Re: 8.1-STABLE amd64 machine check
On Wed, August 11, 2010 7:31 am, Andrew Heybey wrote: > On Aug 11, 2010, at 6:47 AM, Dan Langille wrote: > >> I am encountering a situation similar to one reported by Andrew Heybey >> at >> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6E83197B-9DD5-4C7E-846D-AD176C25464D >> >> This morning I found this in my /var/log/messages: >> >> Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x94614c62001c011b >> Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0106, >> Status 0x >> Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0x100f42, >> APIC ID 0 >> Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR GCACHE LG RD error >> Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Address 0x5d0fe8c >> >> Andrew: You posted about this on July 14. Anything new since then? > > I took jkim's advice and RMAed the CPU to newegg since it was only a week > old. No machine checks from the new one yet. Thanks. My CPU is 6 months old, and now out of Newegg's warranty period (Replacement period: 30 days from original invoice date). -- Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/ ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
8.1-STABLE amd64 machine check
I am encountering a situation similar to one reported by Andrew Heybey at http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6E83197B-9DD5-4C7E-846D-AD176C25464D This morning I found this in my /var/log/messages: Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x94614c62001c011b Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0106, Status 0x Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0x100f42, APIC ID 0 Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR GCACHE LG RD error Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Address 0x5d0fe8c from /var/run/dmesg.boot Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Sun Jul 25 19:18:56 EDT 2010 d...@kraken.example.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KRAKEN amd64 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 945 Processor (3010.17-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x100f42 Family = 10 Model = 4 Stepping = 2 Features=0x178bfbff Features2=0x802009 AMD Features=0xee500800 AMD Features2=0x37ff TSC: P-state invariant real memory = 4294967296 (4096 MB) avail memory = 4100710400 (3910 MB) ACPI APIC Table: <111909 APIC1708> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 Andrew: You posted about this on July 14. Anything new since then? John: Is it time for me to get a new CPU? thanks -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org/ ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Above the law? (was: You gotta be kidding .... Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/specfs spec_vnops.c)
On 16 Jan 2005 at 17:30, Linus Caldwell wrote: > [Although this is formally a reply to Matt, I'm addressing the > committers community here] Then please address to to the committers mailing list. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Raid problems
On 21 Sep 2004 at 13:38, DB wrote: > Hi all > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 5.3-Beta5 on a friend's server. He has a promise > fasttracks SX4000 raid controller (raid level 5), but when booting freebsd we > get a list of all the 4 disks. Is that right? (haven't tried installing freebsd > on a raid computer). You are asking on the wrong list. Ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Kernel GENERIC config file
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, bsd hack wrote: > I need the kernel GENERIC config file for freebsd 4.7. I am able to > find only the config file for freeBSD 5.2 online... can n'ybody either > mail me the freeBSD 4.7 GENERIC file or gimme a link to it? This doesn't belong on hackers. Get it yourself from CVS via the cvsweb interface: see http://www.freebsd.org/ -- Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: testing for substrings in perl
On 7 Jun 2004 at 16:31, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > I think it might just be easier to do a straight comparison of the first N
> > characters of the two strings where N = length of the directory name.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
>
>You can do:
>
> if ($string =~ /\/?\Q$expr\E/) {
> # ... matches ...
> }
>
>\Q and \E are special metaquoting classes in perlre designed
> specifically for cases like this.
>
>See 'man perlre' for more gory info.
Who is lagged here Chris? Thanks for the reply though.
FWIW, I suspect this was a FreshPorts-releated issue, and I think I
was trying to solve this problem: is any file touched by this commit
in the ports tree?
foreach $value (@{$Files}) {
my ($action, $filename, $revision, $commit_log_element_id)
= @$value;
print " processing $filename\n";
if ($filename =~ m|^/?ports/|) {
$PortTreeCommit = 1;
last;
}
}
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Fundraising for FreeBSD development.
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I cannot promise exposure on the main FreeBSD Project pages, that > would be up to the webmasters (and to some extent the core team) > to arrange and allow for such precense. If it helps, I can by put stuff on my websites with respect to acknowledging those that contribute. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Fundraising for FreeBSD development.
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/funding.html typo :(An before any of you get an Should be "And", not An. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Loosing STDOUT after file rotation
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, James Housley wrote: > I have a program that I have the is supposed to run forever. I log any > output to a log file. It is run in a startup script like thie: > > program_name >> $err_log 2>&1 > > The problem is that after newsyslog rotates the $err_log file, no more > data is written to the file. I can not stop and restart the program. I > can accept a signal. But what do I need to do in "program_name" to allow > the data to be written after the "rotation" of the file. Sorry, I missed the >> above I thought you were writing directly. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Loosing STDOUT after file rotation
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, James Housley wrote: > I have a program that I have the is supposed to run forever. I log any > output to a log file. It is run in a startup script like thie: > > program_name >> $err_log 2>&1 > > The problem is that after newsyslog rotates the $err_log file, no more > data is written to the file. I can not stop and restart the program. I > can accept a signal. But what do I need to do in "program_name" to allow > the data to be written after the "rotation" of the file. When the signal is received, close the file, and reopen it. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: fsck fails - mark sectors as bad?
On 29 Mar 2004 at 14:29, Bjoern Fischer wrote: > Hello Dan, > > > I had a hard drive failure. I'm trying to get as much data off it as > > I can before I restore from backup. I have mounted the drive in > > another box and I'm attempting to salvage what I can. > > being confronted with disk crashes like the one you described I usually > try to make a last backup of the complete unmounted file systems with dd. > Trying to fix the file system in place, i.e. on the failing disk that is > about to break down completely, makes the situation worse in many cases. > After dd'ing the file systems to a safe disk you can try fsck. I'm finding the dd is challenging: # dd if=/dev/ad2s1e of=ad1s1e conv=noerror,sync bs=64k dd: /dev/ad2s1e: Input/output error 6+0 records in 6+0 records out 393216 bytes transferred in 42.776918 secs (9192 bytes/sec) dd: /dev/ad2s1e: Input/output error - note, this dd has not finished, I think because of these errors from /var/log/messages Mar 28 19:47:53 tmp /kernel: ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Mar 28 19:47:53 tmp /kernel: ata1: resetting devices .. done Mar 28 19:48:03 tmp /kernel: ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Mar 28 19:48:03 tmp /kernel: ata1: resetting devices .. done Mar 28 19:48:13 tmp /kernel: ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Mar 28 19:48:13 tmp /kernel: ata1: resetting devices .. done Mar 28 19:48:21 tmp /kernel: ad2s1e: hard error reading fsbn 1279871 of 768-895 (ad2s1 bn 1279871; cn 79 tn 170 sn 26) trying PIO mode Mar 28 19:48:21 tmp /kernel: ad2: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode Mar 28 19:48:21 tmp /kernel: ad2: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode Mar 28 19:48:26 tmp /kernel: ad2s1e: hard error reading fsbn 1279903 of 768-895 (ad2s1 bn 1279903; cn 79 tn 170 sn 58) status=59 error=40 Mar 28 19:48:40 tmp /kernel: ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Mar 28 19:48:40 tmp /kernel: ata1: resetting devices .. ata1-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded Mar 28 19:48:40 tmp /kernel: done -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
fsck fails - mark sectors as bad?
OFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CONTINUE? yes ^C And I found this in /var/log/messsages Mar 28 18:35:16 tmp /kernel: ad2s1g: hard error reading fsbn 83986495 of 40829792-40829919 (ad2s1 bn 83986495; cn 5227 tn 233 sn 61 ) trying PIO mode Mar 28 18:35:16 tmp /kernel: ad2: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode Mar 28 18:35:16 tmp last message repeated 5 times Mar 28 18:35:21 tmp /kernel: ad2s1g: hard error reading fsbn 83986591 of 40829792-40829919 (ad2s1 bn 83986591; cn 5227 tn 235 sn 31 ) status=59 error=40 Mar 28 18:35:37 tmp /kernel: ad2s1g: hard error reading fsbn 40829897 (ad2s1 bn 40829897; cn 2541 tn 138 sn 38) status=59 error=40 Mar 28 18:35:47 tmp /kernel: ad2s1g: hard error reading fsbn 40829900 (ad2s1 bn 40829900; cn 2541 tn 138 sn 41) status=59 error=40 -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: F1+Konsole+bash = bash.core
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Dan Langille wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Allan Fields wrote: > > > Ultimately this bug might be best directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > or [EMAIL PROTECTED] if patching the system libreadline > > doesn't help. > > I was trying to do that last night, but they were having DNS problems. I > will try again later today. I just sent the bashbug report. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: F1+Konsole+bash = bash.core
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Allan Fields wrote: > Ultimately this bug might be best directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or [EMAIL PROTECTED] if patching the system libreadline > doesn't help. Allan: I encourage you to add your experiences as a follow up to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/61297 Then I'll try sumbmitting that bashbug report again. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: F1+Konsole+bash = bash.core
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Allan Fields wrote: > Ultimately this bug might be best directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or [EMAIL PROTECTED] if patching the system libreadline > doesn't help. I was trying to do that last night, but they were having DNS problems. I will try again later today. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
F1+Konsole+bash = bash.core
Any one interested in digging for this one? My laptop is out of commission at the moment, but hopefully it'll be back soone. --- Forwarded message follows --- From: Andy Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [kde-freebsd] F1+Konsole+bash = bash.core Date sent: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:15:39 +0200 Copies to: Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Tuesday 16 March 2004 02:23, Dan Langille wrote: > Hi, > > Would this be considered a Konsole issue? > > Press F1 while in a bash shell in Konsole and you get: > > laptpo# bash > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/dan] # Illegal instruction (core > dumped) laptop# > > This does not happen at the console. only Konsole. Nor under any > other shell I tried (/bin/sh, /bin/csh, /bin/tcsh). > > This is bash-2.05b.007 > > $ ldd /usr/local/bin/bash > ldd: /usr/local/bin/bash: not a dynamic executable > > The situation is 100% reproducible here. And duplicated by others. $ gdb /usr/local/bin/bash bash.core (blah) (no debugging symbols found)... Core was generated by `bash'. Program terminated with signal 4, Illegal instruction. (gdb) bt #0 0x2810b9d5 in _rl_dispatch_subseq () from /lib/libreadline.so.4 #1 0x2810b9be in _rl_dispatch () from /lib/libreadline.so.4 #2 0x2810bc28 in _rl_dispatch_subseq () from /lib/libreadline.so.4 #3 0x2810b9be in _rl_dispatch () from /lib/libreadline.so.4 and so on, for 2000+ lines (I stopped checking) I'd call it a bash/readline problem, but I'm no expert A. -- Andy Fawcett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] "In an open world without walls and fences, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- End of forwarded message --- -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cvsd problems
On 10 Mar 2004 at 19:00, db wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:45:56 +0100 > db <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I want to run a jailed cvs server, where users only have write > > > access to their own projects. So this is what I have done: > > > > Sorry, forgot to tell you: > > Arch: i386 > > FreeBSD: 5.2.1 release > > CVSd: 1.0.1 > > Ok nevermind, I found the problem. But you haven't shared it. Please do. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Standard sbc and pcm support in GENERIC kernel?
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Dan Langille wrote: > *That* explanation is vast difference to saying they have to read man > pcm(4). The difference is sigficicant. In the same breath, someone needs to install a spell checker and verify the grammer. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Standard sbc and pcm support in GENERIC kernel?
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Avleen Vig wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 06:26:47PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > > If they'd read pcm(4) they'd know how to get sound support up and > > > running without recompiling their kernel. Is there something wrong with > > > requiring that a new user bother to read the documentation? > > > > They would first have to know to read man pcm(4). > > All the have to do is look at the handbook. And if they can't find the > link on the *front page* of freebsd.org, under the clearly labelled > catagory of "Support", then there is very little we can or should do to > help them. After a point, enough is enough. If the user isn't prepared > to educate themselves, your attempts will ultimately fail. *That* explanation is vast difference to saying they have to read man pcm(4). The difference is sigficicant. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Standard sbc and pcm support in GENERIC kernel?
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 05:03:40PM +0100, Jorn Argelo wrote: > > > > I've been on the question list for some time, and I have noticed that > > many people do not know how to get sound support up and running in > > FreeBSD 5.X. I know that re-compiling the kernel is easy enough, but > > there are still people not willing to do so, as I have noticed on the > > list. Therefor I thought it might be an idea to put sound support in the > > GENERIC kernel configuration, so that newbies will no longer find > > themselves stuck with that. > > If they'd read pcm(4) they'd know how to get sound support up and > running without recompiling their kernel. Is there something wrong with > requiring that a new user bother to read the documentation? They would first have to know to read man pcm(4). -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: kernel options
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:36:56AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > hi, > > is there a way of knowing with which kernel-options a particular kernel > > was compiled with (appart form the obvious config file)? > > In general, no. I have read about an option to include the configuration file with the kernel. From my 4.9-stable /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT file: # This allows you to actually store this configuration file into # the kernel binary itself, where it may be later read by saying: #strings -n 3 /kernel | sed -n 's/^___//p' > MYKERNEL # options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE # Include this file in kernel Not useful unless you've used it, which is not the default case. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
problems resolving bsdcan.org?
