FreeBSD Test-Bugathon.... check
Following the example of our friends from NetBSD. We organized this week-end what they called a Bugathon. Basically, people gather on an IRC channel and discuss about some Problem Reports they either sent or are interested in. This is a great opportunity to get things done faster and get in touch with committers. The Bugathon was only announced on -ports because we weren't sure to get enough src committers, mainly because of the very short notice (it was decided on friday evening CET). Anyway, the result of the Test-Bugathon is that around 140 PRs have been closed (kern:8, bin:2, ports:~100, i386:1, docs:7, www:4, usb:14, conf:4, amd64:1). I'd like to thank all the committers and participants who came, it was a lot of fun. The test has proven its point so we'll definitely make new bugathons in the near future. We haven't settled on a date yet, but an announcement will be made once the date will be decided, at least two weeks before the event. In the meantime, don't hesitate to come to the IRC channel #freebsd-bugbusters on EFNET or subscribe to the freebsd-bugbusters mailing list. Have fun fixing bugs! -- Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current unassigned ports problem reports
Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has been submitted, no sanity checking performed. a - analyzed The problem is understood and a solution is being sought. f - feedback Further work requires additional information from the originator or the community - possibly confirmation of the effectiveness of a proposed solution. p - patched A patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or confirmation from originator) are still open. r - repocopy The resolution of the problem report is dependent on a repocopy operation within the CVS repository which is awaiting completion. s - suspended The problem is not being worked on, due to lack of information or resources. This is a prime candidate for somebody who is looking for a project to do. If the problem cannot be solved at all, it will be closed, rather than suspended. c - closed A problem report is closed when any changes have been integrated, documented, and tested -- or when fixing the problem is abandoned. Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description s ports/52079 vmware3 hangs when nmdm(4) is used as COM1 device f ports/90399 vmware2 port not working on FreeBSD 6.0 f ports/92706 vmware3 panic on 6.0-RELEASE o ports/94044 emulators/vmware2: running $PREFIX/etc/rc.d/vmware.sh o ports/94894 multimedia/fxtv causes freeze and reboot on DGA failur f ports/95081 Problem with enabling logwtmp on POPtop o ports/99286 ruby-ldap broken on amd64 s ports/99623 ksh93 dumps core on FBSD 6.1 o ports/100024Port mail/drac coredumps on runtime if compiled for ex o ports/100358sysutils/portmanager: OpenOffice.org 2.0 Requires Conf o ports/102427Apache 2.0.59 with www/mod_python3 core dumped f ports/103367pglogd fails to start f ports/103584ports/security/op don't work on amd64 system f ports/103672cups-base wont compile/nor is it capable of being port o ports/103673port net/nbd-server broken as of 2.8.6 f ports/103970print/cups-base will not install o ports/104122Re: ports/104117: When building GIMP using ports it cr o ports/104205gnome nautilus cpu usage jumps to 100% 18 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description s ports/57502 ports that define USE_* too late s ports/59254 ports that write something after bsd.port.mk s ports/65794 net/ripetools is obsolete s ports/67815 graphics/ImageMagick no longer recognizes FlashPix s ports/84819 [MAINTAINER] math/coq: enable on ia64 s ports/86401 new ports multimedia/zapping s ports/88900 www/flashplugin-mozilla causes Firefox to crash o ports/92651 graphics/gmt - WITH_EVERYTHING doesn't fetch f ports/94000 request: fork of security/srm with updated features o ports/94074 [NEW PORTS] x11-toolkits/ruby-qt3, x11-toolkits/kde3: f ports/95279 (New Port) FreeBPX: a web gui to the asterisk PBX s ports/96576 R 2.3.0 fails to compile: undefined reference to `R_ru s ports/96731 textproc/docbook-utils doesn`t build f ports/96891 [patch] port dns/powerdns does not have option for com f ports/98364 [PATCH] net-mgmt/nagios-plugins: add several contrib c f ports/98639 [PATCH] japanese/ja-edict-utf-8: update to 20060608, u f ports/99553 cannot use proxy in net-im/gaim-openq f ports/100650audio/moc dumps core when detach/quit f ports/100789net-p2p/verlihub-plugins: compile failure o ports/101340x11/gdm: Vidcontrol Causes Video Corruption In GDM o ports/101450multimedia/transcode: tcprobe broken for devfs o ports/101680mail/poppassd: update of passwd prompts for pam_passwd o ports/102993New port: java/eclipse32 New port of Eclipse IDE versi o ports/103168isc-dhcpd.sh jail options break stop and status comman o ports/103257Missing directory prevents Nepenthes from running out- f ports/103355[patch] Broken FlickrExport plugin from graphics/kipi- o ports/103395gnome-ssh-askpass interferes with gnome-screensaver f ports/103444[PATCH] java/classpath: update to 0.92 f ports/103813www/p5-Apache-DBI: fix package dependenies when WITH_M f ports/104033nagios
