[Fwd: VIRUS IN MAIL FOR YOU (from ) ()]
-- Ted Sikora [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://unixos2.org --- Begin Message --- V I R U S A L E R T Our virus checker found the virus in an email to you from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery of the email was stopped! Please contact your system administrator for details. Replies to this notification message will be discarded. For your reference, here are headers from the email: - BEGIN HEADERS - Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1214B55802; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 05:32:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id 7299E37B403; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 05:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2702D2E8023; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 05:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Sun, 23 Jun 2002 05:32:38 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from excalibur.skynet.be (excalibur.skynet.be [195.238.3.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC07737B401 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 05:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.compaqnet.be (free19276.powered-by.skynet.be [62.4.203.76]) by excalibur.skynet.be (8.11.6/8.11.6/Skynet-OUT-2.19) with SMTP id g5NCTF815593; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:29:15 +0200 (MET DST) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:29:15 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: De Brabandere Jean-Luc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SUBJECT: Die zich bevinden in mijn effectendossier. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_00C9_01F9F3D5.CDF3D510" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: undisclosed-recipients: ; Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-ID: List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive) List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help> (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers> X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk -- END HEADERS -- --- End Message ---
Multilink DSL
Anyone know how or a link for setting up MP 'multilink' PPPoe DSL on FreeBSD. I have PPPoe on FreeBSD-STABLE with 2 cards and DSL lines. How can I connect the second modem on dc1 and join the packets to dc0? -- Ted Sikora [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
wu-ftpd
Does anyone know how to set simultaneous downloads for users to 2 in /etc/ftpaccess for wu-ftpd? -- Ted Sikora [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.unixos2.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
/tmp on a ramdisk?
A while ago several people suggested using /tmp on a ramdisk along with softupdates. Right now I am running several production servers with 4.1-STABLE with softupdates. I'm really happy with the performance. What benefits would I realize using /tmp on a ramdisk? Regards, -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Motif paging
It's been a while since I used mwm. I installed the OpenMotif Metrolink
binaries and have mwm running. It's just as solid as I remember it. One
problem I cannot get paging to work. On an old system I used to use the
following worked for paging:
.Xdefaults
---
Mwm*windowMenu: MyWindowMenu
Mwm*bitmapDirectory:/usr/X11R6/include/X11/icons
!*** panning stuff *
! setup toggle_pinstate menu entry...
! NOTE - these pixmaps require fully qualified path names...
! see sample.mwmrc file for compete definition.
Mwm*pinStateLabelType: PIXMAP
Mwm*pinnedPixmap: pinned
Mwm*unpinnedPixmap: unpinned
! setup which clients and icons are pinned
Mwm*Mwm.clientPinned: True
Mwm*iconPinned:True
Mwm*xclock.clientPinned: True
! Setup the panning menu
Mwm*GotoMenuColor*packing: PACK_COLUMN
Mwm*GotoMenuColor*orientation: HORIZONTAL
Mwm*GotoMenuColor*alignment: ALIGNMENT_CENTER
! This stops all windows from being repositioned on-screen
! after a restart.