I've had reports of people not being able to resolve hostnames for bsdcan.org. I do know that one of the domain's DNS servers is offline (m20.unixathome.org). But the other (nezlok.unixathome.org) is up and accepting queries (at least for all my attempts). My testing at http://looking-glass.taide.net/ gives "connection timed out; no servers could be reached". But a dig from here goes OK: $ dig @nezlok.unixathome.org www.bsdcan.org ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> @nezlok.unixathome.org www.bsdcan.org ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; www.bsdcan.org, type = A, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.bsdcan.org. 3D IN A 66.154.97.250 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: bsdcan.org. 3D IN NSm20.unixathome.org. bsdcan.org. 3D IN NSnezlok.unixathome.org. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: m20.unixathome.org. 3D IN A 66.11.169.50 nezlok.unixathome.org. 3D IN A 66.154.97.250 ;; Total query time: 203 msec ;; FROM: lists.unixathome.org to SERVER: nezlok.unixathome.org 66.154.97.250 ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 26 04:31:02 2004 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 32 rcvd: 130 I can't see the problem. Can you? Thanks. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Chello blocking FreshPorts service
On 6 Jan 2004 at 9:24, Dan Langille wrote: > For some months Chello has denied smtp service from the FreshPorts > mail server. All queries to Chello regarding this matter have gone > unanswered. > > $ telnet smtpgate.chello.at 25 > Trying 213.46.255.2... > Connected to smtpgate.chello.at. > Escape character is '^]'. > 421 viefep12-int.chello.at connection refused from [66.154.97.250] > Connection closed by foreign host. > > This happens for all Chello domains I have tried. This means that > Chello users are unable to use the FreshPorts notification service. > For what it's worth, this also affect the FreeBSD Diary announcement > mailing list. > > If anyone has contacts at Chello, please ask them to look into this. > All attempts to get this resolved have been blocked. > > I've heard many stories about Chello standards of service. This > situation validates everything I've heard. I have had some information from a third party. It appears that Chello are using xbl.selwerd.cx as a RBL. My research indicates that xbl.selwerd.cx should not be used as an RBL: http://mla.libertine.org/tmda-users/2002-11/msg00049.html Anyone here using xbl.selwerd.cx? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Chello blocking FreshPorts service
For some months Chello has denied smtp service from the FreshPorts mail server. All queries to Chello regarding this matter have gone unanswered. $ telnet smtpgate.chello.at 25 Trying 213.46.255.2... Connected to smtpgate.chello.at. Escape character is '^]'. 421 viefep12-int.chello.at connection refused from [66.154.97.250] Connection closed by foreign host. This happens for all Chello domains I have tried. This means that Chello users are unable to use the FreshPorts notification service. For what it's worth, this also affect the FreeBSD Diary announcement mailing list. If anyone has contacts at Chello, please ask them to look into this. All attempts to get this resolved have been blocked. I've heard many stories about Chello standards of service. This situation validates everything I've heard. cheers -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Where is FreeBSD going?
On 5 Jan 2004 at 13:40, Munden, Randall J wrote: > Right. What concerns me most is the rise in the incidence of trolls > all trolling about the same subject or along the same vein. Would > someone please explain what is going on? As a production user of fBSD > this is troubling. Don't let trolls trouble you no matter how many you see. They aren't contributing. And I second what Colin said. One troll. Many disguises. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: optionally include file within a Makefile
On 18 Dec 2003 at 19:02, Dan Langille wrote:
> My goal is provide a way to override values in a Makefile with values
> from a local config file.
I'm getting further. What's the proper way to do an include?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ cat Makefile
A?="things"
all:
@echo A is $A
if [ -r ${HOME}/.bacula-regress ] ; then \
echo loading tha file; \
.include "${HOME}/.bacula-regress" ; \
fi
@echo A is $A
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ cat .bacula-regress
BACULA_SOURCE="${HOME}/src/bacula-cvs"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AUTOCHANGER="/dev/null"
A="stuff"
echo yes, we have stuff here.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ make
A is things
if [ -r /home/dan/.bacula-regress ] ; then echo loading tha file;
.include "/home/dan/.bacula-regress" ; fi
loading tha file
.include: not found
*** Error code 127
Stop in /usr/home/dan.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
optionally include file within a Makefile
My goal is provide a way to override values in a Makefile with values
from a local config file.
My attempt is this:
if test -r ~/.local-values \
then \
. ~/.local-values \
fi
#
# Where to get the source to be tested
BACULA_SOURCE?="${HOME}/src/bacula-cvs"
But I'm getting this error:
$ make setup
"Makefile", line 8: Need an operator
where line 8 is the fi.
Ideas?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Subscription to n lists
On 18 Dec 2003 at 12:28, Aniruddha Bohra wrote: > Is there any way to stop this ? Ignore it. It's being handled. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
using devel/libusb to access USB
Travis Campbell and I are looking at apcupsd to get it working with the APC RS/XS series of USB capable UPSs. We're concentrating on 4.x. Some work has been done in this area by Riccardo Torrini. See http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=57225+0+archive/2003/free bsd-hardware/20030608.freebsd-hardware We have been looking at the devel/libusb port and experimenting with testlibusb which is a part of that port. We have noticed that usb_find_devices() does not find any devices. Looking at the usb.c code within libusb, we found that usb_os_find_devices() does not return any devices, and therefore the while loop is never entered. We tracked the problem down to usb_os_find_devices() (within bsd.c) and found that various things were preventing the list from being created. We're wondering if anyone has had success with devel/libusb for similar things. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
On 14 Nov 2003 at 10:08, Dan Langille wrote:
> Daniel: It appears the patch which was comitted didn't include
> everything it should. I blame myself because the patch below
> contains both debugging code and is reversed. I will submit a PR
> with a patch. In brief, what is missing is:
>
> + if (n == 0) {
> + break;
> + }
> +
See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=59291
Please don't commit this until I've checked something else out first.
I am 100% sure this is correct, but I want it to be validated by
testing on other systems first. I suspect this will be completed
within a week or so.
cheers
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
Daniel: It appears the patch which was comitted didn't include
everything it should. I blame myself because the patch below
contains both debugging code and is reversed. I will submit a PR
with a patch. In brief, what is missing is:
+ if (n == 0) {
+ break;
+ }
+
Oops.
On 17 Sep 2003 at 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 16 Sep 2003 at 20:49, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > > I've had preliminary success with this patch. More testing needs
> > > to be done, but in the meantime, I would appreciate reviews and
> > > comments. The patched code is available from
> > > http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/uthread_write.c and the patch
> > > appears below.
> > >
> > > In short, the logic has been changed to ensure that if __sys_write
> > > returns zero, this value is returned by _write.
> >
> > I think this is not quite correct. Since libc_r is looping
> > and some data may have been read, then the partial byte count
> > should be returned, not zero. It is possible the partial byte
> > count could also be zero in some cases, so it would result
> > in zero being returned in those instances.
>
> I see what you mean. Please have a look at
> http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/uthread_write.c2
> The patch appears at the end of this message.
>
> This version will return the partial byte count (which has always been
> zero in testing) but exit the loop if the return code is zero.
>
> > I think the problem lies with the SCSI tape device. It should
> > either return 0 or -1 with errno=ENOSPC on a write that detects an
> > EOT, not partial byte count.
>
> You are referring to sa(4)?
>
> > If you are using libkse or
> > libthr, you will get a partial byte count and not zero because
> > the tape driver returns the (partial) bytes written. So exiting the
> > loop in libc_r and returning 0 would only seem to correct the
> > "problem" for libc_r.
>
> The problem found when running under pthreads on 4.8-stable [i.e. EOT
> is not returned to the application code] is not found with libkse on
> 5.1-current.
>
> --- uthread_write.c Wed Sep 17 06:23:43 2003
> +++ uthread_write.c.org Tue Sep 16 12:14:22 2003
> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include "pthread_private.h"
> -#include
>
> ssize_t
> _write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t nbytes)
> @@ -71,10 +70,6 @@
>/* Check if file operations are to block */
>blocking = ((_thread_fd_getflags(fd) & O_NONBLOCK) == 0);
>
> - setlogmask (LOG_UPTO (LOG_NOTICE));
> - openlog("uthread_write.c", LOG_CONS | LOG_PID | LOG_NDELAY,
> LOG_LOCAL1);
> - syslog (LOG_NOTICE, "uthread_write.c : blocking = '%d'",
> blocking);
> -
>/*
> * Loop while no error occurs and until the expected number
> * of bytes are written if performing a blocking write:
> @@ -98,7 +93,7 @@
> * write:
> */
> if (blocking && ((n < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK ||
> - errno == EAGAIN)) || (n > 0 && num < nbytes))) {
> + errno == EAGAIN)) || (n >= 0 && num < nbytes))) {
> curthread->data.fd.fd = fd;
> _thread_kern_set_timeout(NULL);
>
> @@ -136,16 +131,11 @@
> * If there was an error, return partial success
> * (if any bytes were written) or else the error:
> */
> - } else if (n <= 0) {
> + } else if (n < 0) {
> if (num > 0)
> ret = num;
> else
> ret = n;
> -
> - if (n == 0) {
> - syslog (LOG_NOTICE, "zero has been returned in
> uthread_write.c;
> num = '%d'", num); - break; -
> }
>
> /* Check if the write has completed: */
> } else if (num >= nbytes)
>
> --
> Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
>
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: libwrap crash
On 30 Oct 2003 at 9:42, Dan Langille wrote: > I've been tracking down a libwrap call which crashes the application. > The crash occurs on line 395 of contrib/tcp_wrappers/options.c, but > I have no idea. I've been given some help in this offline. Apparently, the bacula code is incorrectly using hosts_access. bacula should fork before it calls hosts_access because hosts_access will kill you on twist. Otherwise, you'll get either a deny or an allowed, and the thread continue from here. My offline helper was comparing the inetd source code. I can't find any reference in host_options(5) or host_access(3) which point to the correct usage. Is the FreeBSD documentation incomplete? Is there a more accurate documentation I can point the bacula developers to? FYI: The bacula approach is said to work under Linux and Solaris but I have yet to run my reproducible tests on those platforms. Thank you. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
libwrap crash
I've been tracking down a libwrap call which crashes the application.
The crash occurs on line 395 of contrib/tcp_wrappers/options.c, but
I have no idea.
The situation:
- The daemon starts on the remote client.
- Connection is attempted from another box via port 9102
- The daemon uses hosts_access(3) to see if the connection is allowed
- /etc/hosts.allow contains no explit allow/deny for this connection
which means this line is invoked:
# The rest of the daemons are protected.
ALL : ALL \
: severity auth.info \
: twist /bin/echo "You are not welcome to use %d from %h."
When the host_acess calls invokes twist_option
(contrib/tcp_wrappers/options.c:370), things blow up on this call:
(void) execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", value, (char *) 0);
Any ideas? Suggestions?
Thank you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/sysutils/bacula/work/bacula-1.32b/src/filed] #
gdb ./bacula-fd
GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for
details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"...Deprecated
bfd_read called at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../con
trib/gdb/gdb/dwarf2read.c line 3049 in dwarf2_read_section
(gdb) source ~/debug
Breakpoint 1 at 0x805a365: file bnet_server.c, line 152.
Breakpoint 1, bnet_thread_server (bind_addr=0x0, port=9102,
max_clients=10, client_wq=0x807c4a0,
handle_client_request=0x804d3c0 )
at bnet_server.c:152
152 fromhost(&request);
Current language: auto; currently c++
(gdb) n
153 if (!hosts_access(&request)) {
(gdb) s
0x8049cc8 in hosts_access () at
/usr/src/lib/libwrap/../../contrib/tcp_wrappers/hosts_access.c:126
126
(gdb) /usr/src/lib/libwrap/../../contrib/tcp_wrappers/options.c:395
Undefined command: "". Try "help".
(gdb) b /usr/src/lib/libwrap/../../contrib/tcp_wrappers/options.c:395
Breakpoint 2 at 0x280a1766: file
/usr/src/lib/libwrap/../../contrib/tcp_wrappers/options.c, line 395.