Xorg and marcusmerge like script
Hi, I'd like to test the new xorg ports for Xorg 7.1, is there any scripts available like marcusmercge (for gnome) to test it ? It would easier my life to have one. Thanks. Bapt ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xorg and marcusmerge like script
2006/10/9, Baptiste Daroussin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I'd like to test the new xorg ports for Xorg 7.1, is there any scripts available like marcusmercge (for gnome) to test it ? It would easier my life to have one. I don't know of such a script, but what I did was: 1. Check out the git repository: # cd /usr # git clone http://git.xbsd.org/projects/xorg-exp.git xorg-modular-exp 2. Find differences: do ls m-i for each directory i in /usr/xorg-modular-exp/ do ls d-i for each corresponding directory i in /usr/ports/ 3. Merge-copy the modular tree into the main ports tree using the attached script. 4. Uninstall the old xorg 5. Install the new xorg: # cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg-complete # make install clean To update: 1. Update the tree: # cd /usr/xorg-modular-exp # git pull Perform step 2 and 3 as above. 4. Something like portmaster -a HTH, Regards. Rene -- GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) It won't fit on the line. -- me, 2001 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
portupgrade -varR
Hi all, New to your list, so please forgive if I'm not doing this right, in which case please show me the way :) I have this issue when running portupgrade; /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -varR --- Session started at: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:12:24 +0100 [Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... [Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument: Cannot update the pkgdb!]: Cannot update the pkgdb!] Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -aFQ --- Session ended at: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:12:26 +0100 (consumed 00:00:01) I'm pretty new to using Portupgrade, and need some help with this. No idea what this means or how to fix it. Any pointers would be much appreciated! Thanks, Wernher ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
python 2.4
So is python-2.4.3_2 (just committed) STILL vulnerable? It won't let me upgrade from python-2.4.3 # make === python-2.4.3 has known vulnerabilities: = python -- buffer overrun in repr() for unicode strings. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/fe83eb5b-55e1-11db-a5ae-00508d6a62df.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/python. -- Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.' Mark D. Foster, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mark.foster.cc/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade -varR
On 10/9/06, Wernher Eksteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, New to your list, so please forgive if I'm not doing this right, in which case please show me the way :) I have this issue when running portupgrade; /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -varR --- Session started at: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:12:24 +0100 [Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... [Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument: Cannot update the pkgdb!]: Cannot update the pkgdb!] Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -aFQ --- Session ended at: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:12:26 +0100 (consumed 00:00:01) I'm pretty new to using Portupgrade, and need some help with this. No idea what this means or how to fix it. Any pointers would be much appreciated! Wernher, For general questions you should send emails to the freebsd-questions list. Regarding your question, I believe the problem is that you recently upgraded your Berkeley DB and/or portupgrade and now your version of portupgrade is incompatible with the previous database. I had this problem a while back and if I remember correctly you have to delete your previous portupgrade database and running it afterwards will just create a new one. However, I don't remember how I did this so I would suggest mailing the questions list as I'm sure someone there will have the answer. -David -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# fortune Happiness is just an illusion, filled with sadness and confusion. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pkgtools.status-pkg.sh
