Lazarus for FPC development. This is not a problem of Lazarus, but more that I don't want to often rebuild lazarus when I'm working on FPC. Why do you need to rebuild lazarus when you are working on fpc? Btw, I use lazarus for fpc development. This is very productive. I run one lazarus with my test project and one lazarus with the compiler. Best regards, Paul Ishenin. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
I use Lazarus as my primary IDE (i have to use Delphi in windows sometimes). Lazarus is the only IDE i'm using on Mac OS X. I use it, even if develop non-LCL based applications. The best option Lazarus has to offer is Codetools, not available in other environments thanks, dmitry ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said: > > In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said: > >> Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? > > > > Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_) > > ;-) > > What do you (and/or the other FreePascal authors) use? joe for small editing or textmode IDE for larger multiwindow edit work. I typically don't compile with the textmode ide though, I do cmdline that in a different window (but because I work on FPC, not on an FPC using app, I more often build the whole thing to see if there are complation errors. Different workflow) When I use the said component also at work, I sometimes also use D2009. I don't use Lazarus for FPC development. This is not a problem of Lazarus, but more that I don't want to often rebuild lazarus when I'm working on FPC. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
2010/1/10 Marco van de Voort : > In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said: >> Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? > > Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_) ;-) What do you (and/or the other FreePascal authors) use? Cheers, Hans-Peter ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
Marco van de Voort schrieb: In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said: Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_) ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal Gedit, also geany. Works fine with fpc. HTH, Holger ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] [OT] which editor - emacs?
In our previous episode, Hans-Peter Suter said: > Is Emacs a good choice? Does it work well with FPC? Maybe, but what would you use as editor? :_) ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