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, twist_option (value=0xbfbfe890 "/bin/echo \"You are not
welcome to use bast-fd from undef.unixathome.org.\"",
request=0xbfbff574) at
/usr/src/lib/libwrap/../../contrib/tcp_wrappers/options.c:395
395 (void) execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", value, (char
*) 0);
Current language: auto; currently c
(gdb) list
390 maybe_dup2(request->fd, 2) != 2) {
391 error = "twist_option: dup: %m";
392 } else {
393 if (request->fd > 2)
394 close(request->fd);
395 (void) execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", value, (char
*) 0);
396 error = "twist_option: /bin/sh: %m";
397 }
398
399 /* Something went wrong: we MUST terminate the
process. */
(gdb) print value
$1 = 0xbfbfe890 "/bin/echo \"You are not welcome to use bast-fd from
undef.unixathome.org.\""
(gdb) n
0x2809fb4c in _init () from /usr/lib/libwrap.so.3
(gdb) n
Single stepping until exit from function _init,
which has no line number information.
Error accessing memory address 0x281a1e84: Bad address.
(gdb
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: hosts_access(3) - correct usage?
On 29 Oct 2003 at 18:26, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2003 at 17:10, Guido van Rooij wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:38:50AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > Is this the right way to use hosts_access? The code blows up during
> > > the hosts_access call. I'm told it runs OK on Linux/Solaris. I'm
> > > wonderding if there's something different it needs to do be doing on
> > > FreeBSD.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > #ifdef HAVE_LIBWRAP
> > > P(mutex); /* hosts_access is not thread safe */
> > > request_init(&request, RQ_DAEMON, my_name, RQ_FILE, newsockfd,
> > > 0);
> > > fromhost(&request);
> > > if (!hosts_access(&request)) {
> > > V(mutex);
> > > Jmsg2(NULL, M_WARNING, 0, _("Connection from %s:%d refused
> > > by hosts.access"),
> > >inet_ntoa(cli_addr.sin_addr), ntohs(cli_addr.sin_port));
> > > close(newsockfd);
> > > continue;
> > > }
> > > V(mutex);
> > > #endif
> >
> >
> > This seems okay to me.
> > OpenSSH uses:
> > struct request_info req;
> >
> > request_init(&req, RQ_DAEMON, __progname, RQ_FILE, sock_in, 0);
> > fromhost(&req);
> >
> > if (!hosts_access(&req)) {
> > debug("Connection refused by tcp wrapper");
> > refuse(&req);
> > /* NOTREACHED */
> > fatal("libwrap refuse returns");
> > }
> >
> > I take it that newsockfd is the one returned from accept()?
> > I'd try using a debug version of libwrap...
>
> I was speaking with dwhite on IRC about this. The application
> (sysutils/bacula) has a hacked version of tcpd.h for use with C++.
> This didn't have the #ifdef INET6 statements. So I patched that up.
> But no difference in the results.
>
> If hosts.allow is going to deny access, the crash occurs:
> http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/bacula-fd-gbd.success.html
>
> If access is denied, this occurs:
> http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/bacula-fd-gbd.fails.html
>
> I haven't looked into libwrap yet, but in case someone sees something
> obvious, I've posted the above.
Well, we've tracked it down to one set of allow statements. The
server is at 192.168.0.56 (undef.unixathome.org). The daemon name is
bast-fd. If we supply any one of these in /etc/hosts.allow, the
crash does not occur.
bast-fd : 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 : allow
bast-fd : 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 : deny
bast-fd : undef.unixathome.org : allow
bast-fd : undef.unixathome.org : deny
bast-fd : 192.168.0.56 : allow
With this, the crash occurs:
bast-fd : undef.blah.blah : allow
This is how to make it crash:
$ telnet bast 9102
Trying 192.168.0.21...
Connected to bast.unixathome.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
You are not welcome to use bast-fd from undef.unixathome.org.
Connection closed by foreign host.
Also, if the first call the hosts_access succeeds, then all subequent
calls will suceed. I actually have to restart the daemon, and then
have a deny condition in hosts.allow in order for the hosts_access
call to bomb.
Any ideas?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: hosts_access(3) - correct usage?
On 29 Oct 2003 at 17:10, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:38:50AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> > Is this the right way to use hosts_access? The code blows up during
> > the hosts_access call. I'm told it runs OK on Linux/Solaris. I'm
> > wonderding if there's something different it needs to do be doing on
> > FreeBSD.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > #ifdef HAVE_LIBWRAP
> > P(mutex); /* hosts_access is not thread safe */
> > request_init(&request, RQ_DAEMON, my_name, RQ_FILE, newsockfd,
> > 0);
> > fromhost(&request);
> > if (!hosts_access(&request)) {
> > V(mutex);
> > Jmsg2(NULL, M_WARNING, 0, _("Connection from %s:%d refused
> > by hosts.access"),
> >inet_ntoa(cli_addr.sin_addr), ntohs(cli_addr.sin_port));
> > close(newsockfd);
> > continue;
> > }
> > V(mutex);
> > #endif
>
>
> This seems okay to me.
> OpenSSH uses:
> struct request_info req;
>
> request_init(&req, RQ_DAEMON, __progname, RQ_FILE, sock_in, 0);
> fromhost(&req);
>
> if (!hosts_access(&req)) {
> debug("Connection refused by tcp wrapper");
> refuse(&req);
> /* NOTREACHED */
> fatal("libwrap refuse returns");
> }
>
> I take it that newsockfd is the one returned from accept()?
> I'd try using a debug version of libwrap...
I was speaking with dwhite on IRC about this. The application
(sysutils/bacula) has a hacked version of tcpd.h for use with C++.
This didn't have the #ifdef INET6 statements. So I patched that up.
But no difference in the results.
If hosts.allow is going to deny access, the crash occurs:
http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/bacula-fd-gbd.success.html
If access is denied, this occurs:
http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/bacula-fd-gbd.fails.html
I haven't looked into libwrap yet, but in case someone sees something
obvious, I've posted the above.
thanks
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
hosts_access(3) - correct usage?
Is this the right way to use hosts_access? The code blows up during
the hosts_access call. I'm told it runs OK on Linux/Solaris. I'm
wonderding if there's something different it needs to do be doing on
FreeBSD.
Thanks
#ifdef HAVE_LIBWRAP
P(mutex); /* hosts_access is not thread safe */
request_init(&request, RQ_DAEMON, my_name, RQ_FILE, newsockfd,
0);
fromhost(&request);
if (!hosts_access(&request)) {
V(mutex);
Jmsg2(NULL, M_WARNING, 0, _("Connection from %s:%d refused
by hosts.access"),
inet_ntoa(cli_addr.sin_addr), ntohs(cli_addr.sin_port));
close(newsockfd);
continue;
}
V(mutex);
#endif
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: non-root process and PID files
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Wes Peters wrote: > On Monday 27 October 2003 07:31 am, Dan Langille wrote: > > If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the > > PID file before or after the setuid? > > > > Two methods exists AFAIK: > > > > 1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is chown root:wheel > > 2 - write your PID to /var/run/myapp/myapp.pid where /var/run/myapp/ > > is chown myapp:myapp > > > > Of the two, I think #1 is cleaner as it does not require another > > directory with special permissions. > > > > Any suggestions? > > Create the pid file while still root, and if you are going to change the > user or group id, chown(2) or chgrp(2) the file just before setuid(2) / > setgid(2) calls. I'm told that this leaves you open to a symlink attack. If you leave the file chown root:wheel, then if an attacker does gain control of the application, they can't change the PID file. The key point is the app is root when writing the PID file. If the attacker symlinks the PID to something else (e.g. /etc/fstab), then that's when the fun starts. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: non-root process and PID files
On 27 Oct 2003 at 17:39, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > > If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the > > PID file before or after the setuid? > > > > Two methods exists AFAIK: > > > > 1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is chown root:wheel > > 2 - write your PID to /var/run/myapp/myapp.pid where /var/run/myapp/ > > is chown myapp:myapp > > > > Of the two, I think #1 is cleaner as it does not require another > > directory with special permissions. > > You may have problems removing the file on exit, though. The plan was to not remove it. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
non-root process and PID files
If a process starts up and does a setuid, should it be writing the PID file before or after the setuid? Two methods exists AFAIK: 1 - write your PID immediately, and the file is chown root:wheel 2 - write your PID to /var/run/myapp/myapp.pid where /var/run/myapp/ is chown myapp:myapp Of the two, I think #1 is cleaner as it does not require another directory with special permissions. Any suggestions? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
On 6 Oct 2003 at 19:10, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Is your mailer screwed up? We're getting duplicates (a few > days later). I don't think so. Could they have been moderated? What do the headers say? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
testing for substrings in perl
Hi,
I have a perl regex to test if a file resides under a particular
directory. The test looks like this:
if ($filename =~ $directory) {
# yes, this filename resides under directory
}
This is working for most cases. However, it fails is the directory
contains a +. For example:
$filename = 'ports/www/privoxy+ipv6/files/patch-src::addrlist.c';
$match = "^/?" . 'ports/www/privoxy+ipv6' . "/";
if ($filename =~ $match) {
print "found\n";
} else{
print "NOT found\n";
}
Yes, I can escapte the + in the directory name, but then I'd have to test
for all those special regex characters and escape them too.
I think it might just be easier to do a straight comparison of the first N
characters of the two strings where N = length of the directory name.
Any suggestions?
thanks
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
On 4 Oct 2003 at 10:17, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > > > > All our testing on this patch has been successful. I'm going to do a > > few more tests on different hardware under 4.8-stable. > > > > What's the next step? Commit it? Get others to test with it first? > > It's already in -current. Thanks for that commit. > You'll have to wait for the code > freeze to thaw in -stable before it goes in there. Bugger... which means it won't be into 4.9-RELEASE. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
On 29 Sep 2003 at 9:02, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > > > On 18 Sep 2003 at 7:50, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > > > > > Right, this seems correct to me. > > > > All our testing on this patch has been successful. I'm going to do a > > few more tests on different hardware under 4.8-stable. > > > > What's the next step? Commit it? Get others to test with it first? > > Sure, it looks good enough to commit. Good. I'd commit it, but. > > > > The problem found when running under pthreads on 4.8-stable [i.e. > > > > EOT is not returned to the application code] is not found with libkse > > > > on 5.1-current. > > > > FWIW: our regression tests are failing under 5.1 and we suspect that > > MTIOCERRSTAT ioctl() has changed since 4.8. We're getting: > > > > btape: dev.c:1119 Doing MTIOCERRSTAT errno=22 ERR=Invalid argument > > > > We'll continue with our 5.1 work, but we'd like to finish up with 4.8 > > ASAP. > > Well, I can commit it to -current first, then it can go into > -stable. I'm not sure about the ioctl, though. OK, please do commit to -current. How long do you think is an appropriate delay until MFC? 7 days? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
On 18 Sep 2003 at 7:50, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > > > On 16 Sep 2003 at 20:49, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > > > > > > > I've had preliminary success with this patch. More testing needs > > > > to be done, but in the meantime, I would appreciate reviews and > > > > comments. The patched code is available from > > > > http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/uthread_write.c and the patch > > > > appears below. > > > > > > > > In short, the logic has been changed to ensure that if __sys_write > > > > returns zero, this value is returned by _write. > > > > > > I think this is not quite correct. Since libc_r is looping > > > and some data may have been read, then the partial byte count > > > should be returned, not zero. It is possible the partial byte > > > count could also be zero in some cases, so it would result > > > in zero being returned in those instances. > > > > I see what you mean. Please have a look at > > http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/uthread_write.c2 > > The patch appears at the end of this message. > > Right, this seems correct to me. All our testing on this patch has been successful. I'm going to do a few more tests on different hardware under 4.8-stable. What's the next step? Commit it? Get others to test with it first? > > > I think the problem lies with the SCSI tape device. It should > > > either return 0 or -1 with errno=ENOSPC on a write that detects > > > an EOT, not partial byte count. > > > > You are referring to sa(4)? > > Yes. > > > > If you are using libkse or > > > libthr, you will get a partial byte count and not zero because > > > the tape driver returns the (partial) bytes written. So exiting > > > the loop in libc_r and returning 0 would only seem to correct > > > the "problem" for libc_r. > > If there is a difference, it could be because libc_r is using non-blocking > IO behind the scenes, and sa(4) may be returning partial byte count > in the non-blocking case and 0 (or -1 and ENOSPC) in the blocking case > (which is what you'd get using libkse/libthr). > > > The problem found when running under pthreads on 4.8-stable [i.e. > > EOT is not returned to the application code] is not found with libkse > > on 5.1-current. FWIW: our regression tests are failing under 5.1 and we suspect that MTIOCERRSTAT ioctl() has changed since 4.8. We're getting: btape: dev.c:1119 Doing MTIOCERRSTAT errno=22 ERR=Invalid argument We'll continue with our 5.1 work, but we'd like to finish up with 4.8 ASAP. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
On 19 Sep 2003 at 2:24, Terry Lambert wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > If you are using libkse or > > > > libthr, you will get a partial byte count and not zero because > > > > the tape driver returns the (partial) bytes written. So exiting > > > > the loop in libc_r and returning 0 would only seem to correct > > > > the "problem" for libc_r. > > > > If there is a difference, it could be because libc_r is using non-blocking > > IO behind the scenes, and sa(4) may be returning partial byte count > > in the non-blocking case and 0 (or -1 and ENOSPC) in the blocking case > > (which is what you'd get using libkse/libthr). > > I would think that for non-block multiple and/or non-block-aligned > writes, there's no way to avoid the fault-in penalty for the need > to do read-before-write, so there will always be some unavoidable > stalls. My issue does not concern stalls. It concerns lost data bacause EOT of not correctly signalled. See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query- pr.cgi?pr=56274. But if I've missed the point, could someone please provide a Terry- English translation? I tried http://babelfish.altavista.com/ but had no succeess. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
On 16 Sep 2003 at 20:49, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > I've had preliminary success with this patch. More testing needs
> > to be done, but in the meantime, I would appreciate reviews and
> > comments. The patched code is available from
> > http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/uthread_write.c and the patch
> > appears below.