Hello, I'm wondering what is the purpose of /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.status-pkg.sh and why it is where it is.. ? Cheers, Martin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pear.php bug
http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=8782 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@FreeBSD.orgsubject=FreeBSD%20Port:%20pear-Net_Socket-1.0.6 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ports with version numbers going backwards: lang/python
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one ** For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time. Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Conventions' for more information. Tools that won't work include pkg_version, portupgrade and portaudit. A common error is an accidental deletion of PORTEPOCH. Please fix any errors as soon as possible. - *lang/python* [EMAIL PROTECTED]: python-2.4.3 python-2.4.3_1 | revision 1.154 | date: 2006/10/09 14:29:15; author: perky; state: Exp; lines: +12 -193 | - Update the main python version to 2.5. | - Now, lang/python is just a meta-port which depends on lang/python25. | - And all versions of Python ports have short version identifier in its | package name; python25-2.5, python24-2.4.3 and etc. | - Also you must upgrade all python modules after lang/python updated, | cd /usr/ports/lang/python make upgrade-site-packages | | - Give maintainership of Python ports to the new python@ group which | includes me, alexbl@ and others. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ethereal no longer in ports
I need to install Ethereal but it is no longer located in ports. A search of the online ports collection also had no results. What happened to Ethereal? I'm using FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethereal no longer in ports
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 04:29:09PM -0400, Grant Horning wrote: I need to install Ethereal but it is no longer located in ports. A search of the online ports collection also had no results. What happened to Ethereal? I'm using FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6. See /usr/ports/MOVED or consult google. Kris pgp4equa2uWed.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ethereal no longer in ports
Grant Horning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I need to install Ethereal but it is no longer located in ports. A search of the online ports collection also had no results. What happened to Ethereal? I'm using FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6. # grep ethereal /usr/ports/* /usr/ports/MOVED:net/ethereal|net/wireshark|2006-07-17|Project name has changed /usr/ports/MOVED:net/ethereal-lite|net/wireshark-lite|2006-07-17|Project name has changed /usr/ports/MOVED:net/tethereal|net/tshark|2006-07-17|Project name has changed /usr/ports/MOVED:net/tethereal-lite|net/tshark-lite|2006-07-17|Project name has changed # ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ethereal no longer in ports
Grant Horning writes: I need to install Ethereal but it is no longer located in ports. A search of the online ports collection also had no results. What happened to Ethereal? I'm using FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6. garyj:peedub:freebsd:-bash:50 grep ethereal /usr/ports/MOVED net/ethereal|net/wireshark|2006-07-17|Project name has changed net/ethereal-lite|net/wireshark-lite|2006-07-17|Project name has changed net/tethereal|net/tshark|2006-07-17|Project name has changed net/tethereal-lite|net/tshark-lite|2006-07-17|Project name has changed --- Gary Jennejohn / garyjATjennejohnDOTorg gjATfreebsdDOTorg garyjATdenxDOTde ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with devel/tcllib
I'm working on a new port that requires tcllib (among other things) as a RUN_DEPENDS. I discovered that tcllib does not uninstall /usr/local/bin/dtplite when the port is uninstalled. (In fact it doesn't uninstall any of the three binaries that it installs.) Therefore my port thinks tcllib is installed when it's not. I'm submitting a PR to fix that problem, but there's another problem that keeps the port from building, and I don't know how to fix that one. During post-build, the port runs a series of tests. Those tests fail. So the port will not install. I can work around the problem by commenting out post-build, but this obviously needs to be fixed. Stop in /usr/ports/devel/tcllib/work/tcllib-1.9. + /bin/cat /usr/ports/devel/tcllib/work/tcllib-1.9/testlog.failures [8.4.13] fileutil~~ FAILS T 314 P 285 S 2 F27 [8.4.13] tie ~~ FAILS T 223 P 105 S 4 F 114 + false *** Error code 1 The port maintainer was cc'd on this message and also on the PR for the pkg-plist patch. Stop in /usr/ports/devel/tcllib. Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Re: python 2.4
