Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Steve Rickaby
At 11:49 am -0600 8/12/05, Peter Gold wrote:
>Hi, Steve:
>
>Thanks for the feedback. Do you think there was a problem with Classic's 
>ability to handle the length of the filename or pathname?

No, I don't think so, as the folder concerned was just called 'Graphics' ;-) I 
expected it to work, but it didn't. Surprise.

Ah, I see what you mean... the combined length of the pathname might have been 
too long. Er, ok - will run simple test now... no, it doesn't work even when 
the combined path lengths come nowhere near the 31 character limit. FrameMake 
doesn't want to follow an alias to a graphics folder that has the same name as 
the original. However, once you've told it to use the alias and chosen the 
'update document to use new path', all is well, and remains so.

I realise I'm not being as clear as I might here: what is happening is that 
FrameMaker, after using an actual folder to source graphics, cannot identify an 
alias to that folder as being the same thing until it's told to. After that, it 
uses the alias ok. Sorry if I confused anyone earlier.
-- 
Steve



Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Steve Rickaby
At 11:39 am -0600 8/12/05, Peter Gold wrote:

>Has anyone successfully employed operating system links, aliases, or shortcuts 
>in project-specific graphics folders for this purpose? The idea is that you 
>can have project-specific directory structures that only contain links to the 
>source graphics that are stored in a central location. Each project's graphics 
>directory contains only the project's graphic links. FM files in each project 
>refer to the link, not to the source.

I tried alising a graphic folder within a book folder in FrameMaker 6 on Mac, 
but FrameMaker could not follow the link.
-- 
Steve



Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Grant Hogarth

I use a mixed method, but reference *all* my graphics.
All scaps (screen captures) are in PNG format.
I have a Directory tree like so:


 |
--
|| | |
 Pix   P1P2Help
  |  |   
  ----
  | ||   |  
P1_Only   P2_Only  P1_Help P2_Help

NOTES: P1, P2 ... Have the FM files in them
   Pix has all the images except product-specific ones.


I also use a naming pattern:

but_   (scap of graphic button)
btxt_  (scap of text button)
dlg__  (scap of dialog --
with feature selected if required) 
dtl_ (scap of detail -- usually just a part of a
screen.)
emess_(scap of message dialog)
ill_ (externally created line drawing, flowchart,
etc.)
pic_ (scap of a displayed function; for example the
chart of a stock)
menu_(scap of menu)
rmenu_   (scap of right-click menu)
tbar_ (scap of toolbar) 
wiz__P  (scap of wizard page 1-n)

This makes themn easy to sort/locate.
For ease of use, the product specific versions are all prefixed by a
3-character code and an underscore 
(example: PRO_dlg_YAxis_Props_Grid.png = Professional version, Y-axis
Properties dialog, Grid tab )

I also have a number of naming conventions that are peculiar to this
particular product interface
(candlestick, sample, and others)
Grant

-Original Message-
From: Peter Gold
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:40 AM
To: Martinek, Carla
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Keeping track of graphics


Carla's point about using one graphic for all linked uses is the
simplest. However, the single central folder of all graphics could be
confusing.

Has anyone successfully employed operating system links, aliases, or
shortcuts in project-specific graphics folders for this purpose? The
idea is that you can have project-specific directory structures that
only contain links to the source graphics that are stored in a central
location. Each project's graphics directory contains only the project's
graphic links. FM files in each project refer to the link, not to the
source.

The advantages are fewer graphics (links) to manage for each project,
and a single graphic source for multiple uses.

The disadvantage is setting it up and retraining authors to use the new
approach.

I know that unix links are reliable, and that the reliable Macintosh
aliases are not an option past FM 7.0. Is anyone using Windows
shortcuts?

Regards,

Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices
peter at knowhowpro.com




Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Peter Gold
Hi, Steve:

Thanks for the feedback. Do you think there was a problem with 
Classic's ability to handle the length of the filename or pathname?

Regards,

Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices

At 5:44 PM + 12/8/05, Steve Rickaby wrote:
>At 11:39 am -0600 8/12/05, Peter Gold wrote:
>
>>Has anyone successfully employed operating system links, aliases, 
>>or shortcuts in project-specific graphics folders for this purpose? 
>>The idea is that you can have project-specific directory structures 
>>that only contain links to the source graphics that are stored in a 
>>central location. Each project's graphics directory contains only 
>>the project's graphic links. FM files in each project refer to the 
>>link, not to the source.
>
>I tried alising a graphic folder within a book folder in FrameMaker 
>6 on Mac, but FrameMaker could not follow the link.
>--
>Steve



Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Peter Gold

Carla's point about using one graphic for all linked uses is the 
simplest. However, the single central folder of all graphics could be 
confusing.

