Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Juli Mallett

* De: Craig Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-14 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Quickcam ]
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:39:00PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time.
> > > and just testing now i get a lot of
> > 
> > I haven't looked at it for a couple of years..
> > it did work for me then but it may not any more..
> 
> 
> vic/vat work but are kind of dated applications.
> 
> Why not look at an H.323 application?
> How about something like GnomeMeeting (/usr/ports/net/gnomemeeting) ?
> 
> GnomeMeeting can even be made to interoperate other H.323
> compliant applications such as Microsoft Netmeeting, but that's probably
> not so interesting. ;)

Actually, it is, especially if you consider how many people have to use
windows at work, and may have hardware for video conferencing at work, and
thus may be able to use it more optimally there...

And gnomemeeting is fairly nice.
-- 
Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   | FreeBSD: The Power To Serve
Will break world for fulltime employment. | finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~jmallett/  | Support my FreeBSD hacking!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Craig Rodrigues

On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:39:00PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time.
> > and just testing now i get a lot of
> 
> I haven't looked at it for a couple of years..
> it did work for me then but it may not any more..


vic/vat work but are kind of dated applications.

Why not look at an H.323 application?
How about something like GnomeMeeting (/usr/ports/net/gnomemeeting) ?

GnomeMeeting can even be made to interoperate other H.323
compliant applications such as Microsoft Netmeeting, but that's probably
not so interesting. ;)
-- 
Craig Rodrigues
http://www.gis.net/~craigr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Randy Bush

>> i have a problem with the 'own' part.  it would be nice if we could
>> conference with people who do not run freebsd too.
> "Nice but not crucial"

very true, if you only want to meet with to one percent of the
folk out there.  i need tools i can use in real life, not just
in a clique club house.

randy


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Julian Elischer



On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Randy Bush wrote:

> i have a problem with the 'own' part.  it would be nice if we could
> conference with people who do not run freebsd too.

"Nice but not crucial"


> 
> last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time.
> and just testing now i get a lot of

I haven't looked at it for a couple of years..
it did work for me then but it may not any more..



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Randy Bush

> but it'd be nice if FreeBSD could build it's own "conference-net"
> so we could do that sort of thing..

i have a problem with the 'own' part.  it would be nice if we could
conference with people who do not run freebsd too.

last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time.
and just testing now i get a lot of

failed to open rw...
open wronly returns -1
HalfDuplex returns 1
HalfDuplex returns 1
HalfDuplex returns 1
failed to select input 
failed to open rw...
open wronly returns -1
failed to set mic volume 
failed set input line volume 
failed to output level 70 
failed to output level 70 
failed to open rw...

randy


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Julian Elischer



On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:

> 
> > It'd have been nice if (for example) the KSE talk I did last week
> > at BAFUG could have been to a wider audience..
> 
> well in that specific case just audio would have sufficed :)

Uh, yeah.. we had no whiteboard :-(

but it'd be nice if FreeBSD could build it's own "conference-net"
so we could do that sort of thing..


I've used Vic, and wb, but we don't have a mbone to run it on any more
really..
uunet was charging for it last I looked.. We need to work out some
way to organise our own "Fbone" :-)

J



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Luigi Rizzo

On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:24:36PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
...
> i.e. using a set of tools that are definitly supported and a supported 
> videocam, we could say "If you get this camera, and load the following
> ports, you will be able to take part in conferences
> by attaching to the following freeBSD address"

vic used (and probably still) works with the 'bktr' driver. It
is not a usb camera, i know, we have no support for that in the
kernel. One nice feature of vic is that it can capture from
a random portion of the screen so you can use it as a primitive
whiteboard tool with any program that can produce graphics on your
screen.

> It'd have been nice if (for example) the KSE talk I did last week
> at BAFUG could have been to a wider audience..

well in that specific case just audio would have sufficed :)

cheers
luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Julian Elischer



On a related note...
I woulder if it might be a worthwhile project to start a "FreeBSD
videoconference" project..

i.e. using a set of tools that are definitly supported and a supported 
videocam, we could say "If you get this camera, and load the following
ports, you will be able to take part in conferences
by attaching to the following freeBSD address"

If we used the old 'wb' tool we could even have discussions that peiple
without cameras could follow..

If we got enough regionall FreeBSD using ISPs on board we could do
enough load-sharing that it wouldn't kill any particular member.


It'd have been nice if (for example) the KSE talk I did last week
at BAFUG could have been to a wider audience..
(more audience == more feedback)


julian



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Jonathan Belson

Juli Mallett wrote:
> I was working on porting the Linux driver for this to freebsd's kernel
> at one point.  In general, your best shot is to find something that
> gphoto supports.

Was that the QuickCam Express?  I started doing that also, but John Hay
did it first.  There were some issues with the driver, but they might
have Gone Away with all the usb fixes that have been done since.


--Jon

http://www.witchspace.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Quickcam

2002-10-14 Thread Thomas Vaughan


I also had good luck with OV511 based cameras.  A
Google search for that should turn up a lot of good
results.  (This includes cameras like Creative Labs'
WebCam 3, all USB)

On Sunday 13 October 2002 01:49 pm, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: John Angelmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-13 ]
>   [ Subjecte: Quickcam ]
>
> > I was thinking about buying a webcam (Logitech QuickCam) with an USB
> > port. What kind of usbcams does FreeBSD-Current support?
>
> I was working on porting the Linux driver for this to freebsd's kernel
> at one point.  In general, your best shot is to find something that
> gphoto supports.
>
> juli.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: Quickcam

2002-10-13 Thread Juli Mallett

* De: John Angelmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-13 ]
[ Subjecte: Quickcam ]
> I was thinking about buying a webcam (Logitech QuickCam) with an USB port.
> What kind of usbcams does FreeBSD-Current support?

I was working on porting the Linux driver for this to freebsd's kernel
at one point.  In general, your best shot is to find something that
gphoto supports.

juli.
-- 
Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   | FreeBSD: The Power To Serve
Will break world for fulltime employment. | finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~jmallett/  | Support my FreeBSD hacking!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message