Jose Alonso Cardenas Marquez wrote: The lang/python port was updated, please update your port tree and try again. you don't forget to read of ports/UPDATING note. Regarding the recent python changes... UPDATING states: After upgrading of lang/python, you must rebuild all its consumer ports to make them get ready to Python 2.5. To do this, you will need to: pkgdb -uf cd /usr/ports/lang/python make upgrade-site-packages Please correct me if I'm wrong, but don't these instructions rely on pkgdb which is a component of portupgrade which I do not use. # pkgdb -uf cd /usr/ports/lang/python make upgrade-site-packages pkgdb: Command not found. So must I install portupgrade? Or should I just ignore the error run make upgrade-site-packages ? -- Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.' Mark D. Foster, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mark.foster.cc/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the attention of Conrad J. Sabatier - you e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] is bouncing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. As your e-mail address is currently bouncing I have temporarily taken the maintainership of your recently added ports shells/ch. Please tell me the e-mail address you want me to set as MAINTAINER. Best Regards, Ale -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFKsX4iV05EpRcP2ERArE6AKC/gx5vErx+SG2D6ii726GUlgKDfgCgjhn/ Sfad3GYIMPdOPNTA6RsL6Oc= =EY2u -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: python 2.4
Mark Foster wrote: Jose Alonso Cardenas Marquez wrote: The lang/python port was updated, please update your port tree and try again. you don't forget to read of ports/UPDATING note. Regarding the recent python changes... UPDATING states: After upgrading of lang/python, you must rebuild all its consumer ports to make them get ready to Python 2.5. To do this, you will need to: pkgdb -uf cd /usr/ports/lang/python make upgrade-site-packages Please correct me if I'm wrong, but don't these instructions rely on pkgdb which is a component of portupgrade which I do not use. # pkgdb -uf cd /usr/ports/lang/python make upgrade-site-packages pkgdb: Command not found. So must I install portupgrade? Or should I just ignore the error run make upgrade-site-packages ? All of a sudden, I have these: python 2.4.3_1 python-2.5 python25-2.5 All installed. No. I do not have portupgrade installed. I tried portmanager with the -o option. Which do I need? python-2.5 or python 25-2.5? That's just hypothetical. I'm going to stick with 2.4.3_1 until this is resolved. -- B Briggs ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: python 2.4
B Briggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Foster wrote: Jose Alonso Cardenas Marquez wrote: The lang/python port was updated, please update your port tree and try again. you don't forget to read of ports/UPDATING note. Regarding the recent python changes... UPDATING states: After upgrading of lang/python, you must rebuild all its consumer ports to make them get ready to Python 2.5. To do this, you will need to: pkgdb -uf cd /usr/ports/lang/python make upgrade-site-packages Please correct me if I'm wrong, but don't these instructions rely on pkgdb which is a component of portupgrade which I do not use. # pkgdb -uf cd /usr/ports/lang/python make upgrade-site-packages pkgdb: Command not found. So must I install portupgrade? Or should I just ignore the error run make upgrade-site-packages ? All of a sudden, I have these: python 2.4.3_1 python-2.5 python25-2.5 All installed. No. I do not have portupgrade installed. I tried portmanager with the -o option. Which do I need? python-2.5 or python 25-2.5? That's just hypothetical. I'm going to stick with 2.4.3_1 until this is resolved. I think the python changes, or specifically the modification of python to be a dummy port with dependency python25 should be backed out until they have been though through a bit better, or at least until the ports (eg mailman, py-spambayes, etc) that use python have had a chance to catch up with the new system. It is now impossible to install/portupgrade, eg py-spambayes to run against python-2.4, the version it was ported and tested against, since it pulls in python as a dependency. POLA has been badly infringed here guys... (yes - I've read UPDATING. But I don't _want_ to update to python-2.5 yet-a-while. I wanted to update python to 2.4.3 because of the vulnerability, but Oh no - I can't do that because it breaks all my ports that depend on python). -- Thomas Sandford ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INDEX build failed for 4.