Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #247 ready for review (I think)
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Ethan Jucovy wrote: > > Some of the things that people have said ought to be discussed about PLIP > #247 are: > 1) impact on server startup time > 2) implications for test environments > 3) stabilizing and releasing a new version of z3c.autoinclude > 4) debugging tools/APIs for z3c.autoinclude > * 5) documentation and/or code generation templates to explain the entry > point for plugin authors* > > I'll begin working on #3 immediately, since there's plenty I can do there > while discussion is still happening. > > Please let me know if there's anything else I'll need to submit for the > PLIP's review. > I'm not a member of the Framework Team so this is not mandatory for the PLIP's review, but as a member of the Documentation Team I would appreciate number (5). Something like "Before, we did this to accomplish this task. Now, we can do that.", as Wichert (?) suggested, so we would be able to find and update affected docs easily. Thanks in advance! -- israel ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[Framework-Team] PLIP review deadline has passed - time to review!
The deadline for PLIP submissions was yesterday, so as we agreed no more PLIPs should be accepted at this point. The deadline for the implementation review is two weeks from now: January 30. Where possible please try to give feedback to the PLIP implementors as soon as possible instead of waiting for the deadline so they will have more time to make any required changes. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP 197 ready for review: feedparser as external dependency
How come this PLIP has not been reviewed yet? I think we agreed to encourage people to submit PLIPs early so the framework team can start earlier as well in order to reduce the workload? Wichert. Previously Maurits van Rees wrote: > > The buildout is here: > https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip197-feedparser > > Note that I will not be online the next few days, so be patient when > you have questions. > > I'll paste the README.txt below for convenience. > > > PLIP 197: Add FeedParser as external requirement instead of shipping with it > > > See http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/197 > > Basically the only thing that needs doing is: > > - Remove portlets/feedparser.py from plone.app.portlets. > > - Instead add FeedParser as requirement in setup.py. > > This has been done on this branch (see src/plone.app.portlets in this > buildout): > > > https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/plone.app.portlets/branches/plip197-feedparser-as-external-egg > > > One possible gotcha is that the *package* is called ``FeedParser`` and > the *module* contained in that package is called ``feedparser``. > ``easy_install`` can handle both spellings just fine. But I once > encountered problems when using the lowercased name in setup.py. See > http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/7299 (which is where this plip > originated). I could not reproduce that later, but I say we call the > dependency ``FeedFeeder`` and everything should work. > > ``bin/test`` will run the plone.app.portlets tests. > > > Happy New Year! > > -- > Maurits van Rees | http://maurits.vanrees.org/ > Work | http://zestsoftware.nl/ > "This is your day, don't let them take it away." [Barlow Girl] > > > ___ > Framework-Team mailing list > Framework-Team@lists.plone.org > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team -- Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[Framework-Team] PLIP 237 ready for review
Hi. I'm somewhat late with creating the review buildout for PLIP 237 (Minor i18n upgrades) at: https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip237-minor-i18n-upgrades/ The review notes and detailed explanation is found in the review buildout's README.txt. The PLIP text at http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/237 is somewhat outdated and will be updated with the detailed information if I get a go-ahead. Thanks, Hanno ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #246 ready for review (pending review notes)
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote: > On Jan 17, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote: > >> as a heads-up, the review bundle for PLIP 246 (View for rendering events >> as an iCalendar file) is ready for review. you can get it from >> https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip246-ical-feed/ >> >> it does not yet contain any review notes (as i need to go afk now), but >> i'll add them tonight. >> > > the review notes are available now in the bundle's top-level `README.txt` > file. > For documentation purposes: Is there any change in the UI to reflect the new available option? -- israel ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