Mwm*positionOnScreen: False
.mwmrc
# Menu for hopping to different locations on the virtual desktop.
# The images should be kept in the location specified by
# the "Mwm*bitmapDirectory:" resource.
# See sample images in the images directory. The following
# image references refer to bitmaps and pixmaps contained in
# the examples/images/ directory.
Menu GotoMenuColor
{
link f.goto 0,0
mail f.goto 0,2000
book.2 f.goto 0,4000
knifef.goto 0,6000
plugin f.goto 0,8000
}
# Default Window Menu Description
Menu MyWindowMenu
{
@pinned f.toggle_pin_state
Restore _R AltF5 f.normalize
Move_M AltF7 f.move
Size_S AltF8 f.resize
Minimize_n AltF9 f.minimize
Maximize_x AltF10 f.maximize
Refresh _f AltF2 f.refresh_win
Lower _L AltF3 f.lower
no-labelf.separator
Close _C AltF4 f.kill
}
#
# key binding descriptions
#
Keys DefaultKeyBindings
{
ShiftEscapewindow|icon f.post_wmenu
Metaspace window|icon f.post_wmenu
MetaTabroot|icon|windowf.next_key
Meta ShiftTab root|icon|windowf.prev_key
MetaEscape root|icon|windowf.circle_up
Meta ShiftEscape root|icon|windowf.circle_down
Meta Shift Ctrlexclam root|icon|windowf.set_behavior
MetaF6 window f.next_key transient
Meta ShiftF6 window f.prev_key transient
F4 iconf.post_wmenu
Meta ShiftDelete root|icon|windowf.restart
AltF10 root|window|iconf.post_rmenu
CtrlEscape root|window|iconf.normalize_and_raise_iconbox
MetaUp window|root|iconf.pan 0,-100,1
MetaDown window|root|iconf.pan 0,100,1
MetaLeft window|root|iconf.pan -100,0,1
MetaRight window|root|iconf.pan 100,0,1
}
#
# button binding descriptions
#
Buttons DefaultButtonBindings
{
frame|icon f.raise
frame|icon f.lower
rootf.menu Clients
rootf.menu GotoMenuColor
rootf.menu Control
Meta window|icon f.move
Meta window|icon f.resize
Meta Shiftwindow|icon f.minimize
Meta Shiftwindow|icon f.focus_color
Meta Shiftwindow|icon f.post_wmenu
Meta rootf.track_pan
Meta rootf.track_pan
}
Can anyone help me with this or direct me to a place with the info?
Regards,
--
Ted Sikora
Jtl Development Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
StarOffice source to be released.
I received the following from SUN Microsystems: ---Susan Grabau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks for your note. Here's a bit of an update. We are planning on making the StarOffice source code available in the next few months. This will enable OS/2 users and organizations to migrate later versions of StarOffice to OS/2. Of course this strategy will also enable interested parties to deploy StarOffice on any operating system platform not supported by Sun. Best regards, Susan Grabau ---Susan Grabau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Regards, -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
4.0-STABLE?
I wanted to upgrade several production servers to 4.0 and follow the stable branch. Has 4.0-STABLE been established yet or is stable still RELENG_3? I planned on installing 4.0-RELEASE and then using CVSup with RELENG_4. -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: 5.0 features?
root wrote: > > "Pedro F. Giffuni" wrote: > > > > FWIW, > > > > I downloaded the BSDI 4.1 Release notes and I was surprised by the > > quality of the document. It goes through the basics of installing and > > configuring BSDI. > It is nice. I use it in our webhosting servers. Hi-Performance in my > book. > > > > I think the priority will be getting BSDI binaries running on FreeBSD, > > so I would expect: > > > > -New tools to complement binutils (they also use egcs), no idea if the > > use that nasty ldconfig. > > -Many changes to libc. > > -Native ports of their packaging tools. > > -Ability to mount their disks? > > > > Any idea if BSDI has a unified VM? They carry ISODE and several > > unsupported goodies like LFS, the OSI stack, X25... Their floppy driver > > also supports 2.8 M floppies, which I recall don't work on FreeBSD. > > > > Towards the future I would expect: > > -More SMP stuff (and more threading) > > -New Platforms: SPARC, PowerPC, StrongARM. > > -Clustering: probably MOSIX. > > > > I am not sure if BSDI has a Motif source license, but this is something > > I would prefer to buy from them in a future. In fact, now that there is > > a big company to deal with, I would expect many more commercial products > > available. > Same here. I still prefer Motif. > > How about Java support? Sun is releasing some nice tools to OpenSource > like Forge, etc. At one point I found FreeBSD > better suited than Linux for java development but that has > changed with 1.2's release. Too bad we couldn't conjur up some more > interest here. Sun uses it in some cool ways. No reason we couldn't. The > new generation of Java apps are starting to look > and run pretty good. > > > > > I really don't see what can be negative in this merger (in fact that > > discussion is finally dying in -chat so please redirect new arguments > > there :). IMHO, BSDI will probably end up being a FreeBSD with POSIX and > > C2 certifications, and excellent support...I'm sure big companies like > > Yahoo wouldn't care to pay some bucks for the extra support. > > > Future looks bright indeed! I was so preoccupied listening to everyone > bitching I forgot about all the nice things to come. > > > (And BTW. if people are really worried about drivers perhaps it's time > > for them to really look at the UDI project.) > > If anyone's interested RealPlayer7 just came out today. It's works excellent under Linux Emulation. Includes most of the features of the Win/Mac versions and has a working plugin. I just installed it under (ahem!)5.0-current with Netscape-4.72. I know some of you will scoff(at linux emulation) but hey It's cool. All work and no play -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
5.0 features?