Has anyone successfully employed operating system links, aliases, or 
shortcuts in project-specific graphics folders for this purpose? The 
idea is that you can have project-specific directory structures that 
only contain links to the source graphics that are stored in a 
central location. Each project's graphics directory contains only the 
project's graphic links. FM files in each project refer to the link, 
not to the source.

The advantages are fewer graphics (links) to manage for each project, 
and a single graphic source for multiple uses.

The disadvantage is setting it up and retraining authors to use the 
new approach.

I know that unix links are reliable, and that the reliable Macintosh 
aliases are not an option past FM 7.0. Is anyone using Windows 
shortcuts?

Regards,

Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices
peter at knowhowpro.com

At 11:09 AM -0600 12/8/05, Martinek, Carla wrote:
>We reference all graphics into our documents.  Currently we have a
>couple of thousand graphics stored centrally in the same folder
>location. While it can be a bit cumbersome to maintain that many
>graphics in the same folder, it ends up helping us in the long run
>because if a graphic is updated, it gets updated in *all* locations
>where it is used.  Previously we had project-specific graphic folders,
>and we found that the same graphic might be updated for one manual, but
>not for another.



Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Robert Kern
Pearl,

We only reference graphics and don't have any trouble keeping track of 
them (well, mostly no trouble). We name graphics according to their 
figure number or use and UNF for un-numbered graphics.  The rub comes 
when an author inserts a figure and all the figure numbers in the book 
change --- you end up with actual figure numbers being different than 
the figure number in the book, unless you renumber. Our books are done 
by chapter, so the quantity of graphics is usually small enough that we 
renumber to keep things in sync.  If the author adds a graphic its not 
as bad: you just add an alpha to the numbering scheme for the graphic 
(UNF1-1, UNF1-1b, UNF 1-2).

-bob
Robert Kern
President, TIPS Technical Publishing, Inc.
108 E. Main Street, Suite 4
Carrboro, NC  27510
www.technicalpublishing.com
bob at technicalpublishing.com
919-933-2629 phone and fax


pearlrosenberg at nc.rr.com wrote:

>Hi Dominick,
>
>I do not reference my graphics, but this may be a good reason to do 
>so. Altho having the graphics in the files makes them larger, I also 
>thought it would be easier to manage the book without a directory of 
>graphics.
>
>I'd be interested to hear from those of you who reference graphics 
>about how hard it is (or isn't) to keep track of the graphic files.
>
>Pearl Rosenberg
>TeleHealth Services
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "DeFlorio, Dominick" 
>Date: Thursday, December 8, 2005 10:28 am
>Subject: RE: Can't Open a FM File
>
>  
>
>>If it is hanging-up on a graphic, and you reference your graphics, 
>>
>>
>try
>  
>
>>renaming the graphics folder.  If the file is not corrupt, Frame 
>>shouldopen the file and issue an error message.
>>
>>
>>Dominick A. DeFlorio
>>Senior Technical Writer
>>Plug Power, Inc.
>>968 Albany-Shaker Road
>>Latham, NY 12110
>>(518) 738-0389
>>
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From:
>>framers-bounces+dominick_deflorio=plugpower.com at lists.frameusers.com
>>[mailto:framers-
>>bounces+dominick_deflorio=plugpower.com at lists.frameusers.com] On 
>>Behalf Of pearlrosenberg at nc.rr.com
>>Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:25 AM
>>To: Peter Gold
>>Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
>>Subject: Re: Can't Open a FM File
>>
>>Unfortunately this doesn't work either. I guess I'm going to have 
>>to try
>>to pull this info out of my memory and rewrite the chap again. 
>>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: Peter Gold 
>>Date: Thursday, December 8, 2005 9:41 am
>>Subject: Re: Can't Open a FM File
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hi, Pearl:
>>>
>>>It's more likely a corrupt file than a memory issue.
>>>
>>>Have you tried the "open heroic" method? In FM, tap and rekease 
>>>  
>>>
>>these 
>>
>>
>>>keys in sequence:
>>>
>>>Escape
>>>lowercase o
>>>uppercase H
>>>
>>>Then select the file in the Open dialog box. If it opens 
>>>  
>>>
>>successfully,
>>
>>
>>>save it immediately to a new name.
>>>
>>>At 9:29 AM -0500 12/8/05, pearlrosenberg at nc.rr.com wrote:
>>>  
>>>
Hi Framers,

