I want to import Products
Hi 1. We can get ready to buy clients for your products. We can bring such people, who are searching at google for following keywords. They are ready to buy clients and they are searching these products to make a purchase. If they reach at your site at this time, chances are very great that your site can make a sale to them. keywords: exporter of india indian exporter exporter from india india's exporter exporter of abc (abc is your product name) abc exporter abc manufacturer indian abc exporter 2. We also offer you a 7 Days free trial. Get your free trial at http://www.yesiwillbuy.com/free-trial.htm?chetna 3. For any further information, please let me know. I will be happy to help you. You can call at my US marketing phone number at +1-727-565-1339 or you may call me at India at +91-93122-88917. Or you can send me direct email. I usually reply emails within few hours. Please send us your contact phone number and your desired time, and we will call you to help you with your first order. regards Miss Chetna(Certified by GOOGLE as Certified Google Adwords Professional) Suggest Your Friends to Use - FREE Trial - No Obligation 7 Days Google Trial - Start Getting Leads within 24 Hours for Your Products/Services http://www.yesiwillbuy.com/free-trial.htm?Chetna Jan16-08 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: second question: dependancies not being checked.
Sorry I tabbed in editing and managed to accidentally sent.
Is it safe to assume that it is not bailing on the lack of this
library because there is no devel/py-extended-threading yet, or am I
missing something else.
Sorry again for the goof/double-message.
Thank you,
-Jim Stapleton
Makefile:
# New ports collection makefile for: py-modularapp
# Date created:14 Jan 2008
# Whom:James Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
# $FreeBSD$
#
PORTNAME= py_modularapp
PORTVERSION=0.2
CATEGORIES= devel python
MASTER_SITES+= http://www.var-dev.net/programming/python/modularapp/ \
http://www.var-dev.com/programming/python/modularapp/ \
http://www.var-dev.org/programming/python/modularapp/
DISTNAME= py_modularapp-0.2
MAINTAINER= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COMMENT=A library for trivially extensible python plugins and
applications
USE_PYTHON= 2.3+
BUILD_DEPENDS+=
${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/extended_threading/rwrlock.py:/${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-extended-threading
#alt1
#BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${NONEXISTENT}:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-extended-threading
RUN_DEPENDS=${BUILD_DEPENDS}
USE_BZIP2= YES
do-build:
(cd ${WRKDIR}/py-modularapp/py_modularapp/ \
echo import sys; import py_compile; for f in sys.argv:
py_compile.compile(f) | ${PYTHON_CMD} *.py)
do-install:
${MKDIR} ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/py_modularapp/
(cd ${WRKDIR}/py-modularapp/py_modularapp/ \
${CP} -rfv * ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/py_modularapp/)
.include bsd.port.mk
On Jan 16, 2008 9:00 AM, Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble getting a requirement to work. I'm trying to build
the port I'm developing without the dependancy installed, expecting to
get a related error. This looks like what I've seen in other ports,
and what I've seen in the documentation but it does not function in
mine:
BUILD_DEPENDS+=
${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/rwrlock.py/${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-extended-threading
RUN_DEPENDS=${BUILD_DEPENDS}
Now, my py-extended-threading module has not been put in the ports
tree yet (which may be the issue), but I'm getting a python
compilation error here, which leads me to suspect the dependency is
not being checked:
error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08:57:31 (1) ~/dev/ports/py-modularapp make
=== Building for py_modularapp-0.2
(cd /data/mydocs/dev/ports/py-modularapp/work/py-modularapp/py_modularapp/
echo import sys; import py_compile; for f in sys.argv:
py_compile.compile(f) | /usr/local/bin/python2.5 *.py)
Traceback (most recent call last):ts/py-modularapp ls /usr/ports/www
| grep kon
File __init__.py, line 9, in module
import tapp as TA
File
/data/mydocs/dev/ports/py-modularapp/work/py-modularapp/py_modularapp/tapp.py,
line 13, in module
import extended_threading as ethr
ImportError: No module named extended_threading
*** Error code 1
Stop in /data/mydocs/dev/ports/py-modularapp.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: second question: dependancies not being checked.