Excerpt from Slashdot interview: David Greenman and Mike Karels will be working together as co-architects for the new system. As features are merged in, they will be available for download at www.freebsd.org, and on "snapshot" CDROMs. The completely merged system will be released as FreeBSD 5.0. What kind of features and additions can we expect from the merged systems in 5.0? It looks as though this has been in the works for sometime. I think I read somewhere that SMP support would be much improved? Regards, -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
FreeBSD CD Distribution
Will WC continue to sell FreeBSD packaged sets or will BSDI or a new vendor take that over? -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Is FreeBSD dead ?
David Greenman wrote: > > >>I fail to see how you can read anything bad into this announcement. If > >>you're really concerned, you have just as much right to the code as any > >>one else, feel free to take the 4.0 code base and create your own system. > >>BSDidier has a nice ring to it. > >> > >>Personally, I've been running FreeBSD since 1.0, and I'll be sticking > >>with it for quite some time to come. > > > >Ever read Animal Farm? Remember that BSD/OS started out as "cheap with > >source" and grew into "just another OS company". Good ideas can turn bad > >very quickly. > >The is all just FUD. From the FreeBSD side of things, BSDI is going to > opensource a bunch of their software that we can then integrate into FreeBSD. > We're still very much in control of the FreeBSD development effort and what > fundamentally comprises FreeBSD. In fact nothing really changes as far as > the FreeBSD Project is concerned - it's the same core team, the same > developers, and the same BSD-license source code. It's just as "free" as ever, > and nothing is going to change that. BSDI may decide not to make all of their > BSD/OS open-sourced, but that's their decision and that will in no way > deminish what we have in FreeBSD today. >As others have said, this is a win for everyone and will result in FreeBSD > being a much better open-source OS in the future. I really hope that people > will go and read the various press releases and look at this in an objective > and rational frame of mind. If you do, then there is only one conclusion that > you can get from the facts: This is a great thing for FreeBSD and our future > couldn't be brighter. I am sure of the FreeBSD Projects intentions but like the previous post things can 'turn ugly fast with the greatest intentions' The fact a for-profit company controlling it's movements is cause for concern. (mozilla comes to mind) I use BSDI and love their products but what happens when it continues to stagnate. I see this as a way to boost their own flagship product only? at FreeBSD's expense. I may be wrong but already I see my other favorite OS Slackware teetering on the edge of obscurity. I wish them the best. Regards, -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Temperature
Mike Smith wrote: > > > Marc Nicholas wrote: > > > > > > You're referring to the temps reported via an LM78 or similar, yes? > > The machines bios with Winbond W83782d IC > > > > > not reporting that the machine is actually getting HOTTER under FreeBSD? > > > > It is HOTTER under FreeBSD. Immediatelly upon boot-up it's 26F > > hotter under FreeBSD than under Linux. > > That's fairly hard to believe, unless your system has zero thermal > inertia. I'd have an easier time suggesting that your reporting software > has been broken. I'm also curious as to how you're talking to the BIOS > to obtain these temperature values. > I'm really starting to get irritaed with all these posts. I'm trying to report a potential problem and your treating me like I'm some yokel. I have been a computer engineer for 28 years so I think I have a little experience in this. Well here's some data: FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE #0: Thu Sep 16 23:40:35 GMT 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC (lmmon -i reports) Motherboard Temp Voltages 32C / 89F / 305K Vcore1: +2.016V Vcore2: +1.469V Fan Speeds + 3.3V: +3.234V + 5.0V: +4.932V 1:0 rpm +12.0V: +12.625V 2:0 rpm -12.0V: -2.438V 3:0 rpm - 5.0V: -1.383V System Winbond chip in system bios reports: 87F CPU#0 87F CPU#1 89F CASE TEMP - FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #0: Tue Dec 28 19:28:10 EST 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/TELECAST (lmmon -i reports) Motherboard Temp Voltages 41C / 105F / 314K Vcore1: +2.016V Vcore2: +1.484V Fan Speeds + 3.3V: +3.250V + 5.0V: +4.932V 1:0 rpm +12.0V: +12.625V 2:0 rpm -12.0V: -2.375V 3:0 rpm - 5.0V: -1.383V System Winbond chip in system bios reports: 113F CPU#0 113F CPU#1 105F CASE TEMP These are both taken right after bootup with X started and WindowMaker running. No other apps running. Regards, -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Temperature