FM 7.0p578
Windows XP Professional
512 MB RAM

I hope somebody can help me open this file. When I try to open 


>>it, FM
>>
>>
>>
tells me I do not have enough memory. The file is a little 


>>under 2.7 
>>
>>
MB, and there are larger FM files in the book


>>>that FM
>>>  
>>>
does open. I've tried closing everything and rebooting and then 
opening only that file, but I get the same message.


>>>--
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Peter Gold
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>___peter at knowhowpro.com
>  
>
>>_
>>
>>
>>>KnowHow ProServices
>>>
>>>http://www.knowhowpro.com
>>>
>>>612.823.7113
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>___
>>
>>
>>You are currently subscribed to Framers as
>>dominick_deflorio at plugpower.com.
>>
>>To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>>framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
>>or visit
>>
>>
>>
>http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/dominick_deflorio%
>40
>  
>
>>plugpower.com
>>
>>Send administrative questions to lisa at frameusers.com. Visit
>>http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>>
>>
>>
>___
>
>
>You are currently subscribed to Framers as bob at technicalpublishing.com.
>
>To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
>framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
>or visit 
>http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/bob%40technicalpublishing.com
>
>Send administrative questions to lisa at frameusers.com. Visit
>http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>
>  
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20051208/036c8f92/attachment.html
 


Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Martinek, Carla
We reference all graphics into our documents.  Currently we have a
couple of thousand graphics stored centrally in the same folder
location. While it can be a bit cumbersome to maintain that many
graphics in the same folder, it ends up helping us in the long run
because if a graphic is updated, it gets updated in *all* locations
where it is used.  Previously we had project-specific graphic folders,
and we found that the same graphic might be updated for one manual, but
not for another.

We avoid naming files by document name or figure number because of the
reasons Bob Kern mentioned (if you insert one in the middle, what
happens to the numbering?).  Also, most graphics are used in multiple
locations, such as in the User Guide and in the Maintenance Manuals, so
the fig. numbering really didn't apply for all uses.

Instead, we set up a naming scheme that incorporates the product/s the
graphic is used for and a pre-defined set of procedural/descriptive
words.  It took some time on the front end for our graphics team to set
this up, but it seems to be working pretty well for the most part.

Also, if links are broken, there is only one folder to point to for
updating the path.

-Carla
cmartinek at zebra.com

- CONFIDENTIAL-
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and may also be 
legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, 
use, copy, or distribute this message. If you receive this email in error, 
please notify the sender immediately by reply email and then delete this email.



RE: Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Grant Hogarth
 
I use a mixed method, but reference *all* my graphics.
All scaps (screen captures) are in PNG format.
I have a Directory tree like so:


 |
--
|| | |
 Pix   P1P2Help
  |  |   
  ----
  | ||   |  
P1_Only   P2_Only  P1_Help P2_Help

NOTES: P1, P2 ... Have the FM files in them
   Pix has all the images except product-specific ones.


I also use a naming pattern:

but_   (scap of graphic button)
btxt_  (scap of text button)
dlg__  (scap of dialog --
with feature selected if required) 
dtl_ (scap of detail -- usually just a part of a
screen.)
emess_(scap of message dialog)
ill_ (externally created line drawing, flowchart,
etc.)
pic_ (scap of a displayed function; for example the
chart of a stock)
menu_(scap of menu)
rmenu_   (scap of right-click menu)
tbar_ (scap of toolbar) 
wiz__P  (scap of wizard page 1-n)

This makes themn easy to sort/locate.
For ease of use, the product specific versions are all prefixed by a
3-character code and an underscore 
(example: PRO_dlg_YAxis_Props_Grid.png = Professional version, Y-axis
Properties dialog, Grid tab )

I also have a number of naming conventions that are peculiar to this
particular product interface
(candlestick, sample, and others)
Grant

-Original Message-
From: Peter Gold
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:40 AM
To: Martinek, Carla
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Keeping track of graphics


Carla's point about using one graphic for all linked uses is the
simplest. However, the single central folder of all graphics could be
confusing.