--On Wednesday, January 16, 2008 09:08:12 -0500 Jim Stapleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry I tabbed in editing and managed to accidentally sent.
Is it safe to assume that it is not bailing on the lack of this
library because there is no devel/py-extended-threading yet, or am I
missing something else.
Sorry again for the goof/double-message.
Thank you,
-Jim Stapleton
Makefile:
# New ports collection makefile for: py-modularapp
# Date created:14 Jan 2008
# Whom:James Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
# $FreeBSD$
#
PORTNAME= py_modularapp
PORTVERSION=0.2
CATEGORIES= devel python
MASTER_SITES+= http://www.var-dev.net/programming/python/modularapp/ \
http://www.var-dev.com/programming/python/modularapp/ \
http://www.var-dev.org/programming/python/modularapp/
DISTNAME= py_modularapp-0.2
MAINTAINER= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COMMENT=A library for trivially extensible python plugins and
applications
USE_PYTHON= 2.3+
BUILD_DEPENDS+=
${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/extended_threading/rwrlock.py:/${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-exte
nded-threading
.^.
This is an error. Should be:
BUILD_DEPENDS+=
${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/extended_threading/rwrlock.py:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-extended-threading
--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boris Samorodov wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:10:15 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote: All those libraries need to be found by the flash9 plugin library. Please, give me strict instructions how to repeate (what to do after a fresh install): - 0. Fresh RELENG_X_Y install. 2. Fresh ports (or date=...). 3. ... I said at the very beginning of this thread, that I didn't keep track of what I did, because the tack I took was to relocate all of the libs to the /compat tree, and this sort of strategy can't be taken until I could get official approval of that as the correct method to take for installation of Linux libraries. If I got that approval, I said I would undertake to locate and fix all of the ports that currently install Linux stuff into the /usr/local tree, and then make the flash9 work. This sort of tack can't be attempted, unless I could show the port authors involved that I have official approval to get this thing done, so they could either approve of the diffs I would give them, or argue it with the port managers themselves. What I never, ever intended to try, was to force things in any way, that's acting childishly. I just needed a official hammer that was morally strong enough to get things moving. In fact, if it were understood that I was to get that sort of ruling in advance, then I would agree to submit complete diffs, in advance of the work, both so folks could look at them, and so it could be proven that this strategy does indeed get the flash9 working. I'm not terribly worried about doing that, because I did it on my system already, and the only worry for me is if things (in the meantime) might have changed enough to make this no longer possible. But without that? I would be condemned to endless arguments, in order to effect all the changes, and I don't like arguing that much. No, I am not going to contribute to a tack that I feel is wrong-headed. I won't get in your way, but I wouldn't contribute to that. I hope that's a reasonably honest approach. To be REALLY stict about it, what I'm most strict about is getting all Linux libraries into the /compat tree, and probably doing that alone would be sufficient, but I'm trying here for the whole boat, moving all Linux things into /compat, as the hier(7) dictates (as I read it), and for the reasons that I've given endlessly by now. In fact, I think it's a fact that I've really given this all the airing that's really needed. If folks can't see it's needed after all this, then go ahead and live with it, as long as I can make my system my way. I will no longer feel bad about it, I gave it a fair try at sharing what I felt was the right way to do things. I have asked a bunch of times (both in this thread, and in one direct mail to them) to get one of the port managers to issue a ruling, but I think I will take being ignored as a de facto ruling. I don't wish to harangue folks any longer. - Thanks. WBR -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHjlw/z62J6PPcoOkRAtEgAKCUv3DlBKThxmnDut/8SVvT79jo6ACfd9rR Qm3oROp1RrR/iS+4/HezGPU= =Gd0p -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make error libxml2 port
FBSD-6.2p10 Am trying to build php5 which depends on libxml2, but can't get past the build error below. Any help appreciated. === Extracting for libxml2-2.6.30 = MD5 Checksum OK for gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz. = SHA256 Checksum OK for gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz. tar: Unrecognized archive format: Inappropriate file type or format gzip: /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz: invalid compressed data--crc error gzip: /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz: invalid compressed data--length error *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/libxml2. (^_^) Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Make error libxml2 port