Marc Nicholas wrote: > > You're referring to the temps reported via an LM78 or similar, yes? The machines bios with Winbond W83782d IC > not reporting that the machine is actually getting HOTTER under FreeBSD? It is HOTTER under FreeBSD. Immediatelly upon boot-up it's 26F hotter under FreeBSD than under Linux. Sometime after 3.4-RC and now this started. (I follow the stable branch via CVSup) Under 3.3-STABLE the temerature was always the same as Linux...cool averaging 89F for the CPU's. Now it's over 113F under FreeBSD only. I know it's wierd but the machine does not lie. Under Linux it's the same as before 87-89F. > > On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Ted Sikora wrote: > > > Here's a strange problem. I run Linux stable/development kernels > > and FreeBSD-3-STABLE on a SMP dual-boot workstation. The machines > > temperatures have always been in this range with either system: > > > > 87F CPU #0 > > 87F CPU #1 > > 95F Case Temp > > > > Sometime last week or early this week the temperature under FreeBSD only > > has changed to: > > > > 113F CPU #0 > > 113F CPU #1 > > 109F Case Temp > > This is right after boot and varies 3-4 Degrees + while running. > > > > During the night periodically my temp warning has been going off. > > I have it set to 118F. This happens only under FreeBSD. Linux continues > > to run cool at the old temperatures. Apparantly some code change has > > caused this. Does anyone know exactly where I should look? -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: Temperature
Kent Stewart wrote: > > David Kelly wrote: > > > > Peter Wemm writes: > > > Ted Sikora wrote: > > > > > > > During the night periodically my temp warning has been going off. > > > > I have it set to 118F. This happens only under FreeBSD. Linux continues > > > > to run cool at the old temperatures. Apparantly some code change has > > > > caused this. Does anyone know exactly where I should look? > > > > > > The main difference is that Linux halts the cpu in the idle loop, we don't. > > > As a result the cpu is in a tight spin waiting for a process to become > > > scheduleable. I have some patches half-done that I've been working on for > > > 4.0 that should probably be able to be adapted to the 3.x series. > > > > I'll let others debate whether or not FreeBSD halts the CPU when idle > > or not, or whether this has changed recently. > > > > OTOH Ted has a problem that is being ignored: that his CPU/Heatsink/Fan > > combination is apparently not up to a 100% duty cycle. DOS would cook > > it. As would most games. Or several "make buildworlds" in a row. No this is right after bootup. It started right after I did a make world around Christmas or coinciding with 3.4-STABLE. It runs 26 degrees hotter right from the get go. Linux still runs cool like always. FreeBSD used to be exactly the same. I have a SMP board with 2 CPU's. > > Antec and Startech have some dual fans for P-II's. The old P-II style > is hard to find but the K-7 Athalon apparently uses the same style of > fan. One of the vendors has a monster fan for a P-III. > > I run setiathome in the background on all of my computers, which keeps > the systems at 100% all of the time. I had a new 250W PS go out in > three days. The fans that come on P-II OEM's is not that great. > > It also sounds like he isn't getting enough outside air. You can't > cool if the inside air is hot. It runs at 87F on both CPU's and a 95F case temp under Linux regardless of load maybe varies 3-4 degrees +-. It's extremely cool. FreeBSD was just like that till I did a makeworld right around or after Christmas then this started. FreeBSD runs 26F degrees hotter right after bootup with nothing. Booting back to Linux it reverts back to the old temps...cool. It's just FreeBSD. Regards, -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Temperature
Here's a strange problem. I run Linux stable/development kernels and FreeBSD-3-STABLE on a SMP dual-boot workstation. The machines temperatures have always been in this range with either system: 87F CPU #0 87F CPU #1 95F Case Temp Sometime last week or early this week the temperature under FreeBSD only has changed to: 113F CPU #0 113F CPU #1 109F Case Temp This is right after boot and varies 3-4 Degrees + while running. During the night periodically my temp warning has been going off. I have it set to 118F. This happens only under FreeBSD. Linux continues to run cool at the old temperatures. Apparantly some code change has caused this. Does anyone know exactly where I should look? Regards, -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