> >
> > In short, the logic has been changed to ensure that if __sys_write
> > returns zero, this value is returned by _write.
>
> I think this is not quite correct. Since libc_r is looping
> and some data may have been read, then the partial byte count
> should be returned, not zero. It is possible the partial byte
> count could also be zero in some cases, so it would result
> in zero being returned in those instances.
I see what you mean. Please have a look at
http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/uthread_write.c2
The patch appears at the end of this message.
This version will return the partial byte count (which has always
been zero in testing) but exit the loop if the return code is zero.
> I think the problem lies with the SCSI tape device. It should
> either return 0 or -1 with errno=ENOSPC on a write that detects
> an EOT, not partial byte count.
You are referring to sa(4)?
> If you are using libkse or
> libthr, you will get a partial byte count and not zero because
> the tape driver returns the (partial) bytes written. So exiting
> the loop in libc_r and returning 0 would only seem to correct
> the "problem" for libc_r.
The problem found when running under pthreads on 4.8-stable [i.e.
EOT is not returned to the application code] is not found with libkse
on 5.1-current.
--- uthread_write.c Wed Sep 17 06:23:43 2003
+++ uthread_write.c.org Tue Sep 16 12:14:22 2003
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
#include
#include
#include "pthread_private.h"
-#include
ssize_t
_write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t nbytes)
@@ -71,10 +70,6 @@
/* Check if file operations are to block */
blocking = ((_thread_fd_getflags(fd) & O_NONBLOCK) == 0);
- setlogmask (LOG_UPTO (LOG_NOTICE));
- openlog("uthread_write.c", LOG_CONS | LOG_PID | LOG_NDELAY,
LOG_LOCAL1);
- syslog (LOG_NOTICE, "uthread_write.c : blocking = '%d'",
blocking);
-
/*
* Loop while no error occurs and until the expected number
* of bytes are written if performing a blocking write:
@@ -98,7 +93,7 @@
* write:
*/
if (blocking && ((n < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK ||
- errno == EAGAIN)) || (n > 0 && num < nbytes))) {
+ errno == EAGAIN)) || (n >= 0 && num < nbytes))) {
curthread->data.fd.fd = fd;
_thread_kern_set_timeout(NULL);
@@ -136,16 +131,11 @@
* If there was an error, return partial success
* (if any bytes were written) or else the error:
*/
- } else if (n <= 0) {
+ } else if (n < 0) {
if (num > 0)
ret = num;
else
ret = n;
-
- if (n == 0) {
- syslog (LOG_NOTICE, "zero has been returned in
uthread_write.c;
num = '%d'", num);
- break;
- }
/* Check if the write has completed: */
} else if (num >= nbytes)
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
I've had preliminary success with this patch. More testing needs
to be done, but in the meantime, I would appreciate reviews and
comments. The patched code is available from
http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/uthread_write.c and the patch
appears below.
In short, the logic has been changed to ensure that if __sys_write
returns zero, this value is returned by _write.
The syslog calls are just for debugging and will be removed.
Thank you.
--- uthread_write.c.org Tue Sep 16 12:14:22 2003
+++ uthread_write.c Tue Sep 16 16:38:02 2003
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include
#include
#include "pthread_private.h"
+#include
ssize_t
_write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t nbytes)
@@ -93,7 +94,7 @@
* write:
*/
if (blocking && ((n < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK ||
- errno == EAGAIN)) || (n >= 0 && num < nbytes))) {
+ errno == EAGAIN)) || (n > 0 && num < nbytes))) {
curthread->data.fd.fd = fd;
_thread_kern_set_timeout(NULL);
@@ -136,6 +137,15 @@
ret = num;
else
ret = n;
+
+ } else if (n == 0) {
+ ret = 0;
+ if (n == 0) {
+ setlogmask (LOG_UPTO (LOG_NOTICE));
+ openlog("uthread_write.c", LOG_CONS | LOG_PID
| LOG_NDELAY,
LOG_LOCAL1);
+ syslog (LOG_NOTICE, "zero has been returned in
uthread_write.c;
num = '%d'", num);
+ }
+ break;
/* Check if the write has completed: */
} else if (num >= nbytes)
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Any workarounds for Verisign .com/.net highjacking?
On 16 Sep 2003 at 10:23, Clifton Royston wrote: > In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some simple hack > to disregard these wildcard A records, short of requesting zone > transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via peering with > f.root-servers.net) and purging those records out of the zone before > loading it. Any ideas, either under djbdns or Bind 9? Sorry, only for bind8, as was posted to my local LUG list: http://achurch.org/bind-verisign-patch.html -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: comments on proposed uthread_write.c changes
On 7 Sep 2003 at 19:40, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2003 at 12:32, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > > A problem with pthreads and EOT has been identified. See PR 56274. It
> > > was suggested the solution was probably just a matter of changing one of
> > > the >0 tests to >=0 in uthread_write.c
> > >
> > > Any comments on that?
> >
> > I don't know that a return of 0 isn't valid for other devices.
> > If this is the case, a return of 0 for blocking writes may break
> > other applications.
> >
> > The patch isn't quite correct (at least looking at -current srcs).
> > Lines 98-99 are:
> >
> > if (blocking && ((n < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK ||
> > errno == EAGAIN)) || (n >= 0 && num < nbytes))) {
> >
> > This will get entered first if n == 0, and I don't think your
> > proposed patch would have any effect. I think you would have
> > to change the "n >= 0" above to be "n > 0" in conjunction with
> > your patch.
>
> Ahh thank you. That explains why the test results with the original
> patch did not differ from -STABLE or 5.1-RELEASE. After adding your
> suggestions, we have had success.
Oh I was wrong, very wrong. The test code I ran had not been
compiled with pthreads. Kern found my mistake after he was unable to
reproduce my [false] results.
It appears the problem is not with uthread_write.c... Or at least not
in the areas we are changing.
Suggestions?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: comments on proposed uthread_write.c changes
On 7 Sep 2003 at 12:32, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > A problem with pthreads and EOT has been identified. See PR 56274. It
> > was suggested the solution was probably just a matter of changing one of
> > the >0 tests to >=0 in uthread_write.c
> >
> > Any comments on that?
>
> I don't know that a return of 0 isn't valid for other devices.
> If this is the case, a return of 0 for blocking writes may break
> other applications.
>
> The patch isn't quite correct (at least looking at -current srcs).
> Lines 98-99 are:
>
> if (blocking && ((n < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK ||
> errno == EAGAIN)) || (n >= 0 && num < nbytes))) {
>
> This will get entered first if n == 0, and I don't think your
> proposed patch would have any effect. I think you would have
> to change the "n >= 0" above to be "n > 0" in conjunction with
> your patch.
Ahh thank you. That explains why the test results with the original
patch did not differ from -STABLE or 5.1-RELEASE. After adding your
suggestions, we have had success.
The points to note:
1. The status that stopped the writing was 0
2. It wrote 17,256 blocks, and read 17,256 blocks.
Point 1 is key to determining EOT. Point 2 is what you always want
to have...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tape-test] $ sudo ./tapetest /dev/nsa0
*rewind
Rewound /dev/nsa0
*rawfill
Begin writing blocks of 64512 bytes.
+
weof_dev
Wrote EOF to /dev/nsa0
Write failed. Last block written=17256. stat=0 ERR=Unknown error: 0
*rewind
Rewound /dev/nsa0
*scan
Starting scan at file 0
17256 blocks of 64512 bytes in file 0
End of File mark.
End of File mark.
End of tape
Total files=1, blocks=17256, bytes = 1113219072
*
> This could be solved at the application level by selecting on
> the tape device and performing non-blocking writes to it. Since
> the application knows that a return of 0 is end-of-tape, it
> must also know the difference between talking to a tape device
> and talking to a regular file, socket, etc.
True. But *if* the code is wrong, it should be fixed.
FWIW, the patch follows. As always, opinions and suggestions are
welcome.
--- uthread_write.c.org Sun Sep 7 10:58:31 2003
+++ uthread_write.c Sun Sep 7 15:41:34 2003
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
* write:
*/
if (blocking && ((n < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK ||
- errno == EAGAIN)) || (n >= 0 && num < nbytes))) {
+ errno == EAGAIN)) || (n > 0 && num < nbytes))) {
curthread->data.fd.fd = fd;
_thread_kern_set_timeout(NULL);
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
* If there was an error, return partial success
* (if any bytes were written) or else the error:
*/
- } else if (n < 0) {
+ } else if (n <= 0) {
if (num > 0)
ret = num;
else
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
comments on proposed uthread_write.c changes
A problem with pthreads and EOT has been identified. See PR 56274. It
was suggested the solution was probably just a matter of changing one of
the >0 tests to >=0 in uthread_write.c
Any comments on that?
Here's a diff I came up with after looking at
src/lib/libc_r/uthreaduthread_write.c. Any suggestions/comments?
I plan to apply and test this later in the week.
--- uthread_write.c Sun Sep 7 11:01:13 2003
+++ uthread_write.c.org Sun Sep 7 10:58:31 2003
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
* If there was an error, return partial success
* (if any bytes were written) or else the error:
*/
- } else if (n <= 0) {
+ } else if (n < 0) {
if (num > 0)
ret = num;
else
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Is tar doing the right thing here?
Why is this message not being suppressed? $ tar -czf test.tgz / 2>&1 > /dev/null tar: Removing leading `/' from member names And I don't really want to use the -P option. [Please cc me on all replies; thanks] -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: why does this sendmail connection take so long?
On 29 Aug 2002 at 11:50, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > dan> I am using ipf with "pass out from any to any/pass out from any to > dan> any". > > Unfortunately, I use ipfw/ip6fw so I don't know if my guesses are correct. > > That rule only appears to handle outbound connections (therefore allowing > the sendmail client to open an outbound connection to the localhost > sendmail server). It does not allow for inbound connections (thereby > allowing the incoming connection). Perhaps what you need is also: > > echo 'pass in quick on lo0' > /etc/ipf6.rules > echo 'pass out quick on lo0' >> /etc/ipf6.rules > ipf -6 -f /etc/ipf6.rules > > Note the -6 for the IPv6 rules (which appear to be kept separate from the > IPv4 rules). > > Again, I'm just guessing at ipf usage but you get the idea (I hope). You guessed very well. Making the above changes fixed the problem. And I didn't know about the -6 switch on ipf. Applying the same solution to another box (also running ipf and having similar problems). Thank you for your time and efforts. -- Dan Langille I'm looking for a computer job: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: why does this sendmail connection take so long?
On 29 Aug 2002 at 11:27, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > That explains it. You have a record pointing localhost.example.org at ::1 > but your sendmail daemon isn't listening for IPv6 connections and worse yet > your host appears to drop instead of reject connection attempts. My guess > is you have IP firewalling enabled (either IPFW or IPF) and default to drop > or have ip6fw or ipf rulesets that effectively to do the same. I am using ipf with "pass out from any to any/pass out from any to any". FWIW: in this case localhost.example.org is the DNS server for my private LAN. -- Dan Langille I'm looking for a computer job: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: why does this sendmail connection take so long?
LINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP >>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=9 250 2.1.0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender ok >>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> DATA 250 2.1.5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Recipient ok 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself >>> . 250 2.0.0 g7TIDVRq084370 Message accepted for delivery [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent (g7TIDVRq084370 Message accepted for delivery) Closing connection to localhost.example.org. >>> QUIT 221 2.0.0 xeon.example.org closing connection [dan@xeon:/etc/namedb] $ Thank you. -- Dan Langille I'm looking for a computer job: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: why does this sendmail connection take so long?
; refresh 30M ; retry 4w2d; expiry 1D ); minimum ;; rcode = 0, ancount=0 ;; res_querydomain(xeon, example.org, 1, 28) ;; res_query(xeon.example.org, 1, 28) ;; res_mkquery(0, xeon.example.org, 1, 28) ;; res_send() ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 26790 ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; xeon.example.org, type = , class = IN ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 127.0.0.1 ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 26790 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; xeon.example.org, type = , class = IN example.org. 1D IN SOA ns1.example.org. soa.example.com. ( 2002082901 ; serial 3H ; refresh 30M ; retry 4w2d; expiry 1D ); minimum ;; rcode = 0, ancount=0 ;; res_querydomain(xeon, , 1, 28) ;; res_query(xeon, 1, 28) ;; res_mkquery(0, xeon, 1, 28) ;; res_send() ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 26791 ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; xeon, type = , class = IN ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 127.0.0.1 ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 26791 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; xeon, type = , class = IN . 2h26m42s IN SOA A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. NSTLD.VERISIGN-GRS.COM. ( 2002082900 ; serial 30M ; refresh 15M ; retry 1W ; expiry 1D ); minimum ;; rcode = 3, ancount=0 ***delay occurs here... ;; res_querydomain(xeon.example.org., , 1, 1) ;; res_query(xeon.example.org, 1, 1) ;; res_mkquery(0, xeon.example.org, 1, 1) ;; res_send() ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 26792 ;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; xeon.example.org, type = A, class = IN ;; Querying server (# 1) address = 127.0.0.1 ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 26792 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; xeon.example.org, type = A, class = IN xeon.example.org.1M IN A 192.168.0.18 example.org. 1M IN NSxeon.example.org.org. xeon.example.org.org. 14m47s IN A 127.0.0.1 220 xeon.example.org ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.5/8.12.5; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:36:28 -0400 (EDT) >>> EHLO xeon.example.org 250-xeon.example.org Hello xeon [192.168.0.18], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP >>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=9 250 2.1.0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender ok >>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> DATA 250 2.1.5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Recipient ok 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself >>> . 250 2.0.0 g7THaSRq079062 Message accepted for delivery [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent (g7THaSRq079062 Message accepted for delivery) Closing connection to xeon.example.org. >>> QUIT 221 2.0.0 xeon.example.org closing connection [dan@xeon:~] $ Thank you. -- Dan Langille I'm looking for a computer job: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: why does this sendmail connection take so long?
On 28 Aug 2002 at 16:43, Terry Lambert wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > I've tested this from several boxes behind my firewall each time > > emailing to a box outside the firewall. The test was: > > > >echo 'hi there' | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > echo 'hi there' | mail -v [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ? After issuing the above command, there is a 75s delay (see below for delay location). All subsequent lines appear without delay. At the end of this message, I've issued the commands by hand. No delays occur. [dan@xeon:~] $ echo 'hi there' | mail -v [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Connecting to localhost.example.org. via relay... 220 xeon.example.org ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.5/8.12.5; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:32:14 -0400 (EDT) >>> EHLO xeon.example.org 250-xeon.example.org Hello localhost [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP >>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=34 250 2.1.0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender ok >>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> DATA 250 2.1.5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Recipient ok 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself >>> . 250 2.0.0 g7TCWERq037402 Message accepted for delivery [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent (g7TCWERq037402 Message accepted for delivery) Closing connection to localhost.example.org. >>> QUIT 221 2.0.0 xeon.example.org closing connection 220 xeon.example.org ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.5/8.12.5; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:32:30 -0400 (EDT) >>> EHLO xeon.example.org 250-xeon.example.org Hello localhost [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP >>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=37 250 2.1.0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender ok >>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> DATA 250 2.1.5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Recipient ok 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself >>> . 250 2.0.0 g7TCWURq037483 Message accepted for delivery [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent (g7TCWURq037483 Message accepted for delivery) Closing connection to localhost.example.org. >>> QUIT 221 2.0.0 xeon.example.org closing connection You have new mail in /var/mail/dan [dan@xeon:~] $ telnet m20.example.org 25 Trying 216.187.106.227... Connected to m20.example.org. Escape character is '^]'. 220 m20.example.org ESMTP Postfix MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 503 Error: send HELO/EHLO first ^C^] telnet> quit Connection closed. [dan@xeon:~] $ telnet m20.example.org 25 Trying 216.187.106.227... Connected to m20.example.org. Escape character is '^]'. 220 m20.example.org ESMTP Postfix EHLO xeon.example.org 250-m20.example.org 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 1024 250-ETRN 250-XVERP 250 8BITMIME MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=37 250 Ok RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 250 Ok DATA 354 End data with . . 250 Ok: queued as A62127A11 QUIT 221 Bye Connection closed by foreign host. [dan@xeon:~] $ -- Dan Langille I'm looking for a computer job: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: why does this sendmail connection take so long?
On 22 Aug 2002 at 18:28, Michael Scheidell wrote: > - Original Message - > From: ""Dan Langille"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: local.freebsd.hackers > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 1:41 PM > Subject: why does this sendmail connection take so long? > > > > I'd normally attribute this problem to DNS, but I can't track down > > what DNS problem is occuring. Note the lag between the first event > > and the next. Any suggestions? > > might be identd (port 113) After some testing, I'm inclined to think it's not ident. The network in question is behind a firewall which is doing NAT. Two boxes do not exibit the problem. Two do. All are FreeBSD 4.6-stable created from same source snapshot. I've tested this from several boxes behind my firewall each time emailing to a box outside the firewall. The test was: echo 'hi there' | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] The two boxes which exibit the probem are the DNS server and the firewall. Mail sent from those boxes exhibit identical delays, namely a 75 second lag between the first and second event (see below for an example; note that I've changed the real domain to example.org). I'm not sure whether this indicates a problem on the sending or receiving end. I suspect sending. But what the problem is I'm not sure yet. I've been running "tcpdump -i lo0 port 53" to see if I could find anything suspect in there, but I didn't. BTW, what would I be looking for if the above delay is caused by DNS? Thanks. Aug 28 12:07:24 xeon sendmail[66323]: g7SG7O7G066323: from=dan, size=37, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=dan@localhost Aug 28 12:08:39 xeon sm-mta[66507]: g7SG8dvj066507: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=351, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Aug 28 12:08:40 xeon sendmail[66323]: g7SG7O7G066323: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=dan (1000/1000), delay=00:01:16, xdelay=00:01:16, mailer=relay, pri=30028, relay=localhost.example.org. [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (g7SG8dvj066507 Message accepted for delivery) Aug 28 12:08:42 xeon sm-mta[66509]: g7SG8dvj066507: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ctladdr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (1000/1000), delay=00:00:03, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=esmtp, pri=30342, relay=m20.example.org. [216.187.106.227], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok: queued as 169F57A11) -- Dan Langille I'm looking for a computer job: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: serial console com1 to com1 == login race condition?
On 9 Aug 2002 at 13:14, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > My > question to Dan is, is there a reason you can't have two null modem > cables strung between these machines? No, not AFAIK. I am guessing that both boxes have two com ports. I posted my original question because my contact at the colocation added a single crossover serial cable after both machines recently had sshd die[1] on them during concurrent make worlds[2]. Given the time zone differences, I wanted to explore possibilities before requesting a second cable and to prepare myself for the questions I expect him to have in reply. Thanks folks. [1] - http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=88296+0+current/freebsd- stable [2] - I won't be doing that again. Once the serial consoles are in place, I'll be upgrading them one at a time. -- Dan Langille I'm looking for a computer job: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: serial console com1 to com1 == login race condition?
On 9 Aug 2002 at 12:27, James Housley wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > I have two remote boxes. My colocation hosts have strung a crossover > > serial cable from com1 to com1 on these boxes. The idea is that if I > > paint myself into a corner on one box, I can get access to it from > > the other box via the serial cable. > > > > But... > > > > I will need to set up serial consoles on each box in advance of a > > problem arising. But won't I get a race condition with each box > > thinking the other is trying to login? > > > > [1] - my apologies to those with whom I have already discussed this > > issue. > > One option is com1 to com2 . It takes 2 cable, but if ttyd1 (com2) > doesn't have getty running then the race won't exist. I was trying to avoid the second cable. Mainly because a non-BSD person suggested the cable which is now there, and I didn't want to go back and say sorry, I need a second cable... Yes, it's just ego... Unless of course, he's forgotten that I'd have to setup the serial consoles in advance of a problem arising. -- Dan Langille I'm looking for a computer job: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
serial console com1 to com1 == login race condition?
I have two remote boxes. My colocation hosts have strung a crossover serial cable from com1 to com1 on these boxes. The idea is that if I paint myself into a corner on one box, I can get access to it from the other box via the serial cable. But... I will need to set up serial consoles on each box in advance of a problem arising. But won't I get a race condition with each box thinking the other is trying to login? [1] - my apologies to those with whom I have already discussed this issue. -- Dan Langille I'm looking for a computer job: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: The problem with FreeBSD
On 18 Jun 2002 at 10:21, Christopher Schulte wrote: > At 08:39 AM 6/18/2002 +, Bill Flamerola wrote: > >Okay, this is not really intended as a flame, but kinda necessary, given > >the current situation in the FreeBSD camp. > > OMG R U SERIOUS? Thx for the warning, I'll ditch FreeBSD and load NetBSD > right now. I wonder if NetBSDDiary is available... -- Dan Langille To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
mpd for pptp - can't connect
: phase shift AUTHENTICATE --> ESTABLISH [vpn] LCP: rec'd Configure Reject #2 link 0 (Req-Sent) AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 [vpn] LCP: SendConfigReq #3 ACFCOMP PROTOCOMP MRU 1500 MAGICNUM b6073a2a [vpn] LCP: rec'd Configure Request #4 link 0 (Req-Sent) AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 MAGICNUM 17b425d5 PROTOCOMP ACFCOMP ENDPOINTDISC [LOCAL] 71 35 8f ec 71 33 4c 72 b2 5e 3e c3 c4 1f 11 c5 00 00 00 00 [vpn] LCP: SendConfigAck #4 AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 MAGICNUM 17b425d5 PROTOCOMP ACFCOMP ENDPOINTDISC [LOCAL] 71 35 8f ec 71 33 4c 72 b2 5e 3e c3 c4 1f 11 c5 00 00 00 00 [vpn] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Sent pptp0: CID 0xbc51 in SetLinkInfo not found [vpn] LCP: rec'd Configure Ack #3 link 0 (Ack-Sent) ACFCOMP PROTOCOMP MRU 1500 MAGICNUM b6073a2a [vpn] LCP: state change Ack-Sent --> Opened [vpn] LCP: phase shift ESTABLISH --> AUTHENTICATE [vpn] LCP: auth: peer wants CHAP, I want nothing [vpn] LCP: LayerUp [vpn] CHAP: rec'd CHALLENGE #0 Name: "ROGERT" Using authname "dan" [vpn] CHAP: sending RESPONSE [vpn] CHAP: rec'd SUCCESS #0 MESG: S=F5963AA507E1DECD8998FC50240CB9C088AF4DA9 [vpn] LCP: authorization successful [vpn] LCP: phase shift AUTHENTICATE --> NETWORK [vpn] up: 1 link, total bandwidth 64000 bps [vpn] IPCP: Up event [vpn] IPCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent [vpn] IPCP: SendConfigReq #1 IPADDR 192.168.0.21 pptp0: CID 0xbc51 in SetLinkInfo not found [vpn] IPCP: SendConfigReq #2 IPADDR 192.168.0.21 [vpn] IPCP: SendConfigReq #3 IPADDR 192.168.0.21 [vpn] IPCP: SendConfigReq #4 IPADDR 192.168.0.21 [vpn] IPCP: SendConfigReq #5 IPADDR 192.168.0.21 [vpn] IPCP: SendConfigReq #6 IPADDR 192.168.0.21 [vpn] IPCP: SendConfigReq #7 IPADDR 192.168.0.21 [vpn] IPCP: SendConfigReq #8 IPADDR 192.168.0.21 [vpn] IPCP: SendConfigReq #9 IPADDR 192.168.0.21 [vpn] IPCP: SendConfigReq #10 IPADDR 192.168.0.21 [vpn] IPCP: state change Req-Sent --> Stopped [vpn] IPCP: LayerFinish [vpn] IPCP: parameter negotiation failed [vpn] IPCP: LayerFinish [vpn] bundle: CLOSE event in state OPENED [vpn] closing link "vpn"... [vpn] bundle: CLOSE event in state CLOSED [vpn] closing link "vpn"... [vpn] link: CLOSE event [vpn] LCP: Close event [vpn] LCP: state change Opened --> Closing [vpn] LCP: phase shift NETWORK --> TERMINATE [vpn] up: 0 links, total bandwidth 9600 bps [vpn] IPCP: Down event [vpn] IPCP: state change Stopped --> Starting [vpn] IPCP: LayerStart [vpn] closing link "vpn"... [vpn] LCP: SendTerminateReq #4 [vpn] LCP: LayerDown [vpn] bundle: OPEN event in state CLOSED [vpn] opening link "vpn"... [vpn] link: CLOSE event [vpn] LCP: Close event [vpn] link: CLOSE event [vpn] LCP: Close event [vpn] link: OPEN event [vpn] LCP: Open event [vpn] LCP: state change Closing --> Stopping pptp0: CID 0xbc51 in SetLinkInfo not found [vpn] LCP: rec'd Terminate Ack #4 link 0 (Stopping) [vpn] LCP: state change Stopping --> Stopped [vpn] LCP: phase shift TERMINATE --> ESTABLISH [vpn] LCP: LayerFinish [vpn] device: CLOSE event in state UP pptp0-0: clearing call [vpn] device is now in state CLOSING [vpn] device: DOWN event in state CLOSING [vpn] device is now in state DOWN [vpn] link: DOWN event [vpn] LCP: Down event [vpn] LCP: state change Stopped --> Starting [vpn] LCP: phase shift ESTABLISH --> DEAD [vpn] LCP: LayerStart [vpn] device: OPEN event in state DOWN [vpn] pausing 7 seconds before open [vpn] device is now in state DOWN [vpn] device: OPEN event in state DOWN [vpn] device is now in state DOWN pptp0-0: peer call disconnected res=zero? err=none pptp0-0: killing channel pptp0: closing connection with 1.2.3.4:1723 pptp0: killing connection with 1.2.3.4:1723 -- Dan Langille To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: how to automagically restart net/pptpclient?