At 11:25 PM 1.16.2008 +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: El miércoles 16 de enero a las 22:36:40 CET, Jack L. Stone escribió: FBSD-6.2p10 Am trying to build php5 which depends on libxml2, but can't get past the build error below. Any help appreciated. === Extracting for libxml2-2.6.30 = MD5 Checksum OK for gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz. = SHA256 Checksum OK for gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz. tar: Unrecognized archive format: Inappropriate file type or format gzip: /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz: invalid compressed data--crc error gzip: /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz: invalid compressed data--length error *** Error code 1 Do you have the proper checksums recorded in the distinfo file? They should be: MD5 (gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz) = 460e6d853e824da700d698532e57316b SHA256 (gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz) = 877762a0f44785487d747ed7bd3db364ade75943e6d8e9c49fa6340c3833735e SIZE (gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz) = 4726657 I have run into similar troubles when /usr/port/distfiles is nfs or samba mounted. Regards My checksums were different because the ones in the port did not match. So, I ran make makesum which eliminated the mismatch, but still had the above archive issue. I used your checksums and am back to the mismatch. Any other thoughts -- anyone? Thanks! (^_^) Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Make error libxml2 port
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:32:36 -0600, Jack L. Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11:25 PM 1.16.2008 +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: El miércoles 16 de enero a las 22:36:40 CET, Jack L. Stone escribió: FBSD-6.2p10 Am trying to build php5 which depends on libxml2, but can't get past the build error below. Any help appreciated. === Extracting for libxml2-2.6.30 = MD5 Checksum OK for gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz. = SHA256 Checksum OK for gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz. tar: Unrecognized archive format: Inappropriate file type or format gzip: /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz: invalid compressed data--crc error gzip: /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz: invalid compressed data--length error *** Error code 1 Do you have the proper checksums recorded in the distinfo file? They should be: MD5 (gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz) = 460e6d853e824da700d698532e57316b SHA256 (gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz) = 877762a0f44785487d747ed7bd3db364ade75943e6d8e9c49fa6340c3833735e SIZE (gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz) = 4726657 I have run into similar troubles when /usr/port/distfiles is nfs or samba mounted. Regards My checksums were different because the ones in the port did not match. So, I ran make makesum which eliminated the mismatch, but still had the above archive issue. I used your checksums and am back to the mismatch. Any other thoughts -- anyone? See in freebsd-gnome archive. Cheers, Mezz Thanks! (^_^) Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Make error libxml2 port
El miércoles 16 de enero a las 23:32:36 CET, Jack L. Stone escribió: My checksums were different because the ones in the port did not match. So, I ran make makesum which eliminated the mismatch, but still had the above archive issue. I used your checksums and am back to the mismatch. Remove /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz and fetch again the tarball. Regards pgp6WAm8ogYvh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Make error libxml2 port
At 11:55 PM 1.16.2008 +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: El miércoles 16 de enero a las 23:32:36 CET, Jack L. Stone escribió: My checksums were different because the ones in the port did not match. So, I ran make makesum which eliminated the mismatch, but still had the above archive issue. I used your checksums and am back to the mismatch. Remove /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz and fetch again the tarball. Regards I had already re-fetched and not joy. But, NO_CHECKSUM=yes has allowed the build. It's building now. Many thanks! (^_^) Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: second question: dependancies not being checked.
Thanks, I fixed that, but it still does not appear to be checking the
dependancy. It fails with the same error.
On Jan 16, 2008 2:03 PM, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 16, 2008 09:08:12 -0500 Jim Stapleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry I tabbed in editing and managed to accidentally sent.
Is it safe to assume that it is not bailing on the lack of this
library because there is no devel/py-extended-threading yet, or am I
missing something else.
Sorry again for the goof/double-message.