Has anyone successfully employed operating system links, aliases, or
shortcuts in project-specific graphics folders for this purpose? The
idea is that you can have project-specific directory structures that
only contain links to the source graphics that are stored in a central
location. Each project's graphics directory contains only the project's
graphic links. FM files in each project refer to the link, not to the
source.

The advantages are fewer graphics (links) to manage for each project,
and a single graphic source for multiple uses.

The disadvantage is setting it up and retraining authors to use the new
approach.

I know that unix links are reliable, and that the reliable Macintosh
aliases are not an option past FM 7.0. Is anyone using Windows
shortcuts?

Regards,

Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Steve Rickaby
At 11:49 am -0600 8/12/05, Peter Gold wrote:
>Hi, Steve:
>
>Thanks for the feedback. Do you think there was a problem with Classic's 
>ability to handle the length of the filename or pathname?

No, I don't think so, as the folder concerned was just called 'Graphics' ;-) I 
expected it to work, but it didn't. Surprise.

Ah, I see what you mean... the combined length of the pathname might have been 
too long. Er, ok - will run simple test now... no, it doesn't work even when 
the combined path lengths come nowhere near the 31 character limit. FrameMake 
doesn't want to follow an alias to a graphics folder that has the same name as 
the original. However, once you've told it to use the alias and chosen the 
'update document to use new path', all is well, and remains so.

I realise I'm not being as clear as I might here: what is happening is that 
FrameMaker, after using an actual folder to source graphics, cannot identify an 
alias to that folder as being the same thing until it's told to. After that, it 
uses the alias ok. Sorry if I confused anyone earlier.
-- 
Steve
___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Steve Rickaby
At 11:39 am -0600 8/12/05, Peter Gold wrote:

>Has anyone successfully employed operating system links, aliases, or shortcuts 
>in project-specific graphics folders for this purpose? The idea is that you 
>can have project-specific directory structures that only contain links to the 
>source graphics that are stored in a central location. Each project's graphics 
>directory contains only the project's graphic links. FM files in each project 
>refer to the link, not to the source.

I tried alising a graphic folder within a book folder in FrameMaker 6 on Mac, 
but FrameMaker could not follow the link.
-- 
Steve
___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Peter Gold

Hi, Steve:

Thanks for the feedback. Do you think there was a problem with 
Classic's ability to handle the length of the filename or pathname?


Regards,

Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices

At 5:44 PM + 12/8/05, Steve Rickaby wrote:

At 11:39 am -0600 8/12/05, Peter Gold wrote:

Has anyone successfully employed operating system links, aliases, 
or shortcuts in project-specific graphics folders for this purpose? 
The idea is that you can have project-specific directory structures 
that only contain links to the source graphics that are stored in a 
central location. Each project's graphics directory contains only 
the project's graphic links. FM files in each project refer to the 
link, not to the source.


I tried alising a graphic folder within a book folder in FrameMaker 
6 on Mac, but FrameMaker could not follow the link.

--
Steve

___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Peter Gold


Carla's point about using one graphic for all linked uses is the 
simplest. However, the single central folder of all graphics could be 
confusing.


Has anyone successfully employed operating system links, aliases, or 
shortcuts in project-specific graphics folders for this purpose? The 
idea is that you can have project-specific directory structures that 
only contain links to the source graphics that are stored in a 
central location. Each project's graphics directory contains only the 
project's graphic links. FM files in each project refer to the link, 
not to the source.


The advantages are fewer graphics (links) to manage for each project, 
and a single graphic source for multiple uses.


The disadvantage is setting it up and retraining authors to use the 
new approach.


I know that unix links are reliable, and that the reliable Macintosh 
aliases are not an option past FM 7.0. Is anyone using Windows 
shortcuts?


Regards,

Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

At 11:09 AM -0600 12/8/05, Martinek, Carla wrote:

We reference all graphics into our documents.  Currently we have a
couple of thousand graphics stored centrally in the same folder
location. While it can be a bit cumbersome to maintain that many
graphics in the same folder, it ends up helping us in the long run
because if a graphic is updated, it gets updated in *all* locations
where it is used.  Previously we had project-specific graphic folders,
and we found that the same graphic might be updated for one manual, but
not for another.