On 28 May 2002 at 21:08, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Tue, 28 May 2002, Dan Langille wrote: > > > That looks good. I've tried it, but have been unable to connect to the > > office, which is running an MS PPtP server. I know the *can* work > > because pptp-client can connect. FWIW, here's what I'm running from cron every five minutes: #!/bin/sh ping -n -c 1 -t 2 10.0.1.249 2>&1 > /dev/null if [ $? -ne 0 ] then NETMASK=`ifconfig tun0 | grep -c netmask` if [ $NETMASK -eq 0 ] then echo "TUN0 is not healthy. starting VPN again." /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pptp.sh start else # echo "TUN0 looks healthy" fi else # echo "link is OK" fi -- Dan Langille To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: cvsup doesn't get me what I want
On 6 Jun 2002 at 21:05, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4 Jun 2002 at 8:37, John Polstra wrote:
> > > I'll help you figure this out if you'll send me the following
> > > information:
> >
> > Thanks John.
> >
> > >
> > > The cvsupd server config files for the collection ("releases"
> > > and the list file).
> >
> > [dan@xeon:/home/repositories/sup/freshports-phpAds] $ less list.cvs
> > upgrade phpPgAds
> > [dan@xeon:/home/repositories/sup/freshports-phpAds] $ less releases
> > cvs list=list.cvs prefix=/home/repositories/freebsddiary
>
> OK, this says the server is getting its files from
> "/home/repositories/freebsddiary". But ...
That's the problem. That should be /home/repositories/freshports-1
> > > The full pathname of the ChangeLog RCS file you used as your
> > > example, on the server machine.
> >
> > /home/repositories/freshports-1/phpPgAds/ChangeLog,v
That's the wrong file I gave you, that should be this file:
/home/repositories/freebsddiary/phpPgAds/ChangeLog,v
> That is a different file! It's under "/home/repositories/freshports-1",
> which is not where the "releases" file tells the server to look.
Once I fixed the releases file to point to the correct repo (DOH!), both
tags worked (. and FreshPorts2). That should have been my clue. The
collection exists in both repos but with different tags (and different
customizations for each website).
Thank you John. :)
--
Dan Langille
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
commit messages filtering / FreshSource
I've just seen Matt Dillon's email on this topic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I immediately thought about the overlap between two projects. FreshSource (http://www.FreshSource.org) will allow you to express interest in particular sections of the source tree. Interest can be expressed on a file or directory level and placed on a watch list. You will be emailed any commits which occur to items on your watch list (e.g. one email on a daily basis). Those familiar with FreshPorts will already be familiar with the service described above. FreshSource will behave similarly but will cover all commits, not just those in the ports tree. -- Dan Langille To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: cvsup doesn't get me what I want
On 4 Jun 2002 at 8:37, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Folks, I'm having trouble understanding this problem. I'm trying to use
> > cvsup to get stuff onto my website. This supfile gets things out of the
> > tree
> >
> > $ less ~/phpAdsNew-supfile
> > *default host=xeon
> > *default base=/usr/websites/freshports
> > *default release=cvs
> > *default delete use-rel-suffix
> > *default umask=007
> > *default preserve
> > *default tag=.
> > freshports-phpAds
> >
> > But what I really want is tag=FreshPorts2 but if I use that, I don't get
> > anything out of the repo.
> >
> > The tags exist:
> >
> > However, for example:
> >
> > $ cvs stat -v ChangeLog
> > ===
> > File: ChangeLog Status: Up-to-date
> >
> >Working revision:1.1.1.1 Tue Jun 4 01:01:32 2002
> >Repository revision: 1.1.1.1 /home/repositories/freshports-
> > 1/phpPgAds/ChangeLog,v
> >Sticky Tag: FreshPorts2 (revision: 1.1.1.1)
> >Sticky Date: (none)
> >Sticky Options: (none)
> >
> >Existing Tags:
> > cvs (revision: 1.1.1.1)
> > FreshPorts2 (revision: 1.1.1.1)
> >
> >
> > I just don't get it. Why doesn't tag=FreshPorts2 work?
>
> You should get rid of the "preserve" keyword in your supfile. It
> doesn't really make any sense when working in checkout mode. But
> that's probably not the problem.
>
> I'll help you figure this out if you'll send me the following
> information:
Thanks John.
>
> The cvsupd server config files for the collection ("releases"
> and the list file).
[dan@xeon:/home/repositories/sup/freshports-phpAds] $ less list.cvs
upgrade phpPgAds
[dan@xeon:/home/repositories/sup/freshports-phpAds] $ less releases
cvs list=list.cvs prefix=/home/repositories/freebsddiary
> The full pathnames of the cvsupd server config files for the
> collection.
Is that obvioius form the pwd above?
> The command line used to invoke cvsupd.
from /etc/inetd.conf:
cvspserverstream tcp nowait root/usr/bin/cvscvs --allow-
root=/home/repo --allow-root=/home/repositories/freebsddiary --allow-
root=/home/cvs-scripts --allow-root=/home/repositories/freshports-1 --
allow-root=/home/repositories/websites pserver
> The full pathname of the ChangeLog RCS file you used as your
> example, on the server machine.
/home/repositories/freshports-1/phpPgAds/ChangeLog,v
> The output of "rlog -h ChangeLog,v" on that file on the server.
[dan@xeon:/home/repositories/freshports-1/phpPgAds] $ rlog -h ChangeLog,v
RCS file: ChangeLog,v
Working file: ChangeLog
head: 1.1
branch: 1.1.1
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
cvs: 1.1.1.1
FreshPorts2: 1.1.1.1
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 2
===
==
> The command line used to invoke cvsup on the client machine.
[dan@nezlok:/usr/websites/traffic] $ cvsup ~/phpAdsNew-supfile
Connected to localhost
Updating collection freshports-phpAds/cvs
Finished successfully
[dan@nezlok:/usr/websites/traffic] $
> The output of
> find /usr/websites/freshports/sup -name 'refuse*'
> on the client machine.
$ find /usr/websites/freshports/sup -name 'refuse*'
find: /usr/websites/freshports/sup: No such file or directory
$ find /usr/websites/freshports.org/sup -name 'refuse*'
/usr/websites/freshports.org/sup/freshports-www/refuse
/usr/websites/freshports.org/sup/freshports-www/refuse~
/usr/websites/freshports.org/sup/freshports-config/refuse
$
refuse files from above in case they are useful:
$ less /usr/websites/freshports.org/sup/freshports-www/refuse
www/phorum
$ less /usr/websites/freshports.org/sup/freshports-config/refuse
configuration/phorum
configuration/phorum-3.3.2a/1.php
configuration/phorum-3.3.2a/2.php
configuration/phorum-3.3.2a/forums.php
> The output of "cvsup -v" on the client and "cvsupd -v" on the
> server. Please be careful to ensure that your PATH is really
> finding the same copies of these programs that your cron job or
> other mechanism normally executes.
Client: $ cvsup -v
CVSup client, non-GUI version
Copyright 1996-2002 John D. Polstra
Software version: SNAP_16_1f
Protocol version: 17.0
Operating system: FreeBSD4
http://www.polstra.com/projects/freeware/CVSup/
Report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CV
cvsup doesn't get me what I want
Folks, I'm having trouble understanding this problem. I'm trying to use cvsup to get stuff onto my website. This supfile gets things out of the tree $ less ~/phpAdsNew-supfile *default host=xeon *default base=/usr/websites/freshports *default release=cvs *default delete use-rel-suffix *default umask=007 *default preserve *default tag=. freshports-phpAds But what I really want is tag=FreshPorts2 but if I use that, I don't get anything out of the repo. The tags exist: However, for example: $ cvs stat -v ChangeLog === File: ChangeLog Status: Up-to-date Working revision:1.1.1.1 Tue Jun 4 01:01:32 2002 Repository revision: 1.1.1.1 /home/repositories/freshports- 1/phpPgAds/ChangeLog,v Sticky Tag: FreshPorts2 (revision: 1.1.1.1) Sticky Date: (none) Sticky Options: (none) Existing Tags: cvs (revision: 1.1.1.1) FreshPorts2 (revision: 1.1.1.1) I just don't get it. Why doesn't tag=FreshPorts2 work? cheers -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: how to automagically restart net/pptpclient?
On 28 May 2002 at 9:32, Dominic Marks wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:57:52AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > I have installed net/pptpclient (1.0.3). About 5 times a week, it dies > > and must be restarted. Does anyone have a script which checks and > > restarts it if it has died? > > You might like to try one of the other PPTP clients on offer. I > switched from using pptpclient to mpd and think it is superior. This > is all covered in the Handbook :) > > http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/pppoa.html That looks good. I've tried it, but have been unable to connect to the office, which is running an MS PPtP server. I know the *can* work because pptp-client can connect. Does anyone have a working configuration I can use as an example please? For what it's worth, I'm using this configuration (as stolen from /usr/local/etc/mpd/mpd.conf.sample). vpn: new -i ng1 vpn vpn set iface disable on-demand set iface addrs 192.168.0.20 10.0.1.18 set iface idle 0 set iface route 10.0.1.0/24 set pptp peer 1.2.3.4 set bundle disable multilink set bundle authname me set bundle password mypassword set link yes acfcomp protocomp set link no pap set link yes chap # If remote machine is NT you need this.. set link enable no-orig-auth set link keep-alive 10 75 set ipcp no vjcomp set ipcp ranges 192.168.0.20/32 10.0.1.18/32 where 1.2.3.4 is the public IP address of the office 192.168.0.20 is the internal NIC of my dual-homed gateway 10.0.1.0/24 is the interal office LAN -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
how to automagically restart net/pptpclient?