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX - please wait.. Done. make_index: avr-libc-1.4.5,1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/avr-gcc make_index: avr-libc-1.4.5,1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/avr-gcc Committers on the hook: alepulver arved bsam clsung gerald joerg kris maho mi miwi novel sat se shaun Most recent CVS update was: U KNOBS U MOVED U UPDATING U benchmarks/rawio/Makefile U benchmarks/rawio/files/patch-ad U databases/libodbc++/Makefile U databases/mysql-connector-odbc/Makefile U databases/p5-DBD-ODBC/Makefile U databases/postgresql-odbc/Makefile U devel/avr-libc/Makefile U devel/avr-libc/distinfo U devel/avr-libc/pkg-plist U devel/avr-libc/pkg-plist.doc U devel/avrdude/Makefile U devel/avrdude/distinfo U devel/p5-Carp-Clan/Makefile U devel/p5-Carp-Clan/distinfo U devel/p5-Class-InsideOut/Makefile U devel/p5-Sys-SigAction/Makefile U devel/p5-Sys-SigAction/distinfo U devel/tcllib/Makefile U devel/tcllib/pkg-plist U editors/openoffice.org-1.1/Makefile U editors/openoffice.org-1.1-devel/Makefile U emulators/wine/Makefile U emulators/wine/distinfo U emulators/wine/pkg-plist U lang/gcc40/Makefile U lang/gcc40/distinfo U lang/q/Makefile U mail/qsheff/Makefile U mail/qsheff/distinfo U mail/qsheff/pkg-plist U mail/surblhost/Makefile U mail/surblhost/distinfo U math/wxMaxima/Makefile U math/wxMaxima/distinfo U multimedia/Makefile U multimedia/bmpx/Makefile U multimedia/bmpx/distinfo U multimedia/bmpx/pkg-plist U net/openldap23-server/Makefile U net/samba3/Makefile U net/samba3/files/patch-za U net/samba3/files/patch-zb U net/samba3/files/samba.in U security/Makefile U security/p5-Net-SinFP/distinfo U security/sguil-sensor/Makefile U security/sguil-sensor/distinfo U security/sguil-sensor/pkg-descr U security/sguil-sensor/pkg-plist U security/sguil-sensor/files/log_packets.conf U security/sguil-sensor/files/patch-log_packets.sh U security/sguil-sensor/files/patch-sensor_agent.tcl U security/sguil-sensor/files/pkg-message.in U security/sguil-sensor/files/sensor_agent.sh.in U security/sinfp/Makefile U shells/ch/Makefile U textproc/p5-Text-Bastardize/Makefile U textproc/p5-Text-Bastardize/distinfo U www/MT/Makefile U www/MT/distinfo U www/dokuwiki-devel/Makefile U www/fxhtml/Makefile U www/linux-flock/Makefile U www/linux-flock/distinfo U www/neonpp/distinfo U www/xpi-autobrowse/Makefile U www/xpi-autobrowse/distinfo U www/xpi-clearfields/Makefile U www/xpi-clearfields/distinfo U www/xpi-downthemall/Makefile U www/xpi-downthemall/distinfo U www/xpi-infolister/Makefile U www/xpi-infolister/distinfo U www/xpi-inline-google-definitions/Makefile U www/xpi-inline-google-definitions/distinfo U www/xpi-noscript/Makefile U www/xpi-noscript/distinfo U www/xpi-tabletools/Makefile U www/xpi-tabletools/distinfo U x11-toolkits/p5-Tk-JComboBox/Makefile U x11-toolkits/p5-Tk-JComboBox/distinfo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: INDEX build failed for 4.x
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 11:26:20PM +, Erwin Lansing wrote: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX - please wait.. Done. make_index: avr-libc-1.4.5,1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/avr-gcc make_index: avr-libc-1.4.5,1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/avr-gcc Added avr-gcc to devel/Makefile -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: python 2.4
Mark Foster wrote: Jose Alonso Cardenas Marquez wrote: The lang/python port was updated, please update your port tree and try again. you don't forget to read of ports/UPDATING note. Regarding the recent python changes... UPDATING states: After upgrading of lang/python, you must rebuild all its consumer ports to make them get ready to Python 2.5. To do this, you will need to: pkgdb -uf cd /usr/ports/lang/python make upgrade-site-packages Please correct me if I'm wrong, but don't these instructions rely on pkgdb which is a component of portupgrade which I do not use. You are not wrong. :) However, given that there are now several ports management packages out there, and given that portupgrade is the most commonly used, you may consider it reasonable that most sets of instructions are written for that tool. What should probably also be done is to give instructions that do not depend on a particular package that any user could follow. So must I install portupgrade? Or should I just ignore the error run make upgrade-site-packages ? [doug@ /usr/ports/lang/python] 4$ make upgrade-site-packages Please install sysutils/portupgrade. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/space/ports/lang/python. So, yes and no. :) Seriously though, you could probably use portmaster (which has no overhead of extra scripting languages or databases) to do the same thing, but since I am not familiar with the python changes I wouldn't want to tell you for sure what options to use. Your safest bet is probably to pkg_delete everything python, and everything that depends on it, and reinstall everything. but of course, that's a big pita ... Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