Thank you,
-Jim Stapleton
Makefile:
# New ports collection makefile for: py-modularapp
# Date created:14 Jan 2008
# Whom:James Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
# $FreeBSD$
#
PORTNAME= py_modularapp
PORTVERSION=0.2
CATEGORIES= devel python
MASTER_SITES+= http://www.var-dev.net/programming/python/modularapp/ \
http://www.var-dev.com/programming/python/modularapp/ \
http://www.var-dev.org/programming/python/modularapp/
DISTNAME= py_modularapp-0.2
MAINTAINER= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COMMENT=A library for trivially extensible python plugins and
applications
USE_PYTHON= 2.3+
BUILD_DEPENDS+=
${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/extended_threading/rwrlock.py:/${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-exte
nded-threading
.^.
This is an error. Should be:
BUILD_DEPENDS+=
${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/extended_threading/rwrlock.py:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-extended-threading
--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working!
--- Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boris Samorodov wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:10:15 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote: All those libraries need to be found by the flash9 plugin library. Please, give me strict instructions how to repeate (what to do after a fresh install): - 0. Fresh RELENG_X_Y install. 2. Fresh ports (or date=...). 3. ... I said at the very beginning of this thread, that I didn't keep track of what I did, because the tack I took was to relocate all of the libs to the /compat tree, and this sort of strategy can't be taken until I could get official approval of that as the correct method to take for installation of Linux libraries. If I got that approval, I said I would undertake to locate and fix all of the ports that currently install Linux stuff into the /usr/local tree, and then make the flash9 work. This sort of tack can't be attempted, unless I could show the port authors involved that I have official approval to get this thing done, so they could either approve of the diffs I would give them, or argue it with the port managers themselves. What I never, ever intended to try, was to force things in any way, that's acting childishly. I just needed a official hammer that was morally strong enough to get things moving. If I were a port manager, I would give you approval in a flash (bad pun intended). I completely agree, linux libs belong in /compat - otherwise, what is the point of having /compat ?? Cheers, Tim. Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working!
Quoting Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:34:23 -0500): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boris Samorodov wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:10:15 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote: All those libraries need to be found by the flash9 plugin library. Please, give me strict instructions how to repeate (what to do after a fresh install): - 0. Fresh RELENG_X_Y install. 2. Fresh ports (or date=...). 3. ... I said at the very beginning of this thread, that I didn't keep track of what I did, because the tack I took was to relocate all of the libs to the /compat tree, and this sort of strategy can't be taken until I could get official approval of that as the correct method to take for installation of Linux libraries. If I got that approval, I said I would undertake to locate and fix all of the ports that currently install Linux stuff into the /usr/local tree, and then make the flash9 work. This sort of tack can't be Have a look at the archives, I just got a message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that he resinstalled all linux ports from scratch (empty /compat/linux) and the flash9 plugin was loaded by firefox (native and linux one). Flash9 crashes after a while for him. This is a known problem and the cause is somewhere in some kernel part of the linuxulator. Flash 7 works for him without problems. I still think you should try again with a fresh system. If you don't want to lose your current state, just use a jail or a virtual machine to install the things there. If you still have problems there, just report the error message firefox will spit out when he tries to load the plugin. Please don't copy things around, so that we can analyze the problem. Bye, Alexander. -- Money and women are the most sought after and the least known of any two things we have. -- The Best of Will Rogers http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working!
Quoting Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:22:41 -0600): I guess i am a bit confused, did someone in fact get flash9 working in RELENG_7 or -CURRENT? There are known problems. Something is buggy in the kernel. We don't know what the exact problem is, nobody had time or incentive so far to hunt down the problem. You need to set the linux compatibility from the default 2.4.2 to 2.6.16, and you need a more recent linux_base (read: not the default fc4 but e.g. f7). There's a different thread about flash and [EMAIL PROTECTED] reported there that the plugin is loaded by firefox but crashes. I've also seen reports that it doesn't crash, but I think those people where just lucky and didn't use the subset of flash which triggers the crash. Bye, Alexander. -- Many people are secretly interested in life. http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