I have installed net/pptpclient (1.0.3). About 5 times a week, it dies and must be restarted. Does anyone have a script which checks and restarts it if it has died? FWIW: here's my ppp.conf. From what I can tell, the redial does nothing. And from what I know, the alias command is deprecated. Guess I should be using -nat. PONTEOTTAWA: set authname myname set authkey mypassword set timeout 0 set ifaddr 0 0 set redial 15 0 add 10.0.1.0/24 HISADDR alias enable yes And here is how it dies: May 21 20:55:43 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: deflink: lcp -> open May 21 20:55:43 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: bundle: Network May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: Signal 15, terminate. May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: Signal 15, terminate. May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: deflink: read (0): Got zero bytes May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: deflink: open -> lcp May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: bundle: Terminate May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 157578 secs: 5756166 octets in, 123806252 octets out May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: deflink: : 54244 packets in, 88738 packets out May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: total 822 bytes/sec, peak 63761 bytes/sec on Thu May 23 16:41:59 2002 May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: deflink: lcp -> closed May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: bundle: Dead May 23 16:41:59 ns1 ppp[74801]: Phase: PPP Terminated (normal). -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: remotely restoring over a live working system
On 15 May 2002 at 14:55, Doug White wrote: > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Dan Langille wrote: > > > A disk in remote 4.5-stable box started to develop bad clusters. The > > hosting company replaced the drive for me. I now have a 4.5-RELEASE > > system (they have 4.5-RELEASE drives as stock items). > > > > The defective drive is almost mounted in this box. I'm tempted to tar > > the old disk over to the new disk and get everything back running that > > way. It's that or upgrade to stable, install about 30 or so packages, and > > manually configure everything. > > > > How feasible is copying from ad2 to ad0 given that I'm booting and > > running off ad0? My thoughts are that it's faster but higher risk. > > Be careful spamming the existing files, if the tar keels over and eats, oh > say, libc Thanks Doug and Brandon. I'm going the upgrade route. I have tar'd an existing system to a secondary drive, but never the other way around. Sounds like unfun. cheers -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
remotely restoring over a live working system
A disk in remote 4.5-stable box started to develop bad clusters. The hosting company replaced the drive for me. I now have a 4.5-RELEASE system (they have 4.5-RELEASE drives as stock items). The defective drive is almost mounted in this box. I'm tempted to tar the old disk over to the new disk and get everything back running that way. It's that or upgrade to stable, install about 30 or so packages, and manually configure everything. How feasible is copying from ad2 to ad0 given that I'm booting and running off ad0? My thoughts are that it's faster but higher risk. cheers -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
using cvsup to put the same collection in two places
The objective: I want the same collection in two different places, but I want to use two different refuse files. Some parts of the collection I don't want in one location. The background: I'm playing with phpAdsNew. I've just imported it into my cvs tree for my website. I use https to administer the site. As such, I'd prefer not to have the phpAdsNew/admin/ directory in the public section of the website. I'd like to be able to cvsup phpAdsNew to my website into two different locations (this I can do already) and have a refuse file for one and not for the other (this is where I'm failing). What I've tried: At present I have these two supfiles: This puts the collection in the https section of the website: less ~/phpAdsAdmin-supfile *default host=localhost *default base=/home/freebsddiary/admin *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix *default umask=007 *default preserve fbsd-phpAds This puts the collection in the http section of the website: $ less ~/phpAds-supfile *default host=localhost *default base=/home/freebsddiary *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix *default umask=007 *default preserve fbsd-phpAds Normally a refuse file would go into /home/freebsddiary/sup/ where col is the name of the collection (in this case it's fbsd-phpAds). With the above setup I can have only one refuse file. I need two. So I tried creating a second collection (fbsd-phpAdsAdmin) which merely pointed at the original collection. Sadly, this didn't create a /home/freebsddiary/sup/phpAdsAdmin as I hoped. Any clues? Thanks. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
php regex needed for PR numbers
Hi folks, If you don't know it already, the new version of Freshports <http://www.FreshPorts.org/> is in beta testing at <http://test.freshports.org/>. One of the remaining items I'm looking for help with is the creation of hyperlinks from the log messages to the PR database. I'm hoping that someone can provide a bit of code I can use in PHP to convert lines like this: PR: 12345 PR: ports/1234 PR: 1234,5678 to lines which contain hyperlinks to the actual PR. The HREF isn't difficult, but I'm finding trouble with getting it working and working correctly. Our first attempts can be http://test.freshports.org/phorum/lists.php?f=1 under the thread titled "more PHP regex help wanted please". thanks. -- Dan Langille novice in training - http://www.freebsddiary.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
file(1) returns amusing result
As part of my FreshPorts fun, I decided that after fetching a file from cvsweb, I should make sure the fetch worked. I decided to do that via file(1) and inspect the output. I was testing for ASCII, but that appears to not be good enough. Now I just test for HTML and reverse the sense of the test. Here was the most amusing output: $ file -b /usr/home/dan/ports/databases/mysql++/Makefile Apple Old Partition data block size: 21117 first type: AS_CONFIGURE= yes, number of blocks: 1702047597, $ head /usr/home/dan/ports/databases/mysql++/Makefile # ports collection makefile for:MySQL++ # Date created: 20th July 2000 # Whom: Miklos Niedermayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # # $FreeBSD: ports/databases/mysql++/Makefile,v 1.10 2002/02/11 13:15:14 ijliao Exp $ # PORTNAME= mysql++ PORTVERSION=1.7.9 CATEGORIES= databases devel -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
is this character encoding or corrupted text?
Hello, I'm looking at this commit: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=292893+0+archive/2001/cvs- all/20010429.cvs-all In the log, the name "Matthias Kvppe" appears. Is that the correct name? If you look at the underlying HTML, or fetch the HTML and view it using vi, you will see "Matthias K^[,Av^[(Bppe". I'm wondering if there are special characters in there which were not well handled by the cvs-all process. My next question is how to properly handle these characters. Thanks. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: shell scripts that hang around forever
On 27 Jan 2002 at 20:18, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 27), Dan Langille said: > > Folks: have a look at this FreshPorts shell script and let me know if > > there is a better way to do this. > > Apart from maybe using echo instead of forking 'ls', and caching the > list: > > while : ; do > FILES=`echo *` > if [ "$FILES" != "*" ] ; then > for i in $FILES ; do $HOME/scripts/test-freebsd-cvs.sh $i ; done > fi > done > > it looks fine. Good ideas. Thanks. I'll go with that despite my being so proud of even *knowing* about xargs and wanting to use it -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: shell scripts that hang around forever
Thank you Jason. Yes, it would be helpful. And I had wondered if that
was possible. Cheers.
FWIW: I am now testing the script using the ports/sysutils/daemontools
utilities. That seems to be working well so far. I will be writing a
daemontools article for the Diary and will post the URL here for feedback
before I make it public.
On 28 Jan 2002 at 10:14, Jason Andresen wrote:
> Wouldn't the following change be helpful if you always ^C the script to
> stop it?
>
> > #!/bin/sh
> >
> > LOCKFILE=${HOME}/msgs/processing.lock
> > MSGSDIR=${HOME}/msgs/FreeBSD/incoming
>
> cleanup()
> {
> rm -rf ${LOCKFILE}
> exit
> }
>
> trap cleanup sighup sigint sigquit sigill sigabrt sigterm
>
> > lockfile -r 0 $LOCKFILE
> > RESULT=$?
> > #echo result='$RESULT'
> > if [ $RESULT = 0 ]
> > then
> > cd ${MSGSDIR}
> > while .
> > do
> > FILECOUNT=`ls | wc -l`
> >
> > if [ $FILECOUNT -ne 0 ]
> > then
> > ls | xargs -n 1 $HOME/scripts/test-freebsd-cvs.sh
> > fi
> >
> > sleep 1
> > done
> >
> cleanup
> > fi
--
Dan Langille
The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: shell scripts that hang around forever
On 27 Jan 2002 at 20:18, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 27), Dan Langille said: > > Folks: have a look at this FreshPorts shell script and let me know if > > there is a better way to do this. > > Apart from maybe using echo instead of forking 'ls', and caching the > list: > > while : ; do > FILES=`echo *` > if [ "$FILES" != "*" ] ; then > for i in $FILES ; do $HOME/scripts/test-freebsd-cvs.sh $i ; done > fi > done > > it looks fine. Thanks Dan. I'm also looking at ports/sysutils/daemontools for starting and making sure this "service" is always running. See http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
shell scripts that hang around forever
Folks: have a look at this FreshPorts shell script and let me know if
there is a better way to do this.
This script waits for a file to arrive in a directory, then runs a scipt
to process it. It's part of FreshPorts. the procmail script spools the
incoming cvs-all message to a temporary location, then moves it to the
incoming directory.
The lockfile is an attempt to make the script single-entry (only one
instance at a time). If fails because the only way to exit the script is
to terminate it...
At present, this script runs within a screen session (that's the easiest
way to control it). This script is sort of like a daemon, and I'm tempted
to replace it with one. If it was a daemon, I'm sure that would be much
easier.
#!/bin/sh
LOCKFILE=${HOME}/msgs/processing.lock
MSGSDIR=${HOME}/msgs/FreeBSD/incoming
lockfile -r 0 $LOCKFILE
RESULT=$?
#echo result='$RESULT'
if [ $RESULT = 0 ]
then
cd ${MSGSDIR}
while .
do
FILECOUNT=`ls | wc -l`
if [ $FILECOUNT -ne 0 ]
then
ls | xargs -n 1 $HOME/scripts/test-freebsd-cvs.sh
fi
sleep 1
done
rm -rf ${LOCKFILE}
fi
--
Dan Langille
The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
(Fwd) ip_output() does not checksum outer header
I am forwarding this on behalf of Bruce (his DNS is borked and thus he cannot send to the lists). Please don't CC me in the replies, only Bruce. Thanks. --- Forwarded message follows --- Date sent: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:35:38 + From: Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ip_output() does not checksum outer header Dan, if you could forward this on to freebsd-net I would be most grateful. I have completed most of the code to implement GRE as a regular interface driver under 4.4-STABLE using the cloner interface. This has all worked fine in local tests. Tonight, whilst testing with a remote site, we noticed that the encapsulating IP datagram header around the GRE header does not have any header checksum. I have checked, checked and re-checked the m->m_len, m->m_pkthdr.len, m_pullup() results et al and can find nothing out of the ordinary. This is driving me mad right now, can anybody shed any light on the problem? Regards, Bruce. --- End of forwarded message --- -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ld -X <== important or not?
How important is the -X option on ld? -X Delete all temporary local symbols. For most tar- gets, this is all local symbols whose names begin with `L'. I ask because I'm porting something to Solaris and it seems rather odd that the solaris ld doesn't have this option. cheers -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited FreshPorts - http://freshports.org/ - the place for ports To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2.
On 24 Mar 2001, at 19:59, Dennis wrote: > the only thing more annoying the 2 people having a discussion is a third > person telling them to stop. Feel free not to read any more messages in > this thread. Feel free to read the list charter. You two are in a pissing contest unreleated to this list. Please take it elsewhere. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2.
On 24 Mar 2001, at 16:12, Dennis wrote: > And why does all of your email have that stupid attachment? Whats the > matter, cant figure out how to use an open-source mailer? :-) It's called a PGP signature. Could you two kids please take this pissing contest off -hackers? Thanks. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: OP make import?