___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Martinek, Carla
We reference all graphics into our documents.  Currently we have a
couple of thousand graphics stored centrally in the same folder
location. While it can be a bit cumbersome to maintain that many
graphics in the same folder, it ends up helping us in the long run
because if a graphic is updated, it gets updated in *all* locations
where it is used.  Previously we had project-specific graphic folders,
and we found that the same graphic might be updated for one manual, but
not for another.

We avoid naming files by document name or figure number because of the
reasons Bob Kern mentioned (if you insert one in the middle, what
happens to the numbering?).  Also, most graphics are used in multiple
locations, such as in the User Guide and in the Maintenance Manuals, so
the fig. numbering really didn't apply for all uses.

Instead, we set up a naming scheme that incorporates the product/s the
graphic is used for and a pre-defined set of procedural/descriptive
words.  It took some time on the front end for our graphics team to set
this up, but it seems to be working pretty well for the most part.

Also, if links are broken, there is only one folder to point to for
updating the path.

-Carla
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
- CONFIDENTIAL-
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and may also be 
legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, 
use, copy, or distribute this message. If you receive this email in error, 
please notify the sender immediately by reply email and then delete this email.
___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Keeping track of graphics

2005-12-08 Thread Robert Kern




Pearl,

We only reference graphics and don't have any trouble keeping track of
them (well, mostly no trouble). We name graphics according to their
figure number or use and UNF for un-numbered graphics.  The rub comes
when an author inserts a figure and all the figure numbers in the book
change --- you end up with actual figure numbers being different than
the figure number in the book, unless you renumber. Our books are done
by chapter, so the quantity of graphics is usually small enough that we
renumber to keep things in sync.  If the author adds a graphic its not
as bad: you just add an alpha to
the numbering scheme for the graphic (UNF1-1, UNF1-1b, UNF 1-2).

-bob
Robert Kern
President, TIPS Technical Publishing, Inc.
108 E. Main Street, Suite 4
Carrboro, NC  27510
www.technicalpublishing.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
919-933-2629 phone and fax


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi Dominick,

I do not reference my graphics, but this may be a good reason to do 
so. Altho having the graphics in the files makes them larger, I also 
thought it would be easier to manage the book without a directory of 
graphics.

I'd be interested to hear from those of you who reference graphics 
about how hard it is (or isn't) to keep track of the graphic files.

Pearl Rosenberg
TeleHealth Services

- Original Message -
From: "DeFlorio, Dominick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, December 8, 2005 10:28 am
Subject: RE: Can't Open a FM File

  
  
If it is hanging-up on a graphic, and you reference your graphics, 

  
  try
  
  
renaming the graphics folder.  If the file is not corrupt, Frame 
shouldopen the file and issue an error message.


Dominick A. DeFlorio
Senior Technical Writer
Plug Power, Inc.
968 Albany-Shaker Road
Latham, NY 12110
(518) 738-0389


-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:framers-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On 
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:25 AM
To: Peter Gold
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Can't Open a FM File

Unfortunately this doesn't work either. I guess I'm going to have 
to try
to pull this info out of my memory and rewrite the chap again. 

- Original Message -
From: Peter Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, December 8, 2005 9:41 am
Subject: Re: Can't Open a FM File



  Hi, Pearl:

It's more likely a corrupt file than a memory issue.

Have you tried the "open heroic" method? In FM, tap and rekease 
  

these 


  keys in sequence:

Escape
lowercase o
uppercase H

Then select the file in the Open dialog box. If it opens 
  

successfully,


  save it immediately to a new name.

At 9:29 AM -0500 12/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
Hi Framers,

FM 7.0p578
Windows XP Professional
512 MB RAM

I hope somebody can help me open this file. When I try to open 

  

it, FM



  
tells me I do not have enough memory. The file is a little 

  

under 2.7 


  
MB, and there are larger FM files in the book

  
  that FM
  
  
does open. I've tried closing everything and rebooting and then 
opening only that file, but I get the same message.

  
  
--

Regards,

Peter Gold

  

  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
_


  KnowHow ProServices

http://www.knowhowpro.com

612.823.7113

  

___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as
[EMAIL PROTECTED].

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit


  
  http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/dominick_deflorio%
40
  
  
plugpower.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


  
  ___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED].

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/bob%40technicalpublishing.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.

  


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.