On 14 Mar 2001, at 13:23, Koster, K.J. wrote: > In the interest of a unified BSD ports tree, is anyone working to integrate > the diffs for the make from openpackages into the FreeBSD codebase? I think people might be waiting for us go get to the point where our work is actually usable. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Solution: Sendmail 8.11.3 on FreeBSD 4.2
On 14 Mar 2001, at 12:05, Greg Black wrote: > "Dan Langille" writes: > > | On 14 Mar 2001, at 11:57, Greg Black wrote: > | > | > "David O'Brien" writes: > | > > | > | Perhaps you should read the documentation we supplied on this issue. > | > | > | > | bash$ cat /usr/src/UPDATING > | > > | > Hmmm... > | > > | > $ uname -rs > | > FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE > | > $ cat /usr/src/UPDATING > | > cat: /usr/src/UPDATING: No such file or directory > | > > | > Perhaps the documentation should be installed more thoroughly. > | > | Perhaps you should install the documentation. > > I chose something that implied documentation on the sysinstall > menu; it didn't install that file. There is more documentation than what sysinstall gives you. The documentation in question is useful for people who are updating their system, say from 4.2-RELEASE to 4.2-STABLE. Hence the name of the file in question. You don't have that file because you don't need it. If you were upgrading to 4.2-STABLE, this file would be installed as part of the cvsup step of your upgrade. If you are still interested in this file, you can obtain the latest version of this file at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/UPDATING?rev =HEAD That's what you want. When I said "the", I meant /usr/src/UPDATING. That's what David O'Brien was referring to. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Solution: Sendmail 8.11.3 on FreeBSD 4.2
On 14 Mar 2001, at 11:57, Greg Black wrote: > "David O'Brien" writes: > > | Perhaps you should read the documentation we supplied on this issue. > | > | bash$ cat /usr/src/UPDATING > > Hmmm... > > $ uname -rs > FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE > $ cat /usr/src/UPDATING > cat: /usr/src/UPDATING: No such file or directory > > Perhaps the documentation should be installed more thoroughly. Perhaps you should install the documentation. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: qmail IO problems
On 16 Feb 2001, at 16:34, Dan Phoenix wrote: > 3 drives in there as of 3 min ago. > just want to take these 3 and raid0 then together as /var. > what was recommendation ccd or venim? > > and has anyone done this before...could walk me through setting these up > quickly maybe? perhaps http://freebsddiary.org/vinum.html -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: syscall kernel modules on 3.0-release
On 7 Feb 2001, at 21:14, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > On 7 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > Matthew Luckie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I completely understand your plea to not use 3.0 release. > > > I am personally using 4.2-stable. Its not my decision to use 3.0 > > > I beleive the computers running 3.0 have been running it for several years > > > now - i.e. it was the latest available at the time. > > > > Well, it was a stupid decision at that time, and the decision not to > > upgrade or replace these machines now is even stupider. Be careful how you criticize. > Hey now, go easy. Lots of stupid decisions are made by "managers" who > don't understand the implications of old(er) technology. > > I've got a 3.2-R machine which I'm forced to maintain, and the only reason > why it's not running 3.2-S or 4.2-S is because I can't take the stupid > thing offline. I've haggled with my boss for a 6 hour window and the > answer is no, no, no. I've even got a 3.2-S installation waiting in > /usr/obj. What about replacing the box with a new box? Smaller window. > The only way I'm going to get my 3.2-R machine upgraded (and the only way > this person is going to get their 3.0-R machine upgraded) is when it > breaks and requires a complete reinstall to become operational. It might pay to send an email to your boss, cc'd to yourself explaining this. I've seen some managers who make decisions such as that and then blame others when the crap hits. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: ping over IPSEC works in only one direction
On 5 Feb 2001, at 17:34, Volker Stolz wrote: > In local.freebsd-hackers, you wrote: > >spdadd 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.101 any -P out ipsec esp/transport//use >ah/transport//use; > >spdadd 192.168.1.101 192.168.1.1 any -P out ipsec esp/transport//use >ah/transport//use; > > I can see no corresponding "... any -P in" rules. Did you forget them only > in the posting? If not, this is likely to be a source of confusion. Thanks. That was the problem. I've been able to get most things working. However, when I involve NAT some things break. I'm not using AH, just ESP. I can get ESP working without NAT and have http, ping, going. No problems. But if I try from an external box, involving NAT, ping works, but not http. Not sure why. A tcpdump shows the incoming ESP requests, but nothing going back out. I'm positive I have the keys correct as ping works and tcpdump shows incoming ping request and outgoing ping replies. Quite odd. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ping over IPSEC works in only one direction
I've been playing with IPSEC between two boxes. ping works as expected until I add in the keys. Then ping only works from one box from not the other. tcpdump reveals all traffic to be ESP. Keys on 19.168.1.1 add 192.168.1.101 192.168.1.1 esp 1100 -E 3des-cbc "bastbastbastbastbastbast"; add 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.101 esp 1101 -E 3des-cbc "settsettsettsettsettsett"; spdadd 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.101 any -P out ipsec esp/transport//use ah/transport//use; Keys on 19.168.1.101 add 192.168.1.101 192.168.1.1 esp 1100 -E 3des-cbc "bastbastbastbastbastbast"; add 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.101 esp 1101 -E 3des-cbc "settsettsettsettsettsett"; spdadd 192.168.1.101 192.168.1.1 any -P out ipsec esp/transport//use ah/transport//use; The following is a ping 192.168.1.1. Similar traffic exists for a ping 192.168.1.101 # tcpdump -i ed0 proto 1 or proto 50 tcpdump: listening on ed0 01:24:34.216930 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.101: ESP(spi=1101,seq=0x2a2) 01:24:34.217994 192.168.1.101 > 192.168.1.1: ESP(spi=1100,seq=0x268) 01:24:35.226859 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.101: ESP(spi=1101,seq=0x2a3) 01:24:35.227924 192.168.1.101 > 192.168.1.1: ESP(spi=1100,seq=0x269) 01:24:36.236814 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.101: ESP(spi=1101,seq=0x2a4) 01:24:36.237896 192.168.1.101 > 192.168.1.1: ESP(spi=1100,seq=0x26a) The above tells me that the traffic is using protocol 50 both ways. However, ping 192.168.1.101 fails like this: PING 192.168.1.101 (192.168.1.101): 56 data bytes ^C --- 192.168.1.101 ping statistics --- 69 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss The packets are being received as reported by ipfilter: # ipfstat -hio 12256 pass out from any to any 21 pass out quick proto esp from any to any 11995 pass in from any to any 21 pass in quick proto esp from any to any clues please! thanks -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: An example script for creating a bootable floppy
On 3 Feb 2001, at 19:27, Dima Dorfman wrote: > After a brief inspection of the code, I think adding a 'vga' device > will help: > > device vga0at isa? Yep. That compiles now. Thank you. But it's: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1321263 Feb 4 16:33 kernel Which makes it a pretty full disk... # df /mnt Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on /dev/fd0c13594 1287 0%/mnt After the copy: # df /mnt Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on /dev/fd0c1359 1300 -8 101%/mnt I get a root mount failed, then a panic, but at least it's a kernel. If I make any more progress, I'll le you know. Thanks. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: An example script for creating a bootable floppy
On 3 Feb 2001, at 18:02, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmiss > > ing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ans > > i -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -D_KERNEL -include > > opt_global.h -elf -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 ../../kern/kern_sig.c > > ../../kern/kern_sig.c:359: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype > > ../../kern/kern_sig.c: In function `osigaction': > > ../../kern/kern_sig.c:367: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > > Wild guess: try sticking ``options COMPAT_43'' in the config file. > This smells of missing 4.3BSD compatibility structures or something. That got me quite a bit further. Any ideas about this one please? It's the keyboard isn't it? From LINT, I added these: # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 flags 0x1 device psm0at atkbdc? irq 12 cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat- extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -D_KERNEL - include opt_global.h -elf -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 vers.c linking kernel kbd.o: In function `kbd_register': kbd.o(.text+0x2f6): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set' kbd.o(.text+0x2fd): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set' etc... After that change, I encounted this: cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat- extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -D_KERNEL - include opt_global.h -elf -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 vers.c linking kernel scvidctl.o: In function `sc_set_text_mode': scvidctl.o(.text+0x19): undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o: In function `sc_set_graphics_mode': scvidctl.o(.text+0x26a): undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o: In function `sc_vid_ioctl': scvidctl.o(.text+0x77f): undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0x7a3): undefined reference to `vidsw' scvidctl.o(.text+0x7bc): undefined reference to `vid_get_adapter' scvidctl.o(.text+0x822): undefined reference to `vid_get_adapter' ..etc. thanks -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
An example script for creating a bootable floppy
At http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/backup-programs.html, there is a script for creating a bootable floppy. Part of this script is the MINI kernel. The example is out of date and doesn't work under 4.2. I've included my amended mini-kernel when trying to convert it to 4.2- stable. But it fails to compile (the error is at the end of this message). Given the increase in kernel size since this document was created, is it still possible to create a single floppy kernel + tools which is bootable? If so, could someone please advise me on how to correct the error below. If not, I'll submit a patch removing this section from the handbook. thanks. # # MINI -- A kernel to get FreeBSD on onto a disk. # machine "i386" cpu "I486_CPU" ident MINI maxusers5 options INET# needed for _tcp _icmpstat _ipstat #_udpstat _tcpstat _udb options FFS #Berkeley Fast File System options FAT_CURSOR #block cursor in syscons or pccons options SCSI_DELAY=1500 #Be pessimistic about Joe SCSI device options MAXCONS=2 # number of virtual consoles options USERCONFIG #Allow user configuration with -c XXX #config kernel root on da0 swap on da0 and da1 dumps on da0 device isa0 device pci0 device fdc0at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 device ncr0 device scbus0 device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100 device npx0at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 device da0 device da1 device da2 device sa0 pseudo-device loop# required by INET pseudo-device gzip# Exec gzipped a.out' cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 ../../kern/kern_sig.c ../../kern/kern_sig.c:359: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ../../kern/kern_sig.c: In function `osigaction': ../../kern/kern_sig.c:367: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ../../kern/kern_sig.c:367: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ../../kern/kern_sig.c:369: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ../../kern/kern_sig.c:370: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ../../kern/kern_sig.c:372: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ../../kern/kern_sig.c:379: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ../../kern/kern_sig.c:384: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ../../kern/kern_sig.c: At top level: ../../kern/kern_sig.c:532: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ../../kern/kern_sig.c: In function `osigprocmask': ../../kern/kern_sig.c:538: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ../../kern/kern_sig.c:539: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ../../kern/kern_sig.c: At top level: ../../kern/kern_sig.c:567: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ../../kern/kern_sig.c:721: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ../../kern/kern_sig.c: In function `osigsuspend': ../../kern/kern_sig.c:729: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type *** Error code 1 -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
I had to give up on that disk. I bought a new 10GB IDE to replace it (it's going to be vastly under-filled). I still have the disk, so if anyone wants to follow this up, it is still intact. On 2 Feb 2001, at 5:21, Dan Langille wrote: > I recently upgraded a box from 4.1-stable to 4.2-stable. An NFS mount was > used for the install world and install kernel. During the kernel install > the box panic'd (sorry, didn't see the message). Upon boot, the box give > these messages: > > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > /: bad dir ino 2 at offset 0: mangled entry > panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir > > syncing disks 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1..etc > giving up on 1 buffers > > > I did an fsck on the disk by moving it to another box. The above messages > appeared both before and after the fsck. > > Clues please! -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Trailing slashes and rmdir - POLA broken
On 4 Feb 2001, at 6:58, Greg Black wrote: > Of course it works. The part you quoted was the introduction > and was as it "should" be. You cut out the part with the actual > question. I'll repeat it here: Serves me right for trying to help after a 22 hour work stint and getting up after 4 hours of sleep -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Trailing slashes and rmdir - POLA broken
On 4 Feb 2001, at 6:46, Greg Black wrote: > Observe the following: > > $ uname -rs > FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE > $ ls -l > $ mkdir foo > $ ln -s foo bar > $ rmdir bar > rmdir: bar: Not a directory I'm quite sure that rm bar will work. Have you tried rmdir ./bar? -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://unixathome.org/finger.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
James writes: > You might also wanna try installing the same /kernel and /modules that you > were when it panic'd, while you have the drive mounted on another box. That's a point. I'll try that now. BTW: Someone sent me this: http://freebsd.sinica.edu.tw/pipermail/freebsd-taiwan-questions/2000-Novembe r/66.html But I can't read that langauge... To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
James writes: > What part of the kernel install did it panic on? (if you even saw that > part) Sorry, I forgot to mention that. Here is what was left on my remote screen after the panic: root@ducky:/usr/src/sys/compile/DUCKY] # make install chflags noschg /kernel mv /kernel /kernel.old install -c -m 555 -o root -g wheel -fschg kernel /kernel if [ -d /modules -a -n "`ls /modules`" ]; then mkdir -p /modules.old; cp -p /modules/* /modules.old; fi; > Have you tried booting the previous kernel? I'm not sure if it'll > even boot... but, you might want to try that. I tried the old kernel, but it failed to get past the probing. I can't remember the messages, but it was something like "isa_?? cannot get ports for le.. cannot get irq for le". > You might also wanna try installing the same /kernel and /modules that you > were when it panic'd, while you have the drive mounted on another box. There is no /kernel.old any more. I have installed the new 4.2 kernel when the drive was mounted in another box. Its that kernel which produce the messages below. Thanks. > Dan Langille writes: > >> I recently upgraded a box from 4.1-stable to 4.2-stable. An NFS mount was >> used for the install world and install kernel. During the kernel install >> the box panic'd (sorry, didn't see the message). Upon boot, the box give >> these messages: >> >> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a >> /: bad dir ino 2 at offset 0: mangled entry >> panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir >> >> syncing disks 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1..etc >> giving up on 1 buffers >> >> >> I did an fsck on the disk by moving it to another box. The above messages >> appeared both before and after the fsck. >> >> Clues please! >> >> -- >> Dan Langille - novice in training >> [my thanks to evilcode.com for the emergency email access] >> >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > -- Dan Langille - novice in training To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
After a suggestion offlist, here's the additional information from a boot -v: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ad0s1: type 0xa5, start 63, end = 2503871, size 2503809 : OK /: bad dir ino 2 at offset 0: mangled entry panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir syncing disks 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1..etc giving up on 1 buffers thanks folks